Showers Pass Warehouse Sale

With slew of projects in the pipeline, east Portland’s streets begin era of change

Posted by on May 16th, 2018 at 2:26 pm

It will take both money and good designs to tame east Portland streets.
(Photo: Jonathan Maus)

“There’s a bit of almost a giddy feeling when you think about how many things are going to happen.”
— Kem Marks, The Rosewood Initiative

2018 could go down in history as an inflection point for east Portland. After years of activism and advocacy — and planning and politicking by local governments — a part of our city that has been historically neglected since it was annexed a half-century ago is slated for an infusion of transportation infrastructure investment the likes of which we’ve never seen before.

Tonight (5/16) at an event on SE 122nd Avenue, the Portland Bureau of Transportation kicks off the first of two open houses that will feature nearly two dozen projects and programs aimed at making east Portland streets safer and more convenient. Between projects slated to break ground this summer and next, there’s so much going on it’s hard to keep up.

Kem Marks from The Rosewood Initiative.
(Photo: Jonathan Maus)

Since the East Portland in Motion plan was adopted by Portland City Council in 2012, PBOT estimates they’ve delivered $255 million worth of projects (see PDF below). Between 2018 and 2019, the City’s Fixing our Streets Program alone will invest an estimated $22.4 million in 19 projects east of 82nd. Earlier this month, PBOT Bicycle Advisory Committee member Jim Chasse (a veteran east Portland activist) said the City was “very generous” when it agreed to a request by the East Portland Land Use and Transportation Committee to spend $15 million in Transportation System Development Charges on languishing active transportation projects (which have since been leveraged to $28 million).

“It’s a great thing to see, there’s a bit of almost a giddy feeling when you think about how many things are going to happen,” The Rosewood Initiative’s Director of Transportation Equity Kem Marks shared with me today in a phone interview. “I think the main feeling out here is — it’s about bloody time!”

Marks says this stream of projects is the direct result of blood, sweat and tears from advocates who worked the process for years to line them up. Planning efforts like East Portland in Motion and the East Portland Action Plan’s Bike Committee helped identify projects, make them a priority, and then push them onto appropriate lists. But perhaps more importantly, these efforts have helped organize, mobilize, and radicalize a slew of activists who have become some of the most effective at swaying City Hall — even from neighborhoods many miles away from it.

Here’s a look at just some of the projects and plans in the pipeline:
E Portland funded projects_Poster_5-16-18

Advertisement


East Portland Education and Access to Employment project.
(PBOT)

–> PBOT has a slew of changes coming as part of their federally funded $6.5 million East Portland Access to Employment & Education (EPAEE) project (which seriously needs a better name). The project includes: the 4M Neighborhood Greenway which will run on SE Market, Mill and Millmain between SE 92nd Avenue and SE 130th Avenue; sidewalks on SE Cherry Blossom Drive between Market and Washington; two other neighborhood greenway projects that will run north-south on the 100s between SE Bush and NE Fargo and the 150s between SE Powell and NE Halsey. SE 106th will also get several improvements: a two-way cycle track between SE Main and Stark, and new sections of paved path to fill in gaps at NE Wasco, NE San Rafael and between Division and Market (near Cherry City Park). Construction is slated to begin in 2019.

Concept shown by PBOT for new paths through unimproved roads.


PBOT will create a new path through a parking lot near NE Wasco along 106th.
(PBOT)


East Glisan Update map.
(PBOT)

–> The East Glisan Street Update project will reallocate space on Glisan between I-205 to NE 162nd (city limits). As one of the lynchpins in the emerging outer northeast bike network via the Gateway to Opportunity project, PBOT will redesign the current cross-section of Glisan. Instead of the classic, dangerous arterial design of four standard lanes, a center turn lane and on-street parking lanes on both sides; PBOT will restripe it with two standard lanes, a center turn lane and unprotected, paint-only buffered bike lanes.

Unfortunately, PBOT says physically protected bike lanes aren’t in the budget. At the May 8th Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting PBOT Project Manager Timur Ender said the agency is, “Actively searching for funding internally; but I don’t want to overpromise and underdeliver.”


–> PBOT just kicked off their 122nd Ave Plan, which aims to “improve pedestrian and bicycle access and support better transit” on the notoriously dangerous arterial between SE Foster Road and NE Marine Drive.


“I worry people are going to die if we’re encouraging people to bike where cars are going so fast.”
— Sarah Iannarone, Bicycle Advisory Committee member

For Marks and other people who care about safe streets in east Portland, the next challenge is to make sure these projects are substantive enough to move the needle. There’s a reason so many people are hurt and killed while using east Portland’s arterials: they’re wide and straight and they encourage fast, unsafe driving.

PBOT’s Timur Ender got a taste of that concern after he presented some of these projects at the Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting. Committee member Sarah Iannarone, who lives near SE 148th and Powell, bluntly pointed out that, “I worry people are going to die if we’re encouraging people to bike where cars are going so fast.” Iannarone said she’s an “intrepid cyclist” but has all but given up cycling near her home because it’s so unsafe. She wants PBOT to lower speeds on arterials with bike lanes to 20 mph.

And Kem Marks with The Rosewood Initiative says their work will now shift to making sure these projects are as “transformative” as possible. “We want these projects to really make a difference, not just be band-aid projects,” he says. Marks is “skeptical but optimistic” about PBOT’s efforts to tame east Portland arterials. He wants to see PBOT do something like Better Naito in his neighborhood. “Are they willing to go and do something like that in this part of town?”

Learn more about these and many other east Portland projects online and/or at one of the two upcoming open houses. There’s also a PBOT-led ride tonight at 6:00 pm to explore future neighborhood greenways.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

45
Leave a Reply

avatar
12 Comment threads
33 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
25 Comment authors
qHello, KittytruthseekernuovorecordDan A Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jim Lee
Guest
Jim Lee

Never lived east of 82nd (except in Saint Louis), but this is interesting.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I

Meanwhile, in Gresham, the city is planning on taking the existing 3-lane cross-section of NE Sandy Blvd between 181st and 201st and widening it to 5 lanes. They have not shared any of the concepts publicly, but I have seen advanced copies through my employer. I asked the engineers if the traffic counts justified the widening project, and they said that they didn’t have any data. The 5-lane configuration is “in the master plan”, so I guess they are just pushing ahead with it. I believe construction is slated to start in 2019.

rick
Guest
rick

Did Gresham face opposition?

austin
Guest
austin

I doubt it: “They have not shared any of the concepts publicly,”

Paula
Guest
Paula

I also hope the safety improvements are substantial. Working out on NE 132nd north of San Rafael, I occasionally have to ride 102 or 122 and that 6″ paint stripe does nothing for feeling safe, especially when you are also dodging the debris (rocks and glass) and drains. Then, the whole right turn lane is the bike lane is just plain a mess.

Mike Sanders
Guest
Mike Sanders

That walkway on the east side of the 102 Av. Bridge over I-84 is way too narrow and the wall is too low. Had to cross that regularly in the 1970s in high school and it always scared the heck out of me. It badly needs to be widened and modernized. Crosswalks on the I-205 Trail need safety upgrades and reduced speed limits. Most are next to busy freeway interchanges and motorists often are focusing on the on ramps and not the crosswalk. Better guide sugnage on the I-205 Trail and better connections to/from adjoining neighborhoods are a must.

Huey Lewis
Guest
Huey Lewis

Oof. If I had known about the one tonight I’d have liked to go to be a body to show support for all this. But getting off work at 5 and then riding home I’d be rolling in fairly late.

Huey Lewis
Guest
Huey Lewis

Just in case anyone was wondering about my evening schedule. Sorry for the dumbass comment.

Hello, Kitty
Subscriber
Hello, Kitty

Actually, I was wondering. Thanks for the update.

nuovorecord
Guest
nuovorecord

Thanks for the News. 😉

David Hampsten
Guest

“…a part of our city that has been historically neglected since it was annexed a half-century ago is slated for an infusion of transportation infrastructure investment the likes of which we’ve never seen before.”

I’m wondering, where did this BS come from?

Half-century ago? Most of East Portland was annexed into the city between 1986 and 1991, so between 32 and 27 years ago; parts of Pleasant Valley were annexed in the 1960s, about 50-60 years ago; and most of Lents was annexed in 1920 or so, about 100 years ago.

As for the infusion of transportation infrastructure, most of the streets you see, including all those bike lanes, are from the 1960s through mid-80s when Multnomah County built them, except the ODOT bike paths on I-205 and I-84 (early 90s), the Springwater, and the MAX lines.

C’mon Johanthan, you can do better than that.

Gary
Guest
Gary

For reference (not yours, since clearly you don’t need it!)
https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/51673

Lloyd
Guest
Lloyd

Is the bicyclist in the photo traveling the wrong way on this street?

J.E.
Guest
J.E.

This (combined with cycling on the sidewalk) is standard operating procedure in cities with narrow, unprotected bike lanes along fast, busy streets. I see against-traffic-cycling frequently when visiting family in the suburbs of Sacramento.

John Liu
Guest
John Liu

“To each according to his needs”. I believe this principle applies well to funding ped/bike safety projects in EastPo.

billyjo
Guest
billyjo

A little concerning that the freeway onramp at Glisan will only be 1 lane. It’s already busy and I can just imagine how aggressive drivers will get when they have to wait even longer to get on the freeway. It’s bad as it is and will only get worse. The multi use path is right there and the max station is close…..

I’d love to see a no right turn on red but know that will not happen until someone gets killed there.

John Mulvey
Guest
John Mulvey

Huey Lewis
Oof. If I had known about the one tonight I’d have liked to go to be a body to show support for all this. But getting off work at 5 and then riding home I’d be rolling in fairly late.1

There’s a second event at Rosewood Initiative on June 5 at 6pm. Be there or be square.

soren
Guest
soren

And after attending the open house there is a pedalpalooza ride that gives a preview of the fully-funded 150s neighborhood greenway:

https://www.facebook.com/events/613979008934096/

David Hampsten
Guest

On 157th between Burnside and Glisan is the crash site of a DC8 that came down in 1978. Apparently the plane’s landing gear wasn’t deploying correctly, so the plane made three big circles around the airport. It was on the third try that the landing gear finally deployed, but that’s when the pilot noticed that they were completely out of fuel. Most passengers and crew survived, but several people were killed on the ground.

Alan 1.0
Subscriber

Squinting a bit at that “East Portland Funded Projects” map, toward the left side, it looks like there is a gap of east-west connection improvements between 82nd and I-205. Four connections – Flavel, Foster, Prescott, and a greenway around Halsey/Gateway (marked “Other Funding”) – are all that are shown. Are east-west bike connections better than I think through that gap? Or are connections being given short shrift again? Or…?

East of 205, improvements are marked for Holgate, Powell, Division, Market, Stark, Glisan, Halsey, Russell/Knott, and Prescott, and that’s great, but they need to connect!

David Hampsten
Guest

Between 82nd & 205 there are current connections on Burnside (retro 1970s bike lanes, both directions), Stark (but not Washington, retro 1970s bike lanes westbound only), Mill (sharrows), Division (retro 1970s bike lanes in both directions, soon to be upgraded to retro 2000s buffered bike lanes), Prescott (primitive 1960s shoulder bike lanes), Marine Drive (primitive 1960s shoulder bike lanes), Halsey (a laughable wider sidewalk on the north side only, very 1950s), Flavel (retro 1970s bike lanes, both directions), and of course the Springwater MUP. No 2010s protected bike lanes, of course, nor modern 2018 Dutch streets where cars are a guest and bikes and peds rule, with 14 mph speed limits. Yet.

Dave
Guest
Dave

Let’s just hope that Trump’s missteps in the Middle East give us permanent European-priced gas in the near future–nothing would change priorities like $7.50/gallon.

Alan 1.0
Subscriber

Haha! Nicely answered, so much more satisfying than “no.”

It’s great the east side is getting some long overdue street love, and I have no doubt that the intention is to fill in the gaps eventually. Historically, though, waiting for such connections to be completed has taken way, way too long. PBOT: connect, connect, connect!

truthseeker
Guest
truthseeker

Streets are losing driving lanes – and will be backed up more miles and miles.
Only a few people want to bike in the streets – the rest of us want to drive.

As soon as we, the people start voting our interests in local elections, the anti car crowd will be outvoted and lose.

Hello, Kitty
Subscriber
Hello, Kitty

Why haven’t people been “voting their interests”? Or maybe they have been, and they way they see their interests isn’t how you see their interests?

q
Guest
q

Interesting how only two or three decades ago, bike lanes and bike parking barely existed. Now they’re common. Have the people who don’t like this been boycotting voting for all this time?

q
Guest
q

Or did they want to vote but couldn’t find a place to park?