Why Juan Carlos González cares so much about Tualatin Valley Highway (Video)

Metro Councilor Juan Carlos González picked up trash along T-V Hwy Saturday morning. (Photos/video: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

Metro Councilor Juan Carlos González could be the first elected official in our region to cut the ribbon on a major transportation project that will improve a bus line he rode on as a very small child. And if it all goes according to plan, he might even be Metro President when it happens.

González announced his campaign for president last week. On Saturday morning he was at a Home Depot parking lot in Hillsboro playing host to a crowd of several dozen people at an annual cleanup event he organizes. Wearing an orange safety vest and standing next to Hillsboro Mayor Beach Pace, González addressed the crowd above the whir of highway traffic to tell a story he’d never shared in public before. The story helped explain why the Tualatin Valley Highway transit project has become such a passion project for him since he became the first Mexican-American elected to Metro Council in 2018.

“I grew up on T-V Highway. I was born in Forest Grove,” he began. “When I was growing up, I remember one day — I was like, three or four years old — we went to a little toy store on the bus with my Aunt Tonya and I grabbed a little toy and I put it in my pocket. Then when we got home, and I was playing with it, my tia [aunt in Spanish], was like, ‘Where did you get it?’… She was like, ‘No sir!’ and she grabbed my hand. And I remember, like the shame of little kid, right? Getting on that bus again with my little toy and she made me go back into the store and be like, ‘I’m sorry I took this.’

That’s one of my first memories of being on a bus, and that was on line 57.”

González might get to repeat that story when the TV Highway transit project breaks ground. While that’s years away, he and a broad coalition of supporterx have already made solid progress. Five different jurisdictions — Metro, TriMet, Washington County, and the cities of Beaverton, Hillsboro, Cornelius, and Forest Grove — agreed on a locally preferred alternative (LPA) for the project back in May (a political “miracle,” according to González). That’s a key step that unlocks the potential of the big federal grants the estimated $300 million project might need. $30 million has been raised so far and the design process is moving forward.

The project will focus mostly on creating a bus rapid transit system on 17 miles of T-V Hwy (also known as State Highway 8) between Beaverton and Forest Grove. Despite the highway having a horrific record of traffic deaths and injuries, it still ranks as the fifth busiest bus route in the region. 45% of its riders are from Hillsboro, and that’s partly why Hillsboro Mayor Beach Pace spent part of her Saturday picking up trash.

“We’re working to make the bus service better — with better stops and shelters and lighting and seating — to make it more easy to use,” Mayor Pace shared with my in a short interview. “And frankly,” she added, “with more dignity, so you’re not standing next to a pole in the rain.”

The service planned for Line 57 will be similar to TriMet’s FX service between downtown and Gresham along SE Division. 12 minute service intervals are in the plans, along with longer buses, and many road safety upgrades so that more people can safely hop on and off. The changes should make bus trips along the corridor 15-20% faster.

Mayor Pace sees better bus service as an anti-poverty tool. “Many Line 57 riders have lower incomes and they don’t have the option to drive,” she said. “This project will uplift the mobility of these riders, and it will provide a more dignified experience for all of them.”

One in four intersections along the 17-mile project scope will be completely rebuilt as part of the project — including the one just yards from where volunteers gathered Saturday morning at the corner of TV Hwy and SE Minter Bridge Road. About 300 people get on an off at that stop every day, and when their feet hit the skinny chunk of concrete around the stop, they’re on an island surrounded by freight rail tracks and 11 lanes of fast-moving traffic

30% of T-V Hwy doesn’t have sidewalks, and half of the people who were killed while using it were within a few feet of a transit stop. Councilor González repeated those stats at every opportunity on Saturday. “There’s so much need, and it’s the backbone of my district,” he added. As volunteer crews fanned out along the highway, González worked among them, stabbing bits of trash with a picker and sticking them into a large plastic trash bag. “This corridor has lacked investment for a really long time,” he told me. “We need funding.”

Just last month, Gonzalez and the Metro Council agreed to allocate $28 million in bond funding in hopes of unlocking larger, federal transit grants. But with federal funding uncertain in the Trump era, more local sources are more important than ever. An early version of the statewide transportation package would have directed investment toward T-V Hwy, but that’s since been cut out of the highly compromised bill currently awaiting passage in the legislature.

González lamented that missed opportunity. “I’ve been talking with legislators about the leadership we need from the state and Salem. Frankly, we’re not where we need to be,” he said. “And the sad thing is that there are T-V highways everywhere in the region where people can’t walk, let alone bike safely. That’s a huge problem. That’s not the kind of region I think we should be.”

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
 
 
8 hours ago

Love it when I see an article about the westside here! The westside of the metro area has roughly half the metro’s population, but it gets almost no coverage in outlets like this.
That’s not a knock on Jonathan; it’s obviously easier to cover the place where you actually live. I would love to see more frequent westside coverage as well.

For eastsiders: the westside contains (among many other virtues) the best food in the metro area and the best nature parks in the area. As well some of the actual best bike connectivity in the area: take advantage of the many well-planned off-street connections between low-traffic streets to avoid the major roads. Come visit out here and challenge your stereotypes of a place you don’t go often; you won’t regret it 🙂

As to the topic of the article at hand, TV Highway is our version of Lombard: a high-trafficroute that absolutely needs safe bicycling and and walking infrastructure, but currently only has the absolute bare minimum of narrow bike lanes and sidewalks on one side. The road needs a ton of work to become an actual destination. Some areas have great alternate routes for biking (Alexander Street in particular is a great one from 209th to 170th, or Blanton Street from Brookwood to 160th), but other areas have no such luck. I’d love to see the first round of improvement happen in these areas with no feasible alternate routes, in particular from 160th to Broadway in Beaverton. This particular section is extremely scary when not in a car and there’s no way around it.

dw
dw
6 hours ago
Reply to   

the best food in the metro area

Going to have to agree to disagree there 🙂

best nature parks

Mt. Tabor, Kelly Butte, Powell Butte, Smith & Bybee Wetland, and Oaks Bottom have entered the chat.

well-planned off-street connections between low-traffic streets

My experience has been 50/50. The westside trail is theoretically nice, but much too windy, narrow, and barely connects to anything. Cycling there feels like a big faux-paus. There are sections near the MAX line that are pretty nice though.

absolutely needs safe bicycling and and walking infrastructure, but currently only has the absolute bare minimum of narrow bike lanes and sidewalks on one side.

Absolutely agree there. I have friends that live just off TV highway and I’m always struck by the contrast between the pleasant neighborhoods and the highway itself. Because of the disconnected street grids within neighborhoods, you’re pretty much always forced to reckon with the highway at some point when walking or biking. It’s a classic stroad situation – the road surface is designed exclusively to move cars at high speeds, but the surrounding land use varies widely from empty space to shopping centers, to dense apartment complexes. It definitely needs a major facelift and reconfiguration.

 
 
5 hours ago
Reply to  dw

Mt. Tabor, Kelly Butte, Powell Butte, Smith & Bybee Wetland, and Oaks Bottom have entered the chat.

Cooper Mountain, THNP, Tryon Creek, Chehalem Ridge, Forest Park, Washington Park, the Fanno Creek Greenway, THNWR, and others have entered the chat 🙂 One of the best things about the Portland metro is just how many good nature parks there are!

My experience has been 50/50. The westside trail is theoretically nice, but much too windy, narrow, and barely connects to anything. Cycling there feels like a big faux-paus. There are sections near the MAX line that are pretty nice though.

100%; certainly nowhere close to done! But, well, as I’m sure we both know, there’s almost nowhere in the Portland area where the network is close to done. I’m more thinking the tiny connectors like the one between Millikan and Lombard that are absolutely key to the connectivity of the area.

Absolutely agree there. I have friends that live just off TV highway and I’m always struck by the contrast between the pleasant neighborhoods and the highway itself. Because of the disconnected street grids within neighborhoods, you’re pretty much always forced to reckon with the highway at some point when walking or biking. It’s a classic stroad situation – the road surface is designed exclusively to move cars at high speeds, but the surrounding land use varies widely from empty space to shopping centers, to dense apartment complexes. It definitely needs a major facelift and reconfiguration.

I think one of the biggest impediments here is the active railroad along the south side of the highway. It’s not the highest-volume rail line (nowhere near as bad as the one blocking 11th for instance), but it still makes it super hard to develop anything resembling walkability along the immediate south side of the corridor. And I don’t know of any good ways to fix this issue in the near term…

J1mb0
J1mb0
3 minutes ago
Reply to   

I want to bike commute through here to my work using Blanton and Alexander, but crossing 185th and 198th have deterred me. Frogger across 5 lanes of heavy traffic moving at high speeds in an area with low ridership…

dw
dw
6 hours ago

I think it’s good that Councilor Carlos-Garcia has a vision for this corridor. The Westside has a long way to go but improving transit and walking on these highways will make a huge difference.

I’d like to see a more comprehensive plan for bus improvements throughout the region, similar to Seattle’s RapidRide system. FX2 took like a decade to get up and running, 82nd FX won’t run until 2030 at the earliest, and even if the TV highway improvement gets funding, I suspect it won’t happen until the mid-2030’s. Wouldn’t it make more sense to get and keep all the staff and expertise to convert important bus lines to FX2-style service? Like, instead of starting from scratch on each project. Cesar Chavez, MLK, Sandy Blvd, and the 20 bus route would could all use those improvements.

Fred
Fred
5 hours ago
Reply to  dw

Bus service west of the river is pretty terrible, IMO. All of the best bus service is east of the river, maybe for political reasons?

dw
dw
4 hours ago
Reply to  Fred

I think probably more for historical/density reasons. Most Eastside neighborhoods were developed around streetcar lines so it follows that buses would run there. Not to say that the west side doesn’t deserve bus service – it absolutely does. If you could choose, say, a half dozen west side bus lines or corridors to upgrade to frequent service, which would they be?

 
 
2 hours ago
Reply to  dw

I can’t speak for Fred, but we currently have frequent-service on:

Cornell (48)TV Highway (57)BHH (54)Barbur (12)Hall (76)Burnside/Barnes (20)I would love to have frequent service, and I think it would work, on at least the following:

52 (185th)62 (Murray)67 (158th/Bethany)44 (Capitol)