Feds pitch in $250,000 for Cesar Chavez road diet

By 2028 this curbside lane near Trader Joe’s on Cesar Chavez and SE Schiller will be on-street parking. (Photo: PBOT)

After years of fatal collisions and a steady drumbeat of bad news, the Portland Bureau of Transportation is turning the tide on Cesar E Chavez Boulevard. Last Tuesday, Mayor Keith Wilson announced that the latest budget bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives included a $250,000 earmark for the notoriously unsafe road.

“This stretch of Chavez Boulevard is one of the most dangerous thoroughfares in Portland,” Wilson said in a statement. “This project will save lives – lives of pedestrians, bus riders, cyclists, and drivers.”

The funding was requested by Congresswoman Maxine Dexter (who replaced longtime transportation champion Earl Blumenauer in 2025) and supported by senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley. It will be invested in a one-mile stretch of Cesar Chavez between SE Powell and Woodstock where PBOT will put it toward lane restriping, street lighting, traffic signal upgrades, new crossings, wider sidewalks, and more.

$250,000 won’t go very far; but this isn’t the only iron PBOT has in the fire when it comes to Cesar Chavez. As I reported last month, PBOT already has $2.2 million set aside from a state grant for the section between SE Lafayette (just south of Powell) to SE Schiller. Since that previous story, PBOT has launched a project website, online open house, and public feedback survey.

As we expected, PBOT is proposing a major road diet on Chavez that would take the profile from its current configuration of four standard lanes (two in each direction) and no shoulder, to two lanes with an additional lane for left turns (aka “left turn pockets”) at select intersections. With the space gained from this reconfiguration, PBOT will add curbside parking for automobile users.

South of Holgate, PBOT wants to build a three-lane cross-section that would include one standard lane in each direction, a center turn lane, and on-street parking wherever possible.

Below are current views of Cesar Chavez and SE Francis (left) and SE Schiller (right) next to the PBOT proposal:

If you’re curious about why PBOT would add car parking given that none of our plans call for encouraging car use, consider that its accepted dogma that the presence of parked cars (and the humans who enter and exit them) in the curb lane has a calming effect on drivers. Put another way, on-street parking will lead to slower speeds — which is something PBOT is very interested in on a street where about half the drivers go over the 30 mph speed limit. And of course, adding parking to a street is also a way to make a road diet more politically palatable.

PBOT is also confident in their proposal because their traffic analysis shows this section of Chavez has excess capacity. “The most traffic volume in this section is southbound during the evening peak hour with 720 vehicles,” PBOT writes on the project website. “This volume is substantially lower than many of Portland’s four-lane streets.” PBOT’s analysis showed this project area has similar traffic volume to NE 33rd near Grant High School, which has just one travel lane in each direction.

Some critics might latch onto the fact that PBOT foresees a 30-60 second increase in travel times once the project is complete. But in light of the safety benefits on such a historically dangerous corridor, anyone who takes that position will have a tough row to hoe.

Some local bike advocates think there’s enough space for bike lanes instead, but it doesn’t seem like that will become a major campaign. There’s a good grid of neighborhood streets nearby, and this project on Chavez could help spur talks of a parallel greenway route that is more welcoming and pleasant. Another reason there’s not likely to be a debate about bike lanes on this section of Chavez is because it’s not a commercial main street (like SE Hawthorne or Sandy) full of interesting places bike riders want to go.

North of Powell might be another conversation. PBOT says they’re launching a study to plan for the future of that section of Cesar Chavez that will, “explore opportunities to improve safety for everyone traveling on this stretch of the corridor.”

For now the focus is south of Powell. PBOT says they plan to build this project in 2028.

If you care about Cesar Chavez Boulevard in Southeast Portland, check out the online open house and be sure to take the project survey. It’s open through March 23rd.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fred
Fred
6 hours ago

Some local bike advocates think there’s enough space for bike lanes instead, but it doesn’t seem like that will become a major campaign.

Aren’t you always lamenting the lack of N-S bike routes through Portland? Continuous bike lanes on both sides of Chavez would be a terrific route – though a nice climb in the northern section.

Anne
Anne
1 hour ago

SE 42nd is a lovely place to walk, run, run/walk the dog, and walk/bike to Woodstock businesses. When 39th (it was still 39th!) was repaved south of Powell, volumes did increase on 42nd. And, after, traffic went back to 39th. Can we get diverters, etc, to keep 42nd as a truly calm, low-stress bike/walk street?!?!?

mperham
mperham
4 hours ago

With an empty middle lane, it seems like cars will feel safe to drive even faster in each travel lane. PBOT has a modal pyramid they are supposed to prioritize, with walking biking and transit above driving. Why does that not apply here?

idlebytes
idlebytes
3 hours ago
Reply to  mperham

I’m sure it’s a fiscal reason but it’s still pretty crazy they’d be adding a middle lane here when they’re actively closing them on 82nd and closed most of outer Division’s.

Robert Gardener
Robert Gardener
3 hours ago

This looks like a lack of political will to put in bike infrastructure. Did anyone ask for more on street parking? The nearby 40s greenway wanders all over the place. When we could enhance bike access why not do it?

A few parking spaces can stop a bike lane forever.

idlebytes
idlebytes
3 hours ago

I’m all for calming Chavez but it’s worth noting it’s one of PBOT’s lowest ranked high crash streets and has none of the 30 high crash intersections along it.

hcn-streets-deadly-crashes_11
SafeStreetsNow
SafeStreetsNow
2 hours ago

I thought the plan was supposed to be to increase pedestrian safety along the corridor.

It looks like things like crosswalks, protected crossings, ADA ramps, are all listed as ‘unfunded’. SE Cora (where the pedestrian died) is listed as unfunded. Yep.

39th needs to change, but this plan seems half-baked. No pedestrian crossings, one bump-out, nothing for bikers, cars crammed in where they shouldn’t. The Trader Joe’s parking lot is getting a row of parked cars added in front of it for gods sake.

This plan feels like it violates PBOT’s own policy, but hell they have a lot of stupid policies that don’t make sense. (No daylighting 4-way intersections in neighborhoods still baffles me)