Guest Article: ‘Better Burnside’ reimagines marquee street during upcoming bridge closure

Old Town business owner and urban advocate Ryan Hashagen at a Better Burnside design workshop on March 11th. (Photos courtesy PSU student volunteers)

This story was written by Brian Bill, a student in Portland State University’s Masters of Urban Planning program.

Quiet excitement filled a room inside the Portland State University Urban Center Building on March 11th as Ryan Hashagen of Better Block PDX (the folks who brought us the Naito Parkway bike lanes) and Victoria Via of Strong Towns PDX took the stage to kick off the initial design workshop of the Bridgeless to Better Burnside Project. Using the upcoming closure of the Burnside Bridge closure as an opportunity to reimagine West Burnside is an exciting enough proposition that it brought together more than 50 enthusiastic design professionals and urbanists to the event.

They wanted to be part of what may be Better Block’s most ambitious project yet.

With the Burnside Bridge set to close for reconstruction from 2027 to 2032 as part of Multnomah County’s Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge project, the Better Burnside project aims to transform W Burnside Street from a dangerous barrier into a signature street at the heart of Portland’s west side. The project will collaborate with community groups to propose streetscape improvements that can be implemented while the bridge is closed and W Burnside is no longer a route for through traffic. The future of W Burnside extends beyond the 5-year bridge closure, and proposals will also focus on balancing community desires with the new bridge’s lane configuration, pedestrian paths, and protected bike lanes.

Across two classrooms, participants took to maps and trace paper to sketch out their ideas for a W Burnside designed for people.

A concept for W Burnside created for a PSU urban planning course last fall.

Among the proposed designs is a shared bike and bus-only lane in each direction near the Park Blocks that would be buffered by bollards from car traffic and include parklets, food carts, more pedestrian-scale lighting and raised crosswalks (see above). On SW 3rd Ave, students have proposed removing a right turn lane in front of Dante’s and turning it into a public parklet, as well as expanding the median and painting a street mural in the intersection.

A final option, which the students termed “Burnside Sunday Parkways,” would include temporary placemaking installations to enhance Portland Sunday Parkways. In this scenario, local businesses and organizations could partner with the city to provide cultural programming, create educational opportunities, and prepare for increased business activity along with the increase in bike and pedestrian traffic.

Better Burnside began with a proposal by Xavier Stickler of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, Sean Sweat of the Pearl District Neighborhood Association, and Mary-Rain O’Meara of the Old Town Community Association. This trio of urban advocates came together and applied to local nonprofit Better Block to help realize their vision. 

Supporting the project with planning and engagement expertise are PSU Master of Urban and Regional Planning (MURP) students Alex Gill, Brian Bill, Eric Gasper, Jackson Morrison, Michael Azierski, and Michel Rojas. Those students have worked on Bridgeless to Better Burnside over the last year in multiple PSU Better Block Project Pathway Courses. With this workshop, the partnership expanded to include Strong Towns PDX, the local chapter of a national urbanism advocacy group who dedicated their monthly meeting to the project.

As the project’s lead supporter, Ryan Hashagen’s interest in the project stems from his roles as the managing director of Better Block PDX and owner of Icicle Tricycles, a small business based in Old Town. Hashagen sees the bridge project as a perfect opportunity. “Now is the time for our community to leverage the ‘bridgeless’ years into making W Burnside the signature street it should be,” Hashagen said. “When urban places make people feel safe and welcome, small business can not only survive, but thrive.”

Victoria Via, an architect and member of Strong Towns PDX.

The design workshop marked an important milestone in bringing Better Burnside to the public’s attention. Attendees identified improvements to enhance connectivity across inner W Burnside from 2nd Ave to 10th Ave. Suggestions included reducing vehicle lanes to reclaim space for other uses, creating distinct separations between vehicles and pedestrians, and adding pedestrian and wayfinding enhancements to make exploring easier, more comfortable, and more rewarding.

This project is about addressing local challenges like pedestrian safety, transit access, and increasing both day and night-time foot traffic; but it’s also tied to the broader effort to chart a brighter future for Portland’s Central City. Given the scale of Better Burnside, this workshop was just the beginning of the community engagement process. The PSU students will remain involved with this project until June. In the coming months they’ll refine ideas with local stakeholders and preferred alternatives while the neighborhood associations and Better Block PDX will carry the torch until Better Burnside is handed over to the city for the next phases of engagement, design, and implementation.

Keep an eye out for future engagement opportunities from Better Block PDX, PSU, Strong Towns PDX, and— in the future, with the public’s support— from the City of Portland. With the changes brought by the Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge, W Burnside is entering a pivotal period that will define its purpose and the future of the Central City. Let your voice be heard. If you or someone you know is interested in learning more, contact the project team at better.burnside.psu@gmail.com.

Learn more at the project website.

New details on how PBOT will spend $200,000 on intersection daylighting

Detail from a PBOT slide showing a car parked on N Mississippi at N Failing.

Staff from the Portland Bureau of Transportation have revealed more details about their efforts to prohibit car parking at intersections.

At a meeting of the city’s Pedestrian Advisory Committee on March 18th, PBOT said they plan to implement “vision clearance” (their term for daylighting) standards at 200 intersections over the next two years. When I reported on this last month, all we had was the number of intersections and a timeframe. At the meeting last week, staff added that they have $200,000 to spend on the installations and that they expect to have all of them done this year.

New details revealed at the meeting include:

  • Of the $200,000 budget, $50,000 comes from the Fixing Our Streets (FOS) program (revenue fro local gas tax). That means locations of those intersections must be spread evenly across the four council districts. FOS has $70.5 million allocated for its 2024-2028 project list. The daylighting projects will come out of the $6 million Safety on Neighborhood Streets spending category, so that means at least one of the cross streets of these 50 locations must be a local street classification.
  • In a presentation PBOT shared with the Pedestrian Advisory Committee, they showed a few slides that are examples of locations they’re considering: N Mississippi Ave and N Failing St., NE Alberta Street and NE 16th Ave., NE Alberta Street and NE 16th Ave., and SE Belmont and SE 34th.
  • The remaining $150,000 will come from the city’s General Fund, so there are no location restrictions on 150 of the intersections.
  • PBOT will focus treatments on pedestrian districts that are also business districts. These are places where a busy street intersects with a local (residential street). Additional priority will be on locations where the side street is already a designated neighborhood greenway/walkway and where there’s an existing marked crosswalk.
  • Intersections near schools will be a prime target. PBOT is already doing outreach to schools and will do a small educational campaign (lawn signs at corners) to explain why parking is being restricted.
  • PBOT plans to clear two or four spots at each intersection, with a maximum of one parking spot at each corner. Many installations will remove just one parking spot at two corners (see diagram).
  • Cost for each intersection is about $700-$800 in materials and labor (PBOT says they might be able to do more than 200 intersections with this first tranche of funding).

The practice of daylighting is a standard and proven road safety measure. When people choose to park their cars (especially larger ones) close to the corner it makes it harder for other road users to see cross traffic. Daylighting is especially popular among folks who aren’t inside cars because the risk of injury (or worse) from a collision is far greater when not wrapped by a metal cage.

Once completed, this work will help PBOT answer critics who say they haven’t moved fast enough on daylighting since making it a pillar of their Vision Zero strategy years ago. In 2020, PBOT was sued by a man who was injured in a collision while biking on SE Ankeny and his lawyers said the city was partly liable because they didn’t prevent drivers from parking all the way up to the corner.

The next step in this process is to identify which locations need daylighting the most. If you have ideas, email them to visionzero@portlandoregon.gov.

Learn more at PBOT’s vision clearance website.

Kidical Mass welcomes spring with ride for all ages

The group, led by ride organizer Joseph Eisenberg (blue shirt) rolls down NE 37th en route to Fernhill Park. (Photos: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

Bike buses may be all the rage, but before they were even a thing, Kidical Mass ruled the streets. This past Saturday, local organizers kept the tradition alive with a short and sweet ride that drew a big crowd.

Kidical Mass is a play on “Critical Mass,” the anti-car protest movement that started in San Francisco in the early 1990s. According to the BikePortland historical archives, the first Kidical Mass happened in Eugene in 2008. Portland copied the idea that same year and held its first ever family group ride on downtown streets. Saturday’s edition wasn’t nearly as bold as taking over streets in the central city with little kids in tow, but it was a good excuse for folks of all ages to ride together.

Ride organizer Joseph Eisenberg has led Kidical Mass for many years now. His 17-year-old son Elijah, who I met on the ride, said he first took part when he was just five years old.

After meeting at Alberta Park and decorating bikes with flowers, the group headed north to the Going St. Neighborhood Greenway and then east to NE 37th which connected them to Fernhill Park. Like all good family rides, the destination included a playground.

Check out the photo gallery and short video below and follow Kidical Mass on Instagram to join the next ride.

St. Johns families can get on the bike bus, thanks to donation event

The covered section of the playground at James John Elementary School in St. Johns would normally be quiet and empty on a rainy day after school. But this past Friday was anything but normal as the playground buzzed with activity and over 45 local families showed up to pick out free bikes.

“It’s a good ol’ bike fest!” said Joe Kurmaskie, an author known as the “Metal Cowboy” for his series of books about family bike adventures who’s now the executive director of Reborn Bikes, a statewide organization that expects to give away 12,000 bikes this year. Kurmaskie and his team, along with Metro, Portland Public Schools, Trauma Nurses Talk Tough, Bike Bus PDX, and others, distributed about 130 free bikes, helmets, lights, and locks at the event.

James John Elementary has an active bike bus that has spurred demand for bikes among the school community. Bike Bus leader and mom Jessica Fletcher has stepped up to meet the need. “I have become the biking lady here at our school,” she said. Fletcher has seen the bike bus grow in popularity, but realized a lot of kids were left out. She did a school survey and found 50% of the students don’t even have a bike and that half the families driving to school wanted to ride instead. “So I just felt like, there can’t be this wonderful thing that everybody’s doing and then so many kids can’t do it because they don’t even have a bicycle.”

Fletcher connected with Kurmaskie and others in the community, and the event fell into place thanks to a lot of planning and volunteers.

One of the folks helping out yesterday was John Brandsberg, a hazardous waste technician at Metro. He works with Kurmaskie to keep bicycles out of the waste transfer station (a.k.a. dump). Since the duo teamed up in the summer of 2023, they’ve rescued 2,200 bikes that would otherwise be sent to landfills. “These bikes used to get recycled, which is a good deal,” Brandsberg shared on Saturday, “But giving them to kids so they can ride bikes is so much better.”

Kids like that are what keeps Kurmaskie going. He estimates that his refurbished-bikes-to-bike-bus pipeline supplies about 30-40% of bikes used in Portland’s growing number of bike buses. “Which is a really cool thing, because it makes it egalitarian. It makes it that everybody gets to do bike bus.”

And school leaders like Fletcher are happy to create the demand. “We had a kid that joined [the bike bus] last week who’s a first-grader and he said, ‘I want to get 100 kids on this bike bus’,” she shared. “So I think this is going to make that possible.”

A young James John Elementary student named Arlo provided living proof of concept. I met her as she got comfortable on a purple Trek Mountain Track. She told me she picked it out because, “I really like the handle brakes and I like how it has a cup holder. Plus, I just love the color and stuff.”

“Sometimes you can just feel what bike is right for you,” Arlo added, as she looked down at her new rig. When I asked what she’s looking forward to once she gets the bike home, Arlo said, “Oh, just riding a lot. I’m thinking of joining the bike bus.”

Billion dollar sidewalk funding program passes council committee

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee members in February. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

What’s being called a “generational investment” that aims to build sidewalks in east and southwest Portland passed its first political test this morning when the five-member Portland City Council Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted unanimously to support a resolution that could create a new funding mechanism and serve as a model for other expenditures.

As I reported last week, the Sidewalk Improvement and Paving Program (SIPP) is the brain child of District 1 Councilor Loretta Smith and District 4 Councilor Mitch Green. The two have found an overlapping interest in restructuring how the City of Portland implements and funds sidewalk construction projects in the parts of the city that are most in need of them.

“Our streets and sidewalks are the feet of the city,” Councilor Smith, whose district encompasses all of Portland east of I-205, said while introducing the resolution. “And if our feet don’t work, then of course, we’re not working.” Smith then connected the health of our sidewalks and broader network of non-driving options to the revitalization of Portland: “We need a renaissance in our city and we need to make sure that renaissance includes active transportation.” The way Smith sees the world, we cannot ask Portlanders to get out and attend cultural events and local businesses if they can’t get their safely without a car.

Councilor Green represents all of Portland west of the river (and a small piece of Sellwood). He said the people who rely on sidewalks to get around District 4 are, “Often some of the poorest people and are members of the immigrant community and are exposed and vulnerable to traffic violence.” Other folks are, “Really simply trying to find an opportunity to leave their car behind.”

This resolution doesn’t commit any dollars yet, but it feels much more serious than simply a statement of values and intentions. Green and Smith have both said they are working on a new bonding mechanism that could unlock significant funding. Previously, the only stated funding estimate for the SIPP was $100 million, but in an unscripted remark at this morning’s committee meeting, Councilor Smith said, “We have a ceiling of $1.5 billion and we may be asking for $300 to $400 million.”

“This is generational,” said Oregon Walks Executive Director Zachary Lauritzen during public testimony. “We’ve been talking about doing this for decades. And finally, we have a couple leaders saying, ‘We’re going to do this.’ And I am so moved by that, so excited about that. And just want to say, thank you for being willing to do that.” Lauritzen urged councilors to consider public/private partnerships to stretch any new funding even further.

There was no testimony in opposition to the resolution.

Once discussion among council members began, District 3 Councilor Angelita Morillo expressed concerns about the funding portions of the resolution language. Specifically, she is worried about all the talk she is overhearing about how this program would tap into revenue from Portland Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund (PCEF). “I want to ensure that if those dollars are going to be touched, that they are going to actually be used in a way that reduces carbon emissions and actually address the climate,” Morillo said. She then asked to see data to prove whether or not laying the concrete required for sidewalks would actually reduce carbon emissions.

When a discussion ensued about Morillo’s concerns, Green tried to assure her that PCEF wouldn’t be the main source of revenue and that the Finance Committee would ultimately take a deeper dive into where funding would come from. Green said he prefers that a bulk of the investment comes from a tax revenue bond. “That’s what cities do,” Green said. “They build infrastructure and issue debt to build that infrastructure.”

At one point Morillo tried to get language amended into the resolution that would require it to stop at the Climate, Resilience, and Land Use Committee. She saw that as a necessary step if the resolution’s intent was to use PCEF as a major funding source. But Smith didn’t like that idea and worried about losing control of the resolution if it went to a separate committee (beyond the Finance Committee). Ultimately the funding source-specific language was stricken from the resolution to keep the policy and finance conversations separate. Then, after a bit of back-and-forth, the resolution passed 5-0.

It will now move onto the full City Council and would likely make a stop at the Finance Committee once its funding plan becomes clearer.

For walking advocate Zachary Lauritzen, it’s a major step forward. “There will always be challenges about money,” he said at the end of his remarks today. “But until you take the policy move and start moving to go find those dollars, it just won’t happen. And our kids will wake up in 20, 30, 40, years and go, ‘Huh? Same problem. Why didn’t they do something about it back then?’ And I think you all are in a position to do something about it right now. So thank you.”

Portlanders show solidarity with Palestinians at ride for para-cycling team

Great Ride of Return participants on NE Ainsworth St. (Photos: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

Portlanders came together on Sunday to ride in solidarity with a cycling team based 7,000 miles away. The Great Ride of Return was organized by Palestinian liberation activists and the new Revolutionary Bicycle Club as part of a global gathering in support of the Gaza Sunbirds Cycling Team.

The Gaza Sunbirds are a para-cycling team that began in 2020 to raise awareness for Palestinians with special needs and to foster a competitive spirit among athletes with disabilities. When Israel attacked Palestine in response to an invasion by Hamas in October 2023, the Sunbirds were thrust into the global spotlight.

A few riders donned Gaza Sunbirds jerseys and jackets on Sunday as about 70 people gathered at Peninsula Park in north Portland before the ride. They shared commemorative spoke cards and heard a few speakers before rolling out. I spoke to one man named Perry as he readied the speaker pulled behind his bike in a cargo trailer.

“I’m here to support the Palestinian people. I think we need to do what we can as humanity to come together and fight for these inhumane practices that are going on,” Perry said. Asked about what cycling had to do with the event, he added, “Pedal power is it’s just the most efficient way of mobilizing, and we don’t have to rely on fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are funding this genocide. They’re directly connected with fueling these tanks and aircraft carriers.”

Joel F. was going around and lubing bicycle chains for free. “This is one of the more critical concerns that the world has right now,” he shared with me. “It really is a genocide happening in Palestine and in other parts of the world as well as Sudan and Congo — and we can’t let that happen on our watch, not without being out here and saying, ‘This is not right.'”

I asked a woman who had a “Ceasefire Now” sign on her bike what the Gaza Sunbirds mean to her. “They represent resilience and resistance and riding, enjoyment, and life.”

Another man, who was one of many folks wearing a keffiyeh traditional Arabic headdress, said the Gaza Sunbirds’ resilience, “Is what’s best of humanity.” “And I just love anyone that is willing to get out in the rain and ride and have a common purpose for a better world,” he added.

Right before the group got on their bikes and pedaled out of the park for a short loop around the Piedmont and Arbor Lodge neighborhoods, a speaker encouraged the crowd to fight back against fascism, “before it comes for all of us.” After mentioning the disappearance of Mahmoud Kahlil by the Trump administration, she added, “We all have to fight back and speak up against that every day.”

During the ride, the large group took over the road amid intermittent chants of “Free, free Palestine!” and honks and waves of approval from passersby.

The Revolutionary Bicycle Club plans to support another event this week: On Thursday they’ll bring cyclists and bike-based support to Make Some Noise, a protest against Society Hotel owner Jessie Burke that will be held in Old Town.

Listen to an audio report from the ride and view a full gallery of images below.

Monday Roundup: Pedestrian populism, Tesla terrorism, and more

Welcome to the week. Here are the most notable news items our community has come across in the past seven days…

Anti-car streets are popular: The people of Paris just voted to pedestrianize 500 more streets in an effort to reduce driving in the city. It’s almost as if, when your government goes big on lefty policies and then proves they can implement them, it’s actually good politics. Imagine that! (Reuters)

Steel is real (expensive): Bike chains are one of the few bike-related products that have been impacted by Trump’s 25% U.S. tariff on steel and aluminum. Meanwhile, the industry is scrambling to understand which products will be impacted. (Bicycle Retailer)

Teen drivers arrested for murder: Video footage (not shown at link) from inside a car driven by a 13-year old revealed that the young boys purposely rammed into a cyclist and killed him. (ABC News)

Golden Age of family biking: Another mainstream journalist has had their life so altered by the use of an e-bike they were moved to write a story about it. In this case, the author shares how an e-bike has become a cherished family vehicle. (The Atlantic)

Big time bike racing stateside: Such great news to hear that a company has stepped up to host the Tour of Colorado in 2026, bringing a major stage race back to American soil. (Cycling Weekly)

Distracted cop: A police officer in Vermont faces felony charges after his body camera captured footage of him watching a YouTube video on his in-car monitor at the same time he hit and killed a cyclist. (Burlington Free Press)

Oregon and e-bikes: A new electric bike bill being discussed down in Salem would define micromobility devices and lower the age for legal riding from 16 to 12. (The Oregonian)

The ‘Couv goes big?: If the Vancouver City Council got its way, they’d annex the entire, 56 square-mile urban growth area and become the second largest city in Washington overnight. (The Columbian)

Tesla terrorism: A Florida man intentionally drove his car into a crowd of protestors at a Tesla dealership, causing several injuries. Not surprising given that the Trump administration is calling the peaceful protests “domestic terrorism”. (WPTV)

Motonormativity and how to influence people: Fascinating new research into why some people have normalized use of automobiles to such an extent that it impacts how they think about other types of mobility gives us clues on how to change their minds. (Science Direct)


Thanks to everyone who sent in links this week. The Monday Roundup is a community effort, so please feel free to send us any great stories you come across.

PBOT will cut driving lane to slow speeds on NE Weidler in front of ‘car crash house’

Screenshot

The Portland Bureau of Transportation will reduce the space for driving in order to lower speeds through a notorious corner in the Sullivan’s Gulch neighborhood.

The turn from eastbound NE Weidler to northbound NE 24th has been the scene of numerous car-into-house collisions over the years, so much so that local news outlets say it’s been named the “car crash house.” In late December, another car driver missed the turn and slammed into the house while also breaking a gas line. The collision started a huge fire and the resulting news coverage ratcheted up pressure on the City of Portland to do something about it.

At a meeting of the Sullivan’s Gulch Neighborhood Association on Monday, PBOT said they’ll seize the opportunity of an upcoming repaving project to redesign the street. The idea is to slow drivers down enough so if they miss the turn their cars won’t jump the curb. And if drivers continue to be so bad at operating their vehicles, they’ll slam into newly installed boulders.

According to a presentation shared at the meeting, the plan is to reduce NE Weidler from two lanes to one lane as it approaches the turn. To further narrow the driving space (a proven way to reduce speeds) PBOT will also add parking on one side of the street and widen the protected bike lane through the turn. PBOT will also lower the speed limit from 30 to 25 mph and install a speed reader board that will encourage drivers to go 15 mph around the curves. A new marked crosswalk will be installed on the western corners of NE Weidler and 24th. PBOT will also add several new marked crosswalks, curb extensions, and a buffer to the existing bike lane on NE Weidler between NE 15th and 24th.

And if all else fails, large boulders placed in front of the house at the end of NE Weidler street should prevent anyone from leaving the roadway.

PBOT says they hope to complete the project this summer. See the project website for more information.

New sidewalk funding effort comes into focus

Lack of sidewalks has been a big issue in southwest Portland for years. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

New details have emerged this morning of a nascent infrastructure funding effort that aims to quench the thirst for sidewalks in east and southwest Portland.

As I shared Thursday, District 4 Councilor Mitch Green and District 1 Councilor Loretta Smith have seized on a shared interest in transportation infrastructure funding reform and a desire to deliver popular investments to create a new way to get more sidewalks built. They call it the “Sidewalk Improvement and Pavement Program” or SIPP. We’ve learned more details about the policy package in documents filed to the City Council T & I Committee website and comments made by Green on social media this morning.

According to Green, he and Smith have already solicited recommendations from Portland Bureau of Transportation staff. “From PBOT’s recommendations to Councilor Smith and me, we are considering a range of treatments in areas with constraints or opportunities where pedestrian facilities other than sidewalks are better for the context,” Green shared on Bluesky this morning in response to a post by BikePortland. “We’re generating input for this emerging policy concept for going bigger on sidewalks and paths and how we’re funding it. Potholes are included too.”

More details on the SIPP can be found in the draft resolution language posted to the T & I Committee agenda. The draft language gives us our first clues about how councilors will frame the program and what new revenue will be focused on. The SIPP, “aims to address sidewalk and pavement deficiencies, create safer pedestrian facilities, and improve roadway conditions.” Why will it focus on districts 1 and 4 only? “Of all streets lacking proper sidewalks or pedestrian access, over half of those streets are located in East Portland and Southwest Portland,” reads the draft resolution. :”Prioritizing investments in Districts 1 and 4 will ensure more equitable access to vital pedestrian pathways, enhanced climate resilience, and increased safer road conditions for all residents.”

An impact statement section of the resolution states that, “The City has deferred maintenance on our streets and sidewalks for many years – and far too long… While Portland’s central core benefits from walkable neighborhoods with good sidewalks, most streets in Districts 1 and 4 lack sidewalks entirely.”

As has already been reported by Willamette Week, funding for the SIPP could come from a variety of sources including: issuing bonds and allocating funds allocated to PBOT for sidewalk construction and improvements; federal funding from the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) program; funding from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT); and funding from the Portland Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund (PCEF).

This slide will be part of a PBOT presentation to the T & I Committee on Monday. (Source: PBOT)

The resolution also lists anticipated benefits of the program. Beyond the usual like safety and environmental benefits, the councilors say new and improved sidewalks could be an engine for economic growth, job creation, and “opportunities to demonstrate the use and effectiveness of new and emerging green technologies and sustainable materials in transportation networks such as solar sidewalks and green cement.”

It’s an ambitious effort from two new councilors who say it, “will establish a system-wide effort that could serve as a model for similar construction and renovation projects across the City of Portland.”

If passed by the full council, the resolution would direct PBOT to explore the “full suite” of funding options and initiate a public engagement process that would result in a four-year project list complete with an implementation schedule and budget. In addition to the SIPP policy package, councilors Smith and Green want to pass a separate ordinance that would develop, “a jobs pipeline connecting existing internship, apprenticeship, and other training and education programs to good jobs that SIPP will create.”

A price tag for the program isn’t included in the draft resolution, but I’ve been told a starting point would be $100 million. How many miles of sidewalks that could create depends on many factors — from topography to permitting. The resolution does include a timeline: it’s expected to take about four years before it’s fully baked and sidewalks are ready to be built.

Stay tuned for Monday’s T & I Committee meeting where the SIPP will get its first hearing. You can read the resolution and submit written testimony here.

Bicycling in Portland ‘remained steady’ last year according to latest city counts

Portlanders ride over the Hawthorne Bridge viaduct on November 1st, 2024. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
Cover of 2024 PBOT Bike Count Report

The bad news about the latest city bike counts is that the number of people cycling in Portland didn’t make a big jump in 2024. The good news is that it didn’t go down. Not only that, but we are in a phase the City of Portland has officially dubbed “a new beginning” as ridership numbers continue to rebound after pandemic doldrums.

According the annual bike count report from the Portland Bureau of Transportation, cycling “remained steady” in 2024. Portland has done annual, manual bike counts for over 30 years, longer than any other American city. Between June and September of last year, 170 volunteers equipped with clipboards and pens fanned out to 318 locations across the city. They tallied every person who came by that was on a bicycle or some sort of micromobility vehicle (like a scooter, one-wheel, and so on).

Across 258 locations counted in both 2023 and 2024, there was an average, citywide increase in riders of just 0.9% over last year — 27,923 cyclists and 28,164 cyclists respectively. For perspective, across 119 sites that were counted in both 2016 and 2024, the number of people biking is down by about 40%.

The city split the count locations into eight distinct sectors (see map below). Of those districts, three tallied an increase and five had a decrease. East and North saw the biggest jump in ridership (relative to 2023) at 4.9%. Southwest meanwhile, saw 3.1% fewer riders than last year.

After nearly two decades of steady and strong growth in cycling between the early 1990s and 2015, Portland’s bike use has stymied in the past decade. To help describe what’s going on, PBOT has released a new narrative explanation. Here’s an excerpt from the count report:

Through our analysis of the data, the story of bicycling in Portland over the past 20 years can be told in four parts.

  1. The surge (pre-2016): Bicycle use steadily increased from the early 1990s. Portland set a national record for bicycle modeshare in a large city (population greater than 300,000) with 7.2% of people biking to work in 2014. The number of people bicycle commuting peaked in 2015 at 23,432 even though the mode split slipped slightly to 7% due to population growth.
  2. The ebb (2016–2019): Commuting by bike began a slow decline in both percent of trips and number of commuters after 2015 even as the city’s population grew.
  3. The pandemic (2020–2022): Biking, like all forms of transportation, decreased dramatically during the pandemic.
  4. A new beginning (2023–2024): Similar to other cities, the number of people biking has ticked up from pandemic-era lows and is holding steady as Portland continues its post-pandemic recovery.

The methodology of this count is open to critique, but PBOT would say the value is in its consistency over time. Similar to the quibbles cycling advocates have had with the U.S. Census bike commute mode share number, those concerns are balanced against the fact that the data offers a consistent view over a long time period.

On that note, PBOT gleans their numbers by counting each of the 318 different locations once between June 4th and September 26th (prime cycling season in Portland). The counts are done mid-week and volunteers count for a two-hour period during what PBOT says is the peak cycling hours of 4:00 to 6:00 pm or 7:00 to 9:00 am. (Given the vast increase in people working-from-home since the pandemic in 2020, you can see how this type of count would be impacted.)

PBOT then takes those two-hour counts and (“using a standard traffic engineering rubric”) makes an assumption that they account for about 20% of all daily bicycle trips at each location. That estimate is then considered to represent a full weekday count for each site.

In 2023, the first time PBOT volunteers made a separate tally for electric bikes, they counted 17% of people using bikes with motors. In 2024 that number dwindled to 9%. However, PBOT says the e-bike number is likely a significant undercount, “because newer e-bikes are increasingly designed with features that make them look similar to non-electric models.”

When you add e-bikes to other types of micromobility vehicles like e-scooters, one-wheels, and electric skateboards, that category made up 14% of all trips counted in 2024.

PBOT’s count report also includes insights on the shared bike and scooter programs known as Biketown, which currently consists of 2,350 e-bikes and 3,500 e-scooters citywide. Ridership on both modes has rebounded well since the pandemic in 2020, but PBOT reports a trouble decline in Biketown ridership, which saw a 15% decrease in 2023.

PBOT says the decline in Biketown e-bike ridership is likely due to a number of factors (riders have complained about poorly maintained bikes, and the system service area has expanded without a commensurate increase in bikes), but that the bulk of the decrease is due to changes in their Biketown for All program for low-income riders. As I reported in May, PBOT scaled back the program to cut costs. The city adjusted the program’s eligibility requirements and switched from providing unlimited, free 60-minute trips to providing a $10 credit per month with rides billed at five cents per minute. “The change was made in response to rising costs that threatened the financial stability of the program, which had grown from 169 users in 2020 to 4,270 when the change was implemented,” PBOT writes in the report. Likely as a result of those changes, PBOT has seen Biketown for All use decrease by 21% in 2024.

Despite the relatively flat ridership numbers, PBOT says their are reasons for optimism going forward. In the conclusion of the report, they say the city’s bike network is “more robust and far reaching than it was a decade ago when Portland was setting national records for biking” (but is that enough to counterbalance the rise in drivers and associated erosion of street safety?). PBOT also points to more automated enforcement, major new bike lane maintenance investments, and a new form of city leadership that, “promises fresh ideas and more collaborative city operations,” as reasons for a brighter bicycling future.

The report ends with a bit of editorializing and a call to action:

“Portland can be a world-class bicycle city, but only if we’re committed to making it that way. Prevailing U.S. policy, funding mechanisms, and culture favors less travel choice, more car dependence, rising vehicle traffic, and more traffic fatalities. These outcomes are not flukes; they’re consequences. But Portland is making different choices. We can change for the better. And change is necessary for a brighter, more bikeable future.”

Read the full report here.

Councilors to float $100 million sidewalk funding plan

A residential street in east Portland. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

(*Note: Read Friday’s update to this story.)

Portland city councilors Mitch Green and Loretta Smith have found common cause on a notoriously tricky transportation funding issue: sidewalks.

As you might have already read in the Willamette Week, the two councilors who represent districts one (east Portland) and four (southwest Portland) respectively want to get their constituents out of the mud and onto sidewalks. They’re looking at a variety of funding sources, including Portland Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund (PCEF) grants, federal grants and bonds.

According to Councilor Green’s Chief of Staff Maria Sipin, the two councilors began working together earlier this month following the release of the city administrator’s draft budget recommendations, which included steep cuts for the transportation bureau. Given how difficult it is to fill sidewalk gaps, and how popular they are with voters, Sipin said in a phone call today that, “an appetite had been growing around sidewalks” among city councilors, “especially for district one and district four.”

While details about funding sources are still being worked out, Sipin said Councilor Green is focused on restructuring the city’s debt and using Portland’s bonding authority. “We’re trying to figure out how we can get sidewalks without using PCEF funds specifically,” Sipin said. The use of PCEF funds is a hot topic in City Hall right now, with different camps forming around whether or not the climate change-focused, voter-approved tax on big businesses is an appropriate way to fill the city’s budget holes. It’s notable that the fund already awarded $20.6 million for sidewalks in east Portland last year.

Why sidewalks? Sipin said Councilor Green and Councilor Smith share a deep interest in government accountability and transparency and in finding resources to invest in the things their constituents care about. “And in the Venn diagram of their world, that thing is sidewalks.”

Sipin continued:

“For the good of the people, we’re really trying to figure out, how do we build something as essential and popular as sidewalks? What kind of vision do we have to do that? What tools do we have, especially with the federal government, and lots of funding opportunities that we have relied on over the years at the state as well? What can the city do independently? Do we have the resources? And I think that’s where the bonds idea really emerged from.”

Councilor Green, an economist by training, feels like the City of Portland has been too conservative with its use of bonds in the past and he sees potential in that avenue of funding.

As to which sidewalks would be prioritized? Sipin, a former planner at the Oregon Department of Transportation, said her office would lean on existing city plans and recent public processes that have already identified which sidewalks should be built. “I know there are lists. So there are places to start.”

A program funding total of $100 million has been set as a starting point for conversations. We can expect a draft resolution to be on the agenda of this Monday’s Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting (of which both Smith and Green are members of).

In related news, The Oregonian reported today that Portland Mayor Keith Wilson has already begun exploring a street utility fee as a major new source of revenue for transportation.