You spoke, PBOT listened: No rumble strips on Marine Drive

A treatment like this one on NE Couch
near the Burnside Bridge, might be
coming to Marine Drive.
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)

Earlier this week, I shared that the Bureau of Transportation was considering the installation of rumble strips out on NE Marine Drive. Citing stats that show a higher than average amount of “lane departure” collisions involving motor vehicles, PBOT felt rumble strips would help alert drivers that they were leaving the roadway.

A big issue with rumble strips, however, is that they can cause problems for people on bikes.

Today I’m happy to report that PBOT heard concerns from the community and it looks like they’ll be looking to other solutions.

In an email to Oregon Bicycle Racing Association director Kenji Sugahara, PBOT bike project coordinator Jeff Smith wrote that, “Thanks to all of you for your insightful comments…we’re going to examine other treatments that are more benign to cyclists.” (PBOT reached out to OBRA specifically, because Marine Drive is very popular with serious riders who use the route for training and long weekend rides.)

Smith went on to say that they’ll likely do a treatment known as “raised thermoplastic striping” similar to what they installed to keep people from driving into the bike lane on NE Couch as it curves onto the Burnside Bridge (see photo above). Smith also said that it’s the same treatment used extensively by ODOT along the Oregon Coast on Highway 101.

I think people riding bikes will find this a much more pleasant solution than rumble strips. Thanks to PBOT for asking, and then listening to, community feedback!

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car owner and driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, feel free to contact me at @jonathan_maus on Twitter, via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a supporter.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Molly Cameron
12 years ago

Thanks Kenji!

Kenji
12 years ago
Reply to  Molly Cameron

Wasn’t me Molly! 😉 It was all Jeff for reaching out and the community for responding positively!

Joseph E
12 years ago

This is also a treatment that is applied on top of the asphalt, rather than being something cut into the pavement like rumble strips, so the roadway surface is undamaged. Good choice, PBOT!

But if there are so many problems with drunk/sleepy/speeding drivers crashing on this road, perhaps PBOT needs to plan bigger changes in the future to make it safer.

A.K.
A.K.
12 years ago

Good to hear!

Sunny
Sunny
12 years ago

Now let’s see how many cyclists flip over their bars because of raised bumps.

Kevin Wagoner
Kevin Wagoner
12 years ago

Both stories were great. Thanks for sharing.

Davis Woods-Morse
Davis Woods-Morse
12 years ago

Thanks folks.

Pat
Pat
12 years ago

I hope they heard the other comments, too….MD needs more than that to become a safe corridor for recreational cyclists.

resopmok
resopmok
12 years ago

Why dd they even need to ask in the first place?

GlowBoy
GlowBoy
12 years ago
Reply to  resopmok

It’s a reasonable question. Cyclists aren’t all a homogeneous bloc.

Personally, I would have voted for the rumble strips. I don’t ride a racing bike and can actually deal with having them there, and I believe they would provide greater deterrent towards vehicles drifting onto the shoulder.

But the majority of people with an opinion seemed to think the rumble strips are overkill, so we’ll get less-protective but easier-to-ride raised thermoplastic instead.