home

Updated: More on bike parking from the other side of the hill

Posted by on September 23rd, 2008 at 1:10 pm

[View update at end of story.]

(Photo from OregonLive.com)

Portland’s new on-street bike parking corrals are the subject of an editorial in the Hillsboro Argus today (Hillsboro is about 17 miles west of Portland).

In OK Bike Corral, Argus publisher Clark Gallagher shares concerns from delivery truck drivers about the new parking. Mr. Gallagher overheard one such driver recently tell a TV news camera,

“Well I don’t know what you want me to say. My truck’s parked in the middle of the street, and I have to get past this thing to make deliveries to two stores. It took my loading zone. I’m sure somebody’s happy, but it’s made my life tougher.”

Gallagher writes this is a case of “when green meets reality” and adds that, “it’ll be interesting to see how this plays out.”

Then, channeling a commonly held gripe about bike-specific infrastructure, he writes (emphasis mine),

“We suspect the corrals will get some usage during the good weather and almost no usage during the bad. The delivery trucks and those of us from the suburbs will be on at least four wheels downtown no matter what the weather.”

And if you’re wondering why he titled the piece “OK Bike Corral” it was a reference the classic, 1957 film, Gunfight at the O.K. Corral, which explains his final sentence, “Now we have a corral to fight over.”


Update, 6:54pm: PDOT bike coordinator Roger Geller chimed in below with more on the loading zone issue:

“We know it’s important for businesses to have loading zones so that the delivery companies can find an easy, convenient, and quick means to make their deliveries. We moved the loading zone to provide for the corral. We didn’t eliminate it. We simply hadn’t yet made the change that first day when the driver came by to make his daily deliveries. It’s in place now.”

Email This Post Email This Post


Gravatars make better comments... Get yours here.
Please notify the publisher about offensive comments.
Comments
  • jeff September 23, 2008 at 1:18 pm

    How would it had been any easier for this guy to unload if there was a car there instead? And we’re talking about four corrals here, how many deliveries can he make in front of one?

    Hillsborough. It’s ok, stay there, we don’t need you downtown anyways.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bob September 23, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    Geez, the horror of having four parking spaces removed in a city that has hundreds, if not thousands of parking spaces. How on earth are people like Mr. Gallagher ever going to survive? We need to remove those bike corrals so that more cars are downtown. That will help the parking situation for sure!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • ambrown September 23, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    Actually Jeff, quite a few downtown businesses depend on shoppers from Beaverton, Gresham, Lake Oswego, and Hillsboro. Instead of allowing this story and this particular issue be framed as suburban vs urban, business vs environmentalism, car vs bike, what can bicycle advocates do to make sure that downtown businesses don’t actively resent Portland’s burgeoning bike culture? What are the specific problems with the bike racks?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jason September 23, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    Well, wheelchair ramps are really expensive and block a lot of real estate that could be used for walking, but fortunately the ADA stepped in and thought it was important to make sure everyone, had access to the same places. Last time I checked bicyclists pay just as much in taxes for roads, streets, sidewalks etc.
    Hey does Hillsboro even pay the TriMet tax that all of us Portland businesses need to pay? I know LO doesn’t and yet the buses run out there.
    Very clever title for the article Mr. Gallagher, lets stir up yet more bike/car animosity, and compare downtown Portland to the wild west of fiction. What is he trying to ‘kick up a row’ I think he outta jus pull in dem horns. I think they need a new sheriff out there in Hillsboroville, or at least a new penny rag.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Zaphod September 23, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    This is entirely a function of viewing cycling as a legitimate form of transportation. If ONE car was there, it’d be OK because we, as a society, have come to accept all the negative externalities which cars bring to the table. It’s funny that even with this huge multiplier (# of bikes per car space) we’re still finding people who will complain.

    Surely this “man on the street” interview is a guy who cannot imagine actually riding year round.

    I think those skeptics will be surprised when Portland bike commuters show them what’s up by keeping the corrals well utilized on the darkest of rainy days. We’re not afraid of a little rain.

    Seriously, does he think we live in LA?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Hart September 23, 2008 at 1:43 pm

    Anybody notice this car-loving Hillsboro @$$clown looks like Dick Cheney?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • brewcaster September 23, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    LOL Hart

    I thought the same thing before reading the article. I thought was Cheney’s face as a joke!

    I am glad people have the forums and rights to complain, but nobody has to listen to them.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anonymous September 23, 2008 at 1:52 pm

    There are 6,215 on-street parking spaces and 35,650 off-street parking spaces downtown. We took 8 of them, (less than gets removed anytime there is a construction project,) or 0.02% of them. When this truck driver starts complaining about the 99.98% of parking spaces that are blocked by cars, maybe I’ll care, but right now his complaints don’t mean very much to me…

    And I’d be surprised if the spaces aren’t nearly full in the winter too. Ridership only drops 40% in the winter from the summer before it, and bicycle traffic is increasing by about 20% a year, which means that the winter of 08/09 will have about the same number of riders at the summer of 06, or a still fairly large number…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Oliver September 23, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    I didn’t know they were removing loading zones to create bike parking. My opinion has completely changed now.

    Seriously, drivers, how many of you have driven around and around infuriated by the 4 or 5 empty loading zones on the block on which you’re trying to park?

    (I have my hand up)

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anonymous September 23, 2008 at 1:54 pm

    The truck driver quoted above didn’t specify the location where his loading zone was taken away, but actually, now that I think about it, I realize that the bike corral location at Southpark (SW 9th and Salmon) may have taken the space occupied by a truck loading zone before it. I’ll have to check for sure next time I’m walking by. If so, the city should probably be careful about doing that.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Argentius September 23, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    So, those who DO live in the suburbs, and commute by bicycle, who are they? What do they do?

    Bah,etc.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • no one in particular September 23, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    Blah, blah, blah. Idiotic and pointless personal attacks. Who cares if he looks like Cheney? Sometimes the comments on this site are good, but any time anyone says anything bad about bikes ever, the comments just turn rabid and angry and contentless.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jonathan Maus (Editor) September 23, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    RE: loading zones.

    It’s important to remember that PDOT has a lot of discretion to work with business owners (and residents) to fulfill requests about parking.

    these businesses requested this parking… they could have requested a truck loading zone if they wanted it to…both things perform a “critical business function” according a PDOT staffer i spoke with this morning.

    Also, RE: the “they’ll be empty in winter” thinking.

    At any given time (summer or winter) downtown, there are hundreds of unused car parking spaces in any number of behemoth, concrete, multi-level parking structures.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kg September 23, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    I see trucks illegally parked in the bike lane everyday. This is a joke.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Pete September 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    Is Argus an Oregonian publication? If so, that might explain the mentality. I find the writer’s concluding sentence in this article unnecessary and ignorant.

    I don’t do any business in Hillsboro simply because there are too many cars there – the traffic sucks. I work in Beaverton (drive in from the Gorge and rent a room here) and find it quite easy and safe to get around by bike (year round, despite what this writer generalizes). Both towns may be “on the other side of the hill” and considered evil car-culture suburbia to many Portlanders, but I find the two towns quite different from each other.

    And while the delivery driver makes a valid point that they take away his loading zones, the pictures I see in Jonathan’s original article show that he’d either be blocking crosswalks or parking in front of a fire hydrant.

    So yeah, instead of saying there are too many cars in Portland, the writer conveys the message that bicyclists are the ones making life harder for delivery drivers. Forget that one car parking spot can fit 6+ bikes!

    When we get our first snow storm this year I’ll ride out there just to send him a picture of my bike parked there. Who’s joining me?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GLV September 23, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    “what can bicycle advocates do to make sure that downtown businesses don’t actively resent Portland’s burgeoning bike culture? What are the specific problems with the bike racks?”

    Amen. Keep in mind that bicyclists rely on truck deliveries just as much as people who don’t ride a bike. That’s the jist of the man’s gripe, since almost everyone seems to have missed it.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Pete September 23, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    ambrown (#3): I read that the businesses that these corrals were placed in front of were consulted and were highly supportive of them.

    Not that I believe everything I read, mind you… ;)

    Argentius (#11): I’m a suburbanite who’s commuted by bike nearly two decades and makes a living in front of a laptop in various cubicles. Bike commuting isn’t just for city dwellers anymore. :)

    And by the way your blog is awesome, and that Sojourn is a beauty!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Hart September 23, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Are goods and services going to get stuck somewhere in the tunnel if I park my bike downtown? Is that the point these Hillsboro car clowns are trying to make?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anonymous September 23, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    I like the disabled parking/access analogy (#4 above). The question is – do cyclist have a right to secure bike parking? The city of Portland and many local businesses have said “yes.” Apparently some others, including “news” outlets, have decided “no.” Tension is part of any change.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kg September 23, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    There are plenty of places to park your bike DT without the corrals:
    True

    The bike corrals will be less than half used when the weather turns:
    True

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • toddistic September 23, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    why do we care what hellsboro thinks? they could just as soon fall off the map and i doubt many would notice.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Anonymous September 23, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    First of all, I live in the suburbs and I will be riding throughout the winter, thank you very much. Can you say, “self-fulfilling prophecy” Mr. “I pay terrorists to kill Americans” Gallagher?

    Second, loading zones are are not parking places. I highly value the need for commercial drivers to be able to perform their jobs (as opposed to people too obese to leave their SUV in order to walk into Starbucks).

    However, if PDOT has replaced loading zones with parking, that is a separate issue that is completely unrelated to whether or not designated parking is for bicycles versus motor vehicles.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • K'Tesh September 23, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Hmmm

    Two parking spaces… at most about 8 potential shoppers at any one time.
    2 = 8

    Or

    Two parking spaces with bike racks for 24 bikes each, and each with a potential shopper at any one time
    2 = 48

    My math shows that we’d need to have 12 more spaces to accommidate that number of shoppers if all used a car with four passengers each…

    It is however, very unlikely that each car will have four people, or even three in it. It is VERY likely that each bike will have at least one rider. And we get to ditch 16 cars that are trying to find parking.

    Why is that so hard for these people to grasp?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GLV September 23, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    He was talking about loading zones.

    Why is that so hard for these people to grasp?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • T Williams September 23, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    Anyone see all the four bike related ads on the right side of the article? I love that.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • woogie September 23, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    toddistic,

    This is the Portland insular elitist attitude that creates these types of articles.

    You want people from the burbs to commute by bike, then show them some respect rather than attitude. You just might win some converts.

    Let’s hope the folks up the mountain don’t decide Portland is self sufficient enough to survive without their Bull Run water.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Roger Geller September 23, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    We know it’s important for businesses to have loading zones so that the delivery companies can find an easy, convenient, and quick means to make their deliveries. We moved the loading zone to provide for the corral. We didn’t eliminate it. We simply hadn’t yet made the change that first day when the driver came by to make his daily deliveries. It’s in place now.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GLV September 23, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    “However, if PDOT has replaced loading zones with parking, that is a separate issue that is completely unrelated to whether or not designated parking is for bicycles versus motor vehicles.”

    That was PRECISELY THE POINT of the Op-ed. Please read it before commenting.

    Oh, and now anyone who drives a car is “I pay terrorists to kill Americans.” I’ll let you in on a little secret, A-nonymous: our ENTIRE ECONOMY is completely soaked in oil. EVERYONE is responsible for perpetuating it, including you. You don’t drive? Ok, you are very, very slightly less responsible. But do you eat food? How did it get here? How was it grown? Do you drink coffee? How did it get here? Beer? Clothes? Where does it come from?

    That mouse you are holding in your hand? What is it made out of?

    I could go on and on and on, but I’m sure the point would be completely lost on you.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • toddistic September 23, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    i am being an elitist and im proud of it!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR September 23, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    where was a loading zone removed? I thought it was all normal parking spaces that were removed. Therefore, I think this whole story is complete BS.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • toddistic September 23, 2008 at 3:49 pm

    woogie,

    my attitude doesnt create articles like this, its the people who write them who are unable to grasp that people unlike themselves enjoy other ways to get around that dont rely on fear and indimidation of soveign nations.

    not to mention this whole article / news story is complete and utter garbage! we take 8 spaces out of thousands and people actually have the nerve to complain.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • toddistic September 23, 2008 at 3:49 pm

    BURR @ 29

    it was a mistake by PDOT, and they are removing two car spots to accomidate the loading zone. i saw it on KGW web version of the story.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • matt picio September 23, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    woogie (#26) – you mean Washington, D.C.? Bull Run is entirely part of the Mount Hood National Forest. It’s federal land.

    The City of Portland might be able to lay claim to it, or possibly Multnomah and Clackamas Counties (which Bull Run straddles), but no other municipalities have jurisdiction.

    In fact, Portland could cut off water to Beaverton and Hillsboro, both of which are wholesale water customers.

    The “folks up the mountain” are all Water Bureau employees, since the public has been restricted from Bull Run for over 100 years.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • GLV September 23, 2008 at 4:01 pm

    “people unlike themselves enjoy other ways to get around that dont (sic) rely on fear and indimidation (sic) of soveign (sic) nations.”

    Riiight…because your bike has no plastic components, and every metal part was mined, smelted, and shipped around the globe by zero emission vehicles powered by your own sense of self worth.

    You’re not an elitist, you’re an ***insult deleted***.

    [Note: GLV, please don't call other commenters names. Thanks.]

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Paul September 23, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Loading zones are good. The more, the merrier so that it keeps trucks from double parking – especially in bike lanes. I would hate for downtown to become like NYC where people park and drive wherever the hell they feel like.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Sarah Figliozzi September 23, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    The confusion surrounding the truck loading zone was compounded last week by a scheduling error on PDOT’s side related to signage changes (many of you commented on the pay to park signs that were still hanging despite the racks being in place).

    At SW 3rd and Pine Street, in front of Bijou Cafe, PDOT, in conjunction with the Bijou and Stumptown Cofee, chose to relocate the truck loading zone down the block, north, four spaces.

    No loading zones were removed as part of this project. Further, the new location of the loading zone should improve trucks access as they can pull in rather than backing into the space.

    In the case of the Ace Hotel, the curb space was previously a Hotel Zone which the Ace allocated approximately 40 feet to bike parking.

    Thanks
    Sarah Figliozzi
    Bicycle Program Specialist

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Hart September 23, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    So what if, JUST WHAT IF there was a way to drive cars AND bikes AND PARK THEM all in the same city! DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THIS IS EVEN PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE TO DO????

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • toddistic September 23, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    oh he can point out my spelling mistakes too! OH GEEZ!!! you obviously didn’t pick up the referenced comment “fear and intimidation of sovergein nations”

    … i’ll leave it alone.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bob September 23, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    Do you think he is speaking for delivery drivers when he writes: “Now we have a corral to fight over”? Or when he writes about those being on four wheels from the suburbs?

    If so, there won’t be much of a fight. People realize the importance of loading zones. I don’t interpret his comments that way, however. He has used the story of a delivery driver (which he heard second hand from a tv report) to call into question bike corrals that have not taken away loading zones and were, in fact, asked for by local businesses. His editorial isn’t pro-delivery zones. It is anti-bike parking.

    And, yes, I have read his entire piece.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kgb (the poster formly known as kg. September 23, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    Somebody is posting with my handle.

    According to the PDOT press Release:

    All the businesses that these facilities have been placed in front of were very enthusiastic to have them. I don’t know who this mythical delivery driver who was so put out was trying to deliver to but it should be noted that he does get paid to deliver his goods.

    Other important goals which PDOT is trying to achieve which completely blow apart the delivery hogwash:
    #

    Improving visibility at intersections by eliminating the opportunity for larger vehicles to park at street corners.
    (So they are intentionally trying to eliminate trucks in these locations!)
    #

    Supporting increased commercial activity. Testimonials from local retail shops with existing on-street bike parking corrals affirm that they are appreciated by the business community. The higher ratio of bikes to vehicle capacity that corrals afford equates to a higher potential customer turnover. They also tell us that de-cluttering the sidewalk improves the aesthetics of their retail faades and allows for activities such as caf seating.

    Delivery services are there to serve businesses. If the businesses tell them to adapt they will.

    Dick Cheney, err Clark Gallagher is just upset because there is one less space for him to park his car and his mind is to limited to allow him to realize that all these bicycles are actually freeing up parking spaces.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • ME 2 September 23, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    GLV, what point of its made his life a little harder don’t you get? Yes we all depend on trucks to deliver goods to us, but its not like these racks have made it impossible for the driver to do this. As far as I can tell, he had to go through\around the racks for one day until he was informed about a new loading zone.

    I personally could give 2 licks of concern about a truck driver being slightly inconvienced. There are 1000s of people out there whose lives are harder because they have to do more with less at their jobs or worse yet make their money stretch a little further because they have no jobs.

    And to Mr Gallagher are drivers going to be up in arms over the loss of 0.02% of the available parking spaces?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John Reinhold September 23, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    PDOT says there are over 7000 on-street parking spots in the central city, and almost 4000 more in city owned “Smart Park” garages.

    There are tens of thousands more in private garages and lots, with over 13,000 of them being “all-day”.

    Why are we still talking about using 8 for bicycles. There only needs to be 8 bikes locked up to equal what would be considered “OK” for cars to be there…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jonathan Maus (Editor) September 23, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    Just an FYI, here is some very current information on car parking spaces in the Central City of Portland (taken from a PDOT document shown at an open house for the Central Portland Transportation Plan):

    “Since 1988, approximately 22,500 new parking spaces have been created in the Central City. Most of the parking has been tied to new development. There are over 20,000 surface parking spaces and close to 60,000 garage spaces in the Central City. “

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR September 23, 2008 at 11:03 pm

    and every one of those parking spaces represents some idiot you have to fight for right of way as you’re cycling into or out of downtown.

    I wonder if anyone has any statistics on how many of them are filled by Clark County drivers every day? Washington County drivers? Drivers that live within five miles of downtown?

    I’d love to see them close downtown to private vehicles completely!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • diddy September 23, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    biker’s rul3!!!!!

    we do what we want and all others palin comparison

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Lynne September 24, 2008 at 1:30 am

    #11 suburban cyclists – yes, we do exist and commute every day, rain or shine. I ride to my place of employ and store my bike in a first-come, first-served enclosed locker. There are about 60 of them outside my building, and they are all occupied this month…

    Parking elsewhere – signposts, bike racks, or the bike comes in the store with me.

    I should note that many of the employees here live in Portland. We live in a metro area, not a bunch of silos.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • bill September 24, 2008 at 1:48 am

    Seriously, who the hell gives a frack about the Hillsboro Argus?

    Hillsboro has a newspaper? I’m shocked.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • grasshopper September 24, 2008 at 8:58 am

    quoting ambrown: “what can bicycle advocates do to make sure that downtown businesses don’t actively resent Portland’s burgeoning bike culture?”

    I appreciate any and all dialogue but I also have a question of my own which I ask myself every day that a driver honks at me for not being on the sidewalk, or WHATEVER is bugging them at that moment:

    why are bicyclists and bike advocates being held responsible for an increasingly antiquated infrastructure, which was built with long distance travel (such as long-haul trucking) and other commercial development in the forefront of the design?

    our needs are changing in this world. Whether or not it’s drivers vs. bicyclists, or whatever, why does change always need to be a freaken war?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • a.O September 24, 2008 at 9:03 am

    The fact that Mr Cheney, er, … Gallagher has become upset about a reassignment of 0.02 percent of Portland’s parking spaces demonstrates just how deeply ingrained the anti-bike bias is in our society.

    Given the facts of this story, it’s a stretch for him to use the word “reality” to describe his understanding of the situation.

    Mr Gallagher needs to understand that we Portlanders are interested in designing our City primarily to be as sustainable as possible, and when it comes to transportation that means more bikes, streetcars, busses, Max trains, and fewer subsidies for single-occupancy vehicles.

    More importantly, Mr Gallagher needs to understand that we Portlanders are not interested in designing our City to make it convenient for out-of-towners to drive through at the expense of our values.

    And to those of you who are admonishing other readers not to make it about bikes v. cars, please direct that message first and foremost to Mr Gallagher. As Bob says at #38, if you read the entire piece, it is clear that it’s anti-bike and nothing more.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • k. September 24, 2008 at 9:21 am

    This is a meaningless issue as many have pointed out. The statistics regarding the number of parking spaces and how many are being taken bear this out. The more we talk about it, the more we just keep the (non)issue alive.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • a.O September 24, 2008 at 9:31 am

    K, I would agree with you if it weren’t for the fact that Mr Gallagher is writing in a newspaper that has a significant circulation in Washington County among people who are likely to vote on important transportation issues.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • grasshopper September 24, 2008 at 9:33 am

    Personally, I never dismiss dialogue, and because I see this current form of democracy not working in america I always encourage dialogue.

    Lack of dialogue is (I think) the biggest reason there is still “racial” tension in this country which is predicted to erupt in our lifetime — despite the fact that some misled folks think Barack Obama’s presence in politics will “fix” THAT particular problem (such as “strange fruit” hanging in the tree at Pacific University, the lynched caricature of a presidential candidate who happens to be a black man).

    I believe that dialogue is needed for the larger issue at hand here, which is a lotta road rage. Each small incident will inflame this rage on either side OVER and OVER again.

    It’s just a theory: sunlight makes the best disinfectant. If drivers and others who are angry want to complain, let them answer to the stats and try to sound logical — then the dialogue won’t keep coming up as cheap mainstream media antics. but why should true, earnest dialogue ever be useless?

    There will be, for this auto-addicted culture, a good amount of time in the near future that people will need to be educated to the facts and informed of new options they have not considered before. Will it serve larger society to dismiss these opportunities to inform and expand our potential?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • grasshopper September 24, 2008 at 9:34 am

    i’m sorry, I misspoke: that was george fox university, not pacific.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kt September 24, 2008 at 9:44 am

    Jason, #4, LO is in the TriMet payroll tax district, therefore all business with payroll in LO have to pay the Tri Met payroll tax.

    Hillsboro is also in the TriMet payroll tax district– or at least, some of it is.

    Check out the map on the ODR’s website, the border is marked in Orange.

    You’ll see it extends all the way to the south side of Tualatin.

    On topic: the Argus writer is being quite naive about parking or driving in downtown Portland. Everything I’ve read has said, point blank, that the businesses REQUESTED the bike corrals.

    And y’all: stop ragging on those of us who live in the ‘burbs. Seriously.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • a.O September 24, 2008 at 10:03 am

    Kt, why aren’t you telling Mr Gallagher to stop ragging on people who live in the ‘burbs?

    He said: “[T]hose of us from the suburbs will be on at least four wheels downtown no matter what the weather.”

    Maybe if you’d correct *his* misperception about people who live in the suburbs not biking, he wouldn’t be writing anti-bike articles such as the one we’re discussing.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • ShawnR September 24, 2008 at 10:27 am

    Big suprise that they need to give this newspaper away for free in the hopes someone will actually read it. My weekly copy goes straight to the recycling bin every week.
    (BTW, I’m a Hillsboroite that bike commutes every day, rain, snow or shine).

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kt September 24, 2008 at 10:40 am

    a.O, I could wish that EVERYONE would stop ragging on people who live in the ‘burbs.

    Mr Gallagher doesn’t read this blog; I don’t think he’s even heard of this blog. I wouldn’t address my comments to Mr Gallagher on this blog, I would address my comments to him somewhere there would be a better chance he might see it.

    But, if you insist:

    Mr Gallagher: please stop perpetuating the myth that one MUST drive if one is to live in the suburbs. It is entirely possible to get around suburbia by other means, including by foot and by bike. I should say, ESPECIALLY by foot and by bike; these alternative modes of transportation actually make our home towns more livable. Our home towns are actually easier to get around by foot or by bike than by car, especially by single occupant vehicles: for instance, there is a grocery store literally 1.5 miles from my home– if I bike, I am assured of an easy parking spot near the doors, and can get in and out easier… but if I drove, it would take me the same amount of time just to drive around the parking lot looking for a place to park, no matter how far away.

    My work is 6 miles from my house. During the school year, it takes me exactly the same amount of time to ride my bike to work as it does to drive… and by riding, I’m removing one car from the road, thereby easing congestion for the other road users. I’m also freeing up on more spot in my office parking lot for co-workers and clients.

    It’s even possible for me to get to downtown Portland without driving; in fact, I would prefer not to drive in downtown Portland, it’s so much easier to take Max or the bus and walk around, or bike up over Terwilliger, or carpool with a bunch of other people.

    Your article in the Argus perpetuates the myth that Americans MUST drive everywhere; it is a naive point of view, and exposes your biases and nixes your journalistic integrity.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • thebikelady September 24, 2008 at 11:52 am

    I live on the westside. We have cyclist out here that need parking as well and we ride in the rain (as the editor of the aricle assumes that bicyclist stop riding , when it rains).

    I wish you folks ‘over there’ in portland would stop excluding us folks out ‘here’ on the westide from the ‘bike culture’. We may not look the same as you in many ways, but we still have the same desires and needs.

    I agree with the person who wrote that we need to come up with some way to peacefully negotiate legitimate parking spaces for bicyclist.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • a.O September 24, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Wow Kt (@ #57), great work!

    Maybe you want to submit that as a letter to the editor? It’s definitely worthy, IMHO:

    NewsClerk@HillsboroArgus.com

    Or:

    Hillsboro Argus
    People’s Forum
    P.O. Box 588
    Hillsboro, OR 97123
    fax: 503-648-9191

    Seriously, it would make my day if you sent that in.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • John September 24, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Mr. Gallagher is certainly wrong about those of us in the suburbs and all being cagers. I live in Tigard and work in Hillsboro and bike commute year-round maybe using my car once or twice a week for commuting.
    When going into Portland, why use a car? Use Trimet and your feet (or bike).
    What we need is a use your car day so we can show the pro-car lobby just what would happen if noone used Trimet and the bikes.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Kt September 24, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    Thanks, a.O, I need to come up with a good conclusion…. I sort of ran out of unique things to say and felt like I was going to start repeating myself! :)

    I’ll see about sending it in to the Argus… hopefully they’ll print it…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • JP September 25, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    What are these delivery drivers going to do when there’s a car parked there instead? Anything different?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

- Daily bike news since 2005 -
BikePortland.org is a production of
PedalTown Media Inc.
321 SW 4th Ave, Ste. 401
Portland, OR 97204

Powered by WordPress. Theme by Clemens Orth.
Subscribe to RSS feed


Original images and content owned by Pedaltown Media, Inc. - Not to be used without permission.