Support BikePortland

Parks bureau will begin paving key section of ‘Sellwood Gap’ next month

Posted by on January 14th, 2019 at 2:22 pm

South of Umatilla, the Springwater turns into an unimproved gravel path. This will be smoothly paved and get significant upgrades by the end of summer.
(Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

13 years after it was officially identified, the City of Portland plans to finally close a major gap in the Springwater Corridor.

Pink lines will be paved this summer. Orange line shows current detour. (Map courtesy Portland Parks)

Known as the Sellwood Gap, the popular paved path currently ends at SE Umatilla, forcing bicycle riders into a one-mile detour on surface streets before joining back up with the path at 19th and Ochoco (across from the Goodwill Outlet Store).

Now the Portland Parks and Recreation bureau is just weeks from breaking ground on a $1.83 million project that will close a half-mile of the gap — the section between Umatilla and 13th. Funding comes from a federal grant and Parks System Development Charges (fees paid by developers). Construction is due to start the first or second week of February and be completed by August of this year. Like other parts of the Springwater Corridor right-of-way, this section is adjacent to railroad tracks owned by Oregon Pacific Railroad. Metro, our regional elected government, acquired easements to build this section of the path in 2010.

BikePortland relies on financial support from readers like you.
Please subscribe or donate today!

The project will make a direct and seamless connection from Umatilla to 13th. Once complete, the new path will end where 13th becomes SE Andover Place, just outside the entrance to a enclave of homes adjacent to Waverley Country Club. Despite the stone walls that mark the entry to this neighborhood, bicycle riders are allowed to use the streets. As some of you may already know, this neighborhood provides a quiet and low-stress way to connect to the path on SE 17th that goes to Milwaukie (but rumor has it they are not fond of “bicyclists” so I won’t be surprised if they make protest noises once this project is completed).

Looking northwest from 13th. This is where the new section will end.

Advertisement

springwater-missing-gap-study-2006
(Springwater Missing Gap Report, Alta Planning + Design – 2006.)

By this August, the remaining gap in the Springwater Corridor will be only 2,000 feet (or 0.4 miles). In 2015, Metro negotiated the easement rights for the segment between 13th and 17th avenues. While there’s not timetable for that section, Parks says the planning process has started. Once it’s built we’ll be a tantalizing 450 feet or so from a full connection of the path. That final section won’t be as simple or cheap as adding pavement next to a rail line because the City of Portland will also have to build a safe crossing over 17th.

You can get a sense of design and planning recommendations for the future connection by looking through the 2006 Springwater Missing Gap Report embedded above.

Once this section is paved — except for a short stretch between OMSI and SE Ivon Street (thanks Ross Island Sand and Gravel!) — you’ll be able to bike on a relatively carfree path for about 8.5 miles between the Rose Quarter and (south of) Milwaukie using a combination of the Eastbank Esplanade, Springwater, and Trolley Trail.

Note that no closures or detours will be required during this project. However, if you this section of path (which is unpaved, but open to the public), expect it to be closed during construction.

For more info, see the project website.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

37
Leave a Reply

avatar
13 Comment threads
24 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
cbikesmatchupancakesCory PDouglas KGlowBoy Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Eric H
Guest
Eric H

Bummer. There goes that fun bit of the Springwater. Guess it was fun while it lasted.

bikeninja
Guest
bikeninja

Never fear, the city of Portland will be upgrading 50 miles of dirt and potholes to a network of intermittent gravel trails throughout the city for the benefit of urban gravel fans, lets rejoice.

https://www.oregonlive.com/expo/news/g66l-2019/01/e06812986d2229/portland-will-fill-potholes-le.html

GlowBoy
Guest
GlowBoy

While I’m sure that upgrade of dirt and potholes will be nice for motor vehicle users, as a bicyclist I’ve never met a Portland unpaved street I couldn’t enjoy riding through.

bArbaroo
Guest
bArbaroo

Exactly what I thought!

Brian
Guest
Brian

+2

I wear many hats
Guest
I wear many hats

+3

GlowBoy
Guest
GlowBoy

That was my thought too. I never let the gravel and ballast rocks stop me riding through there, although for the record I support this project.

Cory P
Guest
Cory P

This section was decidedly less fun on a skateboard.

matchupancakes
Guest
matchupancakes

YESSSS! Increasing all ages, all abilities access to biking and the greater Springwater trail is good for everyone! Despair not for the lose of gravel. Plenty still abounds nearby within Brentwood-Darlington and Woodstock, just north of the Springwater!

PS
Guest
PS

What? How does this improve any of that. Currently, the path ends at a greenway on Umatilla and connects to SE 19th also a greenway (with a signal crossing at SE 17th) with direct access to the path. What you’re applauding connects to SE Linn, which from SE 13th to SE 17th is a major cut through route for vehicle traffic and does not have a signal at SE 17th. Of course, one can ride through Garthwick and end up at Ochoco and SE 17th, but that is no longer a 20MPH zone and cars/trucks know it, so have fun crossing with your all ages and abilities there.

matchupancakes
Guest
matchupancakes

Incremental development. Don’t lose sight of the forest while looking at the trees. This is a small step towards a connected Springwater Corridor that eventually will not detour through side streets. It won’t happen this year and the crossing of 17th at Ochoco is a significant barrier that has already been identified in the linked reported in BikePortand’s article. This small piece is not an end but a step towards that all ages and abilities path coming into existence. Chin up!

SilkySlim
Guest
SilkySlim

This is great news. Still a two-putt from completion, but I’ll take it!!

was carless
Guest
was carless

Finally. I’ve been waiting about 12 years for this project.

Mike C
Guest

I’m sure the money is earmarked for projects such as this, but damn that gravel is rideable and where else could $1.83mil be used more effectively? That’s a lot of bikes for tykes at the very least.

The King
Guest
The King

I’m all for bike trails and I’m sure this ($1.83m!) extension is needed and will be nice… but I too will reminisce about that bit of gravel. Since there were very rarely pedestrians or other cyclists on that sector it often became a point of attack when riding with the lads. And if I was riding my CX bike with big tires I’d sometimes ride the rough stuff all the way to 13th. Alas, progress surely wants to tame us.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

Still plenty of gravel all over the city. The Springwater is a really important transportation corridor, and it should be fully paved with no gaps.

Matt M
Guest
Matt M

That’s $346.59 per foot if my math is right. I’d love to know what it actually costs just to pave it without all the bureaucracy that ends up adding to the overall cost?

meh
Guest
meh

You’re talking about a paved path adjacent to a functioning rail line. There’s going to be more than just a paved path if you want a safe path. Keeping the users from accessing the rail line is going to add to what seems like a simple paving job.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

And there are several street crossings. At each street crossing you need bollards set in concrete to keep scofflaw motorists from driving on the path. That adds a lot of cost.

Eric H
Guest
Eric H

Actually, it crosses Umatilla, Harney, Marion, and ends at Linn. All of those crossings already have bollards and small sections of asphalt already installed. So there goes the need for those…

paikiala
Guest
paikiala

For just a 12′-wide AC paved path, excavation, base rock and 4″ wearing surface, is about $264 per foot. Add to that crossing treatments, maybe fencing, and that is the right ball park.

Douglas K
Guest
Douglas K

That final section won’t be as simple or cheap as adding pavement next to a rail line because the City of Portland will also have to build a safe crossing over 17th.

“Over” 17th? Wouldn’t a traffic light and a wider sidewalk on Ochoco do the trick?

Andrew Kreps
Guest
Andrew Kreps

You’d think. 🙂

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

The path also has to cross over from the west to the east side of the rail line at some point. Might be best to do that at 17th.

paikiala
Guest
paikiala

Anything that crosses a street is considered ‘over’ it in engineer-speak. Signals start at around $300k each.

Douglas K
Guest
Douglas K

$300K for a signal to help close the-second-to-last gap in an almost-continuous trail from the Steel Bridge to Boring seems like a bargain to me.

Andrew Kreps
Guest
Andrew Kreps

What’s the over/under on connecting the springwater from where the gravel ends to where it picks back up at 19th? The number of overtly aggressive motor vehicle operators I’ve had to swerve to avoid on Linn st would absolutely blow your mind.

I’ve fatbiked the “gravel” from Linn to 13th, it’s… not passable.

Eric H
Guest
Eric H

Shoot Andrew, you should try walking your dog(s) on Linn on a daily basis. The stop signs at 15th and 16th on Linn aren’t even viewed as optional. People flat out drive through them like they’re not even there or their cars are the newer models that don’t feature brakes.

Also, my 40s roll just fine through that gravel section from Linn on. Maybe we should do a team ride through there so I can give you some pointers. 😉

matchupancakes
Guest
matchupancakes

I hear a Pedalpalooza ride in the works forming in this comment here! Ride leader, Eric??

John
Guest
John

On Google Maps it looks like SE Andover Place is one-way going West. Is that the case on the ground? If so, it looks like it will be shortest to divert to SE Linn when going to the 17th Ave. path from the North.

40 Mile Loop
Guest

We are so pleased to see another gap being filled! The Springwater Trail is a very important part of the 40 Mile Loop.

There are a lot of entities that have made this possible. Please don’t forget to include all the work that 40 Mile Loop Land Trust has done to push this along and close another gap in the 40 Mile Loop. We look forward to closing more gaps in the near future. (e.g. see recent articles about Marine Drive Trail)

Paul H
Guest
Paul H

> rumor has it they are not fond of “bicyclists”

I’ve ridden through Garthwick, as that neighborhood is called, thousands of times over the past 13 years and have never had a negative interaction with anyone there. (Well, I don’t like all the leaves in the road during November and December, but that’s off topic.)

So I’m interested to know what evidence leads to such a “rumor.”

PS
Guest
PS

I am willing to bet it is possibly from some (lazy) cyclists entering Garthwick from the North and then taking the first left which is actually a (very well indicated and signed) one way street rather than proceeding for another block or two. What is interesting is that going the wrong way one way, is actually a Strava segment and people in the neighborhood haven’t even protested that, so I would also like to know where a rumor like this was started and perpetuated by someone who has ridden through there once in the last year.

Paul H
Guest
Paul H

That’s probably a good guess. I always go oh-so-far out of my way (that’s sarcasm) to use the correct eastbound street, so I’ve never encountered anyone who has the audacity (more sarcasm) to suggest that cyclists honor the one-way designation.

Eric H
Guest
Eric H

Well, since I live like 3 blocks north of Garthwick and ride through there on a weekly basis (in the correct direction) I can tell you that they added a nice little sign under the Do Not Enter sign that says something to the effect of “this includes you bicyclists”. It isn’t an official sign, but it sure looks like it. Google maps image from the Andover/Exeter intersection is from April 2016, so it has been added since then.

cbikes
Guest
cbikes

It seems the work has started. There is a trail closed sign where the gravel section begins after Umatilla.