The Monday Roundup

The NTSB wants to see far fewer
of these in cars on U.S. roads.
(Photo: Will Vanlue)

Here’s the news that caught our eyes this past week…

– Oregon’s ban on cellphones use by motor vehicle operators may have been controversial at first, but now even the National Transportation Safety Board says that distracted driving is an epidemic that should be addressed with a ban on cellphone use in the car. During their announcement, distracted driving was compared to other public health dangers like drunk driving and smoking.

– If there’s anyone in your life who’s keenly aware of the dangers of distracted driving, they might night appreciate unwrapping the iDrive Steering Wheel Mount for iPad. Before you panic, the iDrive is nothing more than a prank gift consisting of a cardboard box covered in convincing, if unnerving, photos of people using their Kindles, iPads, and calculators on a steering wheel mount.

“… if congress doesn’t take action before the end of the year, federal tax incentives for driving to work will increase while incentives for taking public transit will nearly be cut in half.”

– After coming out as a “big, big, huge” supporter of the Columbia River Crossing highway expansion project, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood stopped in Chicago to announce a $20 million federal grant to make repairs to the Windy City’s rail network.

– One argument against using tolls and congestion pricing to reduce traffic in a city is that drivers will adapt to the fees and eventually go back to driving as much as they did before the fees were in place. Based on some numbers out of Sweden, that seems to not be the case. Not only does congestion pricing reduce congestion while winning over public opinion, the reduction in congestion is sustained long after fees were in place.

The New York Times explains why, if congress doesn’t take action before the end of the year, federal tax incentives for driving to work will increase while incentives for taking public transit will nearly be cut in half.

– Even with the uncertainty of federal tax credits, USA Today reports on a drop in the mileage driven by Americans in 2011. They point to the economy and gas prices as the likely cause, but others believe the connection may simply be a result of younger people not wanting to drive as much.

– Like many cities in the U.S., Washington D.C. has a gender gap in the people who ride bikes in the city. Recently a group of women met up to discuss the problem with some saying that cultural norms in bike shops and at home are to blame for much of the gap between women — who make up only about a third of the city’s bicycle riders — and men.

– Bend, Oregon resident Sara Salo is out on a bike ride to encourage children to eat healthy, locally grown food. Now 10 months and 2,000 miles into her journey, Salo has made her presentation at elementary, middle, and high schools around Oregon, California, Arizona, and New Mexico and heads to Texas soon.

– The Blue Ridge Parkway, a highway running through Roanoke, VA, may be reclassified as “as a traditional, self-contained, scenic recreational driving experience.” People who ride their bicycles along the road are naturally concerned that this will diminish their status on the popular route, a trend that allegedly is starting with the behavior of some Park Service employees who oversee sections of the highway.

– Citing budgetary concerns coupled with high projected maintenance costs, Detroit is swapping out an expensive proposal for a light rail project for less expensive Bus Rapid Transit routes. The switch is seen as a defeat in many circles but StreetsBlog reminds us that a BRT system in Cleveland, Ohio has already been a draw for commercial development.

– Bus Rapid Transit may be a good addition to a city but people in the city of Bristol in the U.K. are fighting back against a push for a popular route for bicycle to be torn up to make way for a BRT route. The Bristol Bike Path is a safe, direct route for people on bicycles to access the city and ridership on the path has been steadily increasing since it was built.

The Atlantic Cities looks closely at why Tea Partiers often oppose urban planning projects. Their conclusion is that, although some of the arguments against the projects seem rational, most of their efforts are an attack on the process of public feedback itself instead of discussing the merits of each project.

– Popular culture paints the future as a place with increasingly speedy traffic but citizens and city planners alike are starting to realize a successful “city of the future” may operate slower than we assume, with a lot more bicycles and pedestrians than you see in The Jetsons.

– Concerns are being raised about the cost bicycle and pedestrian path being planned for the west span of the Bay Bridge. Figures for the planning and construction of the path pale in comparison to costs associated with motor vehicle-specific projects and members of the “savvy bicyclist lobby” are hoping the path will allow people to safely travel on their bicycles between Oakland and San Francisco.

– Are cities like Portland and Minneapolis, MN “at a tipping point” in the number of people who chose to ride a bike? One journalist at Minneapolis’ Star Tribune thinks so after seeing a 22% jump in bicycle ridership in their city.

– When you’re shopping for bike gear this holiday season, remember that the “Made in China” sticker may be a sign of high-quality manufacturing — at least according to this article from Rapha.

– And with only six more days until Christmas, if you haven’t done so already, you may want to bring home a Christmas tree on your bike.

Did you find something interesting that should be in next week’s Monday Roundup? Drop us a line.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

35 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris Tuttle
12 years ago

Re: congestion pricing — the data and common sense on congestion pricing shows that it works. I’m not a person who can quickly and easily marshall facts and specific examples, but I believe there are other countries that have had considerable success with congestion pricing. Singapore and other Asian countries come to mind. At a minimum, congestion pricing shifts vehicle traffic to alternate routes, which in many cases is a good end in and of itself. The better result is that it incentivizes and increases the use of alternate transportation modes. I believe the data supports this as well.

Without needing to refer to specific real-world examples, common sense tells me that I would certainly change my habits if it were to cost $50 to enter and drive through downtown Portland via I-5 or 405. Regardless of the specific mechanism, driving a car should be made more expensive to take into account all of the societal and environmental costs. It seems to me that car use is and has been heavily subsidized, with considerable and widespread negative effects.

Happy Monday everyone!
~Chris Tuttle (contraptionista.com)

Steven Vance
12 years ago
Reply to  Chris Tuttle

I’ve written at least one paper on Congestion Pricing. I like it a lot. I believe the research supports everything you said. You can read my paper about the I-15 express and then managed lanes in San Diego. Look for “final report” to learn how it was evaluated and what the results were.

http://www.stevencanplan.com/road-pricing-is-more-fair-than-other-funding-schemes/

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago

Rapha seems to have taken that page down awful quick. The Blue Ridge Parkway thing is weird considering that the top speed on that is, what, 45? Isn’t most of it posted at 35 or slower?

Adams Carroll (News Intern)
Reply to  Paul Johnson

Thanks for pointing that out Paul (and for the email 9watts). The Rapha Made in China article has a new URL… http://www.rapha.cc/ktc-china

Dan Kaufman
12 years ago

Quite interesting indeed. Maybe we could make products cheaper here if we could only do away with our environmental protections, child labor, the right to organize, free speech, etc. Of course, subsidized shipping doesn’t hurt.

Jim Lee
Jim Lee
12 years ago

It is odd indeed that women in North America cycle far less than their European sisters. Possibly because Oprah has not endorsed it?

The schmoozing ladies in the District of Columbia should check out Amy Walker’s new book:

http://www.amazon.com/Bicycles-Ways-Bike-Culture-Change/product-reviews/1608680223/ref=sr_1_1_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

Also her blog:

http://onbicycles.com/

Warning! No whining princess zone ahead!

roger noehren
roger noehren
12 years ago
Reply to  Jim Lee

I bought my copy of Amy Walker’s book at Bikeasaurus on MLK a few yards north of the Hawthorne bridge’s west bound ramp, which also carries a myriad of bicycle themed items, many of which are locally made.

spare_wheel
spare_wheel
12 years ago

i wonder if its possible that san francisco has a strong(er) bike lobby because its cycling “advocates” spend less time worrying about “reckless”, “rude”, and “clueless” riders who “run red lights”, ride helmetless, and have the temerity to infrequently involved in a traffic accident.

hat tip: jmaus twitter feed

John Lascurettes
12 years ago
Reply to  spare_wheel

San Francisco does not have a stronger bike lobby IMHO. The article was written by someone with a car-centric outlook. Anything giving gains to bicycles looks like a “special interest” gain to him. What should happen is that anytime a huge bridge project happens is that everyone around should be asking where the pedestrian and bike access is. Or more accurately, why are we spending all this money for ONLY motor vehicle access?

wsbob
wsbob
12 years ago

“…What should happen is that anytime a huge bridge project happens is that everyone around should be asking where the pedestrian and bike access is. …” John Lascurettes

Re-read the article. Asking that question and having it answered with a study, is exactly what happened relative to the bay bridge.

John Lascurettes
12 years ago
Reply to  wsbob

The author seemed to be bitching that bicyclists “already cost toll payers $1.25 million just to take a look at the idea” – implying that they shouldn’t even be paying that much and wouldn’t have if it were not for the “bike lobby”.

wsbob
wsbob
12 years ago

Matier and Ross…authors, not ‘author’.

As for bitching by the authors, consider the source. These guy’s SFGate column appears to be one of those sappy sarcastic ratings grabber pieces news media likes to use because the public seems to enjoy self righteous indignation sometimes to be had from that kind of writing.

Because they don’t come right out and say it, I suppose it’s anybody’s guess who they’re bitching about, if they’re bitching about anybody in particular, or if they’re just bitching in general about how much it costs to do one of those studies that seem to skyrocket in cost, ala CRC.

I kind of figure the writers may be admiring of SF’s bike advocates, and actually are throwing a little contempt Caltrans and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s way for allowing the cost of the study to become so expensive.

davemess
davemess
12 years ago

I’m still confused why the phone companies are against a car-use ban? It’s not like people are going to not buy phones. Maybe because it would reduce usage?

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
12 years ago
Reply to  davemess

See Phillip-Morris International and related companies decades long defense of tobacco.

If cell phone service providers admit even in the slightest that their service enables inattentive drivers to be even more so they would be legally be a contributing party to thousands of deaths annually.

To maintain their “innocence” the cell phone service providers must claim complete ignorance of the problem.

Jason
Jason
12 years ago

RE: Cell phones and Cars. Make Cyclists get off them too. I see way too many cyclists riding around on cell phones weaving in and out of the bike lanes. Yes cyclists are just as bad as auto drivers when on cell phones.

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago
Reply to  Jason

Strangely enough, after a particularly stressful ride yesterday, I had a dream last night where I was ramming other cyclists with my bike on the Hawthorne Bridge, but only hard enough to knock their telephone handset over the bridge railing…

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
12 years ago
Reply to  Paul Johnson

Been tinkering with a cell phone jammer idea where the point is not continuous denial of service but just causing the call to drop.

I think the trick will be a signal analyzer that IDs just a single target device and only emits the bare minimum power to do so.

Then I’ll market it to transit riders.

spare_wheel
spare_wheel
12 years ago
Reply to  Jason

“just as bad” as the motorists who kill people because they were yapping or texting?

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago
Reply to  spare_wheel

How is driving like a drunk any better if you’re not motorized? You still present a greater hazard to other road users if you’re using the phone while you’re driving, motorized or not.

Nathan
Nathan
12 years ago
Reply to  Paul Johnson

Umm… Because most bicycle/rider units don’t weigh thousands of pounds and go a faction of the speed?

Yes, it is more dangerous than normal for a rider to be inattentive. Road users have difficulty reacting safely to any unpredictable rider. However, I’ve never killed anything bigger than a beetle (flew into my maw) on my bike. I can’t say the same about my driving past (sorry squirrel…).

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago
Reply to  Nathan

I hit two skunks in two weeks on the Springwater Corridor in almost the same spot…those things just come out of nowhere at dusk when the shoulders aren’t mowed. Didn’t have time to react either time.

By the way, would not recommend it if it’s at all avoidable…my panniers still stink even after tomato juice and time.

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
12 years ago
Reply to  Paul Johnson

As the new Lead Researcher in Cyclo-skunk related technologies have you considered weaponizing this discovery to encourage wider passing distances between autos and bicycles?

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago
Reply to  q`Tzal

Stink aside, I wouldn’t recommend hitting any animals at all on a bike, even if you do manage to not crash, odds are you’re gonna get the only bicycle cop for MILES around behind you when it happens…which I’m batting 1.000 on! Fortunately, not cited because I stopped immediately and flagged him down to report it (as you’re supposed to do anytime you roadkill in Oregon; I just happened to have a conveniently located cop both times), and there’s really not a lot you can do when a critter decides to go kamikaze and run out of nowhere under your wheels. Second time around, same cop even, said I had to be the unluckiest man alive to hit two skunks in two weeks…

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
12 years ago
Reply to  Paul Johnson

Sorry, wrong angle.
Read a story about how police drug units were shutting down “crack dens” and the like through the application of skunk stench; think it was synthetic.
Allegedly kept people out for upwards of SIX MONTHS.

So I had a cracked though about using skunk smell to ward off autos in the same manner in which rich white folk avoid odiferous homeless people. Not application to the bike rider but out of the back of 007’s car like.

wsbob
wsbob
12 years ago

spare_wheel
i wonder if its possible that san francisco has a strong(er) bike lobby because its cycling “advocates” spend less time worrying about “reckless”, “rude”, and “clueless” riders who “run red lights”, ride helmetless, and have the temerity to infrequently involved in a traffic accident.
hat tip: jmaus twitter feed
Recommended 0

Do you really believe SF cycling advocates worry less than…I suppose you’re thinking of Portland and its BTA…about people riding their bikes on the street in unsafe and illegal ways? I doubt that, but SF has a major infrastructure project in the bay bridge that all area residents will benefit from if the bridge is equipped with a stronger alternative option for travel other than by motor vehicles.

There’s more money wrapped up in a project like the bay bridge and what it eventually will be, than there is in people deciding whether or not to wear a bike helmet, or signaling adequately in advance of turns. It seems cycling advocate groups in SF realize this.

The SFGate article says:

“…Cyclists may represent only a small fraction of roadway users, but they are among the best organized, most persistent and overall successful lobbies when it comes to winning transportation funding. …”

The article describes ‘cyclists’ not as an advocacy group, but as a lobby. The story says that the “…politically savvy bicyclist lobby…”, got Caltrans and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to conduct a study, which “…cost toll payers $1.25 million just to take a look at the idea. …”.

Julia
12 years ago

Riding the Blue Ridge Parkway stands out as one of my all-time best tours!

davemess
davemess
12 years ago

The Tea Party article was very interesting, and the comments below it just downright scary. Really makes me glad I live in a place that has bucked the trend is trying to make “livable” cities.

RyNO Dan
RyNO Dan
12 years ago

Re BRT. Wish Ptown had it and not streetcars.

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago
Reply to  RyNO Dan

Why? Our streets are too narrow. Eugene really had to retrofit their downtown to get their BRT busses to wind around corners. Streetcars don’t offtrack, they’re on rails which totally mitigates that problem.

wsbob
wsbob
12 years ago
Reply to  RyNO Dan

RyNO Dan
Re BRT. Wish Ptown had it and not streetcars.
Recommended 0

BRT and streetcars answer different needs. BRT and light rail answer some of the same needs.

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
12 years ago
Reply to  wsbob

BRT and streetcars are more analogous given the passenger capacity. BRT is most energy efficient when running from overhead lines, but the design of the streets, especially in locations where the bus needs to round corners, has to be fundamentally changed to accomodate massive offtracking. Streetcars, on the other hand, are about the same size as BRT buses, but do not have the same tendency to climb curbs, take out mailboxes and take up three lanes when turning.

wsbob
wsbob
12 years ago
Reply to  Paul Johnson

Electric trolley buses with rubber tires on asphalt instead of trolleys with steel wheels that require rails, following the route of Portland’s trolley lines within the city would not make a BRT. A BRT would be for example, a bus exclusive lane on the Banfield between Gresham and Portland, Portland to Beaverton, Portland to Oregon City.

Wikipedia’s page on BRT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_rapid_transit

9watts
9watts
12 years ago

Speaking of 15mph speed limits…
For anyone interested in slow multi-modal inner city traffic you *have* to watch this short film of Market St. in downtown San Francisco from 1906.

http://www.archive.org/details/TripDown1905

The camera is (or appears to be) mounted on the front of a streetcar which slowly makes its way from 8th Street to the Ferry Building. Amazing to see the body language of pedestrians, bicyclists, horse-drawn wagons and trolleys, and all the rest interacting at a slightly faster-than-walking pace.

(Please note that there are rolling frames and a slight stall in the early part of the film which end at the 1 minute 40 second mark.)

Erinne
Erinne
12 years ago

Columbia River is misspelled in the 3rd paragraph.