Support BikePortland - Journalism that Matters

Community rallies against ODOT’s plans to tear down Flint Ave bridge

Posted by on January 16th, 2018 at 3:26 pm

Veteran activist Ron Buel works the crowd on Flint Avenue this morning.
(Photo: Emily Guise)

They offered free coffee and donuts, and some bad news: The bridge they were giving it out on will be removed if the Oregon Department of Transportation ever breaks ground on their $450 million I-5 Rose Quarter project.

Volunteers from the No More Freeways coalition and Bike Loud PDX hosted the event with an aim to educate people about the project and add signatures to a petition they plan to deliver to Portland City Council this Thursday.

I was there for just a few minutes and was surprised to be greeted by Jim Howell and Ron Buel, two veterans of Portland’s past freeway fights. They were both eager to show me a strip of grassy hillside adjacent to the current I-5 freeway that separates thousands of polluting cars from students at Harriet Tubman Middle School. “That’s where ODOT wants to put the new lanes,” Buel said.

No More Freeways organizer Aaron Brown said nearly 100 people stopped to sign their petition (which is open until tomorrow at 2:00 pm) that reads: “The Rose Quarter Freeway Expansion is #NotAnImprovement to the local streets of North and Northeast Portland. This $450 million freeway is already demonstrably proven to not have any positive impact on congestion relief, will not adequately address the true safety concerns on Portland’s streets, will exacerbate existing unhealthy poor air quality near Harriet Tubman Middle School, and will hinder our ambitious carbon emission initiatives.” So far the petition has about 200 names.

(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)

(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)

Advertisement

(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)

Emily Guise is the co-chair of Bike Loud PDX and worked a shift at the event this morning: “We were able to raise a lot of awareness about the proposed removal of bridge and the other proposed bike/ped changes, as this was the first time many people had heard about it,” she shared with us in a follow-up email.

One of our readers contacted via Twitter said, “Biking past them today was the first time I’d ever heard of it! I would hate it if that bridge was gone. There really is no better way to get onto Broadway.”

ODOT’s plans are to remove the Flint Avenue bridge and replace it with new crossing that will connect between Hancock and Dixon.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

NOTE: Thanks for sharing and reading our comments. To ensure this is a welcoming and productive space, all comments are manually approved by staff. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for meanness, discrimination or harassment. Comments with expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia will be deleted and authors will be banned.

9
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
XsorenSteve B.maxDkathryn Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
joan
Subscriber

Cheers to Aaron Brown, Emily Guise, No More Freeways, and Bike Loud PDX for their work on this issue!

Betsy Reese
Guest
Betsy Reese

“Save the Flint Ave. Bridge” may not be the best rallying cry for pro-bicycle/pedestrian anti-freeway activists. The bike/ped rationale for preferring Flint Ave. over the proposed Hancock/Dixon crossing is not strong.

While I am no fan of freeway expansion, I do recognize the importance of not forfeiting my opportunities to help influence specific aspects of the plan should the freeway expansion project prove to be inevitable.

For example, while continuing to protest the freeway expansion on more solid grounds, like cost and induced demand, maybe we should also be looking at the surface street changes that are proposed. In case the the plan does go through, or in case the TDM trial solves the freeway problem but the land use and surface street aspects of the project are still implemented, we want to understand and perhaps influence those changes.

And also, let’s hold ODOT and PBOT to the promises made for the project. For example, speaking of Flint, the map included in this BP article and currently being disseminated by ODOT online, to the press, and at public info sessions omits two “potential” MUPS that connect Flint from Tillamook to Broadway. These are clearly shown on the plan that was finalized and adopted by City Council and the Oregon Transportation Commission in October 2012. Where are they now? https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/422031 p. 110

mark smith
Guest
mark smith

I honestly don’t see what the big deal is.

soren
Guest
soren

“The bike/ped rationale for preferring Flint Ave. over the proposed Hancock/Dixon crossing is not strong.”

Given that the Flint Ave crossing already exists it’s kind weird to argue that a strong argument is needed to justify it’s demolition and replacement.

Nevertheless, here are some arguments that I consider to be relatively strong ones:

* The Hancock/Dixon crossing requires a steep grade that will discourage use by people cycling.

* The Hancock/Dixon crossing does not align well with the N/S street grid.

* My confidence that ODOT will follow through on unspecified bike/ped improvements is very weak.