The Classic - Cycle Oregon

People on Bikes: Colombia

Posted by on September 3rd, 2015 at 8:10 am


Avenida Carrera 11, Bogotá.
(Photos: M.Andersen/BikePortland)

It’s likely that more bike trips happen in Bogotá, Colombia, than any other city in the Western Hemisphere.

With 8.8 million residents — a number that has grown by about 12,000 every month for the last 50 years — Bogotá’s estimated 4 percent of trips by bike makes it approximately as bikey as the Portland metro area (2.2 million, with about 2.2 percent of commutes by bike) but much, much bigger.

So I was pretty pleased with the fact that my wife was as excited as I was about going there for our honeymoon. Here’s a tip, fellow nerds: don’t tell your traveling partner quite how many photos of infrastructure you think it’s appropriate to take until you’re actually on the trip.

Here’s a second tip: if, after failing to have this conversation, you still happen to have a traveling partner as cool and patient as mine was, make sure they have something to read.

(Confidential to Mo: I owe you at least one Kindle purchase.)

In any case, our 20-day trip in July to Bogotá and the other Colombian cities of Medellín, Cartagena and Campurgana — my first trip anywhere south of Mexico! — led to two posts worth of observations. This one is the first: just a series of photos of Colombians getting around Medellin and Bogota on bikes.

Though these were taken with an iPhone and aren’t as nice as Jonathan’s occasional “People on Bikes” series, we’ll use that name because the goal is similar: to capture a little slice of how people get ready for a bike trip and interact with the world around them while they’re riding.


nice bogota bikeway

As you can see, a lot of these photos are from the ciclorutas, the city’s 200-mile network of protected bike lanes. Built over the last 15 years, these are allegedly inspired by Dutch design but are a very different beast. In most cases (though not all) they were carved out of the onetime pedestrian space and their width and curb cuts (or sometimes lack thereof) aren’t particularly well-suited to biking — certainly not at any high speed. They rarely do a great job of separating bike and foot traffic.

And though I’m sure we’d have learned the routes quickly if we needed to, we lost their course several times because they weren’t very well connected, signed or otherwise marked.

But here’s the thing: without them, biking in Colombia would be horrific by U.S. standards. That’s because, like almost every other country in the world, Colombia has gradually handed over most of its street space to anyone who can afford to drive a car. The shot below shows one of the many huge arterials in Medellín that offer lane after lane to motor vehicles and let people biking fend for themselves.


In the context of current Colombian traffic culture, it would be ridiculous to expect people to avoid driving in a painted bike lane, let alone for people driving to give bikers the thoughtfully wide berths that are (thankfully) common on Portland streets. Basically, the only way to bring biking up to a Portland level of comfort is to build protected bike lanes.

Which makes it all the more impressive, really, that that’s exactly what Bogotá and (to a lesser extent) Medellín have been doing. And their residents have certainly taken advantage of it.




I’m not sure if this couple do this for a living or just really like dogs. Or both.


One thing that keeps these low-budget protected bike lanes more comfortable than they might be, at least in some parts of the cities, is the relatively pointy street corners. I sat alongside the corner below for a few minutes and watched every single car that turned right slow to 15 mph or less, thanks to the short turning radius built into the pavement. (Also note that in this particular intersection, there’s barely enough space for a car to hang out mid-turn without obstructing the vehicles behind it — it’s not a protected intersection but it’s getting there.)

scruffier pbl



This bidirectional lane in a run-down area was pretty empty most of the time. Notice that it doubles as public seating (and sometimes car parking).


Like other leading bike cities I could mention, Bogota has been slow to create a bike sharing system. (It does have some sort of stripped-down system, with various rental locations staffed by public employees, that I never quite figured out.) That’s not the case in Medellín, which prides itself on being generally ahead of Colombia’s curve. Its system is called Encicla:

medellin bikeshare pbl gal
medellin bikeshare pbl

Some of these photos were taken during ciclovía, the open-streets tradition that began in Bogotá in the 1970s and has spread through much of the Americas, including to Portland. Bogotá holds it every Sunday, and hundreds of thousands of Bogotanos turn out every week to savor the temporarily calm streets.


This guy’s big sign says “Around the world for ecology and conscience” in Spanish.


Like quite a few streets in central Bogotá and Medellín, Carrera 7 has been fully pedestrianized during most hours in the city center. There’s still a planter-protected bike lane there, but people don’t pay much attention to it. (In fact it’s sort of an annoying street to bike on, especially during ciclovía, exactly because it’s such a fantastic place to walk.)


OK, that’s your starter kit to Colombian streets. Tomorrow, I’ll share some photos that take a broader look at these Colombian cities and draw a few lessons that Portlanders and other estadounidenses should be learning from them.

Portland Century August 19th

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

  • Curtis Roth September 3, 2015 at 8:58 am

    Nice to see such a positive posting about Columbia, considering the drug-related crime reputation.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Marshall Ney September 3, 2015 at 11:48 am

      That was 20 years ago. Now the crime related drug reputation belongs to Chicago. Colombia is now very safe and has been for years. Huge amounts of Foreign Direct Investment, tourism, growth and stability.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • CapitanColombia September 3, 2015 at 12:37 pm

      Hey Curtis, it’s not 1989 anymore. Colombia has moved on, so should you.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Dead Salmon September 3, 2015 at 9:16 pm

        From the state department as of 2015: “The Department of State strongly encourages U.S. citizens to exercise caution and remain vigilant as terrorist and criminal activities remain a threat throughout the country. Explosions occur throughout Colombia on a regular basis, including in Bogota.”

        We know they know what they’re talking about since they feel it is acceptable to sign a deal allowing Iran to get a nuke in a few years. Laughable.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Chris I September 4, 2015 at 3:10 pm

          To be fair, Columbia does have a gun fatality rate roughly 3x the US (which is already insanely high).

          Regarding the Iran comment, my only advice would be to lay off the right-wing propaganda.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

          • Dead Salmon September 5, 2015 at 2:06 pm

            Thank you for going on the record that it is OK for Iran to have a nuke. Stating facts is not “propaganda”.

            On your gun fatality rate propaganda, Colombia has a gun homicide rate 7.6x that of the US per your own table. If you count suicides then the number is only 3x as you indicated. I don’t worry much about suicides in gun statistics – if someone wants to kill themselves they are going to do it one way or another. AND if you remove the gang shootings caused by liberal policies in big cities the US rate would drop by a factor of 4 or 5 – thus if you just stay out of the “wrong” areas you are fairly safe in the US:



            Recommended Thumb up 0

  • 9watts September 3, 2015 at 9:23 am


    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • El Biciclero September 3, 2015 at 1:12 pm

      If my rusty Spanish is still intact, then the triangular sign on his hat says “Trash is not what is lying on the ground, ‘trash’ is he who throws it there”.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Craig September 3, 2015 at 10:07 am

    When I went to Bucaramanga, Colombia, I had never seen so many cyclists. And I used to live in Durango, CO. Very active, big cycling community. Colombia is actually fantastic, albeit there are still some areas of the country to avoid. But the people are awesome and the country is incredibly beautiful.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • pdx2wheeler September 3, 2015 at 10:26 am

    Some, but not a lot of helmet use… Noticed the younger riders in particular don’t seem to be wearing them.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Brian H. September 3, 2015 at 10:43 am

    Not a single lycra-clad roadie in there!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • gutterbunnybikes September 3, 2015 at 8:20 pm

      Funny how rare those are in the places with higher ridership numbers.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Michael Andersen September 3, 2015 at 8:31 pm

        I did see a few during ciclovia, though just a few.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • gutterbunnybikes September 3, 2015 at 8:43 pm

          26 photos and only 2 bikes with drop bars…..hummm seeing a trend here.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Lance P. September 3, 2015 at 11:05 am

    I love Columbia. I’m thinking of going soon for classes. How was the food/culture/experience?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Michael Andersen September 3, 2015 at 8:43 pm

      Food: meh. It was cheap (at least on today’s dollars) but not the highlight, at least for me. I’d describe Colombian food as simple and straightforward. Not enough vegetables in the diet for my taste. We did go to a couple spendy restaurants (for the price of a nice-but-not-special-occasion restaurant in Portland) and they were fantastic.

      Culture: fascinating. Like the USA it seemed to have both strong regional identity and strong national identity. For somebody who’s obsessed with localism, that’s pretty cool. I read the Great Colombian Novel, One Hundred Years of Solitude, for the first time while we were there and that was a wonderful experience too.

      Experience: get there soon! The world is gradually discovering it.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • JMH September 3, 2015 at 11:05 am

    Wow, couldn’t be jealous of your trip to Colombia. Can’t wait to see more. One thing I noticed in the pics and, have been told about, is the air quality can be tough in Colombian cities. I hope they go as nuts with this stuff as the Dutch have.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • tedder September 3, 2015 at 7:27 pm

      super-high altitude makes air quality worse, but it’s not bad.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Michael Andersen September 3, 2015 at 8:47 pm

      Some of that is just camera-without-white-balance haze. But yes, the air quality is certainly worse than Portland’s.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • JMH September 3, 2015 at 11:06 am

    Meant to say couldn’t be *more* jealous of your trip to Colombia.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Paul September 3, 2015 at 11:08 am

    Nicely done, representative photos.
    That’s real dedication, urban biking in Colombia on your honeymoon, vs. zooming down Haleakala on Maui!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • MM September 3, 2015 at 12:10 pm

      Paul, have you biked down Haleakala? I’m going in February and it’s on my list of potential things to do. Interested if you have any input on the ride.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • caesar September 3, 2015 at 4:28 pm

        My only advice on that ride: Don’t Mistake Aloha for Weakness.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

  • kiel johnson
    kiel johnson September 3, 2015 at 1:42 pm

    always great to see the bicycling movement is a global issue which even though there are plenty of local setbacks, is continually moving forward to make cities around the world better for bikes.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dead Salmon September 3, 2015 at 2:43 pm

    FYI, Bogota is about 1/3 the physical size of Portland according to Google Earth. Portland metro area dimensions in miles ~ 30 x 23 and Bogota ~ 11 x 21. As stated, the population of Bogota is much larger.

    Just out of curiosity, why did you choose to visit there? Relatives in Columbia? AND, we MUST know how you got there – not using fossil fuels we hope.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • caesar September 3, 2015 at 4:35 pm

    It’s spelled Colombia – with an o</b, not a u, no matter what language you’re using.

    And Bogota, at over 8,500 feet in elevation (way higher than any US city, it’s very cool to see how so many people are out pumping the pedals. Necessity is the mother of invention, I suppose.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dead Salmon September 3, 2015 at 6:25 pm

    I realized I misspelled Colombia when I hit the button. There are many “towns” in the US that are higher than 8,500′, but no large cities.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • tedder September 3, 2015 at 7:32 pm

    Bogota (and the rest of Colombia) is fantastic. I’m kind of happy that the American reputation for it is not great, there aren’t many places that are beautiful and also less than 10 hours away by plane.

    Seeing the *weekly* ciclovias is great. The triple-bendy-BRT system is fast and was a wise investment in a country that doesn’t have the capital to build a grand subway system. Most of the improvement happened because of an inspired mayor. Hmm. Does that give you any ideas?

    Some questions for M or anyone else who has been recently:
    – did you go to Crepes y Waffles? omg.
    – do they still have the human phone booths (person with a cell phone on a chain, standing on a street corner)
    – how many private buses did you see on the nonprimary routes? When I was there ~8 years ago they were supposed to be removing many of them.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 9watts September 3, 2015 at 7:34 pm

      “there aren’t many places that are beautiful and also less than 10 hours away by plane.”


      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • tedder September 3, 2015 at 7:44 pm

        missed the “underrated by americans” part when I typed it. That’s where I was headed- hence “kind of happy” in the same sentence

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Michael Andersen September 3, 2015 at 8:46 pm

      Crepes y Waffles = delicious

      Every street vendor was selling mobile minutes, but we didn’t see people just standing in the way you mention.

      Private buses = oh yes. Stay tuned.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Dead Salmon September 3, 2015 at 9:58 pm

      “Bogota (and the rest of Colombia) is fantastic.”

      Maybe, but you need to be careful.

      From the US State Department: “U.S. government officials in Colombia regularly travel to the major cities of Colombia such as Bogota, Medellin, Cali, Barranquilla, and Cartagena without incident. U.S. government officials and their families in Colombia normally are permitted to travel to major cities only by air. They may not use inter- or intra-city bus transportation, or travel by road outside urban areas at night.”

      As of 2012, Colombia has 12th highest homicide rate of world countries (but there is a war going on): (sort the list by “rate”)

      It is getting better – in the 1980s and 90s it had number 1 or 2 highest homicide rate – today it’s down around 10 or 12.

      It does say the areas visited in this BP article are mostly OK – just stay off the busses.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • tedder September 3, 2015 at 10:01 pm

        It’s certainly not for the no-passport/cruise ship crowd. The problems (kidnappings) are for people who are doing Unknown Things In The Jungle and oil company executives. Period. Less than 5% are “tourists”.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Craig September 4, 2015 at 6:43 am

        Colombia is for the most part full of great people who are a joy to hang out with. The areas to avoid, for the time being, are the Pacific coast from the Darien down past Buenaventura; the border region with Ecuador; parts of border regions in the southeast; and now there’s a crisis going on with Venezuela, where Maduro is booting out Colombians. Also, outside of the major cities, there aren’t many people who speak English. Fortunately I’m fluent in Spanish so I didn’t have a problem, but it would have been really difficult in some places with no English. If you’re prior military, and you want to get off the beaten track, avoid taking any kit, anything that resembles military gear, even if it isn’t/wasn’t. I’m sure you could find a tourist here and there who traveled in these areas and didn’t have any problems, but it’s best not to tempt fate.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

      • JJJJ September 4, 2015 at 8:59 am

        You should see what other countries say about the US! With constant mass shootings, riots, out of control police departments, a drug epidemic, and over 30,000 (!) deaths a year on the roads its a wonder Europeans still risk a visit to Disney

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Dead Salmon September 4, 2015 at 1:28 pm

          Sounds like the US is kind of the opposite of Colombia – our rural “conservative” areas are safer than the “liberal” areas of our big cities. I would definitely advise people to stay away from Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis, North Portland, Nawluns, etc…….places run for the past 60 years by liberals and now very unsafe.

          Gotta be careful anywhere in the world today – but that’s always been the case – just need to be more careful in some parts than others.

          I still wonder: Why Colombia as a tourist destination? I am sure it’s a beautiful place but it sounds like the author of this post spent most of the time in cities and thus probably didn’t get to see much of the countryside…..perhaps he has family down there………

          Recommended Thumb up 0

          • tedder September 4, 2015 at 1:48 pm

            Why not as a tourist destination? Is it “wrong” to visit cities?

            Recommended Thumb up 0

            • Dead Salmon September 5, 2015 at 1:35 am

              No it’s not wrong; you can do what you want – but usually there is a “reason” for flying that far away. I’m just used to people going somewhere to do something you can’t do here – like climb a particular mountain, raft a particular river, watch Juan Valdes grow coffee, watch a Colombian war, or see exotic animals, etc. 🙂

              BUT MA explained above – they have friends there – that’s a common reason to go somewhere.

              Recommended Thumb up 0

              • Dead Salmon September 5, 2015 at 1:36 am

                I know it should have been a z.

                Recommended Thumb up 0

          • JJJJ September 4, 2015 at 2:54 pm

            Ah yeah, nothing says “welcome tourists” like the conservative paradise of the mississippi swamps or the florida panhandle where you can get shot if your car is pink.

            I find it quite sad how you only see the world in the liberals vs conservatives way, with blinders on.

            Recommended Thumb up 0

            • Dead Salmon September 5, 2015 at 1:59 am

              Never been to those places but I think both are popular with tourists.

              I’m just giving you some “stuff” in reply to your comment. It’s entertaining to poke fun at liberals, by stating the truth and then watching them squirm, but you are correct that the US is probably viewed poorly by many – our liberal cities are giving us a bad name on the violence front. Sad for sure. There I go again. 🙂

              BUT the EU has over 25,000 traffic deaths per year, so they are not doing so great either:
              AND I’ll bet they have a drug problem just like ours. AND they are having a huge illegal immigrant problem similar to ours………

              Recommended Thumb up 0

          • Chris I September 4, 2015 at 3:17 pm

            The only person I know who has ever been shot at had it happen in rural SE Oregon. Guess they don’t like outsiders in those conservative rural areas…

            Recommended Thumb up 0

            • Dead Salmon September 5, 2015 at 1:43 am

              What was that person doing to get shot at?
              I can’t recall anyone I know who was shot at by someone who intended to hit them. And I’m old and have spent lots of time in rural and urban areas. Lucky I guess.

              Recommended Thumb up 0

  • JJJJ September 4, 2015 at 9:00 am

    On another note, the biggest take-away should be the can-do attitude you see in Latin America.

    We should build a cycle track = done. Maybe not the best design or materials, but money is much tighter. Same with BRT. We need BRT = done.

    Meanwhile, in the US, we have extra money so we throw it into 15 years of studies to get 1/20 of the network and then bitch and moan because a detail is wrong so we should never do it again.

    Recommended Thumb up 0