Splendid Cycles Big Sale

N/NE Portland bikeway dream will soon come true (or be deferred)

Posted by on February 5th, 2010 at 11:06 am

Dar k blue = cycle tracks.
(Graphic: Metro)

U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has announced that funding decisions for their stimulus minded Transportation Investments Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) program will be made no later than February 17th.

To refresh your memory, last fall Metro submitted a TIGER grant request for $98 million in active transportation projects throughout the Portland region. One of those projects is a $38 million proposal to build a dense and complete neighborhood bikeway system in 13 square miles of North and Northeast Portland.

Imagine cycle-tracks on Vancouver and Williams, 40 miles of new bike boulevards, and much more.

The proposal, which has been on Bureau of Transportation drawing boards since the 1990s, would create nothing less of a bike nirvana in N/NE with the stated goal of demonstrating to the rest of the country what a large, focused investment on bikeways can do (or, as Metro puts it in their application, “This project will demonstrate the “art of the possible” in achieving world-class levels of non-motorized mode splits.”).
Here’s a graphic from page 9 of Metro’s TIGER grand proposal document that illustrates the improvements that will come to N/NE if they get the money:

Metro and PBOT’s big plan for N/NE.
Click to enlarge

Since the TIGER grants are meant to boost the economy through transportation infrastructure investments, Metro included economic impacts of the project in their application. Metro estimates that in the long term (20 years) the project would reap a cumulative economic benefit of over $317 million.

For a full breakdown of how Metro arrived at that amount, check out this table from their grant application.

Economic impacts of the project.
Click for larger version

If this project is selected for funding through the TIGER program, it would be mandated for completion by February 2012. Stay tuned for the funding announcements… and whether or not the dream will be realized or put on hold. For more details on this and the other three projects in the grant, see my report from back in September.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

25
Leave a Reply

avatar
25 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
17 Comment authors
BikePortland.org » Blog Archive » TIGER grants: Streetcars win big (again) and no nirvana for bikesboneshakern8maresuburban Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Heff
Guest
Heff

I see the the plans include the npGreenway trail. Finally!

Esther
Guest
Esther

This is so amazing! Fingers crossed!

sustainabologna
Guest
sustainabologna

I’m curious what other folks think of cycle tracks on Williams & Vancouver. I hope it never happens. I’ve ridden the one on broadway a few times and have found that both making left-hand turns and passing cyclists is easier without a physical barrier present.

ben foote
Guest

I can’t think that we’ll actually get the funding.

With the hefty support of Streetcar I have to think that the Feds would feel like they have already “done good by us” and that it would be prudent for them to fund projects in other regions, particularly swing states and congressional districts that are up for grabs in the fall.

But hope does spring eternal. I will keep my fingers crossed, though the typing gets a bit odd at moments.

Herafde lefrt’s trest it out,,,

sustainabologna
Guest
sustainabologna

I’m curious what other folks think of cycle tracks on Williams & Vancouver. I hope it never happens. I’ve ridden the one on broadway a few times and have found that both making left-hand turns and passing cyclists is easier without a physical barrier present.

sustainabologna
Guest
sustainabologna

I’m curious what other folks think of cycle tracks on Williams & Vancouver. I hope it never happens. I’ve ridden the one on broadway a few times and have found that both making left-hand turns and passing cyclists is easier without a physical barrier present.

KJ
Guest
KJ

crossing fingers, this would be amazing!

KJ
Guest
KJ

crossing fingers, this would be amazing!

Matt Picio
Guest

I would love to see Rodney become a bike boulevard. I know Roger will say “we had a public meeting, and there was no public support for it”.

Have another one.

Many of us didn’t live in N/NE when that meeting occurred, and I’d LOVE to help make a Rodney bike boulevard a reality.

Matt Picio
Guest

I would love to see Rodney become a bike boulevard. I know Roger will say “we had a public meeting, and there was no public support for it”.

Have another one.

Many of us didn’t live in N/NE when that meeting occurred, and I’d LOVE to help make a Rodney bike boulevard a reality.

Bent Bloke
Guest
Bent Bloke

I’m hoping the Cazadero Trail will get selected for funding. This project would extend the Springwater Corridor MUP all the way to Estacada!

Jeff TB
Guest
Jeff TB

Matt, I think the map shows Rodney as a boulevard. Am I missing something?

And why does the Williams boulevard stop at Ainsworth? Anyone know?

Daniel
Guest

yeeeeeee haaaaaaaaa!!!!!!

flowb33
Guest

It’s a little odd to not see Concord Ave from Overlook Park to Kenton listed on the map as an already funded BB. I believe its covered in this year’s 15 new miles program. Wonder why they left it off…

Steve B.
Guest

Whatever the outcome, I hope the city considers one of our city’s bicycle highways like Williams for their first *serious* on-street separated cycle track.

The demand is essentially there already, this is the fruit hanging a bit further up in the tree than those bike boulevards. But, a serious cycle track project like Williams with some concrete and real barriers (not just parked cars) could really get us back on track to be the most innovative and action-oriented bike city in the country.

David Bragdon
Guest

Recent developments regarding one of the other components of the package, Springwater-Cazadero: another portion running about two miles south of Boring was recent completed to a gravel standard (it still terminates where a bridge washed out decades ago) and we also recently purchased 17 acres along the trail in the north fork of Deep Creek canyon (southeast of Damascus and north of Barton Park on the Clackamas River). If we get the TIGER grant then we can really start stringing these pearls together.

The eBike Store
Guest

Any chance to get that covered? Lets go for a dry lane. Much cheaper than a new line….

Matt Picio
Guest

Jeff TB (#13) – Rodney is in this map, which is a metro application for funding. It’s in the Bike Master Plan as a “future” Bike Boulevard. Originally, Rodney was going to be the 2nd BB after Going, but there was very little cyclist turnout at the public meeting in NE, and no real neighborhood support.

David (#17) – I, for one am excited to see Metro pushing this project. Cycle Wild, the non-profit I helped found, leads about a hundred people a year through this corridor on camping trips by bike, and the completion of the Boring to Barton segment of the Springwater/Cazadero alignment would give us a car-free path to Hwy 224, bypassing the worst section on our trips, Amisegger Road.

Malex
Guest
Malex

I’m disappointed they didn’t include improvements for current bike boulevards in their grant. The Tillamook/Hancock boulevard could certainly use some additional aids when crossing busy streets (57th, 47th, 24th, and 15th). And if the boulevard had any traffic calming measures at all, that might allow the City to turn a few stop signs…

suburban
Guest

You can stripe it, segregate it, sign it or paint it green, but if riders have to stop their forward movement when crossing streets, it’s NOT a cycle track. I’m with Malex19 on this revolutionary! concept.
Any urban rider knows that “making all the lights” is paramount. I’ll call them “freeways” or maybe turnpikes.

are
Guest

knott is perfectly amenable to bicyclists in its present configuration. striping it with bike lanes would put cyclists in the door zone and encourage unsafe overtaking by motorists. similar comment as to ainsworth.

also, re 14th: the “advisory” bike lane has the effect of sending motorists down the middle and pushing cyclists to the side, while in the present configuration you have what they call “courtesy queueing,” a much better arrangement.

are
Guest

unless the plan is to remove onstreet parking in these places.

n8m
Guest
n8m

We really need to focus cycle track development and money on main arterials where businesses are located and bicycle access is needed. Mississippi, Alberta, etc. By removing a lane of auto parking it is easy enough. Seems most businesses on said streets would support it. It would piss off motorists for a while, but they can walk a block or two from the back streets (or ‘boulevards’) we are relegated to.

boneshaker
Guest
boneshaker

Um… yes please.

trackback

[…] in the local bike scene were dreaming about a $98 million package Metro applied for that would have connected and built trails on the […]