Support BikePortland

Riding Portland’s first (real) cycle track on Cully Blvd.

Posted by on May 19th, 2011 at 8:55 am

The new cycle track on Cully, part of a large-scale road reconstruction project, is now complete.
(Photos/video © J. Maus)

As strange as it may sound, Cully Boulevard in outer Northeast Portland is now home to the most significant piece of bike infrastructure in our city.

The Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) has just completed a cycle track that runs 0.6 miles from NE Prescott to Killingsworth. And, unlike the “cycle track” on SW Broadway near Portland State University (which is nice, but it’s really just a curbside bike lane protected from motor vehicle traffic by parked cars), the Cully facility is the real deal.

We checked in on this project back in November, but it wasn’t quite finished. Now that it’s fully open, I was eager to roll over and check it out.

Cully Blvd cycle track-11

Cully Blvd cycle track-7

First, some background. This cycle track was part of a $5.4 million improvement project that completely rebuilt Cully Blvd, which used to be a bare-bones, two-lane road with no shoulders and no sidewalks. (The difference between now and then is striking.)

With an opportunity to design a road from the ground up, PBOT seized their chance to build a Cully Blvd that works better for everyone and that would include what City Traffic Engineer Rob Burchfield told us would be a, “bike facility to European standards.”

The new bikeway on Cully Blvd is grade-separated (meaning it’s higher than the roadway), it’s built out of concrete and not asphalt (which makes it smoother and visually distinct from the roadway), it’s separated from motor vehicle traffic by a curb and by parked cars, and it has a full complement of pavement markings that help clarify how to behave on and around it.

Cully Blvd cycle track-13

I haven’t ridden in Europe, but the Cully cycle track is certainly built to a higher standard than any other bikeway I’ve ridden in Portland.

The first thing I noticed was PBOT’s attention to detail in the pavement markings. Cars know where to park thanks to large “P” for parking markings in the street; the curb between the cycle track and the parking lane is painted white — except where there are driveways and the paint turns yellow; the bikeway is dashed through every intersection; extra-wide driveways have two bike symbols painted in them; a dashed line helps designate a door zone between the cycle track and parked cars; a few intersections have markings for “Copenhagen” lefts (a.k.a. box turns).

Another detail I liked was the smooth, mountable curb from the bikeway into the street. I also found that being up on the curb improved my visibility, which made intersection transitions feel safer.

Carye Bye, who recently moved to the Cully neighborhood from North Portland, rode the cycle track a few nights ago. “It was 10 at night so there wasn’t any traffic. But I thought it was great. Easy to follow and easy to leave.”

By “easy to leave,” Bye is referring to that smooth curb between the cycle track and the parked cars. It’s rounded, making for a smooth transition from bikeway to roadway. “I like that it’s not a complete barrier,” she says.

Bye says the experience of riding the new cycle track is, “like you are on a bike-sanctioned sidewalk.”

To get a feel for what it’s like, watch the short video below…

Cully Blvd cycle track-6

J.C. is a fan of the cycle track.

Another person I met on the cycle track, a man named J.C. who was in the neighborhood visiting his dad, was really happy to see the new facility. “I like ’em a lot,” he said with a smile, “there’s less gravel and debris now, and I like that it’s off the side because now I have a barrier between me and the cars.” J.C. said he changed his route through this neighborhood specifically to utilize the cycle track.

I heard that same comment from a guy named Nick G. Nick, riding a drop-bar Surly decked out for commuting, told me he used to meander through neighborhood streets, “So this is a lot faster.” When there’s no car traffic on Cully (which is often the case), Nick said he’ll probably still use the roadway, especially northbound since it’s slightly downhill. Overall, Nick says, “I approve of this project.”

The key to this cycle track functioning well will be keeping cars and other objects out of it. Today I noticed one car parked over half-way into the cycle track (it was in front of a market)…

And I also noted a trash can that had been left in the path of bike traffic…

My hunch is that this won’t become a major problem as more people get familiar with the presence of the bikeway and more people start riding in it.

Overall I was pleasantly surprised. Yes, it would be great if the cycle track was longer and more connected to popular destinations, but this is a solid first attempt at going beyond the bike lane. It’s also important to note that there’s a lot more riding on this cycle track than just people on bikes. I’m talking about politics.

Expect to see this become a key example held up by Mayor Sam Adams (to show his commitment to traffic safety and to Northeast Portland) and by PBOT traffic engineers (to show their willingness to innovate).

If this cycle track is deemed a success, it could help move the needle at PBOT for more physically separated bikeways.

I’d love to know if other readers have ridden it yet. If so, what do you think?

Please support BikePortland.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

  • K'Tesh May 19, 2011 at 9:28 am

    So long as it doesn’t get the same treatment by drivers as I found on Broadway the other day…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Don May 19, 2011 at 9:38 am

      Yikes. I see this every other day or so on there. There’s at least one car oblivious to everything. I just ride by hoping they get completely locked in by other cars.

      Now that green paint is a federal standard, maybe they should put it all over the cycle track on Broadway?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • spare_wheel May 19, 2011 at 2:56 pm

        Its not just cars. Its shuttle buses, utility trucks, delivery vehicles, drop offs and crowds of pedestrians. Restripe the bike lane on Broadway! The cully cycle track, on the other hand, looks like a nice facility and I plan on riding it this evening.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Chris I May 19, 2011 at 12:36 pm

      Amazing. How did they think they would get out if someone parked behind them?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Spiffy May 19, 2011 at 1:00 pm

      yikes! I hope you called parking enforcement…

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • K'Tesh May 19, 2011 at 4:16 pm

        I did…

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Paul Johnson May 23, 2011 at 2:45 pm
  • Dave May 19, 2011 at 9:33 am

    Haven’t ridden it yet, but I might have to make my way over there soon and check it out – I’m really curious to see it in person!

    One thing that I loved about the cycle paths in Amsterdam that I think might be a great consideration for future projects, is that they were continuous through intersections in most places, and were raised at least 4-6 inches above road level, so basically if a car was turning right or left off of the main road that the cycle path was following, they had to go over a speed bump to cross the path of pedestrians and cyclists, whereas pedestrians and cyclists had a continuous path through the intersection.

    I think the lack of debris and the fact that the separated paths aren’t going to develop pot-holes or have storm drains in the middle of them is reason enough to be excited – I avoid roads with bike lanes most of the time, because most of the time, the bike lanes are an obstacle course in and of themselves.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Lascurettes May 19, 2011 at 9:36 am

    Glad to see the additional stripe painted and (P) markings. When they first graded the street even with the cycletrack curb weeks ago I figured there would be lots confusion with it being a parking strip. It’s a lot clearer now – except clearly there’ll still be violators.

    I’m guessing the compost bin was the fault of the collector and not the homeowner. They do the same on my street (pull them off the curb but don’t put them all the way back).

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Gregg Woodlawn May 19, 2011 at 2:34 pm

      I love it. THANKS PBOT!!! I’m looking forward to more cycle tracks built. Maybe on Williams???

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Todd Boulanger May 19, 2011 at 9:39 am

    I am impressed. I will have to ride it to compare the fine details with similar facilities I have studied in Europe. though implimenting such shifts in street space will take holistic thinking and broad operational changes across all city departments…

    I am concerned about the automated trash container issue – it has been an ADA issue and now a bike issue – PBoT and the City’s waste contractor are going to have to coordinate and communicate at a much higher level so this does not degrade the safety and utility of this new facility.

    The other option would be to remove select parking for trash pick up once a week. [Note: There is much less of a problem with domestic trash collection along most Dutch cycletracks since each block has a trash / recycling bulk collection point. Much of this bulk container is below ground and is picked up by a mini crane truck.]

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Gabriel Nagmay May 19, 2011 at 9:41 am

    I live in the neighborhood and love the improvements that have been made. However, there is one thing that bothers me.

    The track starts at NE Prescott, but does not go all the way to Killingsworth. Right now, it transitions back to a bike lane at Emerson. Do you know if there are plans to complete it?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Severin May 19, 2011 at 9:47 am

    The transition looks smooth, one of the things that annoy me here in the East Bay is sometimes a bike path is interrupted at an intersection there’s a big ‘clunk’ as I get back on after crossing– that clunk is always a nice reminder that I’m not in the Netherlands. Anyway, it would have been easy for Portland to simply do bike lanes on this street, and Portlanders would still have to deal with doubling parking and trash bins in the lane, perhaps more than they do now with the cycle track. There’s a learning curve for everything and Im confident people will take notice of the changes and be more respectful.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Michelle May 19, 2011 at 10:05 am

    I rode it yesterday and really like it.

    Near Cully I could see many kids’ bikes parked in apartment parking lots, and groups of kids walking home from school. I’ll be interested to see in a few months if those kids are riding on the cycletrack, the sidewalk, or in circles in their parking lots.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • wsbob May 19, 2011 at 10:23 am

    I like that it’s a concrete, rather than an asphalt surface; that will allow it to far more resistant to deterioration from the weather than an asphalt surface is. Since it’s concrete though, it’s probably got expansion joints…periodically spaced, horizontal seams running across it. The depth of joints used on some concrete paths for bikes, can be jarring. The separated Hwy 26 bike lane between Sylvan and Cedar Hills is one example.

    I suppose street sweepers will have no problem driving right up on the elevated cycle track for cleaning. Maybe the slight elevation will resist some of the motor vehicle driven road junk from flying over on to the cycle track. What happens though, to the cycle track’s modest elevation difference, when, eventually…the city has to put down a layer of asphalt to resurface the main roadway? Will the elevation gradually be reduced?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • NW Biker May 19, 2011 at 10:27 am

    Maybe I’m too cynical, but I wonder whether the person who parked on the cycle track did it deliberately? I mean, it’s very well marked. I’d love to go ride it. In my neighborhood, I’d be happy with bike lanes…or even decent shoulders on the streets!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • ec May 19, 2011 at 10:39 am

      Considering they are also parked in a driveway, I’m going to go with stupidity on that one. “Never ascribe to malice…”

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • J May 19, 2011 at 10:52 am

      Not well marked? When do you ever pull off of asphalt on to concrete? When parking on a sidewalk? Someone is being intentionally difficult and refused to park a couple feet away to go to the market. That’s Portland’s problem when it comes to initiatives like this, anti-social behavior on the street level.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • J May 19, 2011 at 10:58 am

        There is my cynicism. I will say it for you. It is the result of unwillingness or resistance to cooperate.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • NF May 19, 2011 at 11:02 am

      While this cycle track was under construction, it was common for people to park on the cycle track path. I suspect it will take some time for people to adjust.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Schrauf May 19, 2011 at 11:42 am

      The car on the cycle track is also blocking a driveway – so probably simply a brief stop by another person who doesn’t care about anyone but themselves.

      Delivery people do it all the time. They could simply double park and block one lane of traffic, but instead they partially pull over and effectivly block two lanes of traffic – the bike lane plus the lane they were “trying” to get out of.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Samuel John Klein May 19, 2011 at 10:51 am

    Very impressive indeed. Now, really make a splash – extend it all the way to Portland Highway, and back to Fremont and 57th. It’s a street that has really needed attention and I’m glad it got it, but let’s not stop here.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Just wonedering May 19, 2011 at 11:29 am

    So where do the garbage cans go on collection day?

    Is there enough space (no parking) around driveways to allow the trucks in to pick up the bins?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bjorn May 19, 2011 at 11:29 am

    I have been surprised how few people are parking on the track now that they have painted it. Prior to the paint treatment many cars were parked on the track.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • mmann May 19, 2011 at 11:40 am

    The New Year’s Day ride went through there and though it wasn’t finished yet, I was really impressed. I especially like the message it sends that other parts of Portland besides downtown/inner east side matter when it comes to high quality bike improvements.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jonathan Gordon May 19, 2011 at 11:52 am

    This will make getting to the airport that much easier!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Greg Benison May 22, 2011 at 1:39 pm

      Easier, yes – but there is still much room for improvement North of the new cycle track on Cully, especially in comparison to its connections with the bikeway network to its South. Perhaps some day Cully will be part of a route to the employment centers of the Airport, Cascade Station, even Vancouver, and recreation along Marine Drive, that is up to the same standard as the routes from NE Portland to downtown are today.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Spiffy May 19, 2011 at 12:59 pm

    looks great… once the cars figure out you can’t park there… kinda far north for my usual adventures, but I hope to ride on it some day…

    did you remind Nick G of the mandatory sidepath law?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • are May 22, 2011 at 3:30 pm

      814.420(2) requires that the city determine that the sidepath is “suitable for safe bicycle use at reasonable rates of speed.” with respect to the striped bike lanes, which are an accepted MUTCD treatment, the city pretends that the hearings preceding adoption of the 1998 bike plan are sufficient. it is unclear whether this reasoning applies to experimental treatments like the cycletrack. i very much doubt that anyone could credibly state that it would be safe to cross all these driveways at 18 mph.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • david May 19, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    ok, @K-Tesch, are you showing double parking? Im confused??.If yes, how were they going to get OUT!. Wish I could have been there, or did call PDX finest. Garbage collection could be interesting, in my neighborhood the sanitation workers just seem to drop the cans wherever. Anybody else? But, it looks fantastic.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • anon May 19, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    Would only take a few bike commuters to move that car back into the parking lane.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • JJJ May 19, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    The person who parked their car like that should have their license revoked. If theyre not capable of understanding such clear signage and pavement marking, then they’re not capable of holding the privilege to drive.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Alan 1.0 May 19, 2011 at 3:18 pm

      And that’s why bike riders should be licensed, too–so that they can also receive Draconian punishment for careless, thoughtless but non-mortal offenses. Not.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kirk May 19, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    I biked this stretch today for the first time, and absolutely LOVED it! It was easy to understand being the first time on it, clearly easy for cars to figure out where to park, the grade separation (even the tiny amount) is crucial for cars to understand they are crossing a path of some sort, the striping is easy to figure out and very big and bold. Everything about this looks great! Keep up the good work Portland! This will definitely be something to learn and build from.

    As a side note, I had to give a minor verbal warning to a pedestrian as they walked into the bike lane without looking for moving traffic (me). After getting to the end of the cycle track, I turned around to try out the opposite side and along the way I noticed the pedestrian across the street. I was expecting a mouth full after I had to warn them of my presence, but instead they yelled to me and asked “How do you like it?” After a quick exchange, both parties quickly and easily agreed that this was a wonderful improvement, and it looks beautiful. It was great to see the locals proud of their street, and obviously proud that it got attention from outside the neighborhood. This is exactly what we need to cool down those tensions that the Oregonian brings about. Talk about a piece of infrastructure that brings that neighborhood together.


    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John May 19, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    I’ll ride it today and tell you what i think!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • patrickz May 19, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    Just came back from there. Loved it and I’m ready for more. It almost didn’t feel or look like Portland, except for the fine views of Mt. Potato —er, Saint Helens— and Hoody.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kenny May 19, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    if only the 50’s bikeway could receive a dedicated cycle track. I understand new construction roads that include cycle track is less expensive due to actually having less asphalt strength required due to bikes being less weighty than cars, so this a ideal experiment. It costs less than traditional bike lanes on asphalt. To really reach the 20% plus ride ship Portland wants… this needs to be done in every bikeway feasible…new construction or not.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Dave May 19, 2011 at 3:32 pm

      Or at least streets that have above a certain traffic volume/speed. On SE Ankeny, for instance, you really don’t need one – on E Burnside, it’d be awesome.

      As people commented on the NE Sandy story – people who choose to ride bicycles should not be denied convenient access to major roads simply because they are riding bicycles and can’t keep up with 35mph automobile traffic.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • was carless May 23, 2011 at 10:59 am

      I personally nominate SE 28th ave. Too many people currently drive to the bars on my street. Then there’s the ‘meat-grinder’ maneuver: bikers passing slow cars on the right.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kenny May 19, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    Precisely. I can see this working well on the major use roads. Powell, Foster, Woodstock, Hawthorne, Burnside, Division… and connect with the calmer shared road bikeways. Priority for Cycle track being high level of automotive traffic based streets.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Tony Fuentes May 19, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    A lot of props should go to the members of the Cully Association of Neighbors for this project. Those folks worked for YEARS lobbying, lobbying, and lobbying to cobble together the funding and the political initiative to the Cully Boulevard project a green light.

    A longer term plan for Cully Boulevard is for it to develop into a “main street”. Initially what is needed is allowing more commercial zoning and development. At present, the amount of commercial zoning in Cully is less than 4 percent whereas the average for Portland neighborhoods is 10 percent.

    Basically, to create a 20 minute neighborhood in Cully, it needs better transportation infrastructure and more commercial services. This is a great start in the right direction.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • efairlay May 19, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    I teach around the corner and have been bicycling through that intersection daily for three years now, coming from the west. I’m glad they did this. This is a high poverty area, the kind of place usually forgotten about when it comes to road improvements. And my students, who have few safe alternatives for bicycling to school, finally get a piece of what Portland is all about (in my opinion). My only complaint is that making a left turn from Cully southbound onto Prescott eastbound: I was not registered by the light and skipped this morning. Was I supposed to wait in the bicycle track? I had maneuvered into the left turn lane. I was forced to make an illegal left turn, but fortunately the cop parked on Wygant waiting to pull over people on 60th was just out of sight. Also, even though it’s safer now, it takes forever to get through the intersection, but its worth it. I hope they’ll fix the camera to trigger the left turn soon.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bikesalot May 19, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    @wsbob – agree on the expansion joints. Another bad example is the new path north of St Johns off the east side of the main road toward Kelley Point Park. They really blew it on that one.

    The folks who built it should check out the beach path going into Los Angeles from the north. I rode it last week on a coast tour and was impressed by the smooth joints for the most part. Of course they still have the blowing sand to contend with there….

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • charley May 19, 2011 at 10:48 pm

      These expansion joints up near Kelley Pt are so disappointing. Why not just pave it with asphalt? It’d last forever anyway, and it’d be a much better surface to ride on.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Hart Noecker May 19, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    I ride through this area on my home from work, and if I see another cyclist every five minutes it’s a rarity. Nobody looks at signs, and nobody is going to notice the handful of bikes per hour using the thing. It’s another novelty bike lane built in the middle of nowhere that connect to nothing that adds more evidence why we’re no longer #1: we don’t have a networked strategy, just a few new tricks here and there. Bike boulevards with traffic control devices to keep away cars work far better, but we’ve got to maintain these streets instead of dropping new boulevards onto unridable washboards like Going.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Steve B May 19, 2011 at 9:27 pm

    The Cully Cycletrack is AWESOME! Major props to Rob Burchfield & PBOT for gracing us with some great cycletrack innovation in Portland.

    If I remember correctly, this is the exact kind of project where Roger Geller’s figure that dollar-for-dollar building a cycletrack on a roadway reconstruction project is actually *cheaper* than extending the roadway and painting bike lanes, because the cycletrack doesn’t need to have the same kind of treatment underneath and won’t need the same level of maintenance.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Doug Klotz May 19, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    One reason a cycle track was possible here is that the right of way on Cully is 80 feet wide for much of the street, as opposed to the 60 feet on SE 52nd, SE Division and SE Woodstock. Besides that, there was only the need for one motor vehicle lane each way.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kenny May 19, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    Thanks Doug. Any chance if parking was removed from one side of the street on those major streets there would be room for these facilities? Even a slightly less wide versions?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • George Carder May 19, 2011 at 10:07 pm

    Looks like an expensive sidewalk to me.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR May 19, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    0.6 miles for how many millions of dollars?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • NF May 20, 2011 at 8:30 am

      The Cycle Track option was cheaper than bike lanes would have been!

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • charley May 19, 2011 at 10:51 pm

    I don’t know how that’s significantly better than a sidewalk. Drivers still won’t be looking to the side to see if there’s traffic over there behind the parked cars, and the right hook would be just as serious a concern. I guess there’d be less pedestrian traffic. That’s about the only difference I can see. And that kind of paving is so bloody bumpy. Why can’t they pave these things flat and smooth?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kenny May 19, 2011 at 11:58 pm

    It is actually less expensive to build cycle tracks than a traditional street with bike lanes on asphalt “if” it is all new. Now, the retrofit a traditional street… different story.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • L Moulton May 20, 2011 at 6:35 am

    H. Noecker: I can’t argue with the washboardiness of Going Street — you’re right on there, but the new improvements on Cully are not in the “middle of nowhere” for those of us who live here. I can see why you’d think so if you’re just passing through, on your way to someplace else. More than a “handful” of cyclists already utilize the new lights and cycletrack, and my guess is that even more will as they become aware of it. For some residents, just crossing Cully to get their kids to school at Rigler has been a game of Frogger, so the work along this stretch is a welcome change for them.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dan Packard May 20, 2011 at 7:04 am

    New cycle track – Exquisite!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bjorn May 20, 2011 at 7:22 am

    Hey Jonathan, do you know if the city did counts on how many cyclists were using cully before so they can now get after counts? I was over there this morning and I saw multiple cyclists within a couple of minutes.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • The Driza May 20, 2011 at 7:58 am

    They should do this to all of the unpaved roads in Portland.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • kenny May 23, 2011 at 5:16 pm

      I agree. It will be more affordable than a traditional road any way. The bike plan could start with just walking and biking facilities until the road was paved as well. Woodstock is a very 20 minute neighborhood, given all the neighbors have some sort of safe facility… some have sidewalks, some do not. Add walking and biking options 1st.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Lake Strongheart McTighe May 20, 2011 at 10:43 am

    This is fantastic! Congratulations City of Portland for creating a facility that works for all users, especially people who bike and walk. The cycletrack/sidewalk provides a wonderful example for other cities in the region and across the country. And, this is the kind of facility that should be used to fill in all of the on-street segments of planned regional trails.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jim F May 20, 2011 at 11:47 am

    Washboard-iness of Going? I ride the street every day to and from work (from Willams to 42nd) and never had a problem with the street surface. Doesn’t seem better or worse than any other road.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • John Lascurettes May 22, 2011 at 7:41 pm

      Jim, Going is pretty bad between 33rd and 35th and again pretty bad from 39th to 42nd. I live just off of going at 41st and the potholes there are pretty heinous.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Steve B May 20, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    This is also a huge improvement for anyone cycling to PDX airport — Cully is a straight-shot on the way to the airport for those who are biking from west of 82nd.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dustin May 20, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    Anyone know the dimensions. From the video clip, it appears too narrow for cyclists to pass each other or ride side-by-side.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Rain Panther May 20, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    Just rode on this thing this morning (not exactly) on my way to work and I must say it gave me a sunny, hopeful feeling- made me feel pretty good about the city I live in. I admit I found the location somewhat of a head-scratcher at first, but I suppose the fact that it exists at all is reason for optimism. It will be interesting to see how it works out as a case study. I’d love to see more of this kind of street design.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Doug Klotz May 21, 2011 at 2:46 pm

    On Woodstock and Division, I believe the curb-to-curb distance is 36 feet.(with 12 foot curb-to-prop line sidewalk corridors) Subtract two 12 foot auto lanes, you’re left with two 6 foot bike lanes, probably not wide enough for a cycle track. And that’s with parking removed on BOTH sides. Removing one side, narrow the auto lanes to 10 feet, you have room for two 4.5 foot bike lanes and a 7 foot parking lane. I think 52nd might be wider curb-to-curb, so they get 6 foot bike lanes (?) with one side parking removal.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • kenny May 23, 2011 at 5:20 pm

      It is wide enough to have cycle track, it is the cost that is preventing them from being built more than anything else. I am getting the impression, at least. There will be 2 6 foot lanes and removal of parking on one side. I would decrease the distance of the network, putting more money into creating cycle tracks over regular bike lanes if that could be done. better use of resources in my honest opinion. Then when the money is available again, keep on adding cycle tracks and a lengthier network.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Tbird May 23, 2011 at 10:28 am

    Well, it looks better than the SW Broadway cycle track, but (and I really hate to be THAT guy), the ramped curb is inviting motorists to park on it!
    Why, oh why must the city of Portland half step on each and every “landmark” improvement surrounding bicycles? An ‘actual’ cycle track is at street level and has a raised square profile curb separating the modes. This is exactly what keeps motorists here in Europe from parking on them.

    The correct model is just sitting right there.
    Copy it. Please?

    I am a fan of the idea. Don’t let my rant above fool you. I just hate to see poorly designed infrastructure trotted out as a great improvement only to have opponents shoot holes in it.

    Jonathan – you mentioned in your article that you’ve never biked in Europe. You should come. It would give you an immense amount of perspective about both the systems here and back in the US.

    Right now I’m in Warsaw, PL. I’ve lived in the Netherlands and PDX too. I’d have to say that my beloved Rose City is in 3rd place out of that group as far as bike infrastructure goes…

    Can you believe a city in Poland would have better bike facilities than PDX? It’s true kids…
    Never even heard of Warsaw on the bike-city map have you? That’s because it’s not on the map. Now that tells you just how far behind any place in the US is at present.

    I’m not saying this to be a hater. I really love Portland. ( really I do…) It’s just I wish most folks at the decision making level could/would admit the window dressing projects are not enough. It takes real change, not just fluffy PR and a poorly engineered project or two to be truly bike-able.

    Ok, flame away… I can take it.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) May 23, 2011 at 10:38 am

      I hear what you’re saying, and I agree somewhat…but it’s important to remember that PBOT has made it clear that their M.O. isn’t to simply “copy” Europe. They’re approach is “European in an American context.” If you look at the progression from SW Broadway to this, it shows a healthy improvement.

      I’m curious though, what the official engineering reasoning was for the ramped curb.

      thanks for sharing Tbird. Hope all’s well in Poland.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Dave May 23, 2011 at 10:43 am

        I think what’s important, and what I got from TBird’s comment, is not so much that we should copy the Netherlands in total, but that certain ideas will work everywhere – like actually making a separated curb so that you can’t drive up on it. It’s not that we need to copy the whole system, but we should be able to take away some best practices and guiding principles that will work everywhere, which we seem not to have done in most cases.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • are May 23, 2011 at 5:46 pm

          unless and until PBoT deals with driveways and intersections on these so-called “cycletracks,” i would not want a hard curb preventing me from getting off the track and onto the road. and except at signalized intersections, i would be pretty much unwilling to do a copenhagen left, which means i would want to leave the track to get to a left turn lane.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) May 23, 2011 at 10:49 am

      OK. I checked the BikePortland archives and found out more about the thinking behind the curbs…

      Head City Traffic Engineer Rob Burchfield did indeed take cues from Copenhagen. A trip there “strongly validated the direction we were going” he told me.

      And here’s an excerpt from a previous story that explains Burchfield’s thinking on the curb:

      Burchfield said they’re still thinking about how bike traffic will leave the cycle track to make a left turn or access a driveway or business on the other side of the street mid-block. He said they’ll design the curbs to be “rollable” so that bike riders can easily leave the cycle track.

      This comes from PBOT’s keen awareness that many people do not like feeling “trapped” or obligated to ride in a bike facility (that’s the cry from more vehicular-cyclist-minded folks whenever the topic of separation has come up.)

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Tbird May 23, 2011 at 10:53 am

        I guess that sort of makes sense seeing this cycle track is a stand alone, but in an integrated system you wouldn’t want ppl. merging across lanes in VC style. You need turn boxes at the corner.

        thanks for the follow up.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

      • was carless May 23, 2011 at 10:57 pm

        I’ve biked in Amsterdam and other places abroad. I personally think the rollable curb was a smart move, as it prevents people with skinny tires from crashing on the lip.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Alan 1.0 May 23, 2011 at 3:03 pm

      An ‘actual’ cycle track is at street level and has a raised square profile curb separating the modes. This is exactly what keeps motorists here in Europe from parking on them.

      I’ve seen cycle tracks in Europe at street level, sidewalk level, and in between. In the first two designs even a small econo-car would have had no problem mounting the curb to park. In other words, the curb isn’t (always) what keeps drivers from parking on European cycletracks. I suspect that culture, education and enforcement play a larger role than curbs.

      Can you believe a city in Poland would have better bike facilities than PDX?

      I understand that Warsaw had some advantages in reconstruction and urban renewal which Portland did not have after WWII (thankfully!).

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Tbird May 23, 2011 at 9:35 pm

        Well, sure… Warsaw has be reconstructed since WWII, BUT that was in the center and basically the Stalinist view of architecture was ALL about the car or public transit. Bike infrastructure simply did not figure into the plan. As a result the center of the city has the least / worst systems. It is, in fact, the outlying neighborhoods built in the last 20 years that are covered with cycle tracks and routing…
        Don’t get me wrong. There are issues here. IT IS still Poland after all. 🙂

        As for the street level / raised cycle track. I have not seen a cycle track raised to sidewalk level. Not saying it absolutely doesn’t exist, but in the almost 3 years out of the last 6 that I’ve spent in Europe, I haven’t seen it…My point being more about the curb profile than raised or not, although the two are in this case somewhat related. The large raised curb will prevent unwanted motorists from parking in the track, mostly..

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Tbird May 24, 2011 at 1:02 am

          Ok, the caffeine deprived statement above sounds slightly incorrect: I meant it is the cycle tracks NOT the outlying neighborhoods that were built in the last 20 years…My point being the cycle tracks weren’t really part of the post war reconstruction.
          ~ that is all 🙂

          Recommended Thumb up 0

    • spare_wheel May 23, 2011 at 6:05 pm

      I LOVE the ramped curbs. IMO, any facility that prevents a cyclists from crossing the street (or taking the lane) is simply treating cyclists as second class citizens. After all, restaurants, cafes, bars, shops, and homes are located on BOTH sides of the street. I’ve always been somewhat discomfited by Copenhagen’s regimented cycle tracks and its “green wave” (the idea that cyclists should move along in one giant mass is not appealing and smells vaguely totalitarian).

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Tbird May 23, 2011 at 10:43 am

    Thanks JM. hopefully I haven’t come off as ‘too’ crass. 🙂

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • tankfixer May 23, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    A bicycle track in the neighborhood with the most unpaved streets in the city..

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Paul Johnson May 23, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    I can’t help but to think that “the weave” going behind and out from behind parking strips is going to be problematic on icy days; straight-line would have been better, even if it meant the elimination of parking.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • are May 23, 2011 at 9:52 pm

      looks to me like the weave is for bioswales

      Recommended Thumb up 0