Support BikePortland - Journalism that Matters

Senate committee passes ‘Idaho Stop’ bill allowing bicycle riders to yield at stop signs

Posted by on April 10th, 2019 at 11:07 am

Some intersections in Oregon already allow bicycle riders to “slow-and-go”.
(Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

10 years after it was last debated in the Oregon Legislature, a concept known as “Idaho Stop” has once again found its way into a bill. And it passed its first committee vote yesterday, just hours before a key legislative deadline.

Senate Bill 998 wasn’t on anyone’s radar before last week. Up until then it was just a vague placeholder bill without any detailed language and with no amendments. That changed when Senator Floyd Prozanski (D-Eugene) drafted an amendment and brought it to the Senate Judiciary Committee during a public hearing for the bill on Monday.

The bill would allow a bicycle user to treat intersections with stop signs or red flashing signals as yields. In other words, as a bicycle user, you’d be able to roll through these intersections without stopping — but only when/if it was safe to do so.

Excerpt from -1 amendment to SB 998.

At Monday’s hearing, Committee Vice-Chair Sen. Prozanski said it’s merely a “re-do” of a bill he sponsored and passed as a member of the Oregon House of Representatives in 2003.

“This bill would follow a law out of Idaho that has been in place for over 35 years,” Prozanski said at the hearing.

“This is one of those situations where I believe, that’s what a lot of people do already with their bikes.”
— Senator Kim Thatcher, Judiciary Committee vice-chair

Only one person testified. A man who said he’s a work zone flagger told lawmakers he’s opposed because, “A lot of bicyclists go right on through” his work zones and he believes it’s a “safety risk”. “It’s bad enough we got boxes in Portland for bicyclists before the cars and they disrespect us,” the man said.

When the bill was brought back to committee for a vote yesterday, Senator Kim Thatcher (R-Keizer) added an amendment clarifying that bicycle users must stop for flaggers.

Committee Vice-Chair Thatcher is in favor of the law. “Just like a few years ago when we told ODOT we wanted to raise speed limits in some areas,” she explained, before logging her “yes” vote, “People were already going those speeds. This is one of those situations where I believe, that’s what a lot of people do already with their bikes.” Sen. Thatcher pointed out that — unlike a car — human-powered vehicles are “really difficult to stop completely and then get going again.”

(Video below by Portlander Spencer Boomhower explains how Idaho Stop works)

Advertisement

Senator Shemia Fagan (D-Portland) also voted in favor of the bill. Sen. Fagan shared that she understands the benefits of the bill because she used to commute to law school by bike. “Things that are in motion tend to stay in motion, things that are at rest tend to stay at rest,” she said. “Anything we can do to encourage people to get out of their cars and ride a bike is a good thing.”

Senator Cliff Bentz (R-Ontario) was the sole “no” vote. After admitting he’s rolled through stop signs on his own bike, Bentz said he opposes the law because of concerns expressed by sheriffs in his district.

The bill passed committee 6-1. It will now move to the Senate floor for a vote.

Sen. Floyd Prozanski in 2011.
(Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

Reached on the phone this morning, Sen. Prozanski said he introduced the bill after a constituent contacted him late last month (Idaho Stop was also one of the bills I mentioned in an op-ed on March 15th). Since he had a placeholder bill to study violations, he was able to draft the language and move it to a vote very quickly. “At this point, I think it has a very good chance of passing the full Senate,” Prozanski said. Once it goes to the House Judiciary Committee, he plans to meet with members and find a sponsor.

Asked why he is such a fan of Idaho Stop, Prozanski recalled his 2003 discussions with the captain of the Boise Police Department. “He said it’s just much more seamless and it makes traffic flow more easily… It’s not as much of a hazard as coming to a complete stop and trying to start when you have other vehicles moving around you and you’re trying to get started and through an intersection with enough time,” he added.

Sen. Prozanski added that, “It seems to me we have enough safeguards in place to allow continual motion when right-of-way is clear.”

As for why the bill failed in 2003, Prozanski said it would have passed were it not for one senator (former Senator John Minnis) who simply didn’t like the bill and wouldn’t give it a vote.

When it was proposed again in 2009 by former House Rep. Jules Bailey — with the full backing of The Street Trust (then Bicycle Transportation Alliance) — the bill failed for several reasons: Irresponsible and biased coverage from The Oregonian and other outlets made it controversial; a high-profile firing of The Street Trust lobbyist in charge of the bill scared off some lawmakers; and some advocates blamed legislators who sought revenge against bicycle bills after being strongly criticized for their support of a mandatory bicycle registration bill.

The Street Trust isn’t working SB 998, but as OPB reported yesterday, they are supportive of it.

Idaho was the first state to adopt a statute like this. Arkansas just passed a version of the law last week.

For more background, peruse the 25 stories in our Idaho Stop Law archives.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

NOTE: Thanks for sharing and reading our comments. To ensure this is a welcoming and productive space, all comments are manually approved by staff. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for meanness, discrimination or harassment. Comments with expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia will be deleted and authors will be banned.

64
Leave a Reply

avatar
13 Comment threads
51 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
29 Comment authors
sorenDan AMark smith9wattssetha Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Bjorn
Guest
Bjorn

This is great to see, especially with bipartisan support. This year we saw Arkansas join Idaho and Delaware in passing Idaho Style stop as yield laws. This is a common sense solution that just makes good sense and I hope that it will pass the Senate and find a warm reception in the House. Many thanks to Floyd for listening to the people he represents and taking action.

dwk
Guest
dwk

About time…

Keviniano
Subscriber
Keviniano

Wow, I feel like hell just froze over (in a good way).

SuWonda
Guest
SuWonda
El Biciclero
Guest
El Biciclero

What!? Passed a committee? This would be fantastic, even if it doesn’t go as far as Idaho with traffic signals (at least we have a “dead red” provision now). I find the one bit of testimony rather intriguing:

“A lot of bicyclists go right on through” his work zones and he believes it’s a “safety risk”.

If this gentleman is speaking about people (regardless of vehicle choice) disobeying a flagger’s STOP sign and proceeding through a work zone, then this is a completely legitimate concern. I’m a little shocked that anyone would do this, and I’m glad the amendment was added to clarify that road crew flaggers’ signs aren’t the same as “an intersection controlled by” signs. It should be clarified that the quotes around “safety risk” are quote quotes, not air quotes, as this is actually a real safety risk.

“It’s bad enough we got boxes in Portland for bicyclists before the cars and they disrespect us,”

Now, this unfortunate addendum to his previous comment is both disappointing and interesting. I wonder whether he is stating an opinion that using bike boxes in the way they were intended constitutes “disrespect” of drivers, or whether he is talking about two different things, i.e., “I don’t like bike boxes, and I also don’t like how bicyclists disrespect us in other ways outside of bike boxes”.

If the former, then it’s just disappointing that anyone would equate using infrastructure for its intended purpose with being “disrespectful”. If the latter, then I’m curious what forms said “disrespect” takes. This interests me in general, since many of the complaints I hear about from people I know are complaints about bicyclists acting in the most safe and legal way they know how, but that the person nevertheless sees as disrespectful. Often, such complaints are wrapped in faux “concern” that the bicyclist they saw was doing something dangerous and might get hurt, when in reality, the bicyclist was merely doing something that either a) “got in the way” of their driving, or b) they would “never” do on a bike.

Dirk
Guest
Dirk

So… in other words… nothing will change for the way I treat stop signs as a cyclist?

mark
Guest
mark

Would this also allow red lights to be treated as stop signs, like in Idaho? I’m very much in favor of this long overdue legislation. Idaho has been doing this since when, 1982?

pdx2wheeler
Subscriber

Great way to decriminalize riding a bike. I’m sure there are an elusive few people that ride bikes that completely stop at every stop sign, every time. I’m sure Bigfoot exists too…

Todd Boulanger
Guest
Todd Boulanger

What?!, Is this a tardy “April Fools” news item that got stuck in the BP outbox before vaycay? 😉

I am surprised the bill’s author did not reach out to tST to get their backing if not awareness…unless he/she/them still addressed the letter to the ‘BTA’. [Or does tST not have a dedicated staffer focused on the State Legislature anymore?]

Mike
Guest
Mike

Does that mean a cyclist can blow through a 4 way stop instead of waiting his or her turn?

Merlin
Guest
Merlin

“ And no, most people don’t come to a complete stop”

What’s an incomplete stop?

It’s like when people say “a little pregnant”. Either you are or you are not.

Either you STOP, or you don’t. Most driver’s don’t except at the busiest intersections with 4 way stops.

mark smith
Guest
mark smith

I idaho stop whatever I want. But, I am white and generally ride in bike gear so the cops leave me alone for the most part.

See why we need the Idaho stop law?

Mark smith
Guest
Mark smith

Portland, the same town that has stop signs at roundabouts.