Note: I'm currently on a family trip and not working normal hours. Email and message responses will be delayed and story and posting volumes here and on our social media accounts will not be at their usual levels until I return to Portland September 4th. Thanks for your patience and understanding. - Jonathan Maus, BikePortland Publisher and Editor

ODOT bike/ped plan open for comment

Not to be confused with the City of Portland’s Bicycle Master Plan, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has its own Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.

Here’s how ODOT describes it:

“Last updated in 1995, the OBPP (they love acronyms!) is part of the long-range, statewide Oregon Transportation Plan. It governs the department’s planning, policy and design requirements for walkways and bikeways. It also serves as a technical, planning and policy resource for others interested in biking and walking.”

According to an ODOT press release, proposed changes to the technical/design section of their plan are up for public comment.

To read the changes and find out how to comment, check out this page on the ODOT website.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Aaron
Aaron
17 years ago

My only recomendation to ODOT is that human beings should not be considered secondary to traffic flow.

Paul
Paul
17 years ago

This biggest hole in this document is the allowance of 2 foot shoulders on rural roads with average daily traffic less than 400 (pg 4, chapter 1). By their definition, the shoulder is too narrow for bike use, but the low traffic use will allow sharing the roadway safely. Anyone who has ridden these roads know cars are buzzing by at 60+ mph in these situations. This minimum shoulder width should be 4 feet in all situations.