Support BikePortland

Budget update: Safety upgrades to outer Halsey and ‘Seasonal Naito’ poised for funding

Posted by on October 21st, 2016 at 1:04 pm

NE Halsey in east Portland

Buffered bike lanes, safer crossings, and lower speed limits could be coming soon to Northeast Halsey.
(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)

And then there were two.

Winners and losers are coming into focus in the mad dash for cash that is known as the Fall Budget Monitoring Process (BuMP). Two of the five Bureau of Transportation projects we’ve been tracking are now poised for funding.

$8 million from the city’s General Fund is up for grabs this go-round with about $4 million of that total set-aside for major maintenance and infrastructure projects. The process began with each city bureau submitting their funding requests. Then the City Budget Office offered their opinions to City Council. The final step before the budget is voted on at Council next week was to see what the Mayor wanted to do.

As we alluded to in a post this morning, we can now confirm that — out of the six PBOT projects in the discretionary category (as in, not part of the major maintenance and infrastructure list) — Mayor Hales has formally requested $350,000 for the Seasonal Naito project and $1 million for new sidewalks and other “safety improvements” on Northeast Halsey Street between 112th and 162nd Avenues (the Gresham border).

The projects that won’t be funded (see list below) include: a path connection between Milwaukie and Sellwood via the new Trolley Trail on SE 17th and the Springwater Corridor; a Vision Zero education and outreach campaign; and major changes to inner Southeast Hawthorne (including a new signal on the west end of the Hawthorne Bridge).

List of PBOT projects and the mayor's funding requests.(Graphic: City Auditor's Office)

List of PBOT projects and the mayor’s funding requests.
(Graphic: City Auditor’s Office)

Advertisement

To refresh your memory, PBOT is focused on Halsey because of its “high number” of crashes. Outer Halsey is also a top priority identified by the city’s East Portland in Motion initiative. The City wants to fill sidewalk gaps, narrow the existing vehicle lanes, add buffered bike lanes, improve and add existing crossings, and reduce the posted speed limit from 45 mph to 35 mph. “This project would support the agency’s Vision Zero goals, in addition to priorities identified in East Portland in Motion,” reads a PBOT description of the project, “by providing infrastructure improvements that are proven to reduce crashes.”

We already know why Mayor Hales is pushing for changes to Naito Parkway; but why Halsey (besides the aforementioned reasons)? By balancing out his request for Naito with a request east of I-205, he’s addressing well-known concerns about the geographic equity of transportation investment.

That tension between transportation investments in the central city and east Portland came up during a brief discussion among the mayor and commissioners at a Fall BuMP work session yesterday.

Commissioner Nick Fish started it off. “In the conversations I’ve had and in the emails I’ve received,” he said, “There’s this tension between wanting to do a seasonal Better Naito and also wanting to address vision zero challenges where equity has a sharper lens in east Portland. Does this proposal [$350,000 for Naito and $1 million for Halsey] get it about right?”

“I think it does,” replied Novick.

It’s important to note that Hales is only requesting half ($1 million) the funds needed for the Outer Halsey project. He’s then asking PBOT to fund the rest with money from their system development charges account. Based on what we heard at the budget work session yesterday, Novick has agreed to this. (Note: The other $900,000 that’s not being funded was for Vision Zero outreach and education along the corridor.)

These funding requests already have two votes (Novick and Hales) and only need one more to pass. (Update: Commissioner Fish supports it!). Council is scheduled to vote on the budget at their weekly meeting this coming Wednesday, October 26th at 9:45 am. In the meantime, please let Mayor Hales and the commissioners know how you feel about these projects.

— Jonathan Maus, (503) 706-8804 – jonathan@bikeportland.org

BikePortland is supported by the community (that means you!). Please become a subscriber or make a donation today.

Please support BikePortland.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

8 Comments
  • Avatar
    rick October 21, 2016 at 1:42 pm

    What does Gresham want with Halsey?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Avatar
      Bart October 21, 2016 at 5:02 pm

      Today we can use it to get over 205 and onto Tillamook, then into NE/SE/Downtown/Wherevs. It’s a great connection to the sharrowed bicycle mecca that some of us were gentrified away from. It’ll also be a perfect drop onto the 205 path or the up and coming Gateway Green. Once it’s complete, I expect it’ll give the neighborhoods east of 205 a foothold, somewhere to anchor a ridership base and a supportive community that will hopefully continue spreading even further out.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Avatar
      David Hampsten October 21, 2016 at 6:05 pm

      A couple years ago, Gresha was part of an East County Connections Plan, where they proposed full-size roundabouts at 162nd at both Halsey & Glisan.

      It is also worth noting that historically, most East Portland work commuters, including those by bike and transit, are not trying to get downtown, but to industrial jobs in the Columbia Corridor, Troutdale, and between Gresham & Boring, as well as in Clark County.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Adam H.
    Adam H. October 21, 2016 at 2:06 pm

    Bummer about the Hawthorne fixes.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Avatar
      Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) October 21, 2016 at 3:48 pm

      those will get funded eventually. this wasn’t the best place to find money for them. it seemed more like a flare sent up by PBOT. a way to show off the project and create some momentum for it more than a real request.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Adam H.
        Adam H. October 21, 2016 at 3:51 pm

        Are you suggesting that PBOT wanted to “start a conversation”? 😉

        Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    Bart October 21, 2016 at 2:20 pm

    Marine Drive is 45 mph. Airport Way is 45 mph. Sandy is 45 mph for a good bit. Halsey is 45mph to 137th. Glisan’s bike lanes stop at Portland’s borders.
    Improvements to Halsey have been overdue for more than 20 years, and I am thrilled that this street and this part of Portland is receiving some prioritization and attention.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Avatar
      Chris I October 23, 2016 at 9:14 pm

      Halsey is 40mph in some sections, and we all know how fast the drivers actually go.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar