Note: I'm currently on a family trip and not working normal hours. Email and message responses will be delayed and story and posting volumes here and on our social media accounts will not be at their usual levels until I return to Portland September 4th. Thanks for your patience and understanding. - Jonathan Maus, BikePortland Publisher and Editor

PBOT project has potential for parking-protected pedaling on NE Killingsworth

This section of NE Killingsworth has a lot of potential. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

The City of Portland is gearing up to repave Northeast Killingsworth Street between 53rd and Cully Boulevard and parking-protected bike lanes are on the table. The project is similar to the Hawthorne Pave & Paint in that the transportation bureau (PBOT) is seizing an opportunity to redesign the roadway in conjunction with a planned paving project.

This segment of NE Killingsworth currently has unprotected, door-zone bike lanes and a 30 mph speed limit. You might recall that there’s already been some advocacy history with this project. Back in March, we reported that PBOT’s initial plan was to simply repave the street and replace it with the exact same cross-section as it has today: one general travel lane in each direction, one center turn lane, bike lanes, and parking on both sides.

But when a coalition of nonprofits got wind of PBOT’s plan, they demanded a pause to consider protected bike lanes. PBOT listened and responded. Now it appears the city is ramping up outreach in order to finalize a plan and get the project slated for construction next spring.

According to cross-section drawings on the project website, PBOT is open to swapping the current bike lane and parking lane. This would put bicycle riders curbside and make them protected from other lane users due to a buffer of parking spaces — a common PBOT design that’s currently in use on inner SE Hawthorne, N Rosa Parks Way, and many other places. When PBOT creates these parking-protected bike lanes, it’s not a clean swap. In order to boost visibility at intersections, they must reduce the amount of car parking spaces.

PBOT is clearly feeling sheepish about how this will be received by people who live and work on the street because they go to great lengths on the project website to explain how car parking might be impacted. Here’s how they frame the changes:

To maintain safe visibility, roughly half the on-street parking spaces will have to be removed if we implement a parking-protected bike lane. However, a recent parking study indicates that most blocks will still have enough parking capacity to meet current demand…

To assess the parking impacts of the proposed redesign of NE Killingsworth with parking-protected bike lanes, we calculated how many spaces would be available post-implementation, then looked at how the current occupancy compares to that revised capacity. We found that in both the average and peak usage scenarios, most blocks will have plenty of available on-street parking spaces. However, in some blocks the demand will outstrip the proposed supply and in that case drivers may have to park on adjacent blocks and walk further to their destinations…

All in all, these parking impacts appear to be relatively minor and worth it for the safety benefits that the proposed street redesign offers.

From the survey.

PBOT has also launched an online survey to gauge public opinion about the idea. One thing that caught my eye in the survey was a question where I could pick my top three priorities that would help the street reach the stated project goals. There was only one option that mentioned bicycling and it was about improving the bike network “in the vicinity of Killingsworth.” I found it odd that they didn’t say “on Killingsworth.”

PBOT has an unfortunate history of pushing bicycle riders away from main streets and onto backstreets. Portland will never reach its transportation goals if we don’t insist on building high-quality, low-stress cycling facilities on major streets. This Killingsworth project is another golden opportunity to transform a important neighborhood arterial from a car-oriented thoroughfare to something much more accessible, humane and efficient.

In addition to a possible bike lane redesign, PBOT also plans to upgrade some crossings. They’ll replace the mid-block half-signal between 54th and 55th with a median island crossing and will add more islands to the existing crossing at 64th.

View the design plans, find the survey link, and learn more at the project website.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
one
one
1 year ago

PLEASE make protected lanes on this stretch. This stretch is a SUPER fast one for car racers.

Toadslick
1 year ago

I used to live in this neighborhood and biked on Killingsworth nearly every day. Removing half the parking spots would have no impact on drivers. The strategy that I and most other people I saw biking on that road employed was to bike in the long stretches of unused parking lane and only veer into the bike lane in the rare instances that a car was actually parked on Killingsworth.

Matthew
Matthew
1 year ago

So when PBOT’s initial plan was met with well-galvanized resistance, they came up with this possible revised version with “safety benefits that the proposed street redesign offers.”

This begs the question that seems to haunt PBOT regularly: Why didn’t they come up with the safety benefits proposal in the first place? Or the related question: Why do they avoid the clearly safer option even when cost is not a hindrance?

Initially, it was going to be the status quo of the exact same configuration. That’s disheartening and provides another example of how unlikely it is that Portland will produce world-class biking infrastructure while the present bureau’s civil servants occupy the PBOT hallways.

maxD
maxD
1 year ago
Reply to  Matthew

Zero Vision

Jay Reese
Jay Reese
1 year ago
Reply to  Matthew

I had the same thought. PBOTs home page claims to be a partner in creating a livable city and even shows a photo of cyclist. You’d think their job would be to consider the perspective of the cyclist/pedestrian in every project and not rely on citizen activism.

Steven Smith
Steven Smith
1 year ago

Why would PBOT even consider maintaining the existing configuration? I thought protected lanes were the de facto choice for new configurations. What was their initial rationale for no change?

It’s frustrating trying to understand what PBOT is thinking and having to track all this crap. Just do the right thing from the start! Transportation is responsible for more than 40% of green house gas emissions. Less driving is safer and healthier for everybody. Make it easier for people to bike! Geez!

Joseph E
1 year ago

The main benefit of this will be narrowing the physical roadway, which should help reduce speeding. It will also reduce the exposed crossing distance for pedestrians.