Support BikePortland

Salem Watch: Bike signal bill passes House committee

Posted by on May 2nd, 2011 at 12:06 pm

SB 130 would make these official.
(Photo © J. Maus)

Senate Bill 130 (text), which would add bicycle-only signals to Oregon’s list of traffic control devices, passed out of the House Committee on Transportation and Economic Development on Friday.

SB 130 passed the full Senate back in February and it’s now poised for a House vote and eventual passage into law.

Paul Mather, a highway division administrator for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), testified on behalf of the bill on Friday. In response to a question from Committee Chair Rep. Cliff Bentz about what benefits the bill might have for automobile drivers, Mathers said,

“The benefits for the driver would be more predictability in intersections… By having a separated, dedicated signal, we’re able to stop the cyclists and have motorists move through the intersection without worrying about what cyclists may or may not be doing… and of course vice/versa.”

In addition to improved safety, having bicycle-only signals officially in state statute would make it easier (legally) for police officers to actually enforce violations of the signals (a $287 fine if you were wondering).

In addition to ODOT, SB 130 has strong backing from the City of Portland Bureau of Transportation.

SB 130 passed the Senate by a vote of 28-1. With no objections or serious concerns about the bill in House committee, it’s likely the bill will also pass the House.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
Peter KoonceTomJakeHmmmmkeepontrekin Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Borgbike
Guest

How about a little yellow trangular-shaped yield sign to be put under certain stop signs, allowing bicycles to yield at some intersections?

are
Guest

how about full scale yield signs at most of the neighborhood intersections that now have two-way stops

Dave Thomson
Guest
Dave Thomson

Jonathan, did you mean “poised for a House vote” in the second paragraph?

Seeing Green
Guest

Do you know if Oregon is the only state to use bike-only traffic signals? Also, I wish the signals could be a bit larger. The bike is too small.

Peter Koonce
Guest
Peter Koonce

The state of California has used them and the indications are described in their Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

keepontrekin
Guest
keepontrekin

Seriously? How much will this cost? How about bicyclists just obey traffic laws like were supposed to?!
At least make the bike lights a triangular shape (so theyre different than normal traffic lights) and make them LED not halogen or incadescent.

Peter Koonce
Guest
Peter Koonce

The costs are fairly minor ($1,000-$5,000 depending on the situation) when you have an existing traffic signal.

Hmmmm
Guest
Hmmmm

I think they are completely unnecessary. Total waste of taxpayer money. Wow.

Jake
Guest
Jake

Melbourne, Australia has these and I love them. Makes riding in the city a bit safer for sure. Doesn’t stop me from rolling reds every once in a while (i.e. no traffic situations), but for the busy parts of town they’re a necessity.

Tom
Guest
Tom

Many places in Asia (China for instance) use a much simpler system with zero added infrastructure.

Green: all vehicles go
1st Yellow: prepare to stop all vehicles
Red: All vehicles stop – bikes go to front, essentially like Portland’s bike boxes
2nd Yellow: bikes only go, motor vehicles wait
Green: all vehicles go