Get ready for a two month closure of the Esplanade that starts February 1st

Make plans to not use the Esplanade between February 1st and April 1st.
(Photo: Portland Parks)

Earlier today we shared the good news: That PBOT will re-open Better Naito three months early.

Here’s the bad news: They’re doing that because the Portland Parks and Recreation Bureau will close the Eastbank Esplanade for two months starting February 1st.

Click for larger version.

Parks is working in partnership with PBOT, the Bureau of Environmental Services, and the Regional Arts and Culture Council on a major maintenance and repair project on the popular path. The closure will last until April 1st and the affected section will be from the Hawthorne to the Steel Bridge. This is an extremely popular path that PBOT estimates carries about 2,400 daily bicycle trips and 1,200 daily walking trips.

“This long-planned project will improve safety and park amenities, replace invasive vegetation with native species, and restore our public art,” said Parks Commissioner Nick Fish in a statement released today. Among the improvements coming will be: replacement and repair of concrete, degraded surfaces, and various amenities, new and improved lights, and the cleaning of trash and graffiti.

Advertisement

Two major events already planned — the Worst Day of the Year Ride (February 20th) and the Shamrock Run (March 17th) — will be permitted to use the path during closure.

As we shared earlier today (the rollout of this announcement wasn’t as smooth as I’d hoped because I was out of the office on-assignment most of the day), PBOT has stepped up to provide Better Naito to help with the detour. You’ll be able to start biking in the two-way protected path on Naito starting January 28th and it will stay up through the summer festival season.

The project to restore this 1.5-mile section of the Esplanade to its original beauty is brought to you by $500,000 in the City’s 2018-19 adopted budget and $200,000 in ongoing maintenance funding.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

22 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mran1984
5 years ago

Nothing good about any of this. That’s a third of my commute that is impacted in the worst way possible (other than a bridge up). Distracted folks heading the wrong direction is never an improvement, let alone safer. The only problem with the Esplanade is the camping. Are “they” going to improve that?

Jeff S(egundo)
Jeff S(egundo)
5 years ago
Reply to  mran1984

‘“This long-planned project will improve safety and park amenities, replace invasive vegetation with native species, and restore our public art,” said Parks Commissioner Nick Fish in a statement released today. Among the improvements coming will be: replacement and repair of concrete, degraded surfaces, and various amenities, new and improved lights, and the cleaning of trash and graffiti.’

Yeah, nothing good about any of this…it’s going to lose its “lived-in” feel.

PS
PS
5 years ago
Reply to  mran1984

If this is a third of your commute, your commute is incredibly short and given an actual detour is provided, it is pretty mellow.

Terry D-M
Terry D-M
5 years ago

They don’t mention adding a Portland Loo, or several. Those “temporary” facilities at Salmon are toxic. There are two restrooms plus a Loo on the west side, but the Eastside has no permanent facilities at all.

I specifically pointed this out when Parks department did outreach at SE Uplift on the Park’s Bond where they asked “Where would be a good place for restrooms?”

As usual, they will make it “look nice” but not fix the worst facilities problem on the entire stretch.

Johnny Bye Carter
Johnny Bye Carter
5 years ago
Reply to  Terry D-M

Portland fails when it comes time to find somewhere to relieve oneself. Even worse in the winter when they close many park restrooms.

But this is true of most places in the US.

was carless
was carless
5 years ago

There are porta potties along the Esplanade. No reason to shit on the street there.

Rivelo
5 years ago
Toby Keith
Toby Keith
5 years ago
Reply to  Rivelo

Right! And we’re still complaining. ; )

Bald One
Bald One
5 years ago

It’s rather outrageous that they require an entire closure for 2-months to do some landscaping and artwork cleaning. How in the world can this be justified, due to the extreme impact to many regular users. I do not agree that the Naito thing is at all a useful detour.

soren
soren
5 years ago
Reply to  Bald One

The problem with “trails” manged by parks and recreation is that this city bureau does not view them as transportation facilities. in fact, parks and recreation has has long history of bias against people cycling (fast cyclists use naito!).

Bald One
Bald One
5 years ago

What would be useful if they improved the switchbacks from Peace park down near the Steel bridge – this route really needs a direct shot up from the southern end to the top, in order to avoid the dangerous mixing zone requiring u-turns into mixed traffic at the bottom of the switchback near the Steele bridge. That would be a great improvement to the path.

Bald One
Bald One
5 years ago

Please join me in taking the lane on SE 11th and SE 12th avenues from Sandy/Burnside to Clay St during this shutdown.

City should go ahead and set up the changes on these streets they have proposed prior to shutting down EE.

Bald One
Bald One
5 years ago

I think the importance of this bike connection necessitates a harder look at what exactly the city is planning during this 2 month shut down. The article mentions repair of concrete, but the City’s website notice of this makes no mention of concrete repair, instead mentioning, “replacing degraded surfaces and amenities” . This sounds more like park benches to me, and less like cracks and potholes in the path surface. I’m not sure we should all just stand up and applaud such a poorly stated scope of work and accept a 2-month shutdown.

Bald One
Bald One
5 years ago

City needs to re-locate the garbage bins and lamp-posts which are sticking into the travel lanes on this path.

City needs to repair the buckled concrete path next to the suspended grating bridge between the morrison and the burnside bridges.

City needs to fix the blacktop between the hawthorne and OMSI.

City needs to widen the path under and adjacent to the Hawthorne bridge – increase traffic flow and allow less conflict between users.

City needs to widen many sections of this MUP. Between all the new joggers using this path now and the summer tourist season, this entire path needs to be widened and improved to reduce conflicts between users. Many specific pinch-points and restrictions in movement due to turns, bottlenecks, and restrictions exist on this path which need to be removed or widened.

X
X
5 years ago
Reply to  Bald One

Even with the problems you mention the Esplanade is still a great N-S link because the conflicts are minor compared to the dangers of mixing with motorized traffic and the sorry delays imposed by the signs and signals that come with motorized traffic.

The fact that traffic controls are not needed for mixed bikes and pedestrians is one of the best arguments for human powered travel. Even at the very awkward spot at the bottom of the ramps by the Steel Bridge there are no crashes* and only the most minor delays. Nothing like a similar three-way intersection used by motor traffic.

I agree that things like trash bins could and should be moved out of the line of travel.

*I’ve never seen or heard of one, anyhow

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

If only we had more routes like the Esplanade with a mile or more of uninterrupted pavement, flat grades, no cross traffic, and no threat from aggressively operated motor vehicles. IMHO something like the Sullivan’s Gulch Trail, connecting downtown, the Esplanade and Springwater, Central Eastside, Lloyd District, Hollywood, Gateway, Gateway Green, I-205 Bikepath, and ultimately the Gorge Scenic Trail, would put a little shine on that whole Platinum thing.

The Sullivan’s Gulch Trail is an asset that would not be “owned” by any part of town, since it would open up and connect a big slice of the East Side to employment, cultural assets, recreation and a variety of economic activities. Besides the parochial interest of people who ride bikes it’s a serious economic development opportunity. It’s also the sort of thing that people put on tourist brochures (ok, websites) and plan trips around. There are nearly 40 hotels, motels, and hostels within a mile of the Esplanade and the Sullivan’s Gulch route, with more under construction.

Bike infrastructure is cheap. How much would 8 or 10 miles of world-class bikeway cost? I’m guessing, a lot less than a straight mile of 4-lane interstate highway, something we already have a lot of.

JeffS(egundo)
JeffS(egundo)
5 years ago
Reply to  X

“*I’ve never seen or heard of one, anyhow“

I have seen one; it wasn’t pretty. And given the design of that intersection, I’ll wager it hasn’t been the only one.

catherine feta-cheese
catherine feta-cheese
5 years ago
Reply to  Bald One

Agree on Steel Bridge switchbacks, especially for exiting to Esplanade at night. Also they really need to remove the miserable shrubbery that blocks view of Hawthorne Bridge ramp when riding north.

Johnny Bye Carter
Johnny Bye Carter
5 years ago

We need some bicycle specific infrastructure along the waterfront.

MTW
MTW
5 years ago

Happy that Better Naito is coming back early to help manage this disruption for bike commuters, but that’s really only an acceptable detour for those traveling from Downtown/SW to the Northeast. If your commute is from SE to N/NE Portland, this detour is certainly not practical (you wouldn’t cross the Hawthorne or Tillikum to ride Better Naito and then re-cross to the Eastside at Steel.)

A bold proposal from a city that truly prioritized non-motorized transportation? How about “Better Grand Ave” as an acceptable detour

X
X
5 years ago
Reply to  MTW

There’s nothing approximately like SW Naito with the neutral face on the park on the E side. SE Water has a lot of crossing conflicts, a lot of parking spaces, not much room, and it’s buried behind the RR tracks. Grand Avenue? Trolley tracks, many side streets and curb cuts, freeway attitude. Yipes.

PS
PS
5 years ago
Reply to  MTW

Your “Bold Proposal” is literally the same exact thing as Better Naito, only, well, worse. It is the same distance from the bike path to Grand as it is from the bike path over the Hawthorne to Naito, the similarities end there. I would think most actual commuters, will find the additional 1/2 mile and 5 minutes added to their commute to be a very minor inconvenience.

mark smith
mark smith
5 years ago

Someday someone will look at 405 and realize it is much better as a people path/Bus route than what it today. Bold thinking is coming. Someday.