Checking in on the transportation bill with advocate Cassie Wilson

The latest from Salem about the transportation funding bill is that there’s yet another delay. Tuesday afternoon reports confirmed that Democrats have opted to delay a vote in the Senate (initially scheduled for this morning) two weeks so one of their members can recover from a medical issue and cast their vote in the capital building.

The move is just the latest twist in a long road of surprises that have defined Democrats’ efforts to fund Oregon’s transportation system. It also underscores how Democrats need every single vote from their party in order to achieve the three-fifths majority required to pass a tax hike (and how Republicans are so determined to see them fail).

Right before this delay was confirmed in the media yesterday, I talked with an advocate who’s done with all the surprises. 1000 Friends of Oregon Transportation Policy Manager Cassie Wilson has worked for over a year as a leader with the Move Oregon Forward coalition in hopes of passing a transportation bill that goes beyond freeway expansion megaprojects and continues the march toward better transit, bicycling, and walking conditions statewide.

Cassie Wilson in August 2022. (Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

Wilson is frustrated about how far the bill has been whittled down by Democrats — to the point where she and her fellow advocates can only show tepid support — while Republicans rejoice and use the bill to rile up their base right before the 2026 elections. “A lot of Democrats were put in a position to have to vote for a version of the bill that none of us wanted to see,” Wilson shared with me in an interview yesterday. And it’s one thing for the bill to be so compromised many members of the Move Oregon Coalition came out as neutral on it, but another thing for Democrats to not make much of a fuss about the last-second amendments that made the bill even weaker on things the coalition has prioritized since Day One.

“I was pretty disappointed watching the House floor yesterday to not see many legislators talk about the investments that are still needed, or even mentioning the transit funding sunset. This isn’t the answer, and it just it makes a bad situation feel worse, because it feels like they’re glossing over it,” Wilson shared.

“We have no guarantees that we’ll have a supermajority again, or a Democratic governor. There’s no guarantees of anything.”

– Cassie Wilson, 1000 Friends of Oregon

The transit funding sunset was the main bargaining chip Republicans used to give Democrats the quorum they needed to pass a bill during the special session that began on Friday. Instead of a doubling of the payroll tax (from 0.1% to 0.2%) to pay for transit into perpetuity, Democrats agreed to sunset the tax at the end of 2027. When transit faces another fiscal cliff at that time, Wilson worries Democrats might not have any power to preserve its funding.

“We have no guarantees that we’ll have a supermajority again, or a Democratic governor. There’s no guarantees of anything,” Wilson continued.

And now, with a highly compromised bill that’s essentially a stop-gap measure to keep ODOT and city and county road agencies afloat, Wilson worries that if it gets referred to voters, its supporters won’t exactly be eager to defend it. “You have to leave the bill intact enough with good stuff to give up a reason to defend it,” she explained.

As Wilson endures what feels like a never-ending legislative session, she’s clinging to one major positive that has come from all of this. The last year or so of organizing has helped Wilson and the Move Oregon Forward coalition, “Built a cohort of legislators who really care about and understand this issue,” she said. It’s a coalition she’s eager to put to work in future legislative sessions. “This is the biggest movement of people advocating around transportation in a very long time, or maybe ever, in terms of statewide organized efforts. We have over 50 organizations in the coalition with statewide representation and that’s not going away. We have a lot to build on.”

— You can listen and watch our full conversation in the players above, on YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RipCityBassWorks
RipCityBassWorks
19 days ago

Wait, this is even worse than I thought: do you mean that the existing transit tax will be repealed in 2028 if this bill passes? I thought the tax would revert to the existing 0.1% rate…

Fred
Fred
19 days ago

Thanks for this interesting conversation. The Ds have screwed this process up royally.

Podcast tip: See if you can get your guest to agree ahead of time what s/he will cover and then share what you will cover. Otherwise your long explanations tend to override everything and your guest is kinda hanging out there with nothing to do.

Chris I
Chris I
19 days ago
Reply to  Fred

And all my coworkers have been talking about this week is how the “income tax doubled” and “registration tax doubled”. I feel like they got huge amounts of negative PR without really getting much out of it.

Micah
Micah
18 days ago
Reply to  Chris I

So on brand for the democrats.

Helena
Helena
17 days ago
Reply to  Chris I

Re income tax, that’s totally false. STIF is a tiny part of the income tax, and it went from .1% to .2%

What does that mean? For someone making $60,000 per year, the increase in STIF taxes is exactly $60 per year.

PNWPhotoWalks
PNWPhotoWalks
19 days ago

“We have no guarantees that we’ll have a supermajority again, or a Democratic governor. There are no guarantees of anything,” Wilson continued.

I think what Cassie said should be a wake-up call. The Democrats in Oregon continue to disappoint me. In 1974, when I was living in Alaska, I cast my first vote, and I haven’t missed an election since. As best I can recall, I’ve never voted for a Republican candidate, and I can’t foresee doing so now given where the party stands.

I’m currently a NAV, and if the Democrats don’t get their act together, I’ll remain a NAV.

Paul H
Paul H
18 days ago
Reply to  PNWPhotoWalks

what’s a NAV?

2WheelsGood
2WheelsGood
18 days ago
Reply to  Paul H

Non-Aligned Voter; i.e. independent

Paul H
Paul H
18 days ago
Reply to  Paul H

OK, I looked it up. NAV = non-affiliated voter.

Seems like if a party is disappointing you, affiliating and being able to vote in their primaries would be the preferred alternative.

PNWPhotoWalks
PNWPhotoWalks
17 days ago
Reply to  Paul H

I apologize for the delayed reply. Email subscriptions for BP stories haven’t been working for me since July 31 (I informed Jonathan), and I don’t check back on stories often.

I also apologize for not spelling out NAV. I assumed it was commonly understood since there are currently more people registered as NAV than with either major party in Oregon. See Voter Registration by County, August 2025: https://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Documents/registration/2025-August.pdf

For the past few years, prior to each primary, I’ve switched back to Democrat. I’d like to see Oregon adopt open primaries. We’re an outlier among the 50 states. See: https://ballotpedia.org/Primary_election_types_by_state

Paul H
Paul H
17 days ago
Reply to  PNWPhotoWalks

I guess I don’t understand what being a NAV accomplishes when you declare an affiliation before a primary so that you can vote in it.

PNWPhotoWalks
PNWPhotoWalks
17 days ago
Reply to  Paul H

Aside from being a NAV now as a form of protest, switching on before a primary and off afterward allows me to avoid having my personal information shared with other parties. There are other reasons. Feed this to an AI bot. The results make sense to me.
“What are some Oregon-specific reasons why someone might register as non-affiliated (NAV)”

soren
soren
18 days ago

Unpopular opinion: This absolute turd of a bill would not pass if so-called “progressives” refused to vote for it.

Jake9
Jake9
18 days ago
Reply to  soren

Unpopular amongst the faithful maybe, but an accurate statement.

Paul H
Paul H
18 days ago
Reply to  soren

This is a rare instance of a fact being stated as an opinion

Helena
Helena
17 days ago

Update to info in the podcast: Javadi switched parties; now a “Democrat.”
However, in his latest newsletter the part about transportation said Zero about transit, walking, biking or climate– only about maintaining roads to drive on.
His newsletter also reinforces that He hasn’t changed; his party has gone off the deep end.

Instead of fighting an uphill battle to bring his party back to where he is (center-right with a strong anti-abortion stance), he’s switching and running as a Democrat and will undoubtedly work hard to pull the Oregon Democrats even more towards the “conservative” side.

It also means that instead of Javadi (my take is if he ran as a Republican he’d win the primary; my experience is people in Tillamook County like brave individualists) and a more progressive Democrat in the 2026 election, it’ll likely be a more “party-line” Republican and Javadi. (Or a

Which is his perogative but I think will likely be bad for the things that public and active transit interested folks want.

It’s really tempting to sing the praises of “converts” but please let’s try to avoid incentivizing Democrats further away from what we want on public transportation, active transportation or climate…