Rolling along the Sandy River outside Troutdale. (Photos: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
To create a world-class regional bicycle network, you need to get everyone on the same page to push for projects, plans, and the funding to make it all happen. That’s difficult to do in conference rooms and Zoom meetings. But put folks on bicycles on a beautiful day and magic things materialize. That’s the idea behind the Policymakers Ride, a tradition in our area that technically began in 2005, but really found its footing in 2006.
This year’s edition of the ride was a survey of east Multnomah County. We rode 20 miles from Level Beer at NE 148th and Marine Drive, along the Sandy River to Troutdale, and then back via the Columbia Slough and a spate of sidewalks and bikeways back to our starting point.
I’ll have a more thorough recap and a video on Monday; but for now, have a look at the photos to get a sense of what we experienced. It was definitely a mixed bag: from terribly narrow bike lanes and white-knuckle sections of Marine Drive, to blissful paths next to natural areas. Highlights for me were pedaling for the first time on the (relatively) new Cha’k Cha’k Trail along the Columbia River — and being among the first cyclists to roll on the not-yet-open new bike path and park along the Sandy River in Troutdale.
Screenshot of Tilikum Bridge from TriMet video footage around 8:40 am on August 29th, 2025. Watch the video below.
Is there any place in Portland drivers won’t go? Seems like every week there’s another example of a person taking their car in a place cars aren’t allowed. Parks, paths, peoples’ living rooms — and now the Tilikum Crossing. We spent $130 million to make this one of the coolest carfree bridges in the country, and it’s been a big success for bus and rail ridership, in addition to being a lifeline for bicycling and walking. So when I heard about this incident of a man speeding across it, I was shocked; but unfortunately, not surprised.
It happened around 8:40 am on Friday, August 29th. The first reports I received were from people participating in Breakfast on the Bridges, a monthly event where folks hand out free coffee and donuts on downtown bridges to anyone who rolls by. My friend Shawne Martinez (who you can see biking with his young daughter as the driver flies past in the video below) was first to post about it on the Bike Loud Slack channel. “Did anyone catch that car driver going 80 mph over the Tilikum Crossing at Breakfast on the Bridges this morning?” he wrote. “My daughter and I had just crossed the carfree street at the light seconds before.”
Sometimes drivers get confused and make mistakes. That happens. This doesn’t look like that type of situation. It’s very obvious that cars aren’t allowed on this bridge, and judging by the way he was driving, it looks like he did this on purpose.
TriMet shared a statement with BikePortland after they released the video footage (which I obtained through a public records request):
“This was a dangerous and illegal act that could have had tragic consequences.
TriMet has about 9,000 cameras across our transit system. Using video from our cameras, we were able to identify the vehicle by make, model and license plate of the vehicle involved in this case. The Transit Police Division conducted an investigation, but unfortunately, the driver has not been cited. We understand there was a discrepancy with the title, and the vehicle may have been stolen. As a result, the driver could not be positively identified.
Anyone who breaks the law on TriMet property, including Tilikum Crossing, is subject to prosecution and may be held liable. We are committed to working with law enforcement to keep our transit system secure, so we can continue to provide safe, reliable and welcoming public transportation for all.”
Thousands of people use the Tilikum on transit and on the paths every day. We are very fortunate nothing tragic happened here. If you know someone who drives, please check in with them, ask them how they’re doing and make sure they get the help they need.
Go get that sun before it’s gone! (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
Happy Friday everyone! Here are my picks for the weekend…
Saturday, September 27th
Westside Critical Mass Party Ride – 9:00 am at Cascade Bikes (Beaverton) I’m tell you guys, Beaverton and WashCo are really coming together around cycling. You should get out there and taste what they’ve got cooking. More info here.
End of Summer Alleycat and BBQ – 4:30 pm at Skidmore Bluff aka Mocks Crest (N) 9 Lives Cycling Club says $5 entry and winner takes all. More info here.
Pasta Ride – 5:00 pm at Laurelhurst Park (SE) “Come celebrate the change of seasons with the flavors of Italia… Bring your own plate/bowl/cup/utensils and a dish to share. Good food, good company, good vibes guaranteed.” More info here.
Boots, Bikes, and Bangers – 5:30 pm at Colonel Summers Park (SE) “We’ll pedal through the city with the soundtrack of today’s biggest country hits, the kind that make you want to belt out lyrics, tip your hat, and ride off into the sunset.” More info here.
Sunday, September 28th
Cyclocross Crusade #1 / PIR Coyote Run – All day at Portland International Raceway (N) It’s year 32 for the Crusade and they’re kicking things off with a new course out at PIR. Roll up and check out what this legendary race series is up to these days. More info here.
Smith and Bybee Lakes, and Beyond! – 9:30 am at corner of N Carey and Princeton (N) Join Portland Bicycling Club and explore this classic NoPo route full of off-street paths and urban wildlife that will loop out to Kelley Point Park. More info here.
— Did I miss your event? Please let me know by filling out our contact form, or just email me at maus.jonathan@gmail.com.
Screenshot from new website. There’s even a cool logo!
Last time I checked in on the City of Portland electric bike rebate program, they told us we could expect a soft launch late summer/early fall. Well I’m happy to report they’ve kept their promise!
In a major update to this long-awaited program, the City has come up with a name for the program — “Portland Rides” — launched a new website and a soft launch of the program is set to begin officially this coming Monday, September 29th when the application period for the first batch of rebates begins.
To refresh your memory, the e-bike rebate program was adopted by City Council as part of the Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund’s (PCEF) Capital Investment Plan in June 2024. The plan is to use $20 million from that fund (which comes from a tax on large corporations) to support an estimated 6,000 new e-bike purchases over the next five years. In addition to helping Portlanders afford these new vehicles, the program will train 50 mechanics and invest in infrastructure for charging and bike parking at multi-family apartment buildings.
According to the City of Portland, the soft launch will target Portland Community College students who will be eligible for a $1,900 rebate. The rebate is split between $1,600 off a “standard Class 1 e-bike” and $300 for “essential bike accessories” (helmet, lock, lights, and so on). The window for rebate applications opens Monday September 29th and closes October 15th. A total of 250-300 rebates will be made available during the soft launch.
Rebates will be redeemable from participating bike shops that are required to have a brick-and-mortar presence in Portland and provide both sales and repair service.
I also learned today that the City of Portland has awarded the contract to administer the program to Resource Innovations, a “women-led, purpose built” firm that, “provides consulting and program management for the energy sector, helping utilities, government agencies, and system operators to achieve decarbonization goals and improve energy equity through services like clean energy transition, grid modernization, and electric vehicle integration.” The company that will process applications and rebates is APTIM, an environmental consulting firm. Portland State University will be the program’s third-party evaluator.
The full program that will be open to all qualifying Portland residents is set to launch in March 2026.
High five for better driving! (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
The sad state of driver training and knowledge is a constant source of frustration and dismay for many safe streets advocates. It seems like the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) will give a license to just about anyone, and it’s become so easy to pass the tests that they don’t really provide any type of substantive education — or at least it appears that way judging from all the terrible driving we see every day. I can’t remember the last time I had good news to share on this front, so I’m excited to relay what feels like a little nugget of progress.
“We’ve had customers take the test 10 or more times per day, indicating they are not learning the information but hoping to pass by chance.”
— Oregon DMV
Starting October 1st, a change from the Oregon DMV should result in better educated drivers. Currently, folks applying for a license can take the knowledge test as many times as they want to in one day. This was new to me before I learned about it from a DMV email this morning which read, “We’ve had customers take the test 10 or more times per day, indicating they are not learning the information but hoping to pass by chance.” Yikes!
I reached out to ODOT Public Information Officer Chris Crabb to learn more. She said the change in guidance from unlimited testing to just two per day, which is now standardized statewide, was done to improve road safety. “The purpose of the knowledge test is to ensure the new driver knows the rules of the road and has some basic safe driving information,” Crabb shared with BikePortland. “By limiting the testing to twice a day, we are encouraging people to take the test seriously.”
Crabb added that not only does the DMV think the test will improve comprehension and encourage more study of the Oregon Driver Manual, but it will also free up DMV staff time. “Our counter staff spend a lot of time with individuals who continually retake the test, and that’s especially true for Portland offices. Reducing the testing will allow them to help more people in line.”
So here’s to ODOT acknowledging the connection between DMV testing and road safety! I hope the next steps are to talk more about what’s on the test, how often people are required to take it, and so on.
Matt Landon at Downtown Sunday Parkways, September 14th, 2025. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
Trigger warning: This story mentions sexual assault and underage rape in general terms without details of any specific incident.
While I was at the recent Downtown Sunday Parkways, I received several reports of a man walking around with a massive sign over his head that read in big, black letters: “Shift2bikes.org is Unlawful” with the “awful” part in red. I had a hunch who it might be. And sure enough, I eventually rolled up to see Matt Landon peering over the top of it.
What the sign all about? It has to do with several things, including: the Thursday Night Ride (TNR), Shift’s management of their popular ride calendar, the fact that Shift has banned Landon from using it, and Landon’s claims that Shift board members are covering up reports of sexual assault that allegedly happened on TNR. Landon, a self-described professional activist and a former leader of TNR, alleges that Shift board members know about at least one incident of rape of a minor during a TNR ride, but that they failed to report it to police. Shift says Landon’s claims are completely untrue, based solely on hearsay, and that his anti-Shift campaign is nothing more than a vendetta.
Before I go any further: Please note that I’ve dealt with several intra-community issues in the past and they are always complicated, convoluted and sensitive to those involved. Each time my preference is to not share them widely on BikePortland and to hope they get resolved among involved parties acting in good faith. However, when behaviors cross a line and people are being hurt or are at risk of being hurt, and a resolution doesn’t appear imminent, I feel airing things out publicly can be helpful. Given Landon’s behaviors thus far — and the fact that many folks have asked me about this following his recent Sunday Parkways demonstration; his spate of long, mass emails detailing his grievances; his release of a 10-page report and complaint that he’s handing out at events; and his attendance at Bike Happy Hour last night — I feel compelled to address what’s going on in greater detail.
So here goes…
To try and unravel what’s going on, I’ve talked and emailed with Landon to hear his concerns. I’ve also talked and emailed with four other people from Shift, Umbrella (Shift’s fiscal sponsor) and elsewhere who’ve been directly named in Landon’s allegations. First, some background…
Shift is one of the many grassroots, all-volunteer organizations in our community that operates under the fiscal sponsorship of the nonprofit Umbrella. Shift started in 2002 to promote “Bike Summer,” which went on to become Pedalpalooza and has recently began calling itself Bike Summer once again. Shift also hosts a very popular calendar of rides and events on their website ShiftToBikes.org. That calendar is at the heart of this dispute.
Shift calendar, July 2025.
Given that the ride calendar is a pillar of our community, one of Shift’s largest responsibilities is to keep it accessible and safe. Anyone can list rides, but Shift has a Code of Conduct committee (and a board) to manage concerns that might arise on rides and/or with specific ride listings. In 2021, Shift decided to delist TNR. This was a big deal because if something’s not on the Shift Calendar, it’s almost as if it doesn’t exist. And the entire goal of a mass social ride is to make it big and attract new riders each week. By that time, TNR had become a huge ride, but Shift had several concerns about it — ranging from a bonfire at the end spot during a burn ban in 2020, a lack of attention to Covid prevention and social distancing rules in 2021, and a general sentiment that people on the ride and/or ride leaders themselves were behaving in a way that Shift does not support. These alleged behaviors included: unprovoked aggression toward drivers, women feeling uncomfortable (unverified reports of sexual assault have swirled around the ride since its early years), reckless riding, and intoxicated ride leaders.
TNR leaders responded to the delisting of their ride by promising Shift they would address the problems. In May 2021, two TNR leaders launched an effort to make the ride safe in hopes of getting put back on the calendar. In a four-page memo, they launched the Biking and Riding Friends Working Group, or BARF. Among BARF’s goals was to, “create a safe space for female, trans, queer, people of color, and all riders during TNR bike rides,” and, “create a zero tolerance policy for sexual assault and domestic violence that occurs during or immediately following TNR bike rides if the victim and perpetrator both attended the TNR bike ride.”
Landon was one of those two leaders and BARF was his baby.
The good-faith effort from Landon and BARF got TNR back on the calendar, and things seemed to be going well on the ride. But in late 2023, Shift says they started to hear more complaints about TNR. In an email from Shift leaders to Landon in November 2023, they wrote:
“These reports have included cases of personal threats to riders, unsafe riding, fights, threats of mass shootings, possession of weapons, etc. These threats have come from multiple individuals often regarding completely separate incidences and dates and have included multiple offenders… this is not just about one bad actor or a few people displeased with the ride. There are multiple problems and too many reports and people to count. One or two a year is expected with large weekly rides and oftentimes they are just small scuffles and personal drama but there’s just been too many which indicates a systematic or cultural problem. These problems go back further than three weeks and BARF should have been addressing these problems as they occur.”
At that point Shift once again took TNR off their calendar for three months and asked ride organizers to develop a plan to remedy the issues. “This is not an attempt to cancel the ride, nor is it based on any personal feelings from any board members,” wrote Shift Board member Logan Vickery in an email to Landon on November 16, 2023. “This decision is based solely on community feedback and we feel that we are forced to take action in order to keep our community safe. We acknowledge the impact that TNR has had over the years and hope to see it continue on but only if its impact is positive and in agreement with the Shift Code of Conduct.”
In February of 2024, Landon attended a Shift Board meeting in hopes of having the ride reinstated. According to two Shift board members who were at that meeting, that’s when things began to go off the rails. While Landon appeared to be acting in good faith at that meeting, one Shift board member said he felt Landon’s attitude was, “O.K., I’ve been nice, now put TNR back on the calendar.” The board member, who asked to remain anonymous out of concern for their safety, said Shift felt more process was needed before the ride could be relisted: “I think that meeting was the first time we set a line and said [to Landon], ‘No, you don’t get to dictate the terms of this,’… and as soon as we started putting in lines, he just it ratcheted up very quickly from there. He did not seem to respect boundaries whatsoever.”
Another Shift board member at that meeting, Logan Vickery, also told me Landon seemed very willing to work with Shift to remedy the situation with TNR, but, “After that meeting, he just started getting weird.”
After that meeting, Landon seemed to go to war with Shift. Since TNR was unable to be listed on the calendar, Landon posted a similar event that started nearby at a similar time. Landon also says he filed a formal complaint last year with the Oregon Secretary of State due to his belief that Shift is in violation of their nonprofit bylaws. And in what would become a frequent tactic, he sent out a long email full of allegations and speculations about Shift with a carbon copy sent to hundreds of individuals and organizations — many of whom never gave Landon permission to use their personal emails. Shift took particular offense to one email from Landon where he claimed to be running a recruitment for Shift board members and citing nonexistent Shift policies — even though he wasn’t affiliated with Shift in any way.
Landon (in hat, bottom right) at Bike Happy Hour last night. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)Landon at Sunday Parkways. (Photo: Sent in by a reader)
Among the allegations Landon made against Shift in these emails is that they were hiding a secret database of assault incidents from TNR and that they were aware of an underage rape on the ride, but were intentionally hiding it all from the public. Landon bases this accusation on the email quoted above where a Shift board member makes a passing reference to “reports” they received about TNR. Landon also cites other mentions of unverified, alleged sexual assaults on the ride from other individuals as being serious enough for Shift to have brought to authorities. Shift has a process for handling ride complaints and taking reports from participants, but their stated policy is that Shift, “does not engage with local law enforcement or otherwise aide law enforcement with their investigative matters.” Landon believes that policy is unlawful.
Asked to respond to Landon’s allegations, one Shift volunteer told me, “He was saying things that were wildly untrue. Clearly, he was not acting in good faith at this point.” Another person, who also asked me to withhold their name out of fear of retaliation by Landon said, “He’s not been an easy person to collaborate with or to communicate with. It doesn’t feel like it’s in good faith.” As for Landon’s chief allegation, that Shift is hiding reports of underage rape that happened on TNR, a Shift leader said, “We don’t have any reports of those sorts of things. We don’t know where that’s coming from.”
In an email sent to local media on March 7th, 2024, Landon wrote: “I’m asking that folks please not donate to Shift2bikes.org since no one gets to vote on anything that Shift2bikes does here in Portland.” In the signature line of that email Landon referred to himself as, “the first whistleblower illegally retaliated against by Shift2bikes.”
On March 7th, 2024, Shift decided to ban Landon from using the calendar and attending any Shift events. In their email to him they wrote that the ban was, “Due to misusing Shift resources, spamming Shift users, and posting events/emails impersonating Shift even after a warning.”
Landon has recently escalated his public demonstrations against leaders of Shift. Not only did Landon walk around Sunday Parkways with his sign, telling people about his claim that the organization is covering up past sexual assaults, he also spent several hours at the Shift table where he called out Shift leadership by first and last name and accused them of being a “criminal organization.” Shift volunteers who were at the event asked Landon to stop engaging with them, but they say he refused to leave. This behavior has spooked several Shift leaders who feel they are being targeted by Landon and are concerned about their safety.
In a 10-page report titled, Mandatory reporter / Whistleblower Matt Landon complaint against Shift, Umbrella, and Willamette Week, that Landon began sharing with bike community leaders and local media on September 14th of this year, he claims Shift has, “admitted via email that they received multiple (too many to count) complaints from victims/survivors yet did not follow up on their legal obligation to investigate the complaints or forward those complaints to either approved safety team members nor the police.” “I’m concerned because underage drugged rape cases continue to be brought up, yet no action has occurred,” Landon wrote. “I fear that these are not the only instances of violence, domestic violence, and sexual violence that Shift and Umbrella have ignored.”
When I asked Landon to explain his rape allegations in more detail, he referred me to his 10 page report and the aforementioned emails where people refer to secondhand incidents and “reports” in a general sense with no verifiable details of any specific assault cases.
At Sunday Parkways earlier this month, I gave Landon the opportunity explain his concerns with Shift (in video below). Here’s what he said:
“On September 14, 2025 I filed a complaint against Shift to Bikes and Umbrella and Willamette Weekly [sic], because they have been ignoring their filing of complaints from people. And I’m filing this as a mandatory reporter, because there have been reports of underage rape that have not been reported by from Shift to the police, and this is illegal. Also, Umbrella and Willamette Weekly have both known about this and have not reported this information to the police as well.”
The mention of Willamette Week comes from Landon’s communications with James Hemphill, a freelancer who has worked for Willamette Week who has also ridden TNR and was, at one time, working on a story about the ride that was never published. In a conversation with Hemphill today, he said he thinks Landon is “making a mountain out of a molehill,” and that, “It’s obvious he’s he’s seeking vindication for something, and he just really needs to own up to what he’s done and accept it and go away.”
At Bike Happy Hour last night I spoke to Landon at length. When I asked if he’s seeking revenge on Shift because they banned him from using the calendar and from TNR, he said that’s not why he was banned. He thinks the ban is an attempt to silence him and avoid accountability.
It might take lawyers to ultimately resolve this dispute; but I hope what I’ve shared here gives you more context on where each side stands.
TNR is Portland’s longest running weekly social ride and a vital part of our community. And for many participants — especially the regulars and leaders — it’s much more than just a bike ride. TNR is a strong community that means a lot to a lot of people. And like I always say, sometimes community is messy and it takes hard work to keep it strong.
And despite all this drama, you’ll be happy to know that TNR is alive today and healthier than ever. Earlier this spring, the ride put all this behind them under the guidance of a new leader; Bike Happy Hour regular John “JR” Russell. Check out the details of tonight’s ride and roll out to the Fountain to join all the fun.
It’s in the plan for 82nd. But just how “X” it will be remains to be seen. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
Advocates closely tracking the status of TriMet’s 82nd Avenue Transit Project are worried that the quality of the bus service might be compromised in light of pushback from some businesses along the corridor.
The Line 72 that runs on 82nd has more riders than any bus line in the state with about 10,000 daily boardings. It also has the most delays due to all the drivers and their cars that get in the way. Whether or not Line 72 gets better along with the generational investment underway on 82nd has never been in dispute; but how much better is the big question. With two lanes in each direction, a dedicated bus lane — also known as business access and transit, or BAT lanes — for all 10 miles of the project between Clackamas and Portland’s Cully neighborhood would mean a lot less space for cars.
Back in May, when TriMet asked the general public whether they wanted “some” BAT lanes or “more” BAT lanes, the results were clear: 70% of respondents chose the “more” option. Now however, it appears TriMet has heard feedback from business owners that’s not as supportive.
TriMet slide that will be presented Wednesday (9/24).
“While the survey in April indicated support for the ‘More BAT’ lanes option, we heard that more business engagement was needed,” reads a slide that will be presented tomorrow (Weds, 9/24) at a meeting of the 82nd Avenue Transit Project Community Advisory Committee (CAC). “In recent discussions with businesses,” continues the text on the slide, “we heard support for the transit and safety improvements, as well as significant concerns to BAT lanes.” TriMet says those concerns had to do with “customer access,” “construction impact,” and “traffic and vehicle diversion.”
Now I’m hearing a bit of worry in messages from some advocates who are tracking this project closely. While many thought the project was moving forward with BAT lanes along nearly the entire corridor, there’s significant concern that TriMet project managers might compromise the BAT lane to win business support. That could mean we’d see BAT lanes only on some sections of the project corridor — a move that would likely result in slower buses.
One transit advocate shared with me today that, given what they feel is a recent change in tone from project leaders about the BAT lane issue, “I am on high alert.”
TriMet has just uploaded a new draft design concept that shows continuous BAT lanes for the entire project within Portland city limits (SE Luther Rd). However, their materials make it clear that nothing is final. “BAT lane under evaluation. The extent of this feature is still being explored,” TriMet writes. The agency expects to make a final decision about the BAT lanes in late 2025.
This topic will be discussed at the CAC meeting tomorrow (9/24) from 6:00 to 7:30 pm at PCC SE Community Hall Annex (2305 SE 82nd Ave.).
New pavement and a much wider bike lane on NE Weidler east of NE 15th Ave. See before shot below. (Photos: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
The main commercial district of Northeast Broadway and Northeast Weidler from about 7th to 24th has long been known as a couplet for drivers. But for cyclists? Not so much. With outdated, door-zone bike lanes, people riding bikes have historically avoided these streets, opting instead for the neighborhood greenway on NE Tillamook (to the north) or the lower traffic volumes and better bikeway on NE Multnomah (to the south).
But that changed this summer when the Portland Bureau of Transportation finished repaving Broadway and Weidler and updated the cycling lanes at the same time. I’ve already covered the changes on Broadway, but NE Weidler now has a wider and more comfortable bike lane of its own. Given these upgrades, is it time to add Broadway-Weidler to your bike map?
Yesterday I returned to NE Broadway to see a few changes that PBOT has made since I was there last month and figured I’d check out NE Weidler while I was out there.
Compare the old cross-section with the image above.
NE Weidler
Starting from NE 7th and heading east, Weidler is unchanged. For about eight blocks (and through the Lloyd Center Mall area) I had to ride in an unprotected bike lane sandwiched between car drivers on my left and parked cars on my right (see photo below). As PBOT upgrades bikeways citywide, this type of facility looks more and more outdated. That’s one positive consequence of progress: as more streets get better bike lanes, the old ones looks even worse by comparison, which (should) create urgency to bring everything up to the latest standards.
PBOT’s recent changes begin at NE 15th, where we now have new pavement and a wider bike lane. There are still three lanes for drivers, but PBOT has added a few feet of buffer space on each side of the bike lane. I appreciated the added breathing room and could feel my stress level go down between NE 14th and 15th. Things get a bit tighter as the street narrows east of 16th and I wish we had more protection for the bike lane here, but it’s still an upgrade from what we had before. Then at 21st, things get even better for cycling as PBOT has reduced the number of driving lanes to one and added a generous buffer zone to the bike lane.
Between 7th and 15th, we still have this crap.New buffer doing its job!Lower speeds are always nice.Green always helps.This is the best part of the changes, where drivers have just one lane and the bike lane has been widened.Love these signs in the merge zone just east of NE 21st.Approaching the infamous curve at NE 24th.New concrete curbs on NE 24th curve.
Forcing drivers to merge into one lane in just half a city block is such a big deal that PBOT had to install not one, not two, not three, but four big yellow advisory signs right next to each other. The signs say, “Take Turns” which is quite novel and the merge symbol sort of looks like two people dancing. (I can only imagine what type of creative vandalism these will attract!)
At the infamous offset intersection of NE Weidler and 24th, where so many drivers were crashing into a house in the curve it has been vacated, PBOT has added a green coloring to the bikeway and concrete curbs for protection. At 24th the bike lane ends and you’re directed onto Weidler as it becomes a smaller, neighborhood street. If you want to access Broadway by bike and continue eastbound, you’re better off hopping up onto the sidewalk unless you’re comfortable sharing the lane with drivers on a busy street.
NE Broadway
I’ve already shared my impressions of the big changes PBOT made in their Broadway Pave and Paint project. And judging by this positive Reddit thread I came across a few days ago, I’m not the only one who thinks it’s a nice step forward.
Since I was there a few weeks ago, PBOT has made a few key changes — some planned and others unplanned.
Between NE 26th and 24th, PBOT has installed what they refer to as “traffic separators” (see below). These went in last week with the goal of creating a bit more peace of mind and protection between drivers and bicycle riders. They’re four inches tall and a foot wide, with a bevel on one side and a right-angle on the other. Unfortunately PBOT maintenance crews installed them backwards and they don’t quite line up inside the buffer zone. The beveled side is supposed to face the bike lane and the sharp edge is supposed to face the drivers. But on both Weidler and Broadway, they’re installed the other way around.
I read a few posts about this on the BikeLoud Slack channel before I saw it myself, so I reached out to PBOT to ask for a clarification. They confirmed that the curbs have been installed incorrectly. However, PBOT says the current installation, “does not result in a negative impact on safety and they would also be costly to remove and reinstall.” “Given the limited benefits and additional cost of fixing the error, PBOT does not plan to remove and reinstall the separators,” a spokesperson told BikePortland yesterday.
In addition to new protective curbs, PBOT has added signage and plastic posts to medians at intersections in order to more clearly designate that the new bike lane should never be used by drivers as a right-turn lane (see below). I shared concern about this in my initial post about the project and it has unfortunately become a big enough issue that — in addition to permanent signs posted on the medians — PBOT has placed large barricades near the curb to prevent drivers from using the lane.
This is an unfortunate development, since it sullies the project and detracts from the beauty of the new infrastructure. PBOT themselves has noted that aesthetics are a very important element of bike infrastructure — especially in high-profile commercial districts. So to have to erect barricades is a bummer. PBOT says their plan is to keep them in place for just three weeks. The hope is drivers will adopt new habits, so that when the barricades are removed, they won’t use the lane for turning. No permanent barrier is planned, in part because PBOT needs to keep the space open so sweepers can fit through (and the cost of a permanent feature wasn’t budgeted for).
Hopefully drivers pay closer attention to the new design and stop using the bike lane as a turning lane.
Final verdict
It’s definitely noteworthy that PBOT upgraded the bike lanes on both Weidler and Broadway within a few months of each other. And given the amount of destinations along these streets, there’s massive potential in making a high-quality bikeway along them. On Weidler, we need more space and protection for the bike lane between NE 7th and 24th for this couplet to really come to life as a good option for cycling. The updates between 15th and 24th are nice, but I’m afraid it’s still not attractive enough for families or novice riders. The new conditions on Broadway are much better, and if drivers make good choices, I think it will attract a much wider array of riders.
And like I wrote in my intro, every upgrade we make creates a higher contrast to older, more dangerous facilities, so this is a step in the right direction. It’ll take a much larger budget and a federal government that isn’t hostile to cycling, for PBOT to create the Broadway-Weidler couplet between the Broadway Bridge and NE 26th that we need and deserve.
— Now that it’s been in place for a month or so, what has been your experience of these new bike lanes?
What even is a “Portland cyclist”? It’s a term that gets thrown around a lot and it describes something that has become a major cultural stereotype. But if you look more closely, it’s easy to see that the people who ride bikes in Portland are a very diverse group. These images were all taken at the same location (N Williams at Hancock) within minutes of each other.
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
Just a tiny slice of the folks riding bikes on Portland streets every day!
We have beautiful sidewalks downtown. It’s a shame we don’t do more with them.
Portland City Councilor Mitch Green wants to make it easier for vendors to open up shop on city sidewalks. An ordinance sponsored by Green that will be heard at a meeting of the Arts and Economy Committee tomorrow, would promote free enterprise by removing regulatory barriers he says make small-scale vending on sidewalks infeasible.
Call it hot dog urbanism.
Green believes fewer restrictions on things like hot dog carts would spur more vibrant streets and public spaces that not only generate more revenue for the city and opportunity for up-and-coming entrepreneurs (many of whom can’t afford a food cart), but would also lead to higher quality public spaces. After all, it’s a tried and true tenet of good urbanism that giving people reasons to linger longer makes cities and spaces more interesting.
Among documents Green has filed on city council’s website is a list of frequently asked questions from the National Hot Dog and Sausage Council, and Green appeared in a selfie with a massive hot dog at an event in Pioneer Courthouse Square on Sunday. While he’s having fun injecting hot dogs into civic discourse, Green is serious about this legislative effort. He wants to amend Chapter 17.26 (Sidewalk Vendors) of Portland City Code.
The current code has three provisions Green’s ordinance is looking to remove: it requires someone to get written consent from adjacent property owners as part of their permit application; it has proximity restrictions that prevent someone from receiving a vendor permit if they are within 100 feet of another permit holder on the same block; and it only allows permits within areas zoned commercial.
Here’s how Green is selling his proposal:
Economic Opportunity for Under-Served Communities: Sidewalk vending often serves as an entry point for immigrants, refugees, low-income residents, and other underrepresented entrepreneurs. Eliminating the adjacent-owner consent requirement reduces a gatekeeping mechanism that has, in some cases, excluded these groups from participating.
Cultural Vibrancy: Street vending brings cultural diversity to the public realm, allowing communities to share food, crafts, and services reflective of Portland’s ethnic and cultural richness. Removing the consent barrier helps preserve and grow this cultural expression.
Accessibility and Age Diversity: Sidewalk vending creates opportunities for youth entrepreneurship, seniors seeking supplemental income, and individuals with disabilities who may not be able to operate traditional storefronts.
Councilor Mitch Green (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)
Green’s not alone in thinking more vendors on Portland sidewalks would be a good thing. Early last year the Portland Bureau of Transportation launched a pilot project to allow food trucks to operate from parking spots and serve folks directly on the sidewalk. The idea behind that project was also to spur activation of city streets and help revitalize downtown.
The move could also spark more bike-based businesses which are the perfect size for selling on street corners.
Ryan Hashagen, owner Old Town-based Icicle Tricycles, supports the ordinance. A former sidewalk vendor himself, Hashagen calls sidewalk vending, “the most approachable and lowest barrier form of entrepreneurship” and believes it enlivens and activates spaces by bringing more eyes to the street.
“Icicle Tricycles started 25 years ago vending ice cream and flowers on the sidewalks and streets of the Pacific Northwest,” he shared with BikePortland this morning. “These initial vending businesses employed people, brought activation to otherwise dormant streets, and led us to ultimately purchase a 30,000 square foot warehouse in the Central City where we manufacture carts and tricycles for businesses and organizations around the world — all from vending ice cream and flowers on city sidewalks!”
I’ve heard grumbling from urbanists and transportation advocates for years about how dead many of our public spaces are compared to other cities. While our food cart scene is unrivaled, they are confined to private property and lack the accessibility, transparency and spontaneity that smaller vendors provide.
Green sees his ordinance as a way to provide a quick shot-in-the-arm for Portland’s reputation as a leader in public space innovation. In comments today at Council’s Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting, he acknowledged that making it easier to sell hot dogs and churros on the sidewalk isn’t the most important thing to spend his time on in this moment. “We’ve got a lot of urgent work to do. But one of those is to do vibes cultivation. We need to continue to cultivate good vibes for the city,” Green said. And while he wasn’t referring to this ordinance when he said that, based on the initial reactions to this I’ve seen online, he’s definitely onto something.
— What kind of vibes are you feeling about this? You can sign up to testify or share written comments on this proposal here.
Hi friends. Welcome to the week. Below are the most notable stories either I came across myself or folks shared with me over the past seven days…
Sober argument for transit: Transit expert Jarrett Walker pens one of his most powerful pieces yet on how urban/rural politics and car-centric thinking impacts our approach to adequately funding public transit. (Bloomberg)
My kind of research: A working paper from researchers from Italy and Switzerland about how the presence of the Tour de France (a “place-based intervention”) impacts voting patterns and economics. (SocArXiv Papers)
GREEN Streets Act: Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley teamed up with Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and others to propose active transportation legislation that includes a fix-it first provision, GHG targets, public transit support, and more. (Senator Markey’s Office)
Stockholm’s approach to downtown revitalization: “We want people to really think about whether it’s worth it to own a car, or whether it makes more economic sense to rely on the public transport network.” (Politico)
Golf carts FTW: I’m not necessarily anti-car, I’m anti-big, unsafe, loud, toxic, society-killing vehicles — which is why I am truly fascinated at how many golf cars are used in this town in Georgia. (Jalopnik)
E-cargo bikes are here to stay: I know this is preaching to the choir, but I just love seeing non-bike outlets screaming from the rooftop that folks should stop buying cars and consider an e-bike instead. (The Verge)
Trump Admin taking us backwards: Among all the other challenges facing transportation departments these days we have a president who is directing his cronies to take away grants that fund bike/walk/transit and wants to refocus the funding on car-centric projects. (Streetsblog USA)
Carfree highway costs politician: A city supervisor in San Francisco who was ousted by voters for his role in making a coastal highway carfree says it was all worth it. (NY Times)
The e-moto problem: I’m happy to see national industry nonprofit People for Bikes lay out the reason we have to stop calling e-motos, “e-bikes.” (People for Bikes)
Members of council, led by Councilor Eric Zimmerman, said Wilson’s unilateral directive to extend the hours of paid parking from 7 to 10 pm in pockets of the city this summer—a move that has frustrated many Portlanders—is an overreach of Wilson’s administration.
“We could revert back to the paid parking hours as they were on the last fiscal year if we want to get serious,” Zimmerman pitched to his colleagues, “and take back our control as the legislative body at this city.”
An “overreach of Wilson’s administration”? Hmm, why does that sound familiar? Oh yeah, it’s just like how an office overseen by Mayor Wilson unilaterally decided to remove traffic diverters on two neighborhood greenways in Northwest Portland. In my coverage of that issue back in August, we learned that most members of city council hadn’t even heard about the plan. In fact, City Councilor Mitch Green was so peeved by this lack of consultation that he’s shared an intention to change city code so it won’t happen again.
Green pulled out a statute in Portland City Code that states, “City Council is the road authority for all public streets.” Then he told a city advisory committee that, “The city administrator is allowed to execute our vote. It’s inappropriate for the city administrator to pull back on investments they’ve made without at least notifying city council and asking for permission. That needs to change and that will change.”
On the paid parking issue, it looks like city councilors are split on the merits of the policy, but united in concern over how it was implemented.
On a related note, I can’t help but notice the hypocrisy here from Councilor Zimmerman. He’s concerned about administrative overreach when it impacts a policy he dislikes (paid car parking), but he didn’t speak up when it impacted a policy he likes (removing the diverters).
The Willamette Week story makes it clear that even City Administrator Mike Jordan isn’t sure who has ultimate authority over transportation decisions. Seems like this is an issue we need to rectify immediately. Either that, or maybe the mayor and other administrative office staff should do a bit more outreach to their colleagues before moving forward with major policy changes.