Support BikePortland

Agenda set for the Portland Bike Theft Summit

Posted by on December 3rd, 2014 at 3:27 pm

bike summit instagram with date

We’re just one week away from the first ever Portland Bike Theft Summit, sponsored by Bike Index. To refresh your memory it’s happening next Wednesday, December 10th from 6-9:00 pm at Velo Cult Bike Shop and Tavern (1969 NE 42nd Ave).

Things are coming together nicely and we’re excited to share the event agenda. We’ve worked hard to get all the key local players in the same room to inspire and inform our next steps in the effort to thwart bike theft. If you come to the summit you’ll get to meet other community advocates who are working on this issue and you’ll get to know (and learn from) key players who are in the trenches of the battle on a daily basis.

We’ve confirmed attendance from representatives from many agencies and organizations including: the Portland Police Bureau, Mayor Charlie Hales’ office, the Portland Office of Neighborhood Involvement Crime Prevention program, the Bureau of Transportation, Portland Parks & Recreation, Bike Index, Project 529, the Multnomah County DA’s office, business owners, and more.

Advertisement

We’ve also connected with local filmmaker Guthrie Straw who’s working on a bike theft documentary. Guthrie will have a “story box” set up to record your amazing tales of bike thievery and recovery.

It will be a fun, educational, and inspiring evening. And it’s free!

Scroll down for a text version of the agenda or check out the PDF here.

===========

Agenda

5:45 – Doors open and networking
Grab a drink and open your mind to bike theft. Take this time meet new crime-fighting partners and record your bike theft story with documentary filmmaker Guthrie Straw.

6:10 – Welcome and opening remarks by Jonathan Maus, founder and editor of BikePortland
Bike theft is out of control in Portland. It’s a complex problem intertwined with other complex problems. But there’s no reason to feel hopeless! There are many things we can do to get a better handle on it. The first step is understanding the scope and context of the problem, who the local players are, and what solutions might be feasible in Portland. In his opening address, Jonathan will explain his expectations for the summit, present new data to illustrate the problem, and share what he’s learned from over seven years of reporting about the issue on BikePortland.org.

6:20 – Bike theft story shorts
Audience members will share their 30-second bike theft stories.

6:30 – Panel discussion #1: Enforcement
“Death to bike thieves!” is a popular mantra; but catching thieves in the act, giving them due process, and then holding them accountable, requires a bit more tact than vigilante justice. Our panelists will share their experiences in the trenches of the bike theft battle — from police work on the streets, to busting repeat offenders. Time for Q & A will follow. (All panels moderated by Jonathan Maus)

    – Vivian Godsey, Multnomah County Deputy District Attorney
    – Roger Goldingay, owner of Cartlandia food cart pod
    – Officer David Sanders, Portland Police Bureau Central Precinct
    – Karras Kalivas, park ranger with Portland Parks & Recreation
    – Homeless advocate, TBA

7:00 – 7:10 – Break for networking (and other fun stuff TBD)

7:10 – Panel discussion #2: Prevention & Technology
With knowledge comes power: the power to prevent bike theft and to recover a bike once it’s stolen. What is Portland currently doing to educate residents about bike theft prevention and recovery? What technology is available to help recover bikes and how can it be improved? Our panelists are experts in the high-tech and marketing side of the equation. Time for Q & A will follow.

    – Bryan Hance, co-director of Bike Index
    – Kate Nelson, Western Bikeworks
    – J Allard, CEO of Project 529
    – Danielle Booth, PBOT Active Transportation Division SmartTrips program (also handles abandoned bikes)

7:40 – Solutions slam
Let’s hear them! Folding bikes, bait bikes, mandatory bike registration, GPS trackers, explosives, other ideas?

8:00 – Panel discussion #3: Parking
Parking is an often overlooked piece of the bike theft puzzle. Rack design, location, availability (or lack of it) and other factors can have a huge impact on security. From the ultimate solution of bike valet to the ubiquitous blue staple racks, this panel will explore how parking impacts theft and what’s being done about it. Time for Q & A to follow.

    – Kiel Johnson, owner of Go By Bike bike valet
    – Clint Culpepper, manager of the Bike Hub at Portland State University
    – Todd Boulanger, VP of operations & facility design at BikeStation and transportation planner
    – Sarah Figliozzi, PBOT bicycle parking program

8:30 – Final Q & A, wrap up and closing remarks by Jonathan Maus

If you haven’t already, RSVP for the event (and invite your friends!) via Facebook.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

18
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
15 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Alan 1.0Todd BoulangerBryan Hance (The Bike Index)GlowBoyJohn Lascurettes Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Peter Micahelson
Guest
Peter Micahelson

Apologies for the mostly off-topic question but I don’t know how else to inquire.

The PDX Reporter smartphone app that many of us use to report potholes, illegally parked cars, etc. does not work under Apple’s iOS8, which many people have upgraded to. Have others here noticed this problem? The App Store reviews are terrible now because of this, which is too bad since it was a highly functional app.

Anyone know when/if it will come back online or who to contact to inquire?

Thanks, Peter

Timo Forsberg
Guest

Hi Peter,
I’ll try to find the right person to forward your comment to. You can email me directly for follow-up (timo.forsberg@portlandoregon.gov).

Now, back to talking bike theft…

John Lascurettes
Guest

I wrote them a couple of weeks ago complaining of just that after I couldn’t report a clogged storm drain and received this reply on November 24th:

We are actively working on a new and redesigned version of the app that will fully support iOS 8 and Apple’s new handsets. Coming later this fall.

Thanks for your patience,
MQ

Mike Quetel, Corporate GIS Solutions Architect
Technology Services | City of Portland, Oregon

TonyT
Guest
TonyT

Yup, it’s now useless. Can’t find who to talk to.

John Lascurettes
Guest

Open the app, the splash screen that comes up has a feedback email link. I wrote them and got a response (see above). They’re aware and working on it, but it wouldn’t hurt to make a sneaky wheel of it.

Alan 1.0
Guest
Alan 1.0

What are the chances of Bike Index and Project 529 sharing basic data for stolen bikes? Sure would be nice!

Bryan Hance (The Bike Index)
Guest

Hi, Alan: not sure if you know this but BikeIndex has an open API – anybody can tap into our stolen bike data. The data’s all there for the taking, provided the taker is using it to ID, search for, and recover stolen bikes, not abusing it, etc. (It’s what let a developer we never even met write our Android app, FWIW)

Far as I know, we’re the only ones doing this.

We’re always trying to convince various partners, hackers, .gov types, PD’s, etc. and other registries to use it, and the idea of cross registry search is one that keeps coming up in the discussions with all the other registries. It was the bulk of the first ‘stolen bike summit’ in SF, earlier in the year, FWIW. And while most people agree on the concept, right now we’re the only ones putting the data out there.

ps come to the summit, I’d be happy to talk to you about it. 🙂

-Bryan Hance
-BikeIndex

Alan 1.0
Guest
Alan 1.0

*snap!* Of course! I hadn’t thought about how BikeIndex’ open API and source would work that way. Now if only 529 and others would (a) take up that offer and (b) reciprocate!

I hope to make it to this summit, thanks!

Alan 1.0
Guest
Alan 1.0

Oh, of course! Now that you mention it, I have seen that BikeIndex has open API and source, I just hadn’t put that together with sharing data with 529. Now if only they and others would take up that offer and share in return.

I’m hoping to make it there, thanks!

Jason Markantes
Guest
Jason Markantes

Hi Bryan, I tried a quick google but do you know of a website summarizing how the SF bike theft summit went? Curious what came out of that, and if Portland can learn from it.

One awesome thing I do see is SF’s police has a bike theft dedicated twitter account. That would seem to require some dedicated resources from the PD, and a good place for the community to spread the word on theft while immediately alerting the police.

Thanks,
Jason

Bryan Hance (The Bike Index)
Guest

It wasn’t summarized in public anywhere, it was super informal, but I don’t mind sharing here – come to the summit on Dec 10th and I can fill in the rest of the blanks for you 🙂

Attending were reps/staff from SF & CA bike/safety/.gov org’s, local biker extraordinaire @plattyjo, @sfpdbiketheft, bike registry folks, and some civic hacker / bike community coders.

Large part was just round-tabling and introducing who we all were & what we had to offer each other in the way of fighting bike theft. And that ranges from sharing data, points of contact, shared programs + efforts, technology (like our registry) or even just higher level explanations – for example @sfpdbiketheft spoke re: the legal / procedural side & the various details on bait bikes, enforcement, chasing thieves on Craigslist, the general state of the problem w/ crime and enforcement in the city in the light of recent CA legal changes — he was really, really illuminating. This is why I’m happy Jonathan has focused a block on enforcement for the PDX summit – I think people will be really surprised @ some of the details around enforcement.

I spent time (prob too much time) asking everybody to consider interoperability in all their efforts, and plugging the open data model (open data, sharing bike/biketheft info among each other) because I see the danger of people developing their own closed registries & further balkanizing the problem. Which has happened. There is a strength in the diversity of efforts and angles with which people attack the problem but the fact that we can’t reach out and cross-check serials w/ all our various partners and like minded bike-crime fighting folks is a hurdle we’re still working on. I/we basically offered free I.T. and support for this …

Much discussion was had about Craigslist thieves and the various efforts there, much more discussion on the bait bike sticker program (psychological warfare!) SFPDbiketheft put together, much discussion on ideas going forward to collaborate, etc. And I joked that the next conference would be in PDX 🙂

-Bryan
-BikeIndex

GlowBoy
Guest
GlowBoy

Did Craigslist themselves participate in the SF summit? I know they don’t have the resources to actually police their site, but it does play a MAJOR role in bike theft — a very large share of bikes listed on CL have been stolen — and it seems they might be able to play some role in reducing it.

At the very least, CL’s “avoiding scams” page could mention that a lot of bikes listed there are stolen, and offer generic tips on avoiding buying stolen ones, including checking the serial number against bike registries.

Bryan Hance (The Bike Index)
Guest

No, Craigslist did not participate. There was much discussion there on many of those topics – all of which you’ve hit squarely on the head. Everybody across the board wants them to step up and do something about the problem. And they remain silent on it.

From our end … it’s a bit of a chicken/egg thing, i.e. proving that there is an easily useable, approachable, user and community supported list of known stolen serials (stolen.bikeindex.org) that people can check against, so part of the answer to “well why should we add serials to our listings” is “because the community maintains and uses this massive free database of known stolen serials”. (If you want to get super geeky, it’s quasi similar to the “stolen imsi” database currently being used for phones …)

Super long topic, could talk about this one all day.

Edwin
Guest
Edwin

I would think “all the players” could or should include a spokesperson from the homeless community where a lot of the crackdown effort may take place.

Todd Boulanger
Guest
Todd Boulanger

From the sociological perspective I can understand this request at the surface…if it is focused on efforts at “self-policing” their communities…but then again would the banking industry invite “bank robbers”/ representatives of crime syndicates to a summit looking for solutions to bank robberies? I am just say’n. (This are my personal thoughts on this topic, having had bikes stolen [I don’t own a car] and working to keep other’s bikes from being stolen.)

Todd Boulanger
Guest
Todd Boulanger

…so perhaps more discussion on how to involve representatives of the “houseless community” on this topic would be merited…at a future summit or at the next stage once “we” as a community (of bike owners etc.) develop a shared vision / goals / and objectives to reduce bike theft in this region.

Alan 1.0
Guest
Alan 1.0

would the banking industry invite “bank robbers”/ representatives of crime syndicates to a summit looking for solutions to bank robberies?

That analogy doesn’t work for me because, unlike bank robbers who are by definition the bad guy, homeless people in general are more often victims of bike theft than they are the actual thief, and bike thieves include both homeless and homed people.

But yeah, it’s quite a full agenda as it is, and trying to solve all the related social issues at one meeting is a recipe to get nothing at all accomplished, so maybe an advocate for the homeless could be invited into the discussion at another point.