Showers Pass Warehouse Sale

Subscriber Post - This post was written by a subscriber.
Want to subscribe? Learn More »

Peak Hour Bike Traffic on Clinton Street Now Exceeds Motorized Traffic

Subscriber Post by Adam on August 12th, 2016 at 1:15 pm

Auto and bike counts on Clinton

Auto and bike counts on Clinton

As of the latest traffic counts from May of this year, westbound morning peak-hour and eastbound afternoon peak-hour bike traffic is now greater than motorized traffic. That means, traditional downtown traffic (i.e. traffic heading into downtown in the mornings and leaving downtown in the afternoons) has more bikes than cars on Clinton Street, one of our most popular bikeways.

  • Morning peak hour was 140 motorized traffic, and 206 bikes (346 total)
  • Afternoon peak was 122 motorized traffic, and 210 bikes (332 total)


These counts were taken at 23rd Avenue, in-between the two diverters. Counts at other points on Clinton Street show similar results, with only at 13th Av morning inbound not meeting this criteria (counts were about 44% bike traffic). At nearly every point observed, inbound morning and outbound evening peak bike traffic exceeded motorized traffic.

This is a huge deal. Having more bikes than cars on a city-designated “bicycle priority” route will further encourage more people to ride. Safety in numbers can be a huge boost to ridership, which will even further improve safety. These counts were even taken before the Biketown rollout, so expect these numbers to increase further, as Clinton Street features two Biketown stations.

Feel free to browse the data yourself; here’s a Google Spreadsheet with the data, you can clone it (file->make a copy) if you want to do your own analysis.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Thank you — Jonathan

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
Duncan ParksAdam H.SpiffyPedal PT9watts Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Anne Hawley
Subscriber
Anne Hawley

Great news. This is the direction we should be consciously heading on the other major bikeways.

9watts
Guest
9watts

This is great stuff, Adam. Thanks.
It would also be interesting to check back with the neighbors who were convinced the sky would fall, that Woodward would be overrun with spillover car traffic; see how that whole thing turned out.
Does anyone have a read on this?

Pedal PT
Member

Very cool! The diverters have been really beneficial on Clinton- Looking forwards to the permanent version on 31st!

Spiffy
Subscriber

maybe I’ll ride to work more now… Clinton was always a stressful section both ways…

Duncan Parks
Guest

First off, a clarification: the data here show that bikes outnumber cars, but there is no comparison with Clinton before the diverters were installed, right? Is that data available to really evaluate their impact?

Duncan Parks
Guest

Second, I really have to point out that while the diverters are successful at changing traffic flow, their design is kind of terrible (especially the block at Clinton/32nd Ave). The visible cues to cross traffic are awful. At 17th, the long barrier suggests right-of-way to cross traffic on 17th, exactly the opposite of the actual signage – though at least the city finally sandblasted off the stop lines that also suggested Clinton traffic would be stopping. At 32nd, the concrete barriers and big arrow signs are a very effective visual barrier to cross traffic seeing the cyclists for whom they are supposed to stop.

This morning I was driving across Clinton at 32nd. I know that I’m yielding to bikes, and I make my full stop at the sign. I’m doing head checks left and right (twice, actually) and then I slowly start across. Right at that moment, a cyclist emerged westbound from behind the barrier. I was going slow enough to stop short, but it was not a nice moment for either of us. The point is, the cyclist was doing what she was supposed to be doing, and I was looking really carefully, knowing that she could be there, but the barrier completely hid her from my view. In other words, it is functionally a terrible design.

Let me close by pointing out that I spend a lot of time on two wheels on the bike route network, and I know how these intersections work (and I support them in principle). Even so, I find it difficult to do the yielding I know I’m supposed to do when I’m driving, because the designs are so poor. These diverters can’t be seen as a success until the City goes back and designs them so they have good sightlines and visual cues that remind drivers of who yields to whom. In the meantime, I’m just urging folks using Clinton to not cruise through these intersections; if somebody like me who really wants to do the right thing has trouble yielding to you, who knows what will happen with a disinterested (or worse, distracted) driver. It’s not your fault – it’s just really poor layout of the diverters.