You might not expect to see big money moves out of Portland City Hall right now, considering the tight budget constraints most city bureaus are under. But when it comes to the Portland Clean Energy Fund (PCEF), it’s a different story — and the latest news out of this program should be very exciting to transportation advocates in Portland.
Among the investments proposed is $20 million for an electric bike rebate program.
Managed by the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS), PCEF is funded by revenue the city collects from large retailers (1% tax on large retailers with $1 billion in national revenue and $500,000 in revenue in Portland) and is dedicated “community-led projects that reduce carbon emissions, create economic opportunity, and help make our city more resilient as we face a changing climate.”
In the past, the PCEF program hasn’t always paid very much attention to the importance of transportation as a climate action strategy. But last year, the program made some changes, dedicating a significant pot of money to transportation decarbonization efforts. The PCEF’s Climate Investment Plan Preliminary Draft released earlier this week gives us a first look of what kinds of projects this might fund.
Out of its $750 million total five-year budget, the PCEF has $100 million over the next five years (2023- 2028) to spend on projects related to transportation decarbonization. This money will be spent on both “strategic programs,” which are large-scale investments managed by the city and designed with input from community members and subject experts and “community responsive grants” awarded to community-based nonprofit organizations designing carbon emissions reduction projects.
A local e-bike rebate program
One of the strategic plans outlined in the draft plan is for an electric bike rebate program with $20 million of funding over the next five years. This would be separate from the $6 million statewide e-bike rebate program currently being debated at the Oregon Legislature. And it might turn out to be a crucial Plan B given that House Bill 2571 is very likely to be much smaller than advocates originally hoped (sponsors are working on new bill language that would include many significant compromises from the original version — more on that coming soon.)
It’s clear from the Climate Investment Plan that PCEF committee members are bullish on e-bikes: “E-bikes provide an efficient way to get around Portland, are not subject to vehicle congestion, do not require much physical exertion, offer trip flexibility, and save money and time with respect to parking,” the draft plan states. “Community education and incentives are needed to provide equitable access to e-bikes, as well as safety equipment, lighting, weatherproof gear, charging infrastructure, secure storage areas, and locks.”
This program would give income-qualified households rebates for e-bike and cargo e-bikes from local bike retailers. Local bike retailers will need to be physically located in Portland and provide bike repair services.
“The program will be conducted in parallel with education and outreach by community-based organizations to PCEF priority populations about the e-bike opportunity, including information about safe riding, route-finding, charging, and storage. Surveys and data will be collected about e-bike use, storage, and charging, including recommendations for a pilot program for allocating funds for safe e- bike storage and charging needs for existing multifamily properties,” the plan states.
PCEF planners also want to invest $25 million in an expansion of the Portland Bureau of Transportation’s highly successful Transportation Wallet program, which offers transit passes and Biketown/scooter-share ride credits to income-qualified Portlanders. This would give PBOT the ability to issue transportation wallets to a lot more Portlanders.
$35 million of opportunity for local nonprofits
In addition to the two projects above, the plan would invest an additional $35 million in grants over the next five years to nonprofit organizations to help them “identify community mobility needs and solutions and prepare them to implement environmentally sustainable transportation projects.” According to the preliminary draft, these grants could support efforts in:
- Community-driven transportation projects that reduce vehicle miles traveled.
- Access to clean transportation through the electrification of fleet vehicles including shared vehicles managed by community organizations and electric bikes (e.g., e-bike libraries, e-cargo bikes).
- Charging infrastructure that is equitable, convenient, reliable, affordable, and accessible.
- Overcoming barriers to accessing clean transportation.
- Providing outreach and education for clean transportation including new mobility options.
- Building capacity of organizations to implement clean transportation projects.
- Support workforce development and training programs that provide economic opportunities in the clean transportation sector.
So, transportation nonprofit people, it might be time to start thinking of grant application ideas that fit these criteria.
From here, the CIP must be recommended by the PCEF advisory committee to City Council later this summer. Then City Council will need to approve the CIP before solicitations for specific projects are released. BPS will host an in-person PCEF workshop this Saturday, March 18 at CORE – Collective Oregon Eateries on 82nd Ave from 1 to 4 pm (RSVP for the event here). There will also be a virtual public workshop on March 22 (info here). And an online survey is available to fill out until the end of the month, which you can find here.
Taylor has been BikePortland’s staff writer since November 2021. She has also written for Street Roots and Eugene Weekly. Contact her at email@example.com
Woo Hoo !! looks like developers are not going to get any relief from bicycle parking 🙂 I imagine we’ll need even more bike parking now…
OMG. The PCEF is a good intention gone wrong. They have so much money….you should see the craziness they are funding. They nearly gave $12 million to a convicted fraudster.
yeah that was a pretty embarrassing growing pain. But I disagree it has “gone wrong.” I think a lot of folks really want to see this fail because it gives power to people and projects that haven’t typically had it. Go PCEF! Let’s do this!
Oh please Jonathan. Look at this list of recipients. It’s a laundry list of many unaccountable and dubious recipients. Just one example: $1.17 MILLION went to pay for a new headquarters for a newspaper (Street Roots) of dubious distinction. How is this helping climate change again? It’s more like a political slush fund granting money to favored friends and like minded ideologues. https://www.portland.gov/bps/cleanenergy/2022-pcef-rfp-2-grant-recipients
thanks for your opinion. If you don’t like how it’s being run, you can attend meetings and get involved in making it better.
Also, I disagree that Street Roots is “of dubious distinction.” It’s a solid news outlet that fills an important niche and does really good work and is often the only voice for an important group of Portlanders.
Have a nice day
That would be like trying to work
I’m a rich people! Thanks for my e-bike rebate!
Looks like something SWTrails should apply for, nothing cleaner than walking!
You mean the org that is primarily focused on recreation urban hiking and not actual transportation issues for walking in SW?
Ok… but what about investing in the public bike share which is probably much more cost effective and even better for reducing carbon. Of course I mean in ADDITION to this program.
I don’t think that would meet PCEF’s rules about having to specifically benefit low-income households and people of color. The only way it can be used for Biketown would probably be to add funding to Biketown For All subsidy program.
I can think of a few ways to justify it. 1) purchase more bikes to offset the impact of expanding the BT4A program without degrading service. 2) use PCEF money for operations, requiring LYFT to hire local minority owned/run contractors for the maintenance and rebalancing and use the savings on expanding the fleet. 3) provide a more bike/library or affordable housing specific subset of the biketown service that is separate from the main fleet but uses the same bikes and can increase availability and reduce per-bike purchase costs.
The owner of this site rides an e-bike now so they are very good for the environment… much better than regular bicycles or walking…
Especially since the data shows no one is riding them…
This is exciting. Ebikes are amazing and total game-changers once you get on one. The barrier to entry is usually the added cost over a regular bike. If there’s a way to make that initial purchase sting less, I could see a lot of people appreciating this as an alternative to public transit and/or the expense of a car.
How about cleaning the existing bike lanes so people don’t get as many flat tires?