Hillsboro PD’s novel distracted driving sting nets 50 citations in three hours

He’s not asking for spare change, he’s trying to change behavior (note the radio wire).
(Photo: Hillsboro PD)

Every city in America has a big problem when it comes to distracted driving. Most states have laws that outlaw it, but the challenge is enforcement.

In order for officers to cite someone, they must first see the behavior. That can be tough from inside a patrol car. So they’ve had to get creative. Oregon State Police unveiled an unmarked car as part of their enforcement strategy and we’ve reported on an undercover sting in Aloha (unincorporated Washington County) where an officer in plainclothes stood on a corner and radioed fellow officers when they saw an infraction.

Advertisement

But what the Hillsboro Police Department is unprecedented (as far as we know) in our region. They put an officer in civilian attire on the corner of SE 10th and Oak Street holding a hand-written cardboard sign that read, “I’m a cop put down your phone.” The method resulted in 60 stops in three hours that included 28 distracted driving citations and 22 citations for other violations.

While some people worried the signs themselves were distracting, the majority of commenters on HPD’s Facebook post about the enforcement action wholeheartedly supported the effort.

We still think the best way to enforce cell phone use would be an undercover officer riding a bicycle in the bike lane during rush-hour; but this is pretty cool too.

Nice work Hillsboro PD! Keep it up.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car owner and driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, feel free to contact me at @jonathan_maus on Twitter, via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a supporter.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
aaron
aaron
4 years ago

PPB, please deputize me for bike patrol on Williams. I need to put my Airzound to work anyway.

The Dude
The Dude
4 years ago
Reply to  aaron

ORS 153.058 so deputizes you.

bikeninja
bikeninja
4 years ago

Lets see, all the cool bike stuff in Portland is closing down, Hillsboro has no campers, no e-scooters, clean streets and sidewalks, well maintained parks, more ethnic diversity, cheaper housing, some cool new separated cycle tracks , a long walking and cycling trail without dangerous lurkers and booby traps (rock creek trail) and now a crack down on distracted driving criminals. Makes one think.

rick
rick
4 years ago
Reply to  bikeninja

TV Highway, an orphan highway from ODOT, is not clean.

JeffS
JeffS
4 years ago

So, HILLSBORO police went out into the county to mess with people. That seems about right.

Chris I
Chris I
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffS

Enforcing the law is “messing with people”?

Middle of The Road Guy
Middle of The Road Guy
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffS

Doing nothing seems like a much better option?

MR
MR
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffS

“Oregon State Police unveiled an unmarked car as part of their enforcement strategy….”

Wylie
Wylie
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffS

Burning hot take from bikeportland user JEFFS. Let’s be sure to always set aside the fact that dangerous driving is straight-up destroying our freedom to travel

bikeninja
bikeninja
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffS

SE 10th and Oak is in downtown Hillsboro, not out in the county somewhere.

Joe kurmaskie
Joe kurmaskie
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffS

Jeff 10th and oak is Hillsboro proper not “going out in the county “ messing with people. Besides, as the director of the countywide bicycle coalition out here I’d like them messing in all 16 cities and in between – put don the phone before you hurt or kill someone is a very god use of tax dollars and apt to change some behavior.

Jason H
Jason H
4 years ago
Reply to  Joe kurmaskie

Jeff is either confused or conflating two different enforcement efforts. Yes the action 2 days ago in Hillsboro by Hillsboro Police was in the city proper. The article does mention and link to another action in un-incorporated Aloha, but the link makes it fully clear that that operation was run by the Washington County Sheriffs Department, not Hillsboro Police. They know their jurisdictions, and make sure that citations they issue can stick.

I’m also thankful they run these enforcements wherever they are and wish they were continual to be honest. I sometimes think that with all the curvy rural roads out here people must pay more attention, but then I see the aftermath of a LOT of run-off accidents into trees, ditches and fields and sadly realize it’s probably not true.

SE 34th
SE 34th
4 years ago

My husband is a TriMet driver. From his high seat, he can see most of the phone use by drivers (he estimates from his viewpoint that between 1/3 and 1/2 are using their phones at any given time). One more creative idea would be to position a police officer in a TriMet bus, and have the police officer radio ahead to a colleague about which cars to stop. Here’s a video of how that works in Ontario, Canada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwqS9mpFAQY

Dave
Dave
4 years ago
Reply to  SE 34th

Brilliant cover–there are enough (too many, thank you neoliberalism) people on traffic islands with cardboard signs so that many drivers probably tune ’em out! Any cell phone enforcement
is good enforcement!

DR
DR
4 years ago

Pffffftttt… I could write more tickets on my two-hour ride. But, it’s a good start.

betty
betty
4 years ago

he can stand on my front porch and issue tickets all day. at least 50% of people have their faces in their phones at my intersection. 🙁

Tom
Tom
4 years ago

The flagged speed safety camera data needs to be reviewed by a police officer anyway before a citation can be given, so why not review at the same time to check for drivers holding a cell phones?

Tom
Tom
4 years ago

Why not test one of these roadhound signs out. Could take data before and after to see how well it works. People don’t like to be called out, even if there is no citation involved. Plus no chance of bias.
https://www.bvsystems.com/product/roadhound-pole-mounted-distracted-driving-alert-deterrent-road-sign/

Tom
Tom
4 years ago

Other cities have partnered with Zendrive to get free metadata on distracted driving that shows how road design interacts with the likelihood of distraction, or where the hot spot locations are for distration. Why not partner to gain insite.

https://go1.zendrive.com/distracted-driving-study-2019/

Andrew
Andrew
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom

That study was an interesting read, thanks. I’m glad to see Oregon and Portland at the bottom of the “most distracted” rankings, but 6% is still way too much.

Andrew
Andrew
4 years ago

PBOT organizes some lame event where their staff dresses in high viz and pleads to drivers. Hillsboro PD sends a plain clothes guy with a sign saying hes a cop and nails a bunch of hazardous drivers. Who’s got the backbone?

Buzz
Buzz
4 years ago

I saw someone doing it the old-school way on N. Interstate the other day – driving along reading a newspaper spread out on his steering wheel. Yikes!

maxD
maxD
4 years ago
Reply to  Buzz

funny! I was riding on Interstate last week and a car ahead of me kept drifting into the bike lane. When I passed it, the woman driving had her nose in thick novel!

Fred
Fred
4 years ago

One cell-phone behavior I’m seeing more and more is the “car stopped dead at stop sign or traffic light.” There’s a car just sitting at a stop sign or traffic light, with a driver engrossed in his/her cellphone. If it’s a four-way stop, we’re all looking at that car, wondering what the driver is going to do.

Apparently many drivers think that if the car is stopped, they can’t be cited for cellphone use. But I don’t think they are right. I suppose this is one reason I’m seeing more cellphones sitting in cradles on the dash: they allow the driver to continue operating the cellphone, without holding it by hand, as if it were the radio or the A/C.

Ellen DeGeneres said it best: “If something requires both arms and both legs, shouldn’t your head also be involved?”

Damien E
Damien E
4 years ago
Reply to  Fred

You are correct – phone use at stop signs/red lights is just as prohibited as when the car is in motion: https://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/2017/09/oregons_new_distracted_driving.html

bikeninja
bikeninja
4 years ago

Maybe we could just hire Hillsboro pd or Washington County Sheriffs to come in to Portland and conduct speed and distracted driver enforcement. They could keep the majority of the fines levied to pay for the service . There does seem to some precedent for this as officers from these two agencies are part of the Transit Police that operate in Portland. Also Washington counties wastewater agency also cleans up part of the Sewage and Stormwater from parts of Portland on the Western Slopes of the West Hills where Portland has trouble getting it pumped to their facilities. Maybe it is time to get creative.

Andrew
Andrew
4 years ago

Theres been some tacit acceptance of distracted driving by regulators, ride share drivers are required to use their phones, and the addition of screens and internet to dashboards. I’ve personally never owned a vehicle with one, but I had a work truck that had an in dash screen for the radio. The scrolling menus and sub-menus required quite a bit of attention. And cant forget the bluetooth. Got to take those calls on the road, hands free but attention lacking.

Pat Franz
Pat Franz
4 years ago

ORS 153.058 requires you to include the name and address of the defendant. That’s quite a burden when you’re being run over. I think it should be updated to allow a video that includes a face and a licence plate.

Mark smith
Mark smith
4 years ago

it’s ridiculously easy police work is stand and watch people look at their phones while their cars are stopped. I honestly don’t see what the big deal is it people looking to phones where the cars are stopped. sure people can create some crazy story about how someone will run somebody of where the car stopped but really doesn’t happen. but since it’s easy and it looks good and it’s great for the camera cops will give people tickets for being stopped and looking at their phone. Aren’t we an amazing society.

Andrew Kreps
Andrew Kreps
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark smith

It’s a big deal to use your phone while still in traffic, even while stopped. You lose your situational awareness, and any information you could glean about your surroundings. There are 12 different directions from which a vehicle or human could be traveling at any given intersection, and if your head is buried in your phone, you’re not going to have any idea what’s going on around you. Add to that most of Portland’s intersections are blind due to large buildings and large vehicles parked right up to them, and you damn well better be paying attention as long as you’re behind the wheel, no matter your speed.

A stopped car is not a safe car.

maxD
maxD
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark smith

Mark smith
that very thing happened to my dad. He was riding on a separated path, a car was stopped behind the path, apparently waiting for the bike to pass but in actuality the driver had his face in his phone, texting. When he was done texting he drove directly into my dad without bothering to look around. My dad never recovered form that. It is NEVER safe to be distracted when you are on the road as a driver. If a driver needs to use a phone, even a rideshare or delivery driver, they should pull over into a legal parking spot.

Greg Spencer
Greg Spencer
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark smith

Actually, about 75 other counties ban mobile phone use while driving — including many in the developing world. What’s amazing about the U.S. is that it’s still legal in 30 states: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phones_and_driving_safety#List_of_countries_with_bans