Joe Bike

Influential Central Eastside transportation committee seeks new members

Posted by on December 12th, 2019 at 3:13 pm

You could be a part of making the Central Eastside a nicer place to ride.
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)

“They could really use some fresh ideas and new blood.”
— Tony Jordan, Portlanders for Parking Reform

Not all of the City of Portland’s dizzying array of advisory committees are created equal. Some are merely rubber stamps, others dive deep into wonky policy details to make substantive changes. Some are filled with bright-eyed volunteers, others are filled with lobbying pros paid to show up and represent a specific interest.

Then there’s the Transportation and Parking Advisory Committee (TPAC) of the Central Eastside Industrial Council, one of the only committees that actually gets to spend real money and has a history of bending the City of Portland’s will to their favor. Tasked with oversight of a growing and dynamic part of of our city, this committee has an annual budget of nearly $2 million and its members exercise significant influence over a host of issues and projects.

And right now the they’re looking for seven new members — nearly half their total membership.

Advertisement

Given the key projects that will go through the CEIC in the coming years — the Green Loop, Central City in Motion bikeways, bus lanes, the new Blumenauer Bridge just to name a few — we’ve got to have smart, open-minded, forward-thinking people on this committee.

Formed in 2012 when City Council passed the Central Eastside Parking Management Plan (PDF), TPAC receives funding from parking meter revenue.

In recent years they’ve used that revenue to fund dubious projects. One of them was a shuttle bus that drove employees from parking structures owned by TPAC members to offices in buildings owned by TPAC members. The shuttle, which shut down earlier this year, cost $250,000 per year (and remember that’s money that goes to City of Portland via parking meter revenue and is then distributed to the TPAC) and had only about 1,500 annual riders. The TPAC also voted to spend the money on private security patrols.

Advertisement

Last year TPAC unexpectedly came out in opposition to protected bike lane projects in PBOT’s Central City in Motion Plan because, as their Executive Director Kate Merrill said, “We can’t handle the loss of 250 parking spaces.”

Founder of Portlanders for Parking Reform Tony Jordan follows the committee closely. While he says some of the TPAC’s parking management policy is “among the most advanced in the country” he thinks they’re missing the boat. “I’ve never gotten the feeling the committee fully embraces the reality that we can’t just build wider roads and more parking garages in the 21st century. They have used hundreds of thousands of dollars on feasibility studies for parking structures and the infamous, and now defunct, Water Avenue Shuttle.”

“They could really use some fresh ideas and new blood,” Jordan says.

TPAC is looking to recruit seven new voting members and four non-voting members. Since they can only have up to 15 voting members, this is a real opportunity to change the dynamic of this committee. Applications are open until December 15th and spots are open to anyone who lives in Portland. Find the application and more details on the City’s website.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org
— Get our headlines delivered to your inbox.
— Support this independent community media outlet with a one-time contribution or monthly subscription.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

7 Comments
  • Avatar
    FDUP December 12, 2019 at 9:28 pm

    FWIW, plz don’t ‘advocate’ for the CEID, it is fine to ride just as it is now, traffic is minimal and/or slow, etc., etc, just ride it! if they ‘develop’ it as a bike route it will just ruin it for many cyclists and/or be the forerunner of more car-oriented gentrification. It’s not ‘perfect’ but it functions pretty well!

    Recommended Thumb up 8

    • Avatar
      John Lascurettes December 13, 2019 at 12:09 am

      I actually like all the weird lack of sidewalks and all the loading ramps west of MLK. Because of the mixture of shipping trucks, pedestrians in the street (especially at lunch), and bikes, it really confuses drivers and they all go a lot slower and pay more attention in the area (Water Ave. excepted, but it kind of proves your point).

      Recommended Thumb up 4

    • Avatar
      Chris I December 13, 2019 at 8:59 am

      CEID is going to be adding density. If we don’t address active transportation infrastructure needs, it is going to be very dangerous. We have already had several fatalities in the past few years, so I would argue that it is not “fine” right now.

      Recommended Thumb up 7

      • Avatar
        FDUP December 14, 2019 at 1:23 pm

        Not if you simply make it a car-free zone from the get-go. There is no ‘rule’ that says every new development needs to accessible 24/7/365 by personal motorized transport vehicles.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Avatar
        FDUP December 16, 2019 at 5:00 pm

        FWIW, the last cyclist fatality in this area I am aware of happened on Water Ave. and the cyclist was in the bike lane, but hit in an intersection; so much for infrastructure protecting cyclists.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    mh December 13, 2019 at 12:51 pm

    I thought the requirements were a little more limited, and applicants had to have a relationship with the area – live, work, worship are the ones usually listed. Is “occasionally shop” enough?

    Recommended Thumb up 1

    • Avatar
      Johnny Bye Carter December 14, 2019 at 10:27 am

      “To be eligible for the advisory committee, members must live, play, worship, go to school, work or do business in the City of Portland.”

      I think “do business” or “play” would cover occasional shopping.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

  • Avatar