This morning, for the first time in over 50 years, former U.S. Congressman Earl Blumenauer had an opportunity to give a speech unencumbered by the responsibilities of an elected official. Facing a large crowd in the Grand Ballroom of the downtown Portland Hilton Hotel on opening morning of a conference he founded 30 years ago, Blumenauer urged the assembled transportation professionals to go it alone.
“The federal government in this administration will do the right thing only by accident,” Blumenauer said. “And you can’t count on them.” “We control the land use. We price the curb. We can establish a policy framework that skips over the federal government,” he added.
Blumenauer spoke at the opening plenary of the MPACT Conference, which started in Portland in 1996 when it was called Rail-Volution. Back then, Blumenauer was a rookie in Congress and had just finished a 10-year stint as a Portland city commissioner where built his brand as a transit-oriented leader of a livable cities movement he would go on to export nationwide.
During one moment in his remarks this morning, Blumenauer appeared to become emotional when speaking about Portland’s recent challenges.
“We’ve had some tough times in Portland to be sure,” he said. “There are a few blocks you can see in the downtown that are challenging.” Then, as he said the next line, he gained strength and seemed to tear up at the same time: “But you can take a 10 minute walk in any direction and find some of the most livable neighborhoods anywhere in America!” he said, defiantly. “People here are committed to those goals and those values.”
Blumenauer likened the Trump administration to previous White House denizens who failed to see the writing on the wall. He told the story of how Portland led the renaissance in streetcars before there was any federal funding to make it happen. “We figured out a way to do it… and today we have 23 streetcar systems around the country,” he said, to loud applause. He urged his former colleagues in the crowd to focus on what they can control and to, “Not get all caught up in what the federal government takes away, or hoops they force you to jump through.”


While local and regional insiders are already laying the groundwork for a new transportation funding initiative, Blumenauer gave them even more motivation to plan the future without an expectation of federal support. He shared the example of public media and how the Trump administration has cut its funding. “We have seen every single dollar [of public broadcasting] cuts replaced by private donations, and then some,” he said. “This is what we can do when we’re committed, when we work together, and we are willing to make those investments.”
Blumenauer also brought up New York City’s successful congestion pricing policy as an example of something that, despite the federal government’s attempts to, “destroy it” and the difficult politics it took to make it happen, “It works as designed: Congestion is reduced. Air pollution is down, and there’s more money for transit.”
Politically, Blumenauer seems to think that the transportation funding pullbacks (he mentioned the $488 million Portland won for the Albina Vision Trust and Broadway Main Street projects specifically) by Trump and his transportation secretary will come back to haunt them come election time.
“Our challenge is to make sure our voices are loud and that we are heard,” he said at the end of his remarks. “Not just in elections, but in the transformational work you are doing around the country.”




Thanks for reading.
BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.
Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.
While it’s easy to criticize the current administration at a transportation conference in deep blue Portland and get raucous applause, the reality is the dysfunction in federal transportation funding goes all the way back to 1993. That year happens to be the last time the federal gas tax was increased to 18.4 cents per gallon and has remained at that rate for the past 32 YEARS! That’s a lot of presidential administrations and Congresses under BOTH Democrat and Republican leadership with no action on federal transportation funding.
Nice try. Trump took back $488 million from a very good project just out of spite. Save me w your defense of him.
C’mon Jonathan. The point I made is not to make a full throated defense of the current administration. It’s to point out that when it comes to federal transportation funding, the people we’ve elected to Congress or the White House have failed us for the past 32 years. To blame all our federal transportation funding problems on the current administration is revisionist history at best and simply feeds political spin to a receptive audience.
So JM, how do YOU explain the lack of federal gas tax increase since 1993?
lack of political leadership.
Maus has his blinders on as usual.
Do you mean the $488 million to buy off the community in order to make widening I-5 through the Rose Quarter politically palatable? That very good project?
Trump’s spitefulness did us a great favor, in my opinion, saving us from ourselves, at least for a while. If only Oregon Democrats would follow suit.
Jonathan,
I agree with you that we cannot “both sides” Trump when the destruction he is bringing dwarfs the neglect of previous administrations. And I think the Biden administration was investing in alternative energy and infrastructure, but Trump has undercut that significantly. Fuzzy has a point that previous administrations have neglected infrastructure, but none have been as damaging as Trump. Finally, I think you are referring to the Rose Quarter project when you reference the $488 Million- I am not sure if that counts a s “very good project” .
Jonathan, Fuzzy Blue was blaming everyone since 1993, not defending Trump. Maybe your “MAGA is everywhere” glasses might need a quick wipe. ♂️
I mean if we’re serious about criticizing Federal transportation policy, the lack of gas tax raises since 1993 doesn’t even register. How about the systematic undermining of public transit since just about forever? Or the absolute shame that is US passenger rail policy? The gas tax should probably be higher but if that’s your biggest gripe, I dunno maybe try riding a bus on a transit system that cannot receive federal funds for operating (any transit system in a large city) and consider how transformative even a 25% federal match in operations would be. Then consider that the national highway system has gotten between 50% and 90% federal matching since the 1950s. It’s no wonder our transit is anemic, and it’ll take way more than indexing the gas tax to inflation to change that
“Politically, Blumenauer seems to think that the transportation funding pullbacks (he mentioned the $488 million Portland won for the Albina Vision Trust and Broadway Main Street projects specifically) by Trump and his transportation secretary will come back to haunt them come election time..”
Really? How so? Essentially no one in Portland (including me) voted for Trump. Not sure how cutting these Portland programs will negatively impact the Orange Guy at the ballot box…