BuddyRider from The eBike Store

N Williams, NoPo Greenway projects seek funding support

Posted by on January 29th, 2013 at 11:45 am

Existing conditions on Williams Ave-8-7

Will we finally see changes on Williams?
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)

Two important Portland projects are vying for funding through a grant process being led by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the deadline to offer your feedback is this Thursday, January 31st.

Of the seven projects in the running from Portland and Washington County, I think two deserve a closer look.

PBOT has requested $1.47 million to fund their North Williams Traffic Safety and Operations Project. This is the infamous Williams project that had humble beginnings over two years ago, but then took many unexpected twists and turns. What started out as a straightforward bikeway project with a budget to do only pavement markings and signage has morphed turned into a full-blown capital project that will include new traffic signals, curb extensions, and even the creation of a neighborhood greenway on nearby NE Rodney.

Specifically, the project will include a complete re-striping of Williams from Weidler to Killingsworth. The main elements will include: a left-side buffered bikeway, 11 curb extensions at eight different intersections; a new signal at N. Cook St; sharrows, signage, and speed bumps on NE Rodney; and a major piece of public art that will, “honor N Williams Avenue’s importance in local African-American history.”

The funding request includes $466,000 in design/engineering costs, $305,000 for crossing improvements, $120,000 for signals, $100,000 for the “Honoring history streetscape,” $80,000 in pavement markings, and so on.

The other project on the list that caught my eye was a proposal to prep the northernmost segment (also known as segment 1) of the North Portland Greenway Trail for construction. Portland Parks & Recreation and Metro are asking ODOT for $799,000 to do full engineering on four miles of this project from Kelley Point Park to Chimney Park (a separate grant application has been made to do the actual construction). As we’ve been covering lately, there are some major quibbles with the route being proposed by the Parks Bureau for this project; but they are mostly in the southern sections (segments 4 and 5 to be exact). Segment 1 is almost entirely on multi-use paths and would be an importation connection and addition to the 40-Mile Loop.

There are 53 projects from around the state vying for just $8.5 million in grants. Public support for projects can go a long way in making them a reality. You have until this Thursday, January 31st to offer feedback on these grant applications via ODOT’s online survey.

For more information, download the full project applications:
— Willamette Greenway Trail – Chimney Park to Kelley Point Park (PDF)
— N Williams Traffic Safety and Operations Project (PDF)

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Thank you — Jonathan

  • Hart Noecker January 29, 2013 at 12:48 pm

    Divide the $450million Oregon will have to pay to fund the CRC by $8.5million and you get 52.94. Imagine that.

    Recommended Thumb up 4

  • Dick Schouten January 29, 2013 at 1:26 pm

    Hey, ever more important Washington County has got some great projects too! The downtown Beaverton Crescent Trail connection is a game changer located in WashCo’s transportation hub!

    Recommended Thumb up 3

    • Andrew Seger January 30, 2013 at 8:03 am

      I can’t really get behind this Williams project. Too expensive for too little extra good. For such a complicated and untried design we should let Alta try it out in some other city on someone else’s dime.

      Instead I’d encourage people to throw their voice behind the Crescent Trail connection in Beaverton. It fills in some of the final gaps and has more potential to making biking easier/safer for more people to access the busiest public transit station the metro area. More upside and a better use of money than the Williams project.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

  • Chris I January 29, 2013 at 1:29 pm

    “$100,000 for the “Honoring history streetscape,” ”

    The Oregonian and the pro-car lobby is going to jump all over that one…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • are January 29, 2013 at 6:58 pm

      if the oregonian jumped on it, i suppose their angle would be that a 100k art project is an empty symbolic gesture, while the neighborhood continues to gentrify.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Champs January 29, 2013 at 1:47 pm

    Traffic medians are gradual and are marked by signs; curb extensions, not so much.

    Anyone peacefully biking on the right side of the road where there and nobody is parked along that street, that pinch in the roadway just might catch you by surprise, especially after dark.

    I very much hope that all of these extensions get paint and/or reflector treatments before someone gets hurt.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • daisy January 29, 2013 at 2:07 pm

    I’m not sure what to think about the N. Williams projects, but a new signal at N. Cook would go a long way towards making my neighborhood so much better.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Steve B January 29, 2013 at 4:23 pm

      Totally. Plus, new crosswalks, crossing beacons, slower traffic speeds, a buffered bike lane, no more bus/bike leapfrog and a brand new city bikeway on Rodney.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Lenny Anderson
    Lenny Anderson January 29, 2013 at 5:19 pm

    I think Williams would be great corridor to create a BOd (Bike Oriented Development) project funded in part by an LID. Start with New Seasons, Emanuel Hospital, the Rose Garden and PCC as anchors and key investors. Its how the first Streecar line was paid for and could be a strong demonstration project for growing the bike network.

    Recommended Thumb up 1

  • Robert January 29, 2013 at 5:30 pm

    Has anyone else felt recently that coming up Williams, it seems like you hit every red? This didn’t used to happen. Conversely, I hit every green going down Vancouver. Why did they change the timing?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Hugh Johnson January 29, 2013 at 6:00 pm

    And SE Division is still a crossing of death. sigh.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

  • Jayson January 29, 2013 at 10:22 pm

    Wasn’t N. Williams a funded safety project? Seems like the City spent so much time on planning and public hand holding that they ran out of money for what should’ve been a simple solution – reduce the street to one auto lane. Seems to happen a lot these days..

    Recommended Thumb up 2

  • spare_wheel January 30, 2013 at 7:52 am

    williams was the lowest priority for me on that list. it was striped with an extra-wide bike lane a few years ago and the design of the new facility is hardly any improvement at all.

    all of you williams boosters should try riding your bikes to the parkrose and argay neighborhoods. i think you will be surprised to see all of the groovy bike infrastructure your ex-neighbors have. spending more money on gentrified inner pdx when other neighborhoods lack the most basic amenities sticks in my craw in a big way.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

    • davemess January 30, 2013 at 9:00 am

      Definitely Spare. I’ve been saying that on this site for a couple of years, and always get yelled at. There are so many places in this city where there are NO facilities for cyclists and/or pedestrians.

      Recommended Thumb up 3

  • johnw January 30, 2013 at 10:01 am

    I’d like to see either Vancouver or Williams become a bike and bus only street, and then make the other a two way automobile street. I have to think that given the trends in the price of gas, the rise of bike riding, etc, that this will eventually have to happen.

    Recommended Thumb up 1

    • Josh Berezin January 30, 2013 at 11:06 am

      Wow. This idea is super-brilliant. What is the real or perceived downside of this?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Allan January 30, 2013 at 8:59 pm

        This was proposed by others (and echoed by me) on the SAC – the City claimed it didn’t have the money. Now they’re asking for 5x the budget. is the opportunity lost?

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • johnw January 31, 2013 at 7:14 am

          I could see where a proposal like this might meet some resistance from drivers and businesses, but on N. Williams I have to think the cyclist are a significant support for local businesses.

          Also the Oregon.gov design guide states that “A complete street accommodates all travel modes…” but why should individual streets be expected to be all things to all people, especially when this is clearly not the case with so many other streets. I think the overall system can accommodate all modes of transportation, but it seems shortsighted to expect that out of every street.

          Allan mentioned that this was already proposed, I’d like to hear more about that.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Marianne Fitzgerald January 31, 2013 at 7:45 am

    The PBOT/ODOT Barbur Blvd. project (#111) includes filling one of the scary gaps in the bike lane, but you have to scroll through to the middle of the document to the project description/solution for the details. “Fill bike lane gaps inbound from 24th Ave to 22nd Ave/Spring Garden Rd, as well as, if feasible, the
    outbound gap from SW 24th Ave and SW Spring Garden. Otherwise, existing bike lanes will be maintained.
    – Build retaining wall to hold up steep slope between SW 24th Ave and Spring Garden, to accommodate
    missing bike lane and sidewalk.” “The focus is on improving safety for both pedestrians and cyclists, providing good
    access to transit, reducing the double barrier effect of crossing SW Barbur Blvd and the I-5 Freeway,
    improving pedestrian and bicycling connectivity and access for users of all ages and abilities and enhancing
    the walking and biking environment.”

    For those of us who live in and travel through SW Portland on bike or foot, this is a very important project that deserves your support.

    Recommended Thumb up 1

  • jim February 2, 2013 at 3:15 am

    and a major piece of public art that will, “honor N Williams Avenue’s importance in local African-American history”
    What about the history of N Williams that is not black? What about the history of the people that homesteaded the property originally? That is what I find interesting, some pictures of steam trains crossing williams at Killingsworth, horses and wagons, old time bycycles… Yes include black heritage, but tell the rest of the story too

    Recommended Thumb up 0