Support BikePortland - Journalism that Matters

Off-road bike trails figure into new property acquired by Parks Bureau

Posted by on May 4th, 2011 at 9:10 pm

River View Forest will soon be
owned by the City.
(Photo: City of Portland)

Calling it the “largest land acquisition in recent decades,” two City bureaus (Parks and Environmental Services) teamed up with Metro to purchase 146 acres of natural area known as the “River View Forest” in Southwest Portland. The $11.25 million deal was announced Monday and was approved by City Council yesterday.

The privately owned land, which is adjacent to and south of River View Cemetery off of SW Macadam Ave, is currently home to a large network of unofficial bike trails that have been ridden for many years. Once the City of Portland becomes the official land-owner (which should be finalized later this summer), what does the future hold for mountain bike access?

As we know from recent experience with Forest Park, that is by no means a foregone conclusion.

Red shows approximate location of River View property.

City Commissioner Nick Fish (who oversees the Parks Bureau) said in a statement on Monday that the purchase, “puts a finishing touch on a chain of green spaces extending along Portland’s west side from Forest Park to the north all the way to Tryon Creek State Park at the southern border of the city.” Fish also said that, “We’ll be working with the community to create a plan for the area that includes ample opportunity for enjoying the space – hiking trails, environmental education programs, and more.”

“I still live in Portland largely due to this tract of land.”
— Erik Tonkin, veteran mountain biker and co-owner of Sellwood Cycle Repair

According to well-known local bike rider, professional racer, and co-owner of Sellwood Cycle Repair, Erik Tonkin, this area has been a popular riding spot for many years and is known colloquially as the “LC Trails” (for nearby Lewis & Clark College” or “The Cemetery” (for nearby River View Cemetery). Tonkin tells us the trails fall into the classic private/public grey area. The land was owned by River View Cemetery but they didn’t actively enforce a no-bikes policy (similar to the paved roads through their cemetery).

Tonkin says he’s very grateful that River View Cemetery and Lewis & Clark College have “generously looked the other way while some of us have recreated on their land.” Tonkin has ridden the trials for 18 years and adds that, “I still live in Portland largely due to this tract of land.”

The trails as they exist today are only suitable for very skilled riders, Tonkin says. They are “nearly always muddy” and are cut into steep sections of the hillside. “The challenges would be vast to make an off-road bicycling trail system… but I can’t imagine a place where I’d like it more.”

Northwest Trail Alliance Advocacy Director Tom Archer says his group has heard from many people who enjoy riding in the area and he hopes Portland Parks keeps off-road biking access on the table as it begins to develop a plan for River View Forest.

In an email to BikePortland he wrote; “This is a great opportunity to formally expand mountain biking in the Portland Parks system, to work with Parks and other stakeholders to improve the current condition of the property and demonstrate that mountain biking can be compatible with long-term environmental stewardship.”

According to Commissioner Fish’s office, it will be several years until a formal public process to develop a trail plan is underway. The first order of business, says Fish policy coordinator Emily Hicks, is to evaluate the 146 acres and begin native species restoration.

Once the public process begins, Hicks says the new natural area “will include recreational trails.”

Will off-road bicycling be permitted on those trails?

“We’ll make sure that all user groups are involved in the process,” Hicks tells us, “including our off-road biking community.”

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for discrimination or harassment including expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

42
Leave a Reply

avatar
29 Comment threads
13 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
35 Comment authors
longgoneAlexJeredLents guyflywater Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Charley
Guest
Charley

FINALLY!!!! I’ve heard about secret trails in SW Portland. Now I know where they are. It’s been like a giant secret for all these years.

captainkarma
Guest
captainkarma

I hope there will be a path through there somehow to get through to PCC from the new Sellwood bridge. *That* would be so mightily awesome, I don’t even care what else happens.

davemess
Guest
davemess

Those trails could fill a gaping hole in Portland biking infrastructure, let’s hope the city does the right thing.

Burk
Guest
Burk

Great googly moogly!

Kiel Johnson (Go By Bike)
Guest

One of my friends at Lewis and Clark built a mud hut in those woods and lived there until someone from the cemetery came and bulldozed it down.

Bjorn
Guest
Bjorn

I’m not so sure about that headline, to me the statement from the city sounds more like step one try to ban bikes step two start a process to consider readmitting them. Frankly if some of these trails are 18 years old I am not so sure that the property owner can stop people from using them at this point. My understanding is that 7 years of use creates a right of way.

Mike bodd
Guest
Mike bodd

Good luck with that.

jonny a
Guest
jonny a

he lives in Portland due to that tract of land? i feel like he’s kind of missing how awesome the rest of Portland is. try moving somewhere else and then you’ll realize how much.

Ian Crozier
Guest
Ian Crozier

I am so excited for this, I only wish I was still living in town to it myself. I spent a great deal of my time as a student at Lewis and Clark exploring and enjoying these trails on foot. A partnership between the school`s environmental programs and the city could produce great results. This forest is full of all sorts of beautiful and myserious things. Here is a rough map of the trails in the forest I made a few years ago: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zyhnkpexVvQ/TcKtG9ZbC5I/AAAAAAAABKw/ECnVPOz0ao4/s1600/ianmap_big.JPG

rwl1776
Guest
rwl1776

Does anyone remember Cooper Mountain in the SW? It had bike trails there, and when Metro turned it into an official park, bikes were kicked out. Yes, PUMP was involved with that planning process too, but Metro and the neighbors decided against bicycle access, despite people having ridden their bikes their for decades. We’ll see if bicyclists get kicked out of this area too by the NIMBY’s.

Brian E.
Guest
Brian E.

I’d like to document the illegal hiking trail that has been put in at the base of Saltzman. It runs up the creek from HWY 30 towards FL2. No possible way it has been used by Mountain bikers.

lisa
Guest
lisa

FL 2 is nowhere near Saltzman.

Brian
Guest
Brian

He mentioned that it is a trail that runs “towards FL2.” Go for it Brian E. Get a camera in there and document the damage. Send it to some news media outlets and see what happens.

L
Guest
L

Funny. Same thing was said in the comments section here about the illegal trail discovered last year that was clearly made by mountain bikers. “Bikers didn’t’ do it, hikers did it.” Once the photographs came in, it was patently obvious that the trail was indeed constructed by bikers. Good luck.

GlowBoy
Guest
GlowBoy

“My understanding is that 7 years of use creates a right of way.” -Bjorn

Not when it comes to bikes. We have precedent after precedent (locally, statewide and nationally) of bikers being kicked off trails that they had used for years, with little if any public process. Just happened a few years ago at Oaks Bottom, and I’m sure it will happen at Mt. Tabor before long.

I just recently “discovered” (i.e., rode) the Riverview trails for the first time this winter, after having heard about them for years. They’re great trails for the more advanced rider.

My first reaction when I read about the city’s acquisition was “awww, crap.” I’m not optimistic about continued access, and not just because of the city’s track record. The cemetery may indeed have looked the other way but the trails were/are officially posted as closed … so, officially, getting bike access will require a change in status, which will be an uphill battle. Also, given the steep, often-muddy nature of the trails and the likely surge in usage, many if not all will be deemed unsuitable for public bike access due to erosion and/or safety concerns.

dwainedibbly
Guest
dwainedibbly

This would be a great opportunity for the City to make amends for locking the MTB community out of Forest Park last year.

David Noble
Guest
David Noble

The fact that River View Cemetery does not have the necessary staff to daily, or even weekly, police 175 acres of forest land should not be viewed as “looking the other way”, or giving tacit approval for trespassing. This is still private property; it is posted as such; and our staff do, from time to time, canvas the property for trespasssers, who are asked to leave, whether hiking, biking or camping. The fact that we have agreed to allow bicycling on a portion of our paved roads, during specified hours, does not mean that we have opened the forest area for use. It is unfortunate that the City of Portland has not been willing to create opportunities for this form of recreation on publicly-owned property. But the appropriate response to that problem is not to trespass on private property. Rather, it is to put more and more pressure on city officials to do the right thing and make accommodation for your sport on public property.
David Noble, Executive Director
River View Cemetery Association

NS
Guest
NS

Thanks David, well said. It is now up to the neighbors of this property (of which I am one) to lobby the city to provide trails that serve all users, including cyclists. I for one will be advocating strongly for mt bike trails, as will several other neighbors.

f5
Guest
f5

..and I live less than a mile away and had no idea this was there.

Access coordinates please?

EQ
Guest
EQ

f5: did you NOT see the message right above yours? It’s an ILLEGAL trail on PRIVATE property. Sheesh.

Matt
Guest
Matt

…Sheesh…

marshmallow
Guest
marshmallow

The thrill of riding secret illegal trails goes out the window when everyone knows. I propose a sign that reads ‘trespassers will be shot by order of multnomah county sheriff’ to bring back some of the excitement…then have loud firecrackers go off if a rider is spotted. A minute later, ambulance sirens. maybe some dead corpses from the cemetery’s unclaimed corpse program. One could go from riding the trails to funeral with dearly beloveds in the span of a couple hours, all in one spot. A money maker for sure.

JPDX
Guest
JPDX

If Portland is so bike friendly then they really need to get with the program and offer mountain biking access too. Not all bikers are spandex wearing roadies.

Lents Guy
Guest
Lents Guy

yeah, not all bikers in Portland are spandex wearing roadies. some of us are spandex wearing mtb’ers!
but seriously “”We’ll make sure that all user groups are involved in the process”. involved in the process doesn’t mean any specific group will be listened to. Some groups, as we all know, are more important than others. In case you don’t know that I’d suggest re-reading ‘Animal Farm’.
But, it would be great if people who aren’t mtb’ers would realize that mtb’ing and nature do co-exist quite well thank you. And mtb’ers do care about the environment. I know I do.

Diego
Guest
Diego

Hate to break it to you guys, but the city has NO intention of allowing bikes on that property. Read their grant proposal for obtaining funding for the land (link below). Most of it will be a fenced off wildlife refuge with limited access for research projects (which is what the college would want anyway). Trails will only be available on the flat part of the land up at the top.

So get in your “mountain biking” while you still can.

(Or as I would call it, “riding a motorcycle-sans-motor down a muddy hill” — I ride by this area regularly and more than half of the people I see going into that area with bikes have enormous downhill rigs that you couldn’t ride back up those hills to save your life)

Here is a link to the grant application, thankfully cached by Google.

JPDX
Guest
JPDX

I noticed that from Capt. Fishpants. Says something about wildlife viewing and hiking trails. Like we need any more of this in Portland. Everywhere I go there are nature paths and hiking trails for viewing the abundance of wildlife in Portland (yha right).

a.O
Guest
a.O

Equally shocking is that someone who is neither a Multnomah County resident nor a mountain biker has such a vast array of anti-mtn biking posts here on bikeportland about mtn biking in Portland.

flywater
Guest
flywater

“…this area has been a popular riding spot for many years and is known colloquially as the “LC Trails” (for nearby Lewis & Clark College” or “The Cemetery” (for nearby River View Cemetery). Tonkin tells us the trails fall into the classic private/public grey area. The land was owned by River View Cemetery but they didn’t actively enforce a no-bikes policy (similar to the paved roads through their cemetery).

Tonkin says he’s very grateful that River View Cemetery and Lewis & Clark College have “generously looked the other way while some of us have recreated on their land.” Tonkin has ridden the trials for 18 years

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You all make me sick. You have trespassing on private property, for years and claim the land owner looked the other way? There is some kind of gray area? There is no gray area when it comes to property ownership. Private property is, well, private. I guess Tonkin won’t mind if we come over and camp in his back yard, it being a gray area?

You all are like the so called Tea Party! Rant, rave and throw tantrums. You are common criminals, abusing nature and people. How will you react when Commissioner Fish decides the best thing for this land is to restore it as a natural area, without the erosion and destruction that single track perpetuates? Another rash of illegal trails in Forest Park?

Do us all a favor and go away.

Lents guy
Guest
Lents guy

I hate to burst your bubble flywater, but single track trails – for the purpose of hiking and/or riding mountain bikes on – do not perpetuate ‘erosion and destruction’ – unless they are poorly designed or improperly situated.
So, I think you be calling the kettle black here when you call some of us Tea Partier types…