Despite political climate, Metro deems annual DC lobbying trip a success

Regional transportation leaders and staffers who attended an annual lobbying trip to D.C. organized by Metro. Seated in front row: Metro Councilor Christine Lewis, Metro Councilor Juan Carlos Gonzalez, Washington County Commissioner Nafisa Fai, Metro Council President Lynn Peterson, Portland City Councilor Angelita Morillo. (Photo: Metro)

Despite reservations that the Trump Administration and its stranglehold on our federal government would prevent regional transportation leaders from having a fruitful lobbying trip to Washington D.C. this year; it turns out the trip was a big success.

You might recall back in January as Donald Trump settled into the White House, Metro Federal Affairs Advisor cautioned members of the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) that given the broad support for Trump among the Republican party, “there are going to be limited opportunities for transportation conversations in DC this year.” “I think we need to recognize that we are a sanctuary state and a blue state that is led by a female, queer governor,” Emery continued. “There are many different reasons in which I think there could be directives for folks in DC to not be meeting with us.”

Several JPACT members disagreed, including Portland Mayor Keith Wilson, who felt it was still important to go and expressed opposition to the idea of staying home. (Wilson didn’t end up attending the trip, but Councilor Angelita Morillo — a vice-chair of council’s Transportation and Infrastructure Committee — represented Portland in his place.)

At a JPACT meeting yesterday, just days after a delegation of 35 people representing 11 different agencies returned home from the nation’s capital, Emery struck a different chord: “It was just a great time to be on the hill. The timing was perfect.”

In a presentation that summarized the trip, Emery said the group — which included representatives from TriMet, Metro, Multnomah County, Clackamas County, Washington County, City of Portland, City of Vancouver, City of Gresham, City of Cornelius, Port of Portland, Washington State Department of Transportation, and the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program — had many important conversations. They met with a majority of Oregon’s congressional delegation, key staff from Senate and House transportation committees, and staff from the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Portland City Councilor Angelita Morillo speaks at a meeting at US DOT as Multnomah County Commissioner Shannon Singleton and TriMet GM Sam Desue look on. (Photo: Metro)

Among the topics of discussion were: the importance of diversifying transportation funding sources, the nexus between transit and housing, the need to enact policies that “proactively promote transportation safety and complete streets,” a desire to speed up project delivery to minimize cost increases while not compromising environmental protections, and funding for specific local and regional projects. The topics that seem to have gotten the most attention were safety and funding for public transit.

“The delegation was clear they support public transit funding and oppose the House’s proposal to gut the [Federal Transit Administration’s] CIG [Capital Investment Grant] program,” Emery relayed. “They also talked about safety as a non-negotiable component of any transportation planning or projects — especially in areas where kids and families and elderly adults are frequenting.”

Sensing that transit it particularly vulnerable in this political moment, Emery emphasized that the delegation discussed with lawmakers, “the need to reposition transit as a public good, and how transportation and transit are economic drivers for communities.” On that note, there was a fruitful discussion about the connection of transit and “sports-oriented development” in light of several projects in the Portland area that combine major new investments (Expo Center, the Moda Center, and a future Major League Baseball stadium).

Emery said the lobbying was well-timed given that Congress is finalizing their 2026 budget and committees are starting to draft text for the next surface transportation reauthorization bill.

Browse a packet created for the trip that lays out the JPACT Federal Policy Agenda.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
david hampsten
david hampsten
27 days ago

Why wouldn’t Oregonians want to visit DC? It’s just about the most “Blue” place there is, they massively voted for Harris in 2024. Excellent bikeways, very walkable, the best public transit (train, commuter train, bus and subway), very affordable food and accommodation for every budget (if you are flexible, it can even be cheaper than Portland!) When you visit, it’s actually quite easy to forget that there’s a “White House” or that anyone lives there.

MattP
MattP
27 days ago

I guess it’s cheaper than flying them to Austria.