(Photo J. Maus/BikePortland)
(Photo J. Maus/BikePortland)
plenty, but can find common ground with him on bikes.
(Photo by J.Maus/BikePortland)
Last week we wrote that “biking and walking safety should be a bipartisan issue.” Today we got a reminder that it still is — and just how rare such issues are recently.
On the same day the Senate recut its rules to fit the current slash-and-burn politics of Washington, Politico published a profile of U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Portland), puzzling over how one of the House’s most liberal members got two Republicans to cosponsor his bill to ensure that bike safety is officially one of the ways to measure a federal road project’s success.
(Images: Blumenauer by J. Maus/BikePortland. All others via Facebook)
On a day when we learned U.S. traffic fatalities in 2012 went up for the first time since 2005 — with notable spikes in bicycling and walking deaths — Oregon Congressmen Earl Blumenauer and Peter DeFazio joined with two of their Republican colleagues, Howard Coble (NC) and Mike McCaul (TX) to introduce the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (H.R. 3494). (more…)
U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer is cosponsoring a bill to officially recognize bike sharing as the newest category of public transit, at least in the eyes of the IRS.
Unfortunately, the bill is limited by a persistent oversight in tax policy that restricts its benefits to those who both live and work in areas that have bikesharing stations.
It’s a new goal for the city transportation commissioner turned Congressman, who spent years pushing for the IRS’s first bike commuting benefit. The $20-a-month deduction finally passed as part of the 2008 bank bailout (despite Blumenauer’s “no” vote on that package).
makers at the United Bicycle Institute Wednesday.
(Photo by M. Andersen/BikePortland)
(Jonathan Maus contributed to this story.)
Portland is nationally known as the city with the highest number of bike riders. But when it comes to making bikes, our reputation is about quality, not quantity. We’re known for custom, handcrafted bikes, but not for producing them in large numbers. The city’s mature cluster of bike makers could change that if they teamed up, representatives of the local industry’s small businesses agreed at a roundtable discussion led by U.S. Congressman Earl Blumenauer on Wednesday.
The event was convened by Rep. Blumenauer, who said he’d “dedicated my life” to making biking a big part of the city and would happily look for ways to help the industry itself become “the next part of the Oregon identity” if they can offer a clear list of ideas within the next few months. The event was a more focused follow-up to a visit to the same location by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce in September.
a tour of United Bicycle Institute with owner Ron
Sutphin (left) and Congressman Earl Blumenauer.
(Photos © J. Maus/BikePortland)
Flanked by Congressman Earl Blumenauer, the United States Department of Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker beamed about the cycling “revolution” she’s seeing across the country during a stop on her national listening tour in north Portland this morning. But to keep it going, she said business owners must have a skilled labor force.
And that’s where United Bicycle Institute comes in.
On that note, Pritzker toured UBI’s Portland campus on North Williams Ave. UBI offers vocational training in frame building and offers certificates in professional bicycle mechanics. In addition to learning about the key role UBI plays as a national vocational leader with over 20,000 graduates to their credit, Pritzker also hosted a private (no media allowed) roundtable discussion with about 20 local bicycle industry leaders. Pritzker and her staff have toured over a dozen cities in recent months doing similar events and the goal is to hear about the issues facing business owners and develop a strategy for the Commerce Department on how to help them.
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)
As the dust has settled a bit on the new, two-year transportation bill that was passed last week, it’s time to start understanding what it means for bicycling going forward. On Friday, I got a chance to talk about it with one of the most important national figures for bicycling, U.S. Congressman Earl Blumenauer.
Blumenauer is not only regarded as a major champion for bicycling in Congress, as a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, he also had a seat at the table of the conference committee that hashed out the final bill. At the outset of our conversation, I could hear from his voice that he was exasperated after what must have been a bruising negotiation process. (more…)
Portland native Earl Blumenauer has served in elected office in Oregon since 1972 when he won a seat in the Oregon House of Representatives at the age of 24. He’s been in politics ever since. On June 14th, Blumenauer’s supporters will throw him a big party to commemorate his 40 years in office.
The event, dubbed “40 Years of Leadership,” will take place at Memorial Coliseum and will include performances by Pink Martini and Storm Large.
During his four decades of leadership, Blumenauer has presided over much of the bicycle and transportation legacy that our region is so well known for. From his position as head of the City of Portland Department of Public Works (what we now call the Bureau of Transportation) from 1987 to 1996, Blumenauer (with Mia Birk as his right-hand woman) oversaw an explosion in bikeway miles. From his office in Washington D.C., where he’s served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives since 1996, Blumenauer is without a doubt the most influential and well-known champion for bicycling on Capitol Hill.
on bicycling lightly.
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)
As arguably the most bike and transit-sensitive member of the U.S. Congress, Earl Blumenauer has had a trying week.
Yesterday, the widely-maligned House transportation bill, a bill that eliminates the Safe Routes to School program and basically strips out all of the pro-bike provisions, moved through a marathon hearing and was passed out of committee this morning. Also this morning, Blumenauer saw the House Ways and Means committee debate — and then pass — a bill that severs the 30-year link between gas tax revenue and transit funding.
Below is the official transcript of U.S. Congressman Earl Blumenauer’s speech to Metro’s Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation, November 10, 2011. (See related story here)
I’m looking over the course of the next 11 months to spend a little more time with some of you in some of these areas, because there are some important landmarks that I think give us an opportunity to step back and look at success. I have some modest interest in ODOT. It was legislation that I had that created the state Transportation Commission and mandated a multi-modal, state-wide transportation plan 20 years before ISTEA. I just had this conversation with Matt, and we’re coming up on the 40th anniversary.
There are a couple of you old enough to remember a speech that I gave at the City Club in 1987. We are coming up on the 25th anniversary of that where I talked about what the region was going to look like and laid out some of my vision for expanding light rail, for regional cooperation, for streetcar, a whole series of things. Now 25 years later, it is time to step back.
What did we do and how did we do it? There are a lot of people who don’t understand what happened, the trade offs and such. I’m proud of having my fingerprints on some of these things. One that gives me the most satisfaction was the development of the regional rail program that ran out of Portland but included everyone in the region.
Twenty years ago, as we were looking at how to transform a light rail line into a system, we included Barbur Blvd, for instance, and invited citizens from the region to come in and help us think about what it would look like, how it would be designed, and how it would be financed. We made trade-offs as a region.
We didn’t have to go to Hillsboro, and there were some trade-offs that we could have looked at a little differently. But it was part of trying to stretch a little bit as a region. We didn’t have to build the tunnels for the West Side light rail line. It was an engineering challenge and $100 million, but was part of an effort in terms of dealing with potential delays, environmental and citizen challenges, and it also provided some operational efficiency for when the big one comes, the tunnel is going to be the only place that is safe in the West Hills. You know, as the Zoo slides into the canyon.
But it was, and I can remember lots of soul searching with Tom Walsh, but I think it was a decision that was right to stretch. And we can go on and talk about other areas where we have done that as a region, which sort of begs the question, where are we now? There have been some significant successes; this week we had the C-Tran vote, where I was surprised by the margin and hoping for the best.
I was working in Cincinnati last week where they rejected the most bizarre Tea Party inspired proposals that would have placed a ten year moratorium in the city charter that they could not consider any rail transportation. Not the funded streetcar line that they have, not light rail, not commuter rail, not higher speed rail, and that was rejected. Most of the funding initiatives around the country passed, going with what we have done here with our friends in Multnomah County and the legislature coming up with a registration fee.
But it is not clear what our regional transportation funding strategy is, it is going to be much harder over the next two to three years on the federal level. There has been a zeal which I don’t fully understand; this notion about earmarks that I have worked with a number of you on that didn’t just go to my “district,” but went throughout the metropolitan area and outside the area in the Gorge which we have made transparent and tried to keep in alignment with what your vision and goals were. It has paid massive returns over time.
Someone is going to make these decisions, and my Republican friends I guess would rather have the Obama Administration make them than congress. As long as we have some reasonable relationship with them, with Ray LaHood thinking we are the most livable place in the country—than that’s cool. Sort of.
But it does have some very significant potential limitations, in things that we’ve done in the region, for example dredging the Columbia River would not be possible, under what we’re doing now and it adds very perverse effects in terms of some of the things people would take for granted to fix local problems fall under this bizarre definition of “earmark” so people are twisting themselves into knots to figure out how to move forward.
The transportation legislation that’s moving forward is dramatically restricted in terms of costs and revenues. It is likely to take away some tools that we have used in the region in terms of enhancing funding that have been able to really magnify some of the impact, very likely that we’re going to have a two year bill.
Because I think that there is no support for a bad six-year bill that would lower the floor for transportation investment for a decade, but this is up in the air. There are issues for us as a region in terms of how we trade off our regional cooperation and shared vision with being able to focus and have priorities when it comes down. I think JPACT offered up a letter on the TIGER grants. Which as near as I can tell will have no impact on the administration other than to move us down a rung because they’re five projects and no priorities.
That may have helped in terms of making everybody feel good because there were five areas that people wanted, unless everybody around the table really feels they were all equal in terms of merit in impact to the region and value. I have some very close friends of mine that are doing the screening, including people I’ve worked with and something comes through that is five things, ok, that’s cool, we’re not going to fund five, this region is zeroed in on this and it is consistent with what we want for TIGER grants and you’d do the same thing if you were there and got billions of dollars more of requests than you can possibly fund. There’s lots of pressure and there are people that are going to be making phone calls and checking in.
We as a region need to be very clear about what we’re doing and there may well be value to do some of that around the table and I’ve been a part of things where I have supported items that I didn’t necessarily think were the highest priority for the region. But having a regional shared vision in working together, I’ve invested a lot of time and effort into that, but we’re in a different era. It is likely if we were betting, I assume that the odds are better than even that we will have this Administration for 4 more years.
I don’t know that for a fact, but if we don’t’ have this administration than we won’t have to worry about TIGER grants because there won’t be any. But if we do things like this, we need to think about what our strategies are. I remain absolutely committed to working with you on the citizen infrastructure. What we did with those regional rail conferences, what we did with Rail~Volution, its different here because citizens believe in it. It’s baked into the DNA in a way that I think has great residual value.
I am hopeful that we can work cooperatively so people understand how we got to where we are, what the choices are going forward because it’s going to get harder not easier, I think for the next couple of years. In any event, I appreciate you allowing me to parachute in. Of course, I continue to appreciate all the advice from the Council we get from you through our staff and your visits here in Washington and the hard work that’s going on the ground.
I have enough experience with you around this table and the day to day work is not getting easier in a challenging economic climate where everybody is an expert in what we do, and people want to summarize complex ideas to tweets and Facebook entries which simply weren’t there when I was with you. And local government is the cauldron, it’s the toughest because you can’t pass it on to anyone else no matter how much you want to on occasion. So I do appreciate what you’re doing and look forward to a little conversation and a continued partnership.