Support BikePortland

The $60 million map: Here’s what a street fee’s ‘safety’ money might pay for

Posted by on September 3rd, 2014 at 2:10 pm

street fee map

Green for new sidewalks, yellow for neighborhood greenways, teal for protected bike lanes, red for painted bike lanes, blue dots for crossing improvements and purple for other improvements like lighting or frequent buses.
(Graphic by BikePortland using Transitmix.net. Click for an interactive version.)

So far, the public debate about a per-household and per-business street fee has been mostly about the costs: who would pay how much.

While that debate rages on, the city has finally floated some specifics about the possible benefits.

Above is a map of almost every project included in a so-called “straw man” list of street projects, to be completed over the first six years of the street fee, that would make it safer and more comfortable to bike and walk within Portland city limits. It’s based on a document circulated last week at the city’s Transportation Needs and Funding Advisory Committee.

“It’s our first attempt to try to tell people what we could be getting with this.”
— Dylan Rivera, PBOT spokesman

“It’s our first attempt to try to tell people what we could be getting with this,” city transportation spokesman Dylan Rivera said in an interview Tuesday.

We made this map using Transitmix.net, a new service designed for creating imaginary transit systems but also pretty good for mapping other street projects.

The map doesn’t include items that weren’t easily mappable, including $24 million in Safe Routes to School improvements throughout the city, $10 million for “ODOT partnerships” (presumably matching funds for improvements to state-owned city streets), and $5 million in unspecified sidewalk improvements around Southwest Portland. Nor does it include any neighborhood greenways that weren’t listed with cost estimates yet. (The neighborhood greenways section is already over budget.)

It also doesn’t include any of the maintenance and operations projects, mostly street paving, that the city says should comprise a bit more than half of a new street fee.

Of the 81 projects on the map above, 62 — about $39 million of the $61 million value here — would go in at or east of the street that formed part of Portland’s eastern border from 1910 until 1980: 82nd Avenue.

This chart includes only projects on the map above, plus $5 million in unspecified sidewalk improvements for Southwest Portland.

Almost half of the mapped money west of the Willamette River would go to one big project: a $10 million stretch of sidewalk along Capitol Highway between Multnomah Village and the West Portland neighborhood. Most of the rest would go to three protected bike lane projects in the central city: N/NE Broadway; part of the money (along with development fees) for a bike-walk bridge over I-405 at Flanders; and $3 million for one or more unspecified “central city” routes that we’ve mapped here, for the sake of visualization, as NW/SW Broadway from the bridge to Portland State.

Advertisement

East of 82nd, the single biggest line item is $8 million for “numerous projects” on 122nd including sidewalks, crossings and signalization changes — enough to improve the walking experience there and (the city speculates) persuade TriMet to bring the extremely popular 71 bus up to frequent service. It’s the only north-south transit line between I-205 and Gresham, a part of town where about a third of renters now live without cars.

East Portland rider - Neri-3

Riding on 122nd Avenue.

Beyond that, the city’s straw-man list would bring East Portland:

  • five new neighborhood greenways connecting to the 205 bike path
  • sidewalks along Holgate, Ellis, Market, Halsey, Fremont, 102nd, 104th, 112th and 148th
  • many improved crossings of 82nd, Sandy, 122nd and Division
  • better street lighting along outer Powell and Foster
  • extending the 102nd bike lane south around the bend to 112th (something the city categorizes for some reason as a “neighborhood greenway”

It’d be a huge investment in East Portland’s deeply incomplete street grid.

“The project list reflects a strong effort by equity advocates to ensure that the communities that have for too long been on the short end of the stick receive their due,” Jon Ostar of OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon wrote in an email Wednesday. Ostar credited Mychal Tetteh, CEO of the Community Cycling Center, as someone who’d provided “leadership” on the issue.

Mark Lear, the city’s street fee project manager, said in an interview Wednesday that the city’s current plan is for this six-year project map to be divided into two three-year lists, the first of which would (in a “best case” scenario) be approved by the city council, along with a citywide street fee, in November.

Want to get involved in changing or prioritizing the projects on this list? Now’s the time, Lear says. If you want to endorse any of these projects or any others, write him an email: mark.lear@portlandoregon.gov. Lear said he’d route messages to the appropriate staffer.

Bicycling advocate Lisa Marie White, co-chair of Bike Walk Vote, is organizing an “our streets happy hour” this Friday Sept. 5, 6:30 to 8 p.m. at the Waypost, 3120 N Williams Ave, to discuss the city’s comprehensive plan in general and where money should be invested in the short and long term.

“Here’s our chance to tell the city what we need,” White wrote in the Facebook invitation for the event.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

55
Leave a Reply

avatar
12 Comment threads
43 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
20 Comment authors
Barbara StedmanAlex ReeddavemessPaul SwansonMichael Andersen (News Editor) Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Justin Carinci
Guest
Justin Carinci

It’s really striking to see it laid out like this. It draws attention to the fact that, for much of its run, 82nd Avenue is closer to the river than it is to Portland’s eastern border (despite once serving as that border, as you mention).

paikiala
Guest
paikiala

Is PBOT planning to finish the greenways it started a couple years ago before ‘funds dried up’?

Roger Averbeck
Guest
Roger Averbeck

The map is incorrect for the Capitol Hwy project in SW Portland – it is not just a sidewalk, but would also include bike lanes where none exist today. Also the project does not extend south of Barbur / I – 5. That segment of Cap Hwy already has bike lanes and sidewalks.

Also missing from the map is the critical safety improvement needed at many busy arterials citywide: improved crossings for cyclists, pedestrians and transit users…

Roger Averbeck
Guest
Roger Averbeck

OK I will correct my post – the crossing safety improvements are there if you use the interactive version and scroll to that specific feature. The map posted above is a bit deceptive.

Adam H.
Guest
Adam H.

Is this the city’s first acknowledgment of bike projects being paid for by the street fee?

Joseph E
Guest

Protected bike lanes on SW/NW/N/NE Broadway thru downtown and the Lloyd district to Hollywood! There may not be much for bikes in the central city on this map, but this one project will be hugely helpful, if done right. We would use this all the time.

Adam H.
Guest
Adam H.

Done right is the key. Too many projects get watered down because of business complaints.

davemess
Guest
davemess

So I’m trying to do the math here. The fee is supposed to raise about $40M/year, meaning over the first six years $240M would be raised. Thus these projects ($60M) account for 25% of the whole fee. Does this sound right?

9watts
Guest
9watts

What I want to know is what is the *net* amount they think they’re going to raise. Let’s not forget the administrative cost to collect this money, never mind all the backroom calculations someone at the city is going to be performing to come up with customized versions of this flat fee for, well, some categories – right?
And are we expecting higher participation rates than with the Arts tax?

davemess
Guest
davemess

Sounds like they really are pushing to include it on our water bills (which is troubling as Fish has said that that is not a possibility).

I agree with your premise, collection is going to be a big issue.

maccoinnich
Guest

How do they collect it in the other Oregon cities that levy a street fee?

davemess
Guest
davemess

That’s a great question. I think it varies (and some even (GASP) use a local gas tax).

Paul Swanson
Guest
Paul Swanson

Here in Oregon City, we have a “Pavement Maintenance” fee included on our water bill.

Barbara Stedman
Guest
Barbara Stedman

What? A single sidewalk project is all the city could come up with in SW Portland?? SW has the lowest sidewalk rate with just 33% (E Portland has 56%). If you take out downtown we are probably looking at 80-90% of streets without sidewalks. That means lots of busy but narrow streets with not more than a fogline for bicyclists and a goat trail (or ditch) for pedestrians. Examples are SW Vermont, Shattuck, Boones Ferry, Sunset, Capitol Hwy and so on. Not to speak of Barbur and Beaverton-Hillsdale hwy.

maccoinnich
Guest

Building sidewalks in the hills (or anywhere really, but especially the hills) is an expensive project.

9watts
Guest
9watts

$10M for that piece? Wow. I grew up along that exact stretch, between Capitol Hwy & Multnomah (no village back then that I remember). I walked a mile (each way) along that shoulder to preschool in Multnomah. Those were the days.

Rick
Guest
Rick

The cost includes stormwater facilities. Nearby Woods creek and gets dumped from the runoff on Capitiol Highway.

Daniel L
Guest
Daniel L

The SW corridor planning has a lot of sidewalk improvement projects recommended in it through the whole area, and some of them are supposed to be expedited. So there’s almost certainly more coming. Where the funding will come from is another question though.

davemess
Guest
davemess

As we all know, most streets in SW will require a good bit of engineering due to the topography. Most eastern sidewalk projects area a bit more low hanging fruit (and thus a lot cheaper).

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

This is the great tragedy of post-war development around the country. The developers and initial home buyers in these areas saved money by not adding this infrastructure, and it is unfair to expect the general taxpayer to pay for these amenities.

Joe Adamski
Guest
Joe Adamski

Being able to get your workforce to work safely while allowing the free flow of goods… reducing the need for the single occupant auto seems a laudable goal. Build the second access to Swan Island.

maccoinnich
Guest

If PBOT finds itself with the money to build a bridge over a freeway, I would rather they extended NE 7th over I-84 than NW Flanders over I-405. And I say this as someone who lives and works in NW.

Reza
Guest
Reza

I’d rather have both.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

Tear out the east bank freeway/Marquam, reroute I-5 onto I-405, and then sell the prime waterfront real estate, using the money (billions of dollars) to pay for capping of I-405 and new bridges over I-84.

gutterbunnybikes
Guest
gutterbunnybikes

of course the word that means the most in this entire article is in the title….Might.

And might doesn’t mean much coming from city hall.

Alex Reed
Guest
Alex Reed

Wow, the equity focus is great! One corner of the city that may get forgotten is Brentwood-Darlington (B-D) in southern southeast Portland (southeast of Woodstock and west of Lents). B-D has many of the characteristics of East Portland (unpaved streets, few sidewalks, low incomes, annexed in the 80s). I think it could use some love (I’m two n’hoods away so I only go through there occasionally but I’m usually surprised by how bad the conditions are when I do).

Cora Potter
Guest
Cora Potter

I wouldn’t call this an equity focus. As was mentioned above, the total amount for the safety category is only around 25-30% of the total revenue spent. And, only about 50% of that 25-30% is going to be spent in East Portland (there’s lots of lines and dots but for the most part they’re pretty low budget projects).

If the amount of the maintenance allocation spent in East Portland isn’t significant, then this is another case where East Portland won’t recoup proportionately to what they put in – it’ll still be a donor area to the areas west of 82nd.

Alex Reed
Guest
Alex Reed

Bike Portland counts 64% ($39 million out of $61 million) of the safety dollars in East Portland if East Portland is defined as extending to 82nd throughout its length. I don’t know the numbers for sure, but I suspect East Portland would provide a good bit less than 64% of the street fee money. Providing a significantly higher percentage of the safety money to East Portland than East Portland is providing, due to East Portland being poorer, having worse traffic safety problems, and having been neglected by City investment in the past, sounds like equity to me. Am I missing something?

Certainly, the maintenance money needs to be equitably distributed for equity to be served overall. And how did we get from half-and-half maintenance vs. safety at the beginning of the street fee proposal to only 25-30% now? I must have missed that plot twist….

davemess
Guest
davemess

Thanks for the shout Alex. Here in B-D we really struggle to connect with the city. As you point out we were “historically” part of east Portland (same annexation time and similar conditions), but are physically located in outer SE. So we often fall through the cracks, and makes it tough for our neighborhood to get any attention.

Surprisingly the bike access in B-D isn’t that bad, as we have bike lanes on a number of major streets (Duke, FLavel, 52nd) and have good access to the Springwater at a number of locations. Sidewalks, paved roads, curbs, etc is another story though. We desperately need better (or some) sidewalks next to all our schools and parks (even some city owned land here doesn’t have sidewalks and curbs in spots!!!!)

The B-D neighborhood is definitely going to fight for our piece of the pie out of the improvements that this fee may generate.

John Liu
Guest
John Liu

I hope people don’t get caught up in a narrow super-local view, demanding that their neighborhood gets its “fair share” of projects or gets its (fee) money’s worth. Increasing bicycling in Portland is a city wide need. The money should be spent where it will have the greatest effect. In many cases, I’d think that will be East Portland since taking bike facilities from nothing to something will be such a big change. In other cases, I can see spending money downtown or inner NE, to fill a key gap or complete a key connection in the existing bike route network. Some neighborhoods might contribute to the fee but get few/no new bike facility projects, because there aren’t such pressing needs. I hope the city, and we, take the bigger strategic view and not a parochial approach.

davemess
Guest
davemess

While I understand what you are saying, many in my neighborhood are viewing the street fee as a good place to kind of “take our stand” and demand the services infrastructure that we’ve somewhat been ignored (but have paid for) for the last 30 years.

I agree that a city is a “common good” type of situation, but after decades many are tired of the common good not being in their area.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

The city doesn’t pay for sidewalks. The initial home builder does, and the existing homeowner pays to maintain them. If the sidewalk in front of your home gets damaged, you have to pay for it.

davemess
Guest
davemess

So I disagree on your point.
see: http://wweek.com/portland/article-17460-dirt_roads_dead_ends.html

“In a 2000 report to City Council about funding for street improvements, an expert panel delved into the history of Portland infrastructure. They called the notion that property owners have always borne the cost of paving streets a “long-standing myth.”

As recently as 2000, the study found, the city was paying most or all of the costs to pave many streets, especially in poorer neighborhoods.

“The implication of this myth was that property owners paid almost entirely for their street, a proposition that is nowhere near the truth,” the report says. “It is much more accurate, and also much more relevant to the problems we face today, to state that property owners have almost always helped pay for at least a portion of the costs for improving their streets.””

And even if you don’t believe this, we’re talking about at least at minimum CITY-OWNED property. The city should pay for sidewalks next to their own property.

maccoinnich
Guest

A 2000 report found that there was a “long standing myth” that was untrue as recently as 2000? That doesn’t make any sense. Is there a copy of this report somewhere?

davemess
Guest
davemess

I’ve tried to get ahold of it, without any luck. I’m not surprised, as I can’t imagine this something the city or PBOT would want to be flaunting around. (I contacted WW, but the author has left).

I”m confused as to your confusion? The report was in 2000, so anything after it couldn’t be documented. But up until the report was put out the city was still subsidizing or paying for streets (as they have apparently been doing for a long time).

maccoinnich
Guest

I don’t understand why the City would commission a report in 2000 to discover if they had ever made a routine habit of paying for street improvements, if they were paying for street improvements in 2000. If you can find this report, I would genuinely be interested in reading it. The city is normally very good about archiving these kinds of things on http://efiles.portlandoregon.gov.

To be clear, I think it’s terrible that there are arterial streets in this city without sidewalks. I think building those is a great use of street fee money. I think building a network of neighborhood greenways in East Portland is a great use of street fee money. But if people expect their cul-de-sac to be paved with money raised city-wide, then I do have a problem with that.

davemess
Guest
davemess

have you seen how our at large council system of government works? Clearly not all departments and officials are on the same page.

davemess
Guest
davemess

and we all know how much the city loves to do reports and studies.

9watts
Guest
9watts

I’m with davemess. These myths are useful in certain circles but that doesn’t make them true in all cases. I encountered a version of this same argument coming from BES staff on the history of our sewer system and who paid for what and why certain outcomes are the way they are.
http://bikeportland.org/2014/04/23/washington-county-commissioner-says-adjacent-landowners-should-help-pay-for-safety-projects-105038#comment-4751019

davemess
Guest
davemess

I’ve had similar interactions with BES folks. I’m not surprised, as I can’t imagine a lot of debate and rocking the boat in most city government departments.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

Many parks in my neighborhood, which has developer-built sidewalks in front of every home, do not have sidewalks. If you get sidewalks in your neighborhood, I want them in mine as well…

davemess
Guest
davemess

how about your schools?