PBOT says deaths dipped last year, but worrying trends continue

Three teenagers were killed in this crash on Southeast Division in June. (Photo: Portland Police)

The initial promise of Portland’s vaunted Vision Zero plan will not be fulfilled. But we can’t stop trying.

10 years ago, when Portland City Council adopted a resolution to eliminate all traffic fatalities by 2025, it was considered “audacious” by some, doable by others, and many felt it was political folly to make such a potent promise. Now it’s clear why some local elected officials warned we should never have set a date in the first place.

Traffic deaths continued to plague Portland last year. Although the number of people killed, 58, was 16% lower than 2023, our dysfunctional driving culture and the rampant dangers it leads to still makes getting around a risky proposition for far too many. And while we seem to have broken the fatality fever of recent years, one year does not make a trend. Fatalities for people outside of cars have not gone down (last year’s death reduction came almost entirely from fewer drivers being killed), there’s been an alarming spike in deaths among young drivers, and we’ve just been through another year of disproportionate loss of life in east Portland.

Those are just a few takeaways from the Portland Bureau of Transportation’s 2024 Deadly Traffic Crash Report released today by their Vision Zero team. The report listed details on every person killed on Portland roads in 2024 and offered data to help understand why, where, and how they died.

But before I share more from the report, a quick note about the fatality numbers is needed. PBOT’s number of 58 deaths differs from the tally recorded by the Portland Police Bureau (PPB) and from BikePortland’s Fatality Tracker. The PPB list includes 63 deaths (the list isn’t shared publicly, but I confirmed it via a public records request) and BikePortland’s list contains 67 names.

PBOT’s number is almost always lower because they adhere to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reporting criteria that excludes people who die under the following circumstances: more than 30 days after a crash; intentionally (by suicide); in an act of homicide (a person intentionally crashes into another person); in a crash not involving a motor vehicle (a MAX train and a pedestrian for example); from a prior medical event (like a heart attack or drug overdose); or a crash on private property (like a parking lot). The police use a bit more relaxed criteria and only exclude deaths by suicide or medical events (although this year, the PPB included one death that was initially reported as a medical event). (It’s an open — and important — debate as to why PBOT doesn’t embrace all road deaths publicly while staying consistent on the back-end with federal statistics; but I’ll save that discussion for another day.)

BikePortland’s list is the most comprehensive and it’s the only one available to the public in real time. I also cross-reference my list with the PPB and PBOT lists at the end of each year to make sure it’s accurate. OK, back to the story…

Much of what’s contained in PBOT’s latest report is the same movie we’ve seen before: Speeds and wide arterial streets are the big culprits. Quite simply, where there are big streets and high speeds, more people die. In 2024, 71% of deadly crashes occurred on what PBOT refers to as “High Crash Network streets,” which account for only 8% of Portland streets overall. And speeding was involved in nearly half (48%) of all fatal crashes last year.

People speed on these “high crash” streets because the width gives them a false sense of security and a license to go fast. But they do so at all of our peril: 67% of the fatalities in Portland last year happened on streets with four or more travel lanes.

These stubborn facts are why PBOT works to narrow wide streets and why they’ve reduced dozens of speed limits citywide.

Changes like that can’t come soon enough for east Portland, where most of the city’s highest crash streets are intersections are located. In 2024, east Portland’s traffic death rate was 15 per 100,000 compared to six per 100,000 in the rest of the city. PBOT’s report also found that east Portland’s death rate remained the same as in 2023, while the rest of the city saw a decline.

A lack of light also plays a major role in road danger. In 2024, PBOT reports that 83% percent of traffic deaths occurred in nighttime conditions (dusk, night, and dawn). This year’s crash report was also the first time PBOT tallied data on vehicle size as part of their ongoing effort to fight the scourge of oversized trucks and SUVs. In 2024, 56% of the deaths to people walking and biking involved a collision with a large vehicle.

So while many people feel the goal of “Vision Zero” is unrealistic, if we just reduced driving space and speeds on major roads and invested in more street lights we could make immense progress relatively quickly.

But we can only control what we can control, and there are thorny outliers that will make reaching Vision Zero even more difficult.

(Source: PBOT)

A disturbing trend PBOT outlined in this year’s report is that youth deaths have spiked. Between 2015 and 2022 there were only about 1-3 people killed on Portland roads who were 18 years old or younger. But in 2024 (and 2023), that number rose to 7. PBOT says this is due in part to the increased popularity of speed racing and street takeovers.

In June, two teenagers (driver and a passenger) died while attempting to elude police in southeast Portland. A third teen who in the same car died two weeks later. In February, two teenagers died as their car crashed and burst into flames during a street race in northeast Portland. These tragedies — along with deaths to people who live on the street, people who use automobile traffic as a means for suicide, and people who are killed intentionally by someone driving a car — illustrate the urgent need to address our dysfunctional driving culture and myriad, underlying societal problems if we want to reach Vision Zero.

Regardless of why these deaths keep happening, the remedies will need to go through a political process. Now that we have geographic representation on Portland City Council for the first time ever, PBOT broke the fatalities down by district. In 2024, a plurality of traffic deaths (47% or 27 of 58) occurred in District 1, which includes east Portland. District 2 followed with 33% (19 of 58) of traffic deaths. Districts 3 and 4 each had 10% (6 of 58) of traffic deaths. The new slate of councilors has fully embrace the challenge of Vision Zero and it remains to be seen whether they will have a notable impact.

While 2024 continued grim trends, 2025 has been surprisingly quiet. So far this year there have been four traffic deaths. Last year we already had 15 deaths by this date — the lowest year-to-date total in many years. So while we haven’t met our first Vision Zero goal, Portlanders deserve nothing less than a continued commitment to save every life.

Portland 2024 Deadly Traffic Crash Report

Primos Cycles is Portland’s hottest bike company

The $799 Primos Dame.

Upstart bicycle brand Primos Cycles has found a home in Portland. Since launching just over three months ago, the Primos “Dame” has already sold out in two of its three colors and YouTubers are gushing about its rare mix of affordability and quality.

And while a number of bike companies have set up shop here over the years, one thing that sets Primos apart is that its founders traveled over 6,200 miles to set up shop in Portland.

I first met Primos co-founders Carlos Cortes and Pascual Duco at Bike Happy Hour last fall. The 36-year-olds met in their hometown of Santiago, Chile in 2015. Like many of us, bicycling brought them together. Cortes and Duco had just graduated from college and met through a shared interest in doing triathlons. After riding and doing a few races they became close friends and traveled to Rio de Janeiro to watch the Olympics.

Duco was already in the bike industry, having launched P3 Cycles in 2013. Cortes worked as an engineer in the aviation industry, but loved cycling and longed to turn his passion into a career. “I saw Pascual with a bike shop, working in the bike industry and would tell myself, ‘What a lucky guy to do something like that!’,” Cortes shared with me in an interview this week.

Duco built P3 Cycles into a large company by being the first bike brand in Chile to seize the market for inexpensive, urban singlespeeds and offer an option to industry heavyweights Specialized and Trek. At its peak in 2021, P3 Cycles earned $5 million in sales. Duco expanded into a new warehouse, had two retail stores, and carried a large inventory. That same year, Duco and his wife moved to Los Angeles with hopes of further growing P3’s sales.

When the market shifted in 2022, Duco got caught with a massive overstock. “Suddenly, no one wanted singlespeeds or fixies and I had like 8,000 of them in inventory. Everyone wanted gravel bikes,” Duco recalled. He spent the next two years in “crisis mode” and narrowly avoided bankruptcy. That business reckoning led Duco down a path where he ultimately discovered Primos; but not before he and his wife discovered L.A. wasn’t a good fit. “We didn’t like L.A. The vibe was just not for us,” he shared.

Duco wanted to move and had heard great things about Portland from friends in Chile who’d visited in the past. “My wife and I came to Portland for a weekend and we just fell in love with the city because you can walk everywhere, there are coffee shops, restaurants, and streets like Alberta where you can just be chill. It’s the only city I would live in in the U.S.”

“It’s also the city that bikes the most per capita in the U.S,” he added. “And everyone I meet knows something about bicycles.”

I talked to Cortes after he did the weekly “Lawyer Ride” downtown and had ridden into Forest Park from his house in northeast. “This is paradise!” he said of how great the riding is in Portland compared to Santiago.

Duco moved to Portland in 2022; and with his wife settled into a masters degree program at Portland State University and his P3 Cycles company stabilized, Duco began to research a new kind of bike company. He spent many days and weeks combing through Instagram and YouTube to learn what people wanted in a new bike (he gave a shout-out of inspiration from former Portlander Russ Roca at Path Less Pedaled) — and what they wanted from a bike company. “That’s when I started to gather all these ideas and putting them together under this brand called Primos,” he recalled.

Cortes visited Duco in 2023, and after spending a weekend in Portland, went home and gushed about it to his wife. “I love bicycles, and I bike a lot,” Cortes shared with me, recounting a conversation he had with his wife. “I thought, maybe this is an opportunity to follow our dreams to finally have this bicycle brand,” he told her. She was up for the adventure and, with their two young daughters, decided to make the move.

Cortes moved to Portland in March 2024 and by then, he and Duco were working on Primos in earnest.

In Primos (which means “cousins” in Spanish) Duco saw an opportunity to build a bike brand a different way. With P3 he doesn’t do any design or development. He just selects parts and colors from a catalog and then the bikes are shipped from a factory in China. That process nagged at him, and left him wanting more personal investment in his bikes and business. So Duco enrolled in a bike design and frame building school in Spain. “That’s where I really learned what a bike is all about,” he recalled. With his new understanding of materials, geometry, welding, and the craft of bicycle making, Duco made several trips to suppliers in Taiwan and China where he applied his knowledge into what would eventually become Primos’ initial offering, the “Dame” — a $799 all-road bike. (“Dame” can be interpreted a number of ways. It means “give me” in Spanish, refers to a lady in French and English, and is also the name of a restaurant near Duco’s house.)

“We really wanted to make something affordable. We know people just want to ride a good bicycle with good components, and that is fun!” Cortes said. And judging by a host of recent reviews of the Dame on YouTube, he and Duco have accomplished that goal.

How? Duco says he went through the bike, part-by-part, to find where he could spend a little more for a big return. Things like double-butted spokes for nicer wheels, compressionless housing on mechanical disc brakes (for a much better braking feel than standard housing, an idea he got from a YouTuber named The Bike Sauce), a solid Microshift Sword drivetrain (considered a budget version of Shimano GRX), thru-axles (instead of quick releases), and so on.

The result is a bike that’s turning heads online and off.

Something Cycles on East Burnside was the first shop to carry the brand (Duco says the pricing doesn’t leave much room for a shop margin, but they’re working on that). Owner Nicholas Sorenson sells mostly reconditioned, vintage mountain bikes. “And as far as the Dame goes,” Sorenson shared with me yesterday. “I don’t think there is a better value bike on the market. With all the modern features like a 1x drivetrain, thru axles, and flat mount disc brakes, it allows the rider to easily upgrade the bike down the road if they choose to do so.”

And just like Cortes and Duco, the branding behind Primos doesn’t take itself too seriously. The word means “cousin” in Spanish, “So that’s the spirit,” Duco says, “Let’s ride together in a non-competitive way. Let’s ride with families and have fun and remember those times when you were just riding bikes with your cousin like I did when I was a kid.”

For Cortes and Duco, Primos is a brand that breaks the mold in another important way: “One of the big criticisms I hear about in the bike industry is that it’s a lot of bikes made by white guys for white guys. So the idea with Primos was to build a brand that would be appealing to more communities and more colors.”

Cortes said he was nervous when the business first launched. “I was like, ‘Oh, maybe because we’re Latino people won’t respect us as business owners’,” he shared. “But now I feel really proud of that and many people support us for that reason.”

From what I’ve learned about Primos, people support it for many reasons. Right now, Duco and Cortes are riding a wave of interest that shows no signs of slowing down.

“We are really proud to be in this community and my family is so happy here,” Cortes shared. “We just want to contribute and do something great. That’s what we are chasing right now.”

PrimosCycles.com

PBOT bike survey kicked out some respondents after reaching demographics quota

Screenshots from PBOT survey.

Usually when a government agency puts out a survey, they want as many responses as possible. That’s why my eyebrows raised a bit when I heard from someone who took a recent Portland Bureau of Transportation survey and told me they weren’t allowed to complete it.

The survey was sent out in a PBOT Safe Routes to School email on March 4th. “Portland is known as a bike-friendly city, but do Portlanders feel the same way?” the blurb with a link to the survey read. “PBOT wants to know what you think about bicycling, whether you currently bike or not.” Responses to the short survey would help inform future planning and community engagement and it was billed by PBOT as an “important research project”. 

“I attempted to take the survey,” shared reader Matt S. in an email to BikePortland yesterday. “And after completing several pages of it, I was informed that, ‘Sorry, we’ve already received enough responses from participants with demographics that match yours’ and was kicked out of the survey.” Matt said he was “gobsmacked” at what he felt was “outrageous, egregious, anti-democratic conduct” by PBOT and its partner on the survey, NW Opinions.

I noted others who posted on the BikeLoud PDX Slack that they received the same message. “Apparently they’ve heard enough from young hispanic men in District 4,” wrote one person who got the same message as Matt. “District 3 filled up too,” and “I guess too many middle-aged cis women in District 4,” wrote other respondents who were also kicked out of the survey before being able to complete it. 

When I posted about this on Instagram, one person seemed to support the tactic. “This is amazing!!! Great to see PBOT being more hardcore about better representation.”

To understand more about what was going on, I reached out to PBOT.

PBOT Communications Director Hannah Schafer said the survey’s goal is to assess Portlanders’ bicycling behavior and attitudes and the agency is, “specifically working to identify the conditions that would encourage people to bike more.” Schafer explained that the survey is being conducted on two tracks: the “scientific track” and the “civic engagement track”. Here’s more form Schafer:

“The scientific track proactively targets a sample population with representative demographics to help ensure that it is obtaining a representative sample of Portlanders. That track is tightly controlled by the pollsters and will also include statistical weighting at the back-end to ensure statistical representation. The civic engagement track – which is the survey people are taking and are concerned about – will help bolster the data that will be received from the scientific track.”

So why kick some respondents out? Schafer says the pollsters didn’t expect such a robust response and wanted to reach only people who don’t already consider themselves enthusiastic cyclists. “However, because the pollsters are seeing great interest in the survey and surmise that many of the people responding are both active and passionate about bicycling, they have since modified the survey to allow everybody to take it – even if it overloads certain demographics.”

“That feedback is likely to provide detailed information about the subgroup of Portlanders who identify as people who bike, rather than serve to directly augment data from the scientific track,” Schafer added. “Both approaches have value, and the high number of responses received on the civic engagement track indicates its utility is more in better understanding that sub-group.”

Schafer says people who were initially turned away should be able to take the survey now. “We are so grateful for the tremendous response.”

Take the survey here. It’s up until tomorrow (March 7th).

Podcast: River City Bicycles Owner Dave Guettler

30 years ago this week Dave Guettler opened the doors of River City Bicycles. The iconic shop on Southeast Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd and Alder near the Morrison Bridge is beloved locally and revered nationally as one of the best bike shops in America. Given immense changes in the cycling industry, the culture of Portland, and small business in general since 1995; running a bike shop that still thrives after 30 years is an incredible accomplishment.

Yesterday I sat down with Guettler to learn more about him and the shop he’s tended to with so much love and care for the past three decades.

Dave Guettler in the Shed on March 4th, 2025. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

I learned during this conversation that Guettler had a successful chain of seven stores in northern California before he moved to Portland. So why come up here?

“I had tons of friends who were bike racers… I’d see all these cool bikes and all this cool stuff that they had that they didn’t buy from any of our shops. And it would just kind of break my heart. On the one hand, I was doing all the purchasing for these stores; but on the other hand, there really wasn’t anything that I would have wanted to buy for myself. So I was thinking, ‘There’s got to be a different way of doing things.’ So the concept of opening up a single store that had a very strong community tie-in with it, and that catered to more of an enthusiast type cyclist — to me, that just seemed like a lot more fun than the multi stores and just kind of doing things by the book.”

With Specialized Bicycles founder Mike Sinyard in his corner as a friend and financial backer (Sinyard gave him a significant line of credit to open the shop), the two hopped in a car after a breakfast in Portland in 1994 to look at a few buildings Guettler was thinking about for the shop. “And he saw the one on Martin Luther King, and goes, ‘That’s, that’s the one.'”

Guettler said opening a shop in Portland in 1995 was a big “leap of faith.” The city hadn’t yet embraced its perennial title as America’s Best Cycling City and Guettler worried about how much rain would dampen enthusiasm. But it didn’t take long for Guettler to see the light:

“When you do business plan, you do three: a best-case scenario, worst -case scenario, and a likely or hopeful scenario. And within six months or eight months, we had blown the doors off of the best-case scenario business plan. So we really did kind of hit the ground running, and that was incredibly exciting. Compared to what we were doing in the Bay Area all the sudden it was like, ‘Holy cow! This is a solid market.'”

Guettler was ready for our inclement weather in more ways than one. He dedicated an entire floor of the building to an indoor test track so customers could stay dry while riding any bike on the showroom floor. He also made sure his shop became a go-to for fenders and other wet weather accessories and apparel. He even crafted a line wooden fenders for several years (which he co-designed with an employee). Guettler is a dedicated woodworker who made all the shop’s signs, racks and furnishings; but his wooden fenders ended up being too popular for their own good.

“That was super fun. Never want to do it again, but it was very fun,” Guettler shared.

“You’re not selling them anymore?” I interjected.

“No, I burned the molds. I had an order for 700 pairs of fenders come in from this company called Dahon folding bikes. And it broke me. They ordered matching fenders and chain guards. We filled the order, and that was it,” he recalled.

Despite that grueling order for Dahon, Guettler, now 67 and still recovering from a very serious traffic collision in 2023, still puts in hours at the shop. “My favorite day is Saturday,” he said with a childlike smile. “That’s when I get to work on on the floor at a bike shop, the bike shop of my dreams.”

These are just some of the fun moments in the interview. Watch the whole thing on YouTube or listen in the player below or wherever you get your podcasts.


River City Bicycles 30th Anniversary Party
Saturday, March 8th from 3:00 to 5:00 pm
706 SE Martin Luther King Jr Blvd

“Join us for cake, champagne, stories, music from our own DJ TWOBIT, and a few odd surprises. Everyone’s invited! We can’t wait to see all of our old and new friends and fam!” Cake and champagne toast at 4:00 pm.

Guest Opinion: Modal filters are cheaper and work better than speed bumps

These modal filters on NW Flanders through the North Park Blocks block car users from accessing the greenway. (Photos: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

By northeast Portland resident and bike bus leader, Sam Balto.

Portland prides itself on being a leader in biking and sustainable transportation, yet the city’s approach to traffic calming on our Neighborhood Greenways is both outdated and unnecessarily expensive. The Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) continues to rely heavily on speed bumps to slow down drivers when a more effective, affordable, and bike-friendly solution exists: modal filters (a.k.a. diverters).

For years, PBOT has installed speed bumps along our greenways in an attempt to reduce cut-through driving and keep speeds below 20 mph. But speed bumps don’t solve the core problem—cars still dominate streets that are supposed to prioritize biking and walking. Worse yet, speed bumps don’t actually prevent drivers from using greenways as shortcuts. Instead, they just make the experience mildly more annoying, often leading to aggressive driving between bumps.

Meanwhile, speed bumps cost taxpayers around $3,500–$7,000 each. A series of them along a stretch of greenway can easily add up to $50,000 to $100,000. That’s money spent on a solution that doesn’t address the root issue.

Modal filters, on the other hand, are a cost-effective way to truly prioritize greenways for people biking and walking. By restricting through traffic at key intersections, modal filters reduce the number of cars using greenways in the first place. They don’t just slow drivers down; they eliminate the need for most of them to be there at all. A simple concrete planter or curb modal filter costs a fraction of what PBOT spends on multiple speed bumps, while achieving a greater safety impact.

This has been playing out in my neighborhood of Beaumont-Wilshire where PBOT recently installed 11 speed bumps at a cost of over $50,000 on NE 37th between Fremont and Prescott instead of a modal filter which was presented to the neighborhood association board members before the project. To top it off, the issue on NE 37th is too many drivers, not too many people speeding. So why did PBOT choose the more expensive option? In conversation with PBOT staff, the modal filter was removed based on neighborhood association feedback.

PBOT has a chance to not repeat the same mistake. Since PBOT delayed the implementation of Mason/Skidmore Neighborhood Greenway Project until this summer, the agency could opt to forgo building five expensive speed bumps on NE Skidmore between 37th and 42nd (which sees 85th percentile speeds at 21 & 23 mph) and instead implement the modal filter design at NE 37th and NE Skidmore. This would help PBOT meet its own guidelines by reducing peak-hour traffic counts and create a more bike-bus friendly neighborhood greenway for two nearby schools. The modal filter should cost about $10,000 (even less without drawn-out neighborhood association meetings which eat up city budgets), instead of up to $35,000 for speed bumps.

Modal filters on SE Clinton installed in 2016.

The proof is in the numbers. When PBOT installed modal filters on SE Clinton Street in 2016, it resulted in a reduction of 35-75% of annual car trips on the greenway. The decrease in drivers was so significant that most bicycle users gushed about the improvement to the street. Compare that to streets with speed bumps, where car volumes remain a persistent issue.

It’s time for PBOT to stop spending more for less. This is especially important given their ongoing budget crisis, which will not slow down in the coming years. Modal filters aren’t just a better solution—they’re the fiscally responsible one.

— Sam Balto

Proposed rules would expand e-bike access on Oregon State Park roads, trails and beaches

A couple and their dog ride e-bikes on the beach near Netarts Bay. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

The Oregon Parks and Recreation Department (OPRD) has proposed new rules that would govern how electric-assisted bicycles (e-bikes) can legally be operated on State Park properties and on the Oregon Coast. The draft rules vastly improve e-bike access, bringing them more in line with rules for traditional, non-motorized bicycles.

Rules that govern e-bikes in parks and beaches have not kept up with the booming popularity and accessibility of a wide array of motorized bicycles. Currently, e-bikes are allowed on OPRD trails over eight feet wide and on the ocean shore where driving on the beach by car users is allowed. However, “With the popularity of e-assisted bike recreation increasing, the agency is finding that current rules do not clearly accommodate growing need and cause confusion among all visitors,” reads a February 25th 2025 memo to the Oregon Parks and Recreation Commission.

A bill passed by the Oregon Legislature last year (that went into effect January 1, 2025) finally gave OPRD a clear definition of what qualifies as an e-bike and paved the way for new rules that would give park managers and rangers more clarity on how to regulate them. The bill (HB 4103) split e-bikes into three classes and put limits on the power output of the motor (1,000 watts max) and top speed (20 mph).

OPRD launched a formal rulemaking effort in June 2024 and an advisory committee met four times last fall. In addition to the formal advisory body, OPRD received nearly 4,000 public comments last summer on the issue of e-bike use.

Below is a summary of the proposed rule changes:

  • “E-assisted bicycles” will be regulated in the same category as what OPRD refers to as “Other power-driven mobility devices” or OPDMD. These include golf carts, personal mobility devices, Segway products, “or any mobility device designed to operate in areas without defined pedestrian routes, but that is not a wheelchair.”
  • Any area currently open to pedestrian and bicycle use will also be open to e-bikes, “unless there is a legitimate safety reason that the [device] cannot be accommodated.” And those “reasons” are also detailed in the proposed rules.
  • E-bikes would be permitted on any road or trail within a State Park property except where specifically prohibited, “as determined by the District Manager, based on an evaluation of factors related to the use of these devices including, but not limited to, the degree of conflict with other users, public safety, or damage to park resources.”
  • Any electric-assisted bicycles that do not meet the statutory definition (ORS 801.258), or that have been “modified out of the classification criteria” will be considered “motor vehicles” and will be allowed only where motor vehicles are allowed.
  • The previous rule said e-bikes could only be used on beaches where it’s legal to drive a car (four segments along the entire coast). The proposed rules widen access for e-bikes to all state recreation areas as long as riders stay on wet sand and as long it’s not specifically prohibited by a local district manager.

“The proposed rules balance access to public lands for diverse recreation options while protecting the state’s resources and existing recreation opportunities,” OPRD said in a memo. “Implementation of any changes will require more than rule enforcement and the agency is prepared to commit to an extensive education and outreach campaign.”

OPRD is seeing public comments on these proposed rules now through April 1st. You can submit comments via the rules website or you can attend a virtual public hearing on March 17th or 26th. Once the public comment period ends, any new updates will go to the Parks and Recreation Commission in April or June for possible final adoption. Once that happens, the new rules would be implemented in July once the agency has changed signages and maps.

Tesla Takedown protest draws large crowd (video)

Protestors lined the street in front of a Tesla showroom on S Macadam Saturday. (Photo: Elianna Gnoffo/BikePortland)

There was a large contingent of folks at Saturday’s “Tesla Takedown” protest who arrived by bike. A group met before the event in southeast Portland to make signs and then rode together to the Tesla showroom on South Macadam Street.

Portlander Elianna Gnoffo grabbed footage of the event for me and I saw several familiar faces in the crowd. Gnoffo reported seeing Portland City Councilor Mitch Green among the 100 or so attendees. Protesters lined the street and received lots of support from drivers passing by.

Below is a short video from the event:

Protests take place at this same location every Monday afternoon starting around 4:00 pm. More information here.

Monday Roundup: Flaneurs, ODOT’s error, speed cameras, and more

Welcome to the week. Here are the most notable news items our community has come across in the past seven days…

Concern trolling tolling: When the Trump Administration says congestion pricing is “elitist” they’re not considering the fact that the revenue goes directly to helping low-income people who rely on public transit. (Vox)

A speed camera option: Gotta’ love it when the head of a driver lobbying group realizes his hatred of speed enforcement cameras leads him to support safer street designs. Sounds good to me! (Route Fifty)

Silver bullet for streets: The more data that comes out of Manhattan since congestion pricing began, the more it seems like a silver bullet for many urban ills, and the more the Trump Administration looks completely out of touch with reality. In this example, we learn that Manhattan’s economy has been humming with fewer drivers on the roads. (Streetsblog NYC)

City budget: On Friday, Portland’s city administrator launched the opening salvo in what will be a very strained conversation about the budget. (OPB)

Tariffs are good, actually?: Just kidding. But I’ll be very interested to see what happens to the vehicle choice decision-making process when/if cars get much more expensive then they already are. (Bloomberg)

ODOT cannot be trusted: The latest example of how ODOT governance is broken and the agency should not be trusted in its current form is a one billion accounting mistake. (Willamette Week)

Walking and talking: As a flaneur and lover of chance public encounters, it’s a bummer to me that folks don’t hang out and chat on city sidewalks as much as they used to. Sidewalks are third spaces and not immune to broad societal shifts that have made folks less likely to linger. (Bloomberg)


Thanks to everyone who sent in links this week. The Monday Roundup is a community effort, so please feel free to send us any great stories you come across.

West End Bikes closure leave a bike shop desert in downtown Portland

West End Bikes on SW Washington in December. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

Owners of a major bike shop in downtown Portland are throwing in the towel. West End Bikes has announced a closing sale after 14 years in business. The shop opened with a bang in 2011 on the corner of SW Harvey Milk and 11th (just one block south of Burnside). Co-owners Mark Ontiveros and Mike France stocked the “palatial” showroom with high-end bikes and had the backing of Specialized Bicycles, one of the largest brands in the industry.

West End offered a wide selection of bikes, apparel, and parts; but was known for its selection of high-end road bikes from brands like Wilier, Pinarello, and locally-based Sage Cycles. Ontiveros, who worked as head apparel buyer at River City Bicycles from 1995 until he left to team up with France, filled the shop with top clothing brands like Outlier, Assos, and Velocio.

Former co-owner Mark Ontiveros (left) and current co-owner Mike France (right) in January, 2011. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

In 2022, the shop moved to a smaller location on SW Washington Street when the historic building it was located in underwent major renovations. Around that same time, original co-owner Ontiveros sold his shares in the business (he’s now working at Lakeside Bicycles in Lake Oswego) and France brought in another co-owner.

In a post on Instagram, West End wrote, “After 14 years of following our passion, the time has come to slow the roll.” France added in a comment that he’s been planning to retire this year for a while.

The closure of West End Bikes leaves a vast swath of the central city without a major bike shop. The Trek Portland store moved from SW 10th and Salmon to the Nob Hill/Slabtown neighborhood last year. Once West End is gone, there will be a bike shop desert across downtown for 1.7 miles between NW Raleigh and 20th all the way to the Portland State University Bike Hub at SW Harrison and 6th.

I’ve asked West End Bikes owners if they’d like to share a statement about the closure and will update this post when I hear back.

The shop is having a closing sale with discounts on all bikes and products. More info here.

From cars to cargo bikes: City seeks ‘micro delivery hubs’ in city-owned parking garages

An electric cargo trike awaits its next load at a B-Line Urban Delivery warehouse in southeast Portland. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

The City of Portland has taken a step toward decarbonizing its freight system. The Portland Bureau of Transportation wants to turn downtown parking garages into cargo hubs where electric bikes and other small vehicles would load up with goods and deliver them to customers nearby.

PBOT issued a request for information (RFI) last month for their “Micro-Delivery Hub Pilot in a City-Owned Parking Garage” project. It’s the latest extension of Portland’s effort to eliminate toxic emissions, improve street safety, and create a more vibrant, human-centered city by reducing the number of large delivery trucks in dense, commercial areas.

“This is a unique opportunity to explore the feasibility of repurposing space in a parking garage… Their relatively small footprint lends them to be well suited for the transfer of deliveries from a larger vehicle to a smaller vehicle, such as an e-cargo bike, that is better suited for short distance deliveries in a dense urban contexts,” reads the RFI.

PBOT owns and operates five “SmartPark” garages downtown. The pilot would utilize three of them, including locations at NW Naito Parkway and Davis, SW 10th and Yamhill, and SW 3rd and Alder.

PBOT has been dreaming of small delivery hubs full of e-bikes since at least 2021 when the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability first floated the concept to the Old Town Community Association. Since then the bureau has adopted the 2040 Portland Freight Plan, which prioritizes testing of “novel interventions” like micro-delivery hubs.

The idea is that these hubs would be tiny logistics facilities for private companies. Larger vehicles would transfer goods to smaller vehicles, like e-cargo bikes, for the last-mile delivery. Microhubs are already in use in New York City and the concept has worked in Paris and London. And PBOT isn’t new to this space. In 2023 they won a federal grant to establish a zero emission delivery zone. That project uses digital tools to monitor curbside traffic and sets aside several loading zones downtown where only zero emissions vehicles can operate.

Through this RFI, PBOT hopes to find local companies who see the potential of repurposing the valuable location of SmartPark garages. At the top of the list is B-Line PDX, a business founded in 2009 that owns and operates a fleet of electric cargo trikes and boasts dozens of clients who depend on Portland’s bike lanes to get their products to market. Other possible partners would be coffee roasters, bakeries, restaurant suppliers, and so on.

In the MicroDelivery Hub Feasibility Study published by the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability late last year, the city said, “To ensure their effectiveness, these hubs should be located near a well-integrated city bike network. This integration allows cargo bike riders to efficiently navigate the city after collecting deliveries from the hub.” PBOT is also exploring possible zoning code and other regulatory changes (such as reducing space for off-street vehicle loading if developers create space for cargo bike loading and parking) to facilitate the hubs.

“Portland is laying the groundwork for a future where sustainable deliveries thrive, emissions are reduced, and the urban fabric is safe and walkable,” the feasibility study states.

The RFI won’t issue any contracts, PBOT is simply probing interest at this point. View the bid solicitation here.

Bike ride planned to ‘Tesla Takedown’ this Saturday

A Tesla and a Tern EV parked at the Adidas North American headquarters in north Portland. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

This Saturday, March 1st, Portland will join 74 other cities in a protest against Tesla, the company owned by Elon Musk. And of course someone has organized a group ride to the event.

Musk has become a lightning rod of controversy since President Donald Trump took over the presidency last month. As an unelected member of Trump’s inner circle, Musk has haphazardly slashed workforces at government agencies, throwing thousands of lives into disarray. His motivations and actions have been based o personal grudges and business interests. Musk also made a Nazi salute at an event in January, then brushed it off as if it were just a joke.

“The news is pretty grim these days. If Congress won’t act, how can anyone stop a hostile government takeover by Nazis?” reads the Ride to Tesla Takedown Protest event description. “#TeslaTakedown is a grassroots, leaderless movement to take down Elon Musk’s greatest source of wealth: his over-inflated car company.”

Organizers behind Tesla Takedown say 74 cities across America have signed up to participate. The plan is to meet up and make signs, then ride to a Tesla dealership to discourage new customers, implore existing owners to sell their Teslas, and to dump stock in the company.

“If you know of someone who owns a Tesla, encourage them to sell it and trade up for an E-Bike or Electric Cargo Bike (or one of the many other better EV’s on the market!” organizers of Saturday’s event say.

The ride will meet at 9:00 am at Floyd’s Coffee in Ladd Circle, then ride to the Tesla showroom on South Macadam. More details on the Shift calendar.

Portland ecologist mixes passion for plants, pollinators, and pedaling

A 2024 planting site. (Photos: Kim Brown/Portland Beecycle)

Parking strips next to sidewalks planted with nothing but grass are like wide roads intended solely for cars: They serve a purpose, but they hurt the planet and could be doing much more to make our city great.

To Portlander Kim Brown — an ecologist, master melittologist (study of bees) with the Oregon Bee Atlas and secretary of the Native Plant Society of Oregon — those strips of grass are a canvas waiting to be painted with native plants. And those roads? Well, that ecosystem also needs a wider mix of vehicles, preferably bicycles.

Brown is the woman behind Portland Beecycle, an annual event that brings together plants and pedalers to help pollinate parking strips citywide. Last month she put out a call for homeowners who’d welcome a re-planting of their front yard strips. When I saw the announcement and realized the work would be done by folks who arrive by bike, I had to learn more.

Event organizer Kim Brown.

“Beecycle is about creating beautiful, accessible spaces in our urban areas that benefit wildlife and the community,” Brown shared in an email to BikePortland this week. She said her inspiration to organize the events comes from three places: to create more native plant areas in neighborhoods; to improve conditions for pollinators, birds, and other wild things; and to help bring a beautiful garden to someone in need.

“We have amazing access to park spaces in Portland, but many people do not actually interact with these areas on a daily basis,” Brown shared. “For many, our daily interaction with nature is our neighbors yards and street strips.”

Brown first got her shovel dirty working with Portland nonprofit Friends of Trees, who’s been doing tree plantings-by-bike for many years. Planting a successful garden is a bit more complicated than planting one tree, so Brown has partnered with the Oregon Native Plant Society and Twinflower Natives, Portland State University’s Rae Selling Berry Seed Bank, and Friends of Backyard Habitat to make her plantings possible.

Each year she seeks out homeowners who apply to have their strip planted. Brown then selects 2-3 homes, makes sure the location is safe for a few dozen cyclists to work at, develops a plant list and garden design, then fundraises for seeds, plants and other supplies.

She’s organized successful rides since 2023. They take place in middle to late September, to make sure the plantings don’t get baked in the summer sun. Riders meet at a park, then ride to the planting locations, then grab a bite to eat nearby.

The event has grown to include hundreds of plants and related supplies. This year, Brown hopes to transport everything by bike, so she’s hoping folks with cargo bikes will join the ranks.

If you’re interested in taking part, follow @PortlandBeecycle on Instagram and stay tuned for updates about the 2025 ride.