City wraps up post-storm gravel pickup two weeks early (updated)

City crews picking up gravel
in their trademark, two-sweeper formation.
(Photo: LiUNA Local 483)

The on-street gravel treatments that added traction to Portland’s streets during February’s snowstorm have been cleared from the bike lanes and shoulders two weeks earlier than expected, a city spokeswoman said Tuesday.

The city managed to clear 1,700 lane-miles of gravel from its streets in four weeks, rather than the six to eight weeks it first expected, by devoting additional crews to the task.

“In addition to the night crews, we had day crews,” spokeswoman Diane Dulken said. Related overtime cost the city about $100,000, she said, 14 percent of the total storm response. “Because it is a priority, we did these things to speed it up.”

The city said the gravel application was essential to keeping buses and emergency vehicles running during the snow event, Portland’s biggest in six years. But the leftover gravel drew criticism for being potentially unsafe to bikes.

Dulken said the city had made “quite a commitment” to gravel cleanup.

“Often they needed to treat a street twice, because gravel does migrate,” she said. “Because gravel is really hard on the machines, it meant additional repair as well.”

If you come across gravel still on the road, it’s best to notify the city’s street crews at 503-823-1700 (not the 503-823-SAFE number used for other street safety issues, Dulken said).

“We know there’s still stray gravel out there, so our regular cleaning crews are willing to pick up stray gravel,” Dulken said.

In all, the city calculated that storm cleanup cost taxpayers about $740,000. In a news release last week, city transportation finance executive Alissa Mahar said the city has until June 30 to “create savings where possible to cover the additional storm costs.”

Update 4:30 pm: In the comments below, reader Mork shares the following troubling story about calling the number the city recommended for gravel pickup:

I just called the phone number Michael included in the post and the woman who answered it said “We aren’t picking up any more gravel.” I tried to negotiate a bit with her and told her that it was my understanding that the city would continue to pick up gravel in trouble areas, so she put me into a voicemail of a daytime street cleaning supervisor.

I think the City needs to get the messaging straight–are you DONE or not? There are clearly some forgotten spots.

Update 5:10 pm: Dulken says she “can’t comment on that particular conversation” but calls it “curious” and asks people not to hesitate to call 823-1700 with gravel reports.

“We are taking calls from members of the public,” Dulken said. “The information should have been relayed to dispatch and that should have been enough. … We’re done with the overtime, we’re done with the extra crew, and we still have our night cleaning crew in addition to our other duties.”

Michael Andersen (Contributor)

Michael Andersen (Contributor)

Michael Andersen was news editor of BikePortland.org from 2013 to 2016 and still pops up occasionally.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

55 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Todd Hudson
Todd Hudson
10 years ago

No kidding. I saw it in three different places on my commute!

David
David
10 years ago
Reply to  Todd Hudson

I saw literally dozens of pieces of gravel just today!

Chris I
Chris I
10 years ago
Reply to  David

This is going to be on Bike Snob next week…

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
10 years ago

Too bad it isn’t economically practical to crowd source the removal of gravel by offering a bounty for clean gravel that ODOT would have to pay to replace anyways.
Certainly it would cost more per ton than just buying the gravel new but you have to add in the O&M costs for the equipment and manpower needed to remove everything they lay down TIMES the amount of time gravel is causing potential for lawsuits the government might be responsible for on at least some part.

At a certain point of worrying about salt, gravel, ice, deployment, emergency response, lives and business lost it seems reasonable to just heat the road surface to 33F°. I like the the idea of doing this with waste heat from commercial buildings and industrial processes.

Spiffy
Spiffy
10 years ago
Reply to  q`Tzal

if they handed out dustpans the homeless would collect gravel on the cheap…

Todd Hudson
Todd Hudson
10 years ago
Reply to  q`Tzal

This could all be avoided if Portland sparingly used road salt *during snow emergencies only* (“x” inches accumulation and below freezing temps). Using salt for two-three days, once every five years, won’t be any more harmful than the sodium chloride that sewage treatment puts into rivers every single day. In a few days, the rain will wash it away.

Chronic use of road salt is bad. But like fluoride and the sales tax, Portlanders have to be irrational and purist when it comes to things like this…

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
10 years ago
Reply to  Todd Hudson

During the 2004(2003?) ice storm that coated all of the metro area east of the west hills in between ½”-3″ of sheet/black ice the city was almost totally shut down for commercial activity and everything else.
At a certain point the city started panicking over tax revenue not coming in in thr millions. I often wondered if the EPA fines for using road salt that one time would have been cheaper than waiting for the ice to melt over a week later.

davemess
davemess
10 years ago
Reply to  q`Tzal

EPA fines for road salt? Please describe.

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
10 years ago
Reply to  davemess

This is an assumption based me not knowing of a “can’t use road salt in Oregon” law AND the historical track record of every government ever not sticking to principles when the economically expedient choice is available.

The main argument against using road salt is environmental damage. If there is no law there must be a direct monetary reason road salt is not kept in reserve to keep Oregon’s biggest economic engine chugging along producing tax revenue during a winter weather event.

Simple logic.
Probably too simple; I expect that I’m missing pertinent data.

Mork
Mork
10 years ago

I just called the phone number MIchael included in the post and the woman who answered it said “We aren’t picking up any more gravel.” I tried to negotiate a bit with her and told her that it was my understanding that the city would continue to pick up gravel in trouble areas, so she put me into a voicemail of a daytime street cleaning supervisor.

I think the City needs to get the messaging straight–are you DONE or not? There are clearly some forgotten spots.

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
10 years ago
Reply to  Mork

Is this a PBOT vs ODOT issue? Jurisdiction and who did what might be at the center of the problem.

Mindful Cyclist
Mindful Cyclist
10 years ago

I just called the number because the exit ramp off the Jefferson st/jeld wen (okay, Prov Park) exit still has a lot of gravel on the shoulder all the way through the tunnel. She was friendly, but told me to call ODOT.

Nathan
Nathan
10 years ago

Today, I called the Portland area ODOT number for reporting road hazards about that exact stretch. The person on the phone was friendly and said they would push the information along.

Here are the ODOT dispatch numbers:
Portland metro – 503-283-5859
NW Oregon – 503-362-0457
Southern Oregon – 541-858-3103
Central Oregon – 541-383-0121
Eastern Oregon – 541-383-0121

Mindful Cyclist
Mindful Cyclist
10 years ago
Reply to  Nathan

Great! I got busy at work after I posted that and did not have time to call. She did give me the number.

Poisonpony
Poisonpony
10 years ago
Reply to  q`Tzal

And don’t forget Tri Met, OHSU, and PCC.. They all put out gravel also. We have already swept up the 1,000yds we put out and there is still a lot out tbere. Tri Met blasted their bus routes.

Poisonpony
Poisonpony
10 years ago
Reply to  Mork

Mork We are still out there sweeping gravel. If you have problems with a City employee ask for the bureau directors voice mail and make a complaint, or call 503-823-4000 and ask for HR and make a complaint.
I work for you, some forget that. We are required to be courteous to citizens.

Shyla O.
10 years ago

122nd and Fremont near the I-84 path entrance is still a mess. Biking under that overpass with traffic just coming off the freeway, and not bring able to safely take the lane…what a nightmare.

Mossby Pomegranate
Mossby Pomegranate
10 years ago
Reply to  Shyla O.

Ha…biking in that area under the best of conditions is a nightmare.

Shyla O.
10 years ago

Even the sidewalk on the west side going under the overpass is choked with gravel. No idea how it got there. Seems unlikely it will ever get removed since it’s not on the street. But ironically, that sidewalk really is the only truly “safe” option for any north or southbound cyclist trying to connect to or from NE Portland and East County. Suppose it’s time to call that friendly lady…:/

davemess
davemess
10 years ago

So who has jurisdiction for the I-5 bridge (and some of the approaching paths (like coming off of Marine DR)?

Poisonpony
Poisonpony
10 years ago
Reply to  davemess

Ramps on, and off a freeway are ODOT’s. PBOT right of way is the corner of the ramp.

Jessica Horning
10 years ago
Reply to  davemess

The I-5 bridge and ramps are ODOT’s. You can report any issues on ODOT facilities by calling 1-888-Ask-ODOT or filling out a form online at: http://highway.odot.state.or.us/cf/comments/comments.cfm

davemess
davemess
10 years ago

$740,000 is pretty sobering. (Granted I know that is not THAT much in government money, but when bike projects are usually looking at only getting a few million a year that is a good chunk of it).

John Lascurettes
10 years ago

Kudos to the cleanup crew. I will fully acknowledge that they’ve done a much better and expeditious job of cleanup compared to snowpocalypses past – but as others pointed out, there’s still problem spots. Thanks for the phone number and the repotting – I’ll be calling for a couple of the spots I still see.

John Lascurettes
10 years ago

“reporting,” not “repotting”. Sheesh!

Cold Worker
Cold Worker
10 years ago

The city could (should) get parked cars off the streets they want to sweep. It does no good to run down streets with the street cleaners where they bounce in and out from between parked cars. Move your car or it gets towed. Tough shit. The city has a job to do and it should get done quickly and efficiently. Get some folks from the city to figure out the street cleaning schedule is, send out notes in the mail and clean the goddamn streets right. The first time. Act like a city, do your work.

Poisonpony
Poisonpony
10 years ago
Reply to  Cold Worker

The street cleaning crews have wanted that on some heavy parked up streets for a long time. Like sweeping NW 18th, and 19th. They could make it that on the first Tuesday of the month no parking on right side. First Wednesday, no parking left.

Chris I
Chris I
10 years ago
Reply to  Poisonpony

This is just good policy. It makes it next to impossible for people to park semi-functioning cars long-term.

Cold Worker
Cold Worker
10 years ago
Reply to  Chris I

That too. If parking is so f’ing valuable and hard to find (I don’t think it is but whatever) then this should be supported not only because streets will be cleaner but your neighbor that collects junked cars, he’s gonna likely end up losing some to the tow yard.

Susan Otcenas
10 years ago

Meanwhile, out in Washington County, the bike lanes are still littered with gravel everywhere.

Shyla O.
10 years ago
Reply to  Susan Otcenas

Gresham too. Awful.

GlowBoy
GlowBoy
10 years ago

I noticed the newly clean bike lane coming down Barbur yesterday. Still a lot of debris on walkways though. The sidepath on the 99E viaduct (over the UP tracks), which I ride regularly coming downtown from Brooklyn, is still slathered in pea gravel. (Not that I care that much, just pointing it out).

John Stephens
John Stephens
10 years ago

Given the enormous cost of clean up, I have to wonder if spreading the gravel as generously as the city did was really all that valuable to drivers in the first place. I’ve driven on snow and can’t say that gravel ever helped that much. Thoughts?

Poisonpony
Poisonpony
10 years ago
Reply to  John Stephens

I think the same way, coming from areas with severe winters. Sand inclines, and declines where you have to start and stop, and bad corners.

pdx_arch
pdx_arch
10 years ago

Sorry, they can’t say this is done. There’s still plenty of gravel on Williams, Willamette, west Marine Drive is terrible. The Vancouver Ave bridge over the Columbia Slough is worse.

Eric
Eric
10 years ago

Maybe everyone should just buy a gravel bike and it wouldn’t be a problem?

Schrauf
Schrauf
10 years ago

What a joke. Some of the most central, highly used routes are still full of thick gravel. Eastbound just past the Broadway Bridge near the Rose Quarter, for one.

Champs
Champs
10 years ago

Dumb luck that I’d been off the bike for three weeks, but Tuesday’s return to the saddle featured plenty of pea gravel. If straight lines feel pretty safe now, I’m not taking corners at speed.

Poisonpony
Poisonpony
10 years ago

We know we’re not done sweeping up the gravel. Call the 503-823-1700 number and tell us where the bad spots are. We get the service requests in our work orders on night shift. There is gravel put out by other agencies we don’t even know is there. If you know of a bad spot please call. I filled dump truck with gravel in just a few miles last night.

Lisa
Lisa
10 years ago
Reply to  Poisonpony

You are awesome. Thanks for doing what you do!

JL
JL
10 years ago

From http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/319704

The City cleans only streets with curbs. This policy was initiated after a 1979 Street Cleaning Study presented to City Council found that 97% of street debris lies within 40 inches of the curb. The accumulation of debris at the curb is caused by the design of the street and vehicular movement. Streets are designed with a crown in the middle sloping toward the sides. Water and debris move toward the curb and gutter areas. Vehicle movement scatters debris to the edges of traffic lanes.

Streets with no curbs are affected by the same factors as curbed streets, but with no curb the debris is dispersed onto areas adjacent to the paved surfaces. Uncurbed streets are, in effect, self-cleaning. The policy recommendation of the study was that “no residential or arterial blockface be swept with a street sweeper unless a minimum of 75 percent of its length is curbed.”

Oliver
Oliver
10 years ago
Reply to  JL

I remember reading that before. Similar to the gas tax mess (% per gallon instead of per dollar), they’ve used the wrong metric in the model.

Debris accumulates 40 inches from the edge of the travel lane, and yes on roads where there is a curb, this is where you’ll find it. But when you have 4 ft of bike lane or hard shoulder between the travel lane and edge of the pavement then that is where the debris accumulates.

q`Tzal
q`Tzal
10 years ago
Reply to  Oliver

That’s why I call’em “debris lanes”. The bicycle community everywhere in America has been “gifted” the part of a paved road that all their design and engineering specifications say never needs to be cleaned.

Spiffy
Spiffy
10 years ago

“have been cleared from the bike lanes and shoulders”

“We know there’s still stray gravel out there”

so which is it? have they cleared it up, or is it still out there? you can’t have it both ways…

judging by my commute home yesterday I’m saying it’s still out there…

Paul Atkinson
Paul Atkinson
10 years ago

My commute is more or less clean and gravel-free from door to door at this point. While the puncturephilic nature of the gravel used still doesn’t please me, it’s hard to be in a bad mood when riding on this beautiful morning.

Bald One
Bald One
10 years ago

I have some experience with this to relate. Several days ago I called the 823-1700 number to request gravel cleanup in bike lanes related to post snowstorm. I was also told by the person who answered that the city is done with that program and all crews have returned to normal duty. Arghhh! But, she did transfer me to the voicemail of the daytime street sweeping supervisor. When those folks called me back and explained that I needed to speak with someone else – specifically the “night shift supervisor”, I was beginning to suspect the run-around from city. But, day shift turned out to be very helpful and friendly. Apparently, the city arterials with painted bike lanes that I tend to ride and which some still have thick gravel in the bike lanes, are swept by night shift, and day shift only sweeps the residential streets. So, I called the nightshift number (823-1740) and left a voicemail listing several streets with thick gravel still in the bikelanes. I was so incredibly pleased to see that nearly the entire list had been cleared last night and the lanes were free of gravel this morning. Wow, it was a great response from the city street crews. (Thank you, you know who you are. It means a lot).

City still needs to coordinate their response a little better (why do I have to make 3 calls and leave voicemails with various people to get the correct response when you call the 823-1700 number?) They need to consider an alternative to gravel. Also, the sidewalks are a big problem with the gravel – some designated bike routes the city puts you up on the sidewalk for 100 yards or so and clearly the gravel gets spewed onto the sidewalks after just a few hours in the travel lanes by the actions of car tires. Who will clean the sidewalks? In the Port of Portland, their crew blew all the gravel off the MUP and sidewalks within days after the storm so the sidewalks and bike path were clear (they also had the snow cleared off the MUP immediately after the big storm! ). So, it is possible. And I don’t think it costs $300 Million – City that Works 😉 Focus more money and effort on maintenance of the infrastructure we have.

kittens
kittens
10 years ago

“MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”

m bodd
m bodd
10 years ago

122nd between NE Shaver and NE San Rafael still have gravel filled bike lanes on MAR 14 th

K'Tesh
K'Tesh
10 years ago

The gravel in the cycle track in front of PSU (SW Broadway and SW Harrison, SW Broadway and SW Hall) is still there as of when I went through there today.

K'Tesh
K'Tesh
10 years ago

I should add that I got a flat tire not long after riding through the gravel piles there last Friday

GlowBoy
GlowBoy
10 years ago

Found two more bike lanes full of gravel on the way home last night: Spring Garden Street where it crosses I-5 by Capitol Hill Elementary, and Barbur Blvd northbound towards downtown, starting where Naito Parkway splits off.

Robert Burchett
Robert Burchett
10 years ago
Reply to  GlowBoy

West Burnside on Friday

Robert Burchett
Robert Burchett
10 years ago

Oh heck. East. East Burnside.