Support BikePortland

‘Track-straddling’ on Lovejoy, bike access issues persist

Posted by on July 27th, 2011 at 2:23 pm

Due to the presence of new streetcar tracks, people on NW Lovejoy routinely drive in the bike lane.
(Photos © J. Maus)

At the end of October 2010, PBOT re-opened several streets in the Pearl District just west of the Broadway Bridge following construction of the new eastside streetcar loop. The changes brought on by the streetcar project were very significant, especially for people riding bicycles.

NW Lovejoy biking conditions-2-1

NW Lovejoy, which has been a key part of the bikeway network for years because of its direct connection onto the Broadway Bridge, was decommissioned as a bike route. A street that used to have bike lanes in both directions now has no dedicated space for bikes. PBOT and streetcar planners decided to make NW Marshall (one block north) the new bikeway in order to turn Lovejoy into an eastbound couplet (with on-street parking on both sides and three standard vehicle lanes).

In addition, new streetcar tracks have been added close the bike lanes on the ramp on NW Lovejoy leading to the Broadway Bridge.

Judging from recent observations of bike traffic the area, these changes are still causing confusion for people riding bicycles; and they appear to have made bicycling in this area more stressful and dangerous.

Back in December I shared what I call the “track-straddle” phenomenon. Because of the presence of streetcar tracks on the downhill (westbound) side of the Lovejoy Ramp, cars are straddling the tracks which causes them to drive on the bike lane. This is not only illegal (according to ORS 811.435), but it creates a squeeze on the already narrow space dedicated for bicycling.

As these photos attest, people in cars are still driving upon the bike lane.

I’ve also noticed that the bike lanes have been restriped and widened several inches (about the width of the stripe itself). While this gives a few more inches of breathing room, it puts the bike space that much closer to the tracks.

Other problems also remain with the bicycling conditions in this area.

While PBOT hopes people take NW Marshall and not NW Lovejoy, old habits — and a desire for direct, A to B access to businesses and destinations — mean that people are still bicycling on it. During my observations, many people rode both east and west on NW Lovejoy, despite the dangerous and awkward traffic conditions it put them in.

With Lovejoy no longer accessible to bikes, many people are using the sidewalk…

…Which puts them into an awkward and potentially dangerous crossing situation on the next block…

Heading eastbound on Lovejoy, bicycle riders are forced to navigate some tricky track crossings, including a new curb extension/streetcar stop at the intersection of 9th where there is just a few inches between the curb and the tracks.

This is definitely not the kind bicycling experience PBOT strives for.

Since riding on Lovejoy isn’t pleasant or recommended by PBOT, if you are heading westbound off the ramp, there’s a left-turn island to help you continue south on NW 9th. This “Copenhagen left” works in theory, but I noticed several people who didn’t use it. One woman on a bike told me she was confused and that she didn’t feel safe standing out on an island (despite it being painted green) in a traffic lane.

Another issue I noticed yesterday was the tricky navigation of the tracks when riding southbound on NW 9th up onto NW Lovejoy to go east. The left turn to get into the bike lane puts you right in line with streetcar tracks.

NW Lovejoy biking conditions-10-9

These changes and the confusion by people riding bikes that remain — a full nine months after the changes went into effect — seem like a step backwards in bike access and bikeway quality.

What do you think? Do you ride in this area? Have these changes impacted your riding? If so, how?

Please support BikePortland.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

  • dan July 27, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    Well, you have to remember that 90% of the people currently encountering these conditions only started biking in the last 6 weeks or so, since it stopped raining. The people who have been riding those routes for the last 9 months have probably worked things out.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • beth h July 28, 2011 at 12:00 pm

      Not necessarily. I ride year round and have to take the Lovejoy ramp every week to attend worship services in NW Portland.
      I am generally a huge fan of bike lanes, but this one is such a stinker in design and placement that I stay on the sidewalk all the way down the ramp into the Pearl. Been doing it for months and so far no one seems to care.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Andrew Seger July 27, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    Yea I’m still gonna take Lovejoy for the time being. The Marshall and 10th crossing really needs to have the stop signs flipped, too. Would love to have some of those plastic barriers along the bike lane heading east to the broadway bridge to encourage car drivers to stay in their lane.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • kevin July 27, 2011 at 3:19 pm

      I agree on the stop sign issue at Marshall and 10th. Also like the idea of plastic dividers east bound on Lovejoy towards the Broadway Bridge. Would really like to see something similar on the westbound side as well.

      On the issue of turning onto Lovejoy from southbound 9th, I feel like a painted turning path for bikes toward the bike lane on Broadway might be helpful.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • matthew July 27, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    That track heading eastbound on Lovejoy can be tricky. I ruined my rear wheel in it last year during a bad downpour. I’ve also seen two other cyclists have pretty harsh wrecks there. It’s easy to get caught in the track and bail into traffic. Would love to see a thoughtful/intentional plan or discussion on this.

    I remember reporting my accident to the city. I believe I found the link about reporting such Max/Streetcar Track accidents on this very site.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jeff July 27, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    If putting the bike lane between an auto lane with tracks and a vertical barrier/tall curb, it is silly to expect that motorists would not try to straddle the tracks, thus hanging over into the bike lane. Perhaps on this Lovejoy section, they could raise the bike lane up to join with the sidewalk plane between these two intersections as a sort of joined pathway? However, downhill cyclists would probably pick up speed and thus not mix well with pedestrians.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Allan July 27, 2011 at 2:46 pm

    As Chris Smith would say ‘friends don’t let friends ride Lovejoy’. Marshall sucks because there are too many cars and it ends at 19th, Johnson sucks because its 2 blocks out of the way, yet I use both because ultimately Lovejoy really sucks to ride (I’m not the only one who has crashed on the streetcar tracks). I would hope that PBOT would consider striping 1 lane in each direction up the ramp so that cars will all straddle left and leave plenty of space for bikes, but I don’t see that happening.

    While its not comfortable I’m used to it now. Maybe future projects will get it better

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ted Buehler July 27, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    Whenever you see cars in the bike lane on the Lovejoy ramp, call them in to 823-SAFE and ask for enforcement.

    You can send emails with photos of violators to

    Be the squeaky wheel…

    Ted Buehler

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • OnTheRoad July 27, 2011 at 3:48 pm

      Some of the pictures accompanying article clearly show license plates. Be first on your block to turn them in.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • John Lascurettes July 27, 2011 at 7:12 pm

      I’ve already taken a number of reference photos; I was planning on sending them to Jonathan for an article just like this. Looks like he had it handled.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • single track July 27, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    It seems like great foresight (sarcasm) of PBOT to require bikers to “narc” on car drivers, rather than just designing a system that accommodates all modes effectively. The new lovejoy is almost a “monorail” in terms of safety and cost.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • single track July 27, 2011 at 2:56 pm

      ps- marshall is a poor bikeway given the multiple stops and visual clutter on the road. This project definitely gets an “F” for bikes.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • BURR July 27, 2011 at 3:21 pm

        higher up, Marshall carries a lot of motor vehicle traffic to and from the hospital parking structures, and lower down you need to deal with the cobblestones if you don’t want to ride in the door zone.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ben Waterhouse July 27, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    The first photo reminds me—twice this week I’ve encountered idiots on scooters riding in the bike lane to circumvent morning traffic on 14th. I hope it’s not a sign of a trend.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • jonno July 27, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    I do live and ride in the area (to and from my place at 22nd and Glisan when going to N/NE destinations), and it has impacted my riding. Lovejoy is so direct if I want to get on the Broadway bridge but every other way is slower, requires more stops or is poorly signed. I still use Lovejoy but it sucks. People are going to use the direct route, why do these sorts of projects seem to ignore that?

    (editorial ahead) It’s just another example of poor bike connections to NW neighborhoods. Routes in and out of the area on bikes are either tricky, dangerous or roundabout, but never particularly pleasant. This does not seem to get mentioned much in the Portland bike community which seems much more focused on the east side.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Colt45 July 28, 2011 at 9:03 am

      Amen! It’s the densest part of the city, parking is terrible, and there are short connections to everywhere downtown, but all of the places I’ve lived in Portland it’s absolutely the most unpleasant place to bike. Cars are more aggressive, bike lane connections are terrible, and neighborhood greenways are no different from any other street except for the sharrows.

      I know the city gets flack for investing too much money in NW/Pearl/Downtown but it seems with a few relatively cheap improvements they could get a lot more people on their bikes in this part of town. Given the demographics, terrain and density the NW should be bike central!

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Byron July 27, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    It took me forever to figure out how to ride this, and I do not ride it often. I hate the access to the bridge from the west side. Too difficult to ride across the tracks.

    As for the straddling, I see this as a problem anywhere bikes and cars share the roadway. It is especially difficult at Burnside/Couch on the east side, and on 14th at Everett and after Glisan. Cars can’t seem to keep from drifting into the bike lane. Yesterday a bus drove in the lane as I was coming onto the Burnside bridge and if I had not help back I would have been squished.

    How about some enforcement efforts on cars in bike lanes?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR July 27, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    The streetcar has been terrible for cyclist safety and access all around, right from the start; and based on the situation described above by Jonathan, it hasn’t gotten much better over time.

    Don’t forget that the new streetcar line has also impacted cyclists negatively at the west end of the bridge at Larrabee, and has also eliminated the possibility of a right-side bike lane or cycle track on Grand, as well.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • BURR July 27, 2011 at 3:18 pm

      that would be the westbound east end of the Broadway Bridge.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • OnTheRoad July 27, 2011 at 3:27 pm

      Agree about Grand. You will find me holding up traffic going either between the tracks or in the middle car lane without tracks.

      I am thinking since it is less safe to use the streetcar lane, I am justified taking the next lane over, but then I get cars passing me on my right.

      Why don’t I use the bike lane on 7th you may ask. My destination is on Grand.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • A.K. July 27, 2011 at 4:45 pm

        … use it until a block before your destination? Unless you don’t know exactly where you’re going.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Spiffy July 28, 2011 at 7:05 am

          why don’t the cars use 7th then? easier for them to waste time going out of their way…

          it’s because people want to get where they’re going in the most direct route possible… bicycles will continue to be ridden on main roads by those brave enough to take the lane…

          Recommended Thumb up 0

        • jered July 28, 2011 at 5:00 pm

          Headed South MLK is a blast to ride, I use to commute to SE Portland and I’d take 7th from alberta to broaday then MLK to morrison, then 7th again after I ran out of downhill speed! Going home I’m wander the backroads between 7th and 12th for fun.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

    • beth h July 28, 2011 at 12:04 pm

      I concur, and not only on the west side.
      It will be instructive — and probably a bit scary — when the east side Streetcar starts running. It’s already become challenging to negotiate the track layout at several spots along MLK and Grand.
      It seems like an awful lot of trouble and expense for a streetcar that’s designed to hold less than a fourth of the number of riders a light-rail car can. Pretty much not a fan of the bicycle-streetcar interface as its been designed.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • OnTheRoad July 28, 2011 at 5:29 pm

        What interface? Seems like the whole streetcar philosophy has been — we’re putting tracks here, on the right hand side of the street where cyclers are, by law, supposed to ride — and you bicyclers find yourselves another route.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Paul Johnson July 28, 2011 at 11:22 pm

          Seems like that would make the next lane to left “as right as practical” if you’re not about to hang a right, then.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • BURR July 27, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    Couplets stink too, and it was beyond stupid to remove bike access from Lovejoy. Much better to have turned Lovejoy into bike and streetcar access only and made the motorists find another way.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Babygorilla July 27, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    Streetcars are not passenger vehicle friendly, whether bike or auto. The city should just buck up and give the streetcar dedicated right of way. At least then it could serve as an efficient transportation choice instead of the sightseeing / property development tool it is now.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • A.K. July 27, 2011 at 4:51 pm

      Yeah, back when I was a student at PSU it was always a bit of a joke that if you walked up to a streetcar stop and it said that the next streetcar was, say, another 14 minutes away, it was faster to just walk into downtown/the pearl than wait for the streetcar.

      If you were going all the way to 23rd, it was less boring to walk along the route until the streetcar finally came (rather than sitting at the stop), which by that time you were already almost to where it turns west-bound in the Pearl.

      The idea is good… but it’s just so slooooooow…

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Martin July 29, 2011 at 7:54 am

        Agree completely. The thing stops at stop signs….who designs a rail system with stop signs in the way?!? Put the stop signs on the cross traffic and let the street car keep moving. Seems so obvious…

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Paul Johnson July 29, 2011 at 12:00 pm

          Stop signs appear on various railroad crossings facing trains at a number of Washington County locations, particularly on MAX tracks (in the alternate direction where there’s often not another signal) and on P&W trackage (particularly on branches near Millikan Way that don’t get used often).

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Rol July 27, 2011 at 3:43 pm

    This area does suck now, both the recommended and not-recommended options. And it’s in a part of town that, generally speaking, is already pretty car-dominated, and so can’t afford to lose points.

    I’m not much of a fan of the streetcar itself either. All these outlandish conveyances, as if we humans didn’t already have the power of independent locomotion!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Chris Smith July 27, 2011 at 3:49 pm

    Note in the picture of the left from 9th onto the ramp that there are some light painted lines where PBOT has experimented with potential guidelines to direct cyclists to cross the tracks at a more perpendicular angle. PBOT would love feedback on the best path to direct cyclists along (I personally think the faint lines represent too sharp an angle for the turn, but I’d love to hear what people think).

    I still hold out hope for Marshall. The Streetcar stop at 10th will to the north side of the intersection this fall, which creates opportunities for a lot of measures on Marshall to improve the situation by reducing auto traffic. Don’t lose faith…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • BURR July 27, 2011 at 4:11 pm

      The best path for cyclists here is the one shown in the photo. What stinks is the streetcar tracks.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • BURR July 27, 2011 at 4:12 pm

        and by that I mean the one being used by the cyclists in the photo.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jessica Roberts July 28, 2011 at 2:09 pm

      Here’s my input: That turn is too sharp for me. The first time I tried to negotiate it I found myself wanting to get on the sidewalk – which I never ever do! – because there was too much going on in too small of a space that required me to make too sharp of a turn across tracks.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • fredlf July 27, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    In my view, the changes here have made this area dangerous and inconvenient. It used to be my main route into NW from NE. Now it is such a pain I just seldom go there unless I have to. When I do go, I just keep using Lovejoy. The alternatives are ridiculous and I’m comfortable bunny-hopping.
    It reminds me of the case where they tried to get students (I forget where) to stop cutting diagonally in a hypotenuse across a lawn and use the existing sidewalks. No matter what signage they erected, or sidewalk furniture and landscaping, people still cut through to go the shortest way. Eventually, they gave up and paved the diagonal. Cyclists are no different than any other traffic. We will take the most direct route.
    I’m in favor of the streetcar, and any other infrastructure that provides freedom of choice for transportation. But this area was very, very badly implemented.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • are July 27, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    not sure why anyone would ride to the right of the tracks on eastbound lovejoy as several of these photos are showing. you have much more control if you assert the travel lane (in this case, between the rails). similarly, it is not strictly necessary to take the turn from 9th onto the ramp at such a shallow angle.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • SV July 27, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    The intersection at 10th & Lovejoy REALLY bugs me, especially as a pedestrian. It is definitely one of those situations where you almost feel like it would be better if no traffic control existed and everyone mushed through at about 8 miles per hour to get where they need to go. The whole area seems just to be far too over engineered. PBOT tried too hard to utilize vehicle-style management tactics onto peds and bicyclists.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • jonno July 28, 2011 at 1:00 pm

      “Over-engineered” could describe the lion’s share of inner Portland road development over the past 5 years or so. Been through Rose Quarter lately? Yeesh. At some point the number of individual vectors through a space just can’t be managed by lights and signs.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • spare_wheel July 27, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    At least then it could serve as an efficient transportation choice instead of the sightseeing / property development tool it is now.


    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Seth Alford July 27, 2011 at 9:50 pm


      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • beth h July 28, 2011 at 12:06 pm


      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:46 pm

      Astute observation.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jim Lee July 27, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    Now for the good news:

    The project to build new streetcars locally is so messed up for various reasons that the new line never will open.

    Then we can just pave over the meatgrinder that Portland Streetcar, Inc., has manufactured and make some really cool cycletracks, like down MLK and up Grand, out of it.

    Chris, dude! Time to abandon THE DARK SIDE OF THE FORCE.

    Luke S.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Seth Alford July 27, 2011 at 9:51 pm

      Where would we get the money to pave over the streetcar tracks? Oh, I know! The money that would have been used to build the CRC.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jon July 28, 2011 at 10:37 am

      They just need to design a good streetcar project, the Eastside Streetcar is poorly designed. Bikes and streetcars (and cobblestones) exist just fine in Copenhagen and Amsterdam.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • David Parsons August 1, 2011 at 10:30 pm

      That’s okay. If Oregon Iron Works can’t produce streetcars, there are plenty of other streetcar manufacturers in the world. And there’s always the three Council Crest replicars to fill in the gaps in the worst case (they aren’t ADA compatable, but they’re better than nothing) while the city scrambles to find a different manufacturer.

      True, this does mean the bicyclists in Portland will end up having to deal with fewer automobiles downtown, but places like Foster Road are still there for the thrill-seekers.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Ted Buehler July 27, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    There’s lots of engineering solutions out there. to
    * direct bikes through redesigned intersections
    * reduce the bumpiness of rail crossings
    * reroute streetcars away from bike traffic areas
    * add stop signs and other traffic control devices to mitigate degraded bicycling conditions where streetcar construction has changed things.
    * design for fewer incursions of cars into bike facilities as they avoid streetcar facilities.

    AROW has brought these up to Portland Streetcar in 2 meetings.

    Portland Streetcar has been very slow to make any concessions or improvements.

    And they have not reviewed their plans to eliminate future incursions into bicycle infrastructure. Just last week they placed a power pole in the sidewalk at the east entrance to the Broadway Bridge, narrowing the path/sidewalk from 7′ to 5′. This was *after* many requests ensure that future construction doesn’t interfere with bicycle facilities.

    The one thing they have done is to eliminate the right hook at Broadway and Larrabee, headed east. This was done a month ago.

    So, I say — complain. Make your voice heard to PBOT. Let them know you bike, you care. You want the bicycle facilities along the streetcar tracks to be “World Class.” That’s what the city promised in the 2030 Bicycle Master Plan.

    The more they hear from constituents, the more mitigation Streetcar construction will need to do to offset degradation to bicycle facilities.

    Ted Buehler

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Schrauf July 27, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    Why would people on bikes use Johnson or Marshall when PBOT has not turned the stop signs, and they have to stop every block for six blocks in a row? THAT is a bike route? Ridiculous – it’s like saying F-You to bikes. The more of us that continue riding Lovejoy in the center of the lane, possibly slowing down cars, the sooner PBOT will decide to improve Johnson/Marshall into actually reasonable alternatives. Just be careful riding Lovejoy – it takes some practice.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • BURR July 27, 2011 at 4:47 pm

      Cyclists shouldn’t have to risk their health and safety to ride Lovejoy, that’s just ridiculous.

      Where is not only PBOT but the BAC and the BTA on this? BAC and BTA are supposed to citizen cyclists looking out for cyclists in general, why are they green lighting these terrible projects?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:45 pm

      Well, PBOT would have to put speed bumps there if they turned stop signs, otherwise you’d have a mini freeway of drivers speeding through there.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Paul Johnson July 28, 2011 at 11:28 pm

        Speed bumps are never the answer when chicanes and choking a street to one lane briefly with curb extensions get the same job done more safely. There’s literally no application where speed bumps are more appropriate than a chicane or chokers in any location they’ve been used by PBOT so far.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • BURR August 2, 2011 at 1:41 pm

          curb extensions force cyclists into traffic. I’d rather have asphalt speed tables than be a human speed bump.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Heather July 27, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    I ride this route almost daily on my bike with a dog trailer. Because of the trailer I take up more room in the bike lane and I’m more paranoid about potential bike vs. car incidents. I’ve had issues coming across the Broadway Bridge from NE. I make the right hand turn down the hill to Lovejoy. From there I take a right onto NW 9th. I often encounter cars that take over the lane or crowd me.

    I’d like to see the entire bike lane on both sides leading up to the bridge painted green. Even more obvious signage would be helpful so that it is absolutely clear that there is a bike lane and that cars are NOT allowed in it. It seems like the solid green paint seems to get people’s attention more than the white line.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • K'Tesh July 27, 2011 at 5:53 pm

    I said it once, I’ll say it again… Install buttons to give motorists that wonderful rumble of “you’re driving in the wrong place” message.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • dwainedibbly July 27, 2011 at 6:07 pm

      Agreed. And not just some whimpy “bots dots” reflectors, either. Make ’em some big honkin’ “half-a watermelon” things. Either that, or raise the bike lane several inches.

      If there’s a streetcar track on a one-way, two lane road, I take the left lane. If I can’t do that, I ride between the rails so that I don’t get pinched by the platform.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • fw July 27, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    A couple months ago, for the first time in over a year I needed to ride over the Broadway from NW. I found myself trapped on Lovejoy b/c I hadn’t known about the changes, i.e. removal of bike lanes.

    On my way home I knew that I should no longer take Lovejoy, but wasn’t sure which street was now the designated bike-way. I guessed and found Marshall. Now I know better.

    Diverting bikes onto Marshall or Lovejoy is SO much slower. Maybe 7-10 min slower than when I used to take Lovejoy.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Bjorn July 27, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    I destroyed a front wheel last summer during the construction because of a confusing bike detour sign that directed me straight into a trench where lovejoy meets broadway. Ever since I just avoid the broadway bridge, it didn’t seem worth the danger to ride around there during the construction and I haven’t gone back.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Paul Johnson July 27, 2011 at 8:02 pm

    Anybody else notice the cyclist entering a street in the wrong direction, nearly mowing down a pedestrian in the crosswalk while doing so?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Mike July 28, 2011 at 9:10 am

      It’s ok. He’s on a bike! Everyone knows bicycles cause less damage than automobiles and therefore riders shouldn’t be held accountable to laws or courtesy.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • are July 28, 2011 at 10:27 am

        the cyclist in the photo is using a sidewalk rather than the street. not my preferred course, but the subject of the photo essay is that conditions on lovejoy are causing some cyclists to make less than optimal decision.


        in the photo, the cyclist is stopped and has a foot on the ground. he is not “nearly mowing down” anyone.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Oliver July 28, 2011 at 9:54 am

      “During my observations, many people rode both east and west on NW Lovejoy, despite the dangerous and awkward traffic conditions it put them in.”

      Yeah, the author noticed it.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • esther c July 27, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    I go this route occasionally in my car and it sucks in a car too. Its one way on lovejoy off the bridge so you have to turn right and go up Marshall which sucks because its a bike boulevard which I don’t like to ride on.

    I wish they’d taken all that streetcar money and used it to improve max service and bus stops in the outer areas. I really feel like the whole point of the streetcar isn’t to improve transportation in the downtown area but to help developers sell real estate.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:41 pm

      You may have a point there. Tourists (potential condo purchasers) are impressed by the streetcar.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • jim July 27, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    This whole lovejoy project is just one big giant cluster@#%*&
    If they wanted to make the street one way it should have been westbound since this is the road that goes directly to the hospital. Trying to get to the hospital now is just awful.
    They obviously didn’t put a lot of thout into bicyle safety in this project either.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Seth Alford July 27, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    Ted Buehler
    There’s lots of engineering solutions out there. to
    * direct bikes through redesigned intersections
    * reduce the bumpiness of rail crossings

    Ted Buehler

    Got links to pictures of these, or examples of where they have been installed locally? About the only design I have seen that seems to offer a reasonable measure of safety is where there is sufficient space to cross at right angles with the hard rubber crossing of the tracks. There’s an example of this on 5th, west of the intersection of 5th and Griffith, in Beaverton. Even there, though, they only have one on the north side of the tracks.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • eli July 27, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    Why are the bike lanes on the car side of the concrete dividers on the ramp?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • maxadders July 27, 2011 at 10:47 pm

    Apparently the tracks plus white line confuses drivers. Maybe we need to cover the entire bike lane from the top of the ramp on down with the green “Bike Box” material to make things more obvious?

    I haven’t commuted via this route since 2008, but even then, drivers would routinely encroached into the bike lane on the descent. I can only imagine that adding streetcar tracks to the mix has made the issue worse.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:38 pm

      Like the green paint would stop them.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Martin July 29, 2011 at 8:07 am

      I agree with previous posters that bumps on the white line would be effective at alerting auto driver not to cross.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • are July 29, 2011 at 9:18 am

        since i ride without reference to the placement of the white line, sometimes but not always to the left of the line, it would probably create a hazard for me to have bumps placed on it. there should not be a striped bike lane on this ramp, at least downhill. if there are pavement markings, they should be sharrows.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Paul Johnson July 29, 2011 at 12:04 pm

          Try not riding on the lane line, then, and pick a lane like the law requires…

          Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Paul Johnson July 29, 2011 at 12:03 pm

        This should be a standard feature anyway, given most road markings turn invisible when wet here.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Charley July 27, 2011 at 11:33 pm

    Put those plastic poles up right on the white Bike Lane thermoplastic. Once the driver goes THWAP-THWAP-THWAP a few times, they’ll stay out of the bike lane. Then again, you can hardly blame them- driving on the tracks is so bad for steering control. You’d think with all the money this cost, they could have placed the track in such a way that it wouldnt’ necessitate driving in the bike lane.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Paul Johnson July 28, 2011 at 2:56 pm

      You don’t have to drive out of the lane to avoid driving on the tracks. Notice the Kia Soul next to the streetcar platform in the pics.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • bumblebee July 28, 2011 at 6:57 am

    It has been interesting to note that while many people claim to enjoy cycling, they seem awfully anxious to make their commute as short as possible, either by traveling at breakneck speed or eliminating a few turns and stop signs. Cycling to and from work is the best part of my day. If I have to extend it by 7-10 minutes, so be it!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • spare_wheel August 3, 2011 at 3:09 pm

      I deeply apologize for wanting to get from point A to B (efficiently). I momentarily forgot that the main purpose of riding a bike is to sloooow down, reeelaaaax, smell the roses, breathe the fresh air, meditate, and get high on life.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Paul Johnson August 3, 2011 at 3:14 pm

        Pretty sure you’re confusing walking with cycling. Cycling is supposed to be faster for essentially the same price as walking, or why even bother with the bicycle?

        Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Spiffy July 28, 2011 at 7:34 am

    it’s hard to tell from the pics but it looks like on the bridge the tracks are properly recessed just slightly so that cars don’t “wander” unintentionally… the ones on Lovejoy look like they’re raised a little out of the pavement surface… but it just might be the pics…

    the lane is too narrow on the bridge for cars not to veer into the bike lane… anywhere the travel lane is narrow motor vehicle encroach into the bike lane, even when there aren’t tracks… this is especially bad on bus routes where the bus drives right on the bike lane stripe to avoid being close to the center lane and oncoming traffic…

    I agree that they should install some hearty non-bots-dots style bumps on the bike lane stripe to keep people from driving on it… especially if it’s now wide enough to allow bikes to pass each other without leaving the lane…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • RRRoubaix July 28, 2011 at 7:57 am

    I take this route whenever I ride home from work (not as often as I’d like), roughly once a week. PBOT really dropped the ball- this is a shitty commuting path. I go down Lovejoy to 9th, and the lane-straddling is always an issue. I don’t continue on Lovejoy anymore, since it’s SO bike-unfriendly, now I take Johnson and it’s countless stopsigns.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • 9watts July 28, 2011 at 8:04 am

    I’m probably missing something obvious, but why would a car straddle the tracks at all? What is the logic behind that? In a bike I know very well why I keep my tires away from the (parallel) tracks, but in a car?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • A.K. July 28, 2011 at 8:50 am

      I don’t understand either. I’ve driven on streetcar tracks hundreds of times. I think people don’t like that their wheels have a slight “back and forth play” feeling that is translated through to the steering wheel while on the slick track as opposed to textured asphalt. But if you pay attention its not an issue, it doesn’t send your car off in another direction or anything.

      I think the people are just being overly cautious/weird…

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • single track July 28, 2011 at 8:27 am

    the lane needs to be elevated, separated, or at the very least painted green. This will at least deal with the straddling in this ONE location. PBOT needs to have someone looking at their master plan when developing this condo piggy bank infrastructure.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Slate July 28, 2011 at 8:47 am

    Crossing the tracks to head up to the bridge is terribly dangerous, add any water and it’s a near certain accident. The angle across the track is bad- I crashed and watched two others go down here. It needs to be addressed.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Winnie Ruth July 28, 2011 at 9:36 am

    I don’t usually have a reason to turn right off the Bway Bridge but on Saturday night I was headed up 11th so I decided to go that way. Big mistake. I’m glad to know by reading this blog that I was supposed to take Marshall to get west. There sure wasn’t any signs for the new bike route.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Jon July 28, 2011 at 10:27 am

    I’m a streetcar rider, pedestrian and cyclist and I hate it. This is a huge mistake on all fronts, and its bad for everyone regardless of mode. Thanks for addressing Lovejoy, this is a huge peeve of mine. There was absolutely no public process for this, it was decided in secret with only the Pearl District Neighborhood Assoc.

    NW Lovejoy should have remained two-way 2 lane with bike lanes just as it was. This would have also allowed the streetcar tracks to be located in the center of the street and therefore not have to clip the corners so much at 10th/Lovejoy to accommodate its wide turning radius. What we have now is a suburban street design with no-stop right turn lanes that are very dangerous for pedestrians crossing.

    NW Marshall was supposed to be a slow lightly traveled bikeway, now it has a stream of cars going westbound. NW 10th/Marshall intersection is extremely dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists trying to cross NW 10th as motorist speed through the intersection on NW 10th blindly turning onto NW Marshall. Very very few motorists use NW Northrup to go West. The traffic light at NW 10th & Northrup has the longest wait and there is never any traffice there so you wait there forever to make a left turn (especially delaying the streetcar). The cobblestones on NW Marshall were removed for smooth bike lanes which ticks me off that one of the few remaining cobblestone streets was destroyed. Now this smoothed surface which benefits bikes has the added benefit of speeding up motor vehicles on Marshall which have dramatically increased in huge numbers thanks to this incompetently designed couplet. We had traffic calming on NW Marshall with the cobblestones and it was mostly removed. It was a surprise to everyone when ‘No Parking’ signs appeared a year ago on NW Marshall saying “Cobblestone Removal” and destruction beginning a few days later.

    The removal of bike lanes on Lovejoy means that the travel lanes are an additional 5 feet wide, so now we have 16-17 ft wide travel lanes through the heart of the Pearl which encourages speeding. And speeds have increased and motorists are gunning it as soon as they get past 14th at the beginning of the one-way and are weaving between lanes to maintain high speeds between 14th and the bridge.

    The new streetcar stop at 9th/Lovejoy should have been built like the one at 13th/Lovejoy (which has the bike lane decommissioned).

    The whole routing is confusing coming off the Broadway Bridge with cyclists supposed to be using 9th and motorists 10th. The streetcar route into the Pearl coming off the Broadway Bridge is ridiculous that it heads north 2 blocks before heading south into Downtown. Now the streetcar tracks have preserved this whole traffic configuration for generations.

    This whole redesign is a complete failure, this is something one might have expected in 1953. To do this in 2010-11 in Portland is tragic and unacceptable.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Unit July 28, 2011 at 4:38 pm

      I wonder if this is the result of planning by committee?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Opus the Poet July 28, 2011 at 10:31 am

    OK the number of incursions seems to be sufficient that a barrier of somekind would be appropriate to protect the bike lane, like reflectored “turtle” lane markers.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:34 pm

      tire spikes

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Dabby July 28, 2011 at 10:42 am

    Street cars are lame, slow, outdated, and in the way of actual progress.

    Not to mention the tracks we do not need are on the roads we need for cycling.


    Tear out the street car tracks!
    OH wait, we did that already.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:34 pm

      Max good. Streetcar not so good. I can definitely get there faster by walking.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • roger noehren July 28, 2011 at 10:54 am

    This is an excellent photo-essay! Thank you Jonathan for covering this so assiduously.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • esther c July 28, 2011 at 11:29 am

    How many signaled crosswalks could they have put in for low income people trying to cross 82nd Ave and Division street out in the hinterlands for the cost of these streetcars?

    How much would they have saved if they’d made them run on electric overhead cables and wheels instead of tracks?

    But it wasn’t about providing and improving transportation. It was about selling real estate.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Unit July 28, 2011 at 4:40 pm

      They can’t install signals on 82nd. ODOT would never allow it. Look at how much was invested in the 82nd Avenue project and all they ended up with was 5 crossing islands. Better to avoid wasting $$$ on ODOT roads until ODOT comes out of the 1960s.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • NoPo Matt July 28, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    I take Lovejoy into town and turn left onto 9th and then head up to NW via Johnson. It’s anarchy trying to turn left. I can tell you that 4 out of 5 times I ignore the “Copengahen left” and just cross over the tracks while on the ramp so I’m in the left turn lane. The only exception is when there are cars running parallel down the ramp, but this happens less often than I’d expect. Part of the reason the turn island isn’t great is that there’s just not much room to turn your bike 90 degrees. I feel safer crossing the tracks than I do stopping my bike with cars from the north on 9th jocking for position on a right turn and cars from lovejoy whizzing by. So I take my chances crossing the tracks (and I’ve noticed at least half of bikes turning left do this). I don’t have road tires, I have a hybrid bike, so I haven’t had any problems. But it’s far from optimal.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Jocelyn August 2, 2011 at 10:41 pm

      I do the same, every day, on my hybrid bike. Since the Copenhagen left went in I think I’ve used it once. I’ve never encountered enough car traffic there to keep me from changing lanes and crossing the tracks to the turn lane. I am super aware, though, as I do it, that I’m crossing those tracks — I agree, it’s far from optimal.

      Because I don’t use it, I can’t speak to the feeling of safety (or lack thereof) in the turn box. I have to admit that I don’t use it because I find it annoying and it slows me down — and also because it’s always appeared optional to me. Does a Copenhagen left supersede a regular left?

      And for that matter, when making a right off of the B’way Bridge westbound onto Lovejoy, am I ruled only by the bike signal? Am I being a jerk when I make that right without stopping on a green arrow/red bike signal?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • 007 July 28, 2011 at 8:32 pm

    Have commuted by bike here since 1996. Lovejoy has been ruined, in fact, the whole area there is ruined for biking IMHO.
    NE 7th Ave where the new rails have been installed near Multnomah is not going to be fun. I can see it already… cars driving in the bike lane. Another bikeway ruined. Two steps forward, one back.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Martin July 29, 2011 at 7:33 am

    I ride in this area and it is my primary route to and from NE portland. The changes make it more dangerous for bikes. I think travelling on the sidewalk for 2-3 blocks is much faster than going up to marshall, so thats what I do now. Or perhaps riding in one of the left car lanes which dont have tracks in them.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • yoyossarian July 29, 2011 at 8:07 am

    A lot of people on here talk about the streetcar like a few loud people in Clackamas talk about the MAX. Have any of you ever seen how crowded the streetcar is all day? Maybe how many elderly riders use it? How many people use it to commute to work from the Pearl/NW to downtown and OHSU? Yeah, it’s way slower than biking but not everyone wants to bike. Saying it’s faster than walking is true for short distances, but try beating it from NW 23rd to downtown and you’re going to lose by long shot.

    I’m not defending the horrible street design they put in on Lovejoy, but a lot of these observations about the streetcar are overblown. Plus, worst case scenario and it is a tool for developers, then we get more close in dense development East of the river. Better to spend energies making sure development adequately accomodates lower income, or at least the average Portlander, and not exclusively the wealthy.

    A lesson we could all learn from this is to put a lot of pressure on the inclusion of bike infrastructure in the next streetcar project. It seems given the huge expense of these things they could include some pretty decked out features for bike riders as part of the overall plan, with relatively little extra money tacked on. Hating on a semi-permanent piece of non-automobile transportation structure in a dense urban core seems a bit regressive to me.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • esther c July 29, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    Yes, I’ve used the streetcar and seen that it was jam packed. But wouldn’t a trackless electric trolley work just as well?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • OnTheRoad August 1, 2011 at 11:25 am

      I’ve asked that before and the talking point answer is that the nearby property owners (who are being dinged with a special assessment for streetcar development) want assurance that the line is going to stay put. Too easy to reroute a trolleybus.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Seth Alford July 29, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    I agree with previous posters that bumps on the white line would be effective at alerting auto driver not to cross.

    The bumps would alert drivers to not wander into the bike lane. But, think about the next snowstorm. Then think about the gravel they put down for traction for motorists. Then, think about what happens the next week, after the snow melts. Where is the gravel then? In shoals in the bike lane. With your bumps, now not only do I have to deal with the gravel, but to avoid it I have to deal with the bumps, too. No bumps, please.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Paul Johnson July 29, 2011 at 6:17 pm

      If there’s gravel in the bicycle lane, riding on the lane line isn’t the answer, so what does it matter if it’s bumpy?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Martin August 1, 2011 at 5:03 pm

      I agree there may be unintended consequences that would need to be considered, but they have similar cement bumps between MAX tracks and car lanes throughout downtown to prevent cars from driving on the max tracks.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Steven M July 29, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    I really wish the city would stop getting funding for these trollys to nowhere. I mean that one into SE, really! It goes along a string of empty stores and warehouses. Next it’ll be coming to inner SE! PLEASE NO!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • David Parsons August 2, 2011 at 9:27 am

      I believe that the idea is to *not* have rows of vacant storefronts along MLK/Grand. If the city can slow down traffic through there (and provide decent mass transit in the process) it’s more likely that those storefronts will get occupants again.

      Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Seth Alford July 29, 2011 at 6:06 pm

    I’m a streetcar rider, pedestrian and cyclist and I hate it. This is a huge mistake on all fronts, and its bad for everyone regardless of mode. .. Now the streetcar tracks have preserved this whole traffic configuration for generations.

    Exactly why street cars are a Bad Idea. Buses go where there are roads. If we don’t like where they are going, we can have them go on different roads. We should be looking at hybrid buses that operate on diesel, catenary, or battery, depending on what’s available.

    My comments on rail-based transit from 2 years ago still apply. See

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • carrie July 30, 2011 at 10:58 am

    Just took a fall in the streetcar tracks the other day — I knew it was a bad idea taking that route, I was being especially careful around the tracks and I STILL got caught up in them! Lesson learned. I’ll be finding a different route from now on.

    I do appreciate what the Streetcar lines bring to the city, and I agree with some comments above that it’s time to incorporate bike lane planning along with the new streetcar lines.

    In the meantime, stay safe around those slick tracks!

    Recommended Thumb up 0

    • jim August 1, 2011 at 7:56 pm

      It sounds like the tracks are bad for both bikes and cars.
      Who really wanted the tracks anyways? Are these so the people living in the lofts can ride the little trolly to the blazer games? Were the buses not good enough? It seems like a lot of money spent that isn’t going to make any of our lives any better. The bus system was just fine (except for the drunks…). What would happen if we were to vote on these projects before they were built? I’m just not so sure this was a top priority. Perhaps a bikeway on Foster would have been better?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • Paul Johnson August 2, 2011 at 5:34 pm

        It should be noted that there was no bus service along any of the existing or currently under construction streetcar routes.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

        • OnTheRoad August 3, 2011 at 9:49 am

          MLK and Grand (now under streetcar construction) has the No. 6 busline.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Chris Smith August 3, 2011 at 10:05 am

          In NW, portions of the streetcar line also overlap the #15 and #17. There are other overlaps in downtown.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Chris Smith August 3, 2011 at 10:05 am

          Sorry, meant #77, not #17

          Recommended Thumb up 0

          • jonno August 3, 2011 at 10:42 am

            Chris –

            I ride the #77 to work from NW to Lloyd District frequently. Do you know if there are plans afoot to kill parallel service once the streetcar goes online? Because I checked the map and this would require a transfer to go the same distance on streetcar. Thanks!

            Recommended Thumb up 0

          • Chris Smith August 3, 2011 at 10:52 am

            No, the only bus line under discussion at all is the #6 and that discussion appears to be limited to whether there is a better way to bring it into downtown than going all the way to the Hawthorne bridge once the streetcar is providing service on MLK/Grand since a primary purpose of the #6 is to bring folks from N/NE Portland into downtown.

            Recommended Thumb up 0

  • lyle August 1, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    Going from 405 east to the Broadway bridge on Lovejoy is complete insanity. Never again. I started the climb up to the bridge after going through that crap, turned my head around and all you could do is just shake it. Never again.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • David Johnson August 3, 2011 at 5:07 pm

    Took a tumble on NW Lovejoy today. I have not been down there for a while and I did not realize that the bike land was not there (leant that from this thread), though from the road markings it looked as though it was. At a narrow section between the sidewalk and the streetcar tracks (photo above in Jon’s article) I thought I was safe of the tracks, but the next thing I knew my back wheel went from under me and I slid a short distance hitting the back of a parked van. The driver got out to see what was going on and another guy came up to check that I was OK and he said that he had seen a couple of similar accidents there.

    Bike was fine, and I just scraped a knee & have pulled a muscle. Took the sidewalk for the rest of the wat to the Broadway Bridge. Will look to use Marshall next time (or some other route), but don’t like the look of that turn up onto the bridge over the tracks.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Pieter August 3, 2011 at 6:06 pm

    It’s difficult not to be mad about this.
    On one hand, it’s not the cities job to coddle people and make everything perfectly safe. Life is better for everyone when it is a little bit dangerous, when common sense is the rule. On the other hand, the city has made a huge mess of the area.
    1) Turning Lovejoy into a one way was a terrible idea as the situation now proves.
    2) Whoever suggested digging up the cobble on Marshall St should be banished to Phoenix, AZ or Culver City, CA for twenty years. That cobble is irreplacable. It’s a shame we let that be done, a shame.

    Recommended Thumb up 0