A golden opportunity for Oregon cycling

Wow! That was easiest letter I have ever sent. The form they provide forwards the letter directly to my representative and senator. Thanks for the link!

GO VELO!

Pardon my ignorance, but could someone better explain how this bill will be proceeding? Being a Senate bill now, must it pass there before proceeding to the House? If that’s the case, might it be best to write to State Senators now and hold off on writing Reps until the bill is actually in front of them?

Also, is there any approximation of when this will actually come up for a vote in the Senate?

good questions DR,

at this point, the bill is still in the Senate and is awaiting referral to committee.

During its time in committee, it will likely have a public hearing. We will organize a “Bike Day in Salem” for that hearing (stay tuned!).

After committee it must then be passed by the Senate and House before becoming law.

At this point, we’re just trying to educate as many of the lawmakers as possible about what a velodrome is and how large of a community in Oregon supports this bill.

Just sent mine in… it’s so easy even a caveman could do it. Here’s my text, feel free to cut an’ paste of modify as needed.

“I am asking for your support of Senate Bill 926, the Velodrome Bill. I believe that construction of these two facilities would have a positive impact on the State’s ecomomy and provide a healthy, envirommentally friendly recreation opportunity for Oregonians.
I feel it would be a positive use of public funds.”

You can fill out an online form at this link:

http://www.leg.state.or.us/writelegsltr/

Man, that was easy. Thanks for the link, keep up the good work.

I dunno….I mean, the velodromes sound like a cool idea, but I don’t see much of a link to the advocacy that’s generally promoted here. Seeing as how probably 1% or less of Portland’s biking population will actually use the thing, it seems like that money would be better spent improving infrastructure that affects everyone. Jon, you say it’s an opportunity to “improve cycling in Oregon”, but who, for instance, on this website would actually benefit from it? You said:

[i]Two new velodromes in Oregon would benefit everyone from a kid learning about dedication and practice while attending a summer camp to the potential Olympic hopeful training for the World Championships and the hotel owner with the “No vacancy” sign during a big event.[/i]

So yes…maybe a few kids would get into it. Someone here could be an Olympic athlete, and that would be cool if you were into that sort of thing. And I, as well as many others, could care les if some hotel owner gets a little richer.

Maybe I’m missing something, and if I am please let me know.

Brad,

Track racing is growing more and more each day. The one velodrome that we have here in Oregon is completely outdated. Southern California has an indoor track…..it seems silly that rainy Portland does not. my .02

I wasn’t saying we shouldn’t get one. I’m just saying it’s being presented as something that will be a great benefit to everyone, whereas in all reality it’s just a professional (and amateur) sporting venue. It is certainly cool, and I will probably use it occasionally, but I don’t consider it “a golden opportunity for Oregon cycling” by any stretch of the imagination. That would be like if they were going to build a major league baseball stadium in Portland, and all of the coaches in Little League started telling the kids what a great opportunity this was for them.

Portland would benefit from a velodrome because:
Tourism-hosting regional and national events would bring people and money.
Branding-It would be another reason portland would be the premier cycing city in the US.
Jobs-Another reason bikes companies would have to move opperations here.
Butts on bikes-Having year round access to a velodrome, more people would use it, plus the opportunity to get kids into it means more cyclists, and that benefits us all.

Uh, Brad…your baseball analogy is just what Paul Allen tried in Seattle. Lure in the Soccer Moms to vote yes on his football stadium, by saying the stadium “could” be used for soccer tournaments. yeah right.

I think the bike community is much more inclusive than Mr. Allen! Look at what’s going on at Alpenrose now, ranging from hosting Track Nationals, to their all-comers nights and lesson nights. Imagine what it could be if we had a modern track.

Here is a link to the bill’s text:

http://www.leg.state.or.us/07reg/measures/sb0900.dir/sb0926.intro.html

Does anyone know where the Lottery money is coming from? It looks like it is being taken from another program in Parks and Rec and moved to this one – or is it part of expected increases in Lottery proceeds?

Brad severely under estimates the number of people that use the current velodrome at Alpenrose. It is reasonable to expect that a covered velodrome that would be usable during the 7 month of the year that Alpenrose is not usable (at least not dependably) would be used by even more people. Use of the velodrome is not limited to professional and amateur racers. In fact, there are many users that don’t race. The baseball argument also breaks down since kids do actually use the velodrome. In fact, a velodrome is really the best and easiest place to run a kid’s cycling program.

It looks like the Gov’s budget expects a hefty increase in lottery proceeds – about 15% or so.

Its also worth noting that the Gov’s budget asks the legislature to create and fund a Parks and Rec position to promote cycling in Oregon.

Well it is what the lottery boards in other states have noticed; lottery players increase as the job market falls and the econamy goes to shit. We begin to take riskes in the hope we can be that one in 700.000.

we are monkeys.