Support BikePortland

Finally! An easy web tool to track city transpo projects

Posted by on October 3rd, 2013 at 2:54 pm

A screen grab of transportation projects in the Portland planning bureau’s new map app.

Isn’t it great when a local government agency uses the Internet to make political participation much easier?

Portland’s Bureau of Planning and Sustainability released a new tool Tuesday that does exactly that. It’s the Google Maps of Portland planning and demographics, and definitely a resource worth knowing about.

The coolest map for BikePortland readers might be the one in the screenshot above, the very last of what this application refers to (in thick planning-ese) as “discussion layers.” It’s a clickable, zoomable, scrollable map of every project in the city’s current transportation system plan — essentially the transportation department’s official to-do list.

For example, this makes it easy for me to see not only that the city is planning to add bike lanes and sidewalks to Southwest Hamilton Street between Dosch and Scholls Ferry roads sometime in the next six to 10 years, but that it’s expected to cost about $6 million.

For people like me, who don’t want to constantly keep up with every project we care about but want to get up to speed on them every now and then, this will be a terrific tool.

A couple usage tips: to get to the transportation map, you have to click and drag on the list that starts with “Centers,” “Corridors,” and so on, and then flip the “on” switch. To read the documentation for each layer, click on its name. To see the legend, click “legend” near the lower left.

Finally, the public is invited to add comments to these plans by clicking the dialogue box in the upper right.

It’s also great that this tool is in the same place as a wealth of demographic data and many other aspects of the city’s comprehensive plan. I’m working on another post highlighting at a few particularly interesting maps to be found here, so stay tuned.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Eden DabbsMichael Andersen (News Editor)Nick FalboJonathan GordonJohn Landolfe Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
dwainedibbly
Guest
dwainedibbly

(Over two hours and no comments, yet?) This is a fantastic resource! Thank you, BPS!

AndyC of Linnton
Guest
AndyC of Linnton

Dangit! Now I will even more obsessively track and dream about projects!
Too cool, BPS.

Alexis
Guest
Alexis

Very cool. That left side menu could use some improvement (dear web designer, normal scrolling please, don’t invent your own), so thanks for the guidance on it.

I guess the 20s Bikeways is out of date in the TSP, it goes a lot further south now than Clinton (all the way to Crystal Springs).

John Landolfe
Guest

Love it. Nice work.

Jonathan Gordon
Guest
Jonathan Gordon

I’m having a bit of trouble reconciling some of this. Take the “Fifties Bikeway, NE/SE (Tillamook to Woodstock)” project.

– They list “Timeframe: (Years 11 – 20)”. What does that refer to? The project website says they anticipate starting construction Feb 2014.

– They list Estimated Cost: $677,500 but the project website says they have $1.5M in federal transportation funds and that wasn’t enough to support the bids they received in July of 2013.

http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/406193

Anyone with more experience with the app have any insight?

Nick Falbo
Guest
Nick Falbo

The map is an illustration of the Transportation System Plan… our document to guide long-range transportation planning. The project costs, timeframes and descriptions come from the time of TSP publication I think, which was 2006.

When these projects get into actual planning and development, reality catches up. Projects change slightly, costs go up or down, and the timeline shifts to match.

It would be great to have a similar map that shows active and upcoming plans, as well as active and upcoming construction, so that you could track a project like the 50’s bikeway from concept to completion.