E-bike rebate bill voted out of committee 9-1

You could get $400 or $1,200 Specialized’s new Haul e-cargo bike. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

“I think in many ways, particularly for lower income families, this can be a powerful anti-poverty measure.”

– Khanh Pham, Oregon House representative

The bike bus bill wasn’t the only piece of legislation on our watchlist that moved forward on Wednesday. House Bill 2571, the e-bike rebate bill, was voted out of the House Committee on Climate, Energy & Environment by a vote of 9 to 1.

The only lawmaker to vote against the bill was southern Oregon Representative Kim Wallan, a Republican who represents District 6 in Medford.

As we reported earlier this month, HB 2571 has been significantly amended since it was first introduced in November. General Oregon residents can receive up to $400 toward the purchase of an e-bike and those who qualify for the low-income tier (80% of average median income) can receive $1,200. The bill also takes responsibility for processing the rebate away from bike shops and leans more heavily on the Department of Environmental Quality for administration.

The bill’s chief sponsor is Rep. Dacia Grayber (D-28). At the committee work session yesterday, bill co-sponsor Rep. Khanh Pham (D-46) asked Grayber’s Legislative Assistant Barrett Johnson how this bill would mesh with a Portland e-bike rebate that is likely coming as part of the Portland Clean Energy Fund grant program. Johnson said they’ve contacted PCEF and that, “We believe these rebates will be able to stack, similar to the way rebates for electric cars stack at the state and federal level. That’s something that we are hoping to see to help additionally alleviate cost burden and that the DEQ is in support of at an agency level as well.”

Rep. Pham, who sits on the committee, touch on affordability in comments she made prior to her “yes” vote:

“Particularly for low income families that can’t afford a car, these kinds of e-bikes can be a really critical replacement for trips to the grocery store. I bike my daughter to school [on ours]. We were able to avoid having to buy second car. So I think in many ways, particularly for lower income families, this can be a powerful anti-poverty measure.”

From here the bill has been referred to the Joint Committee on Ways and Means. While this vote is a step forward, insiders know that many bills die at Ways and Means where final decisions are made about bills with budgetary implications. That committee will weigh the urgency of this rebate against many other statewide priorities.

In an email to supporters of the bill, Barrett Johnson wrote, “This is a point in which a number of great bills and popular policies lose steam. Not because of their quality, nor how well they were advocated for, but because there is simply not enough money for everything.”

Johnson said he’s “cautiously optimistic” it will move forward based on the fact that it has bipartisan support from lawmakers and public demand signaled by the “overwhelming success” of a new rebate program in Bend and the possible PCEF investment.

Stay tuned as this and other bills work their way through the legislative process.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car owner and driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, feel free to contact me at @jonathan_maus on Twitter, via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a supporter.

Notify of

newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

The Ways & Means committee is taking their public hearings on the road so if you want to testify on the budget and how you think things should be prioritized you can do in person. You MUST register in advance — they will be in Portland April 8th. https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/rayfield/Documents/WM%20Hearings%20Release%20March%2016,%202023.pdf

1 year ago

Wouldn’t it be interesting to actually explore whether or to what extent low income families who can’t afford a car would pursue this. I find it noteworthy (and distressing) how almost everything to do with e-bikes here is premised on wishfulness, speculation, hunches, virtue signaling, hype.
Research into these questions isn’t especially difficult to conduct. And I suspect there are folks who are doing just that. And we would all learn a lot from any serious investigation into what people are actually doing when it comes to e-bikes.

  • how long they last, what the failure modes and trajectories look like?
  • who uses e-bikes and for what purposes?
  • to what degree are e-bikes found to be car substitutes? How and under what circumstances does this occur? When and for whom?

Without serious inquiries (I don’t mean reassuring anecdotes) we are left with whatever folks want to believe, and from reading bikeportland almost since the beginning it is pretty clear that when it comes to e-anything people mostly turn off circumspection, scrutiny, reasoned argument.

1 year ago
Reply to  9watts

I believe PSU is currently studying this. There is an e-bike survey which seems to explore your second and third bullet points.

pierre delecto
pierre delecto
1 year ago
Reply to  JP

There is an e-bike survey which seems to explore your second and third bullet points.

That internet push-poll is the exact opposite of serious inquiry.