Harvest Century September 22nd

Is Senator McCain playing politics with bike parking?

Posted by on August 16th, 2010 at 12:30 pm

Does Senator John McCain (R-AZ) hate bicycles? Or is he just using them to make a political statement? According to the League of American Bicyclists, the recently passed jobs bill included several things that could impact bicycling (including $2 billion in rescissions from state DOTs), including a reauthorization of the Federal Aviation program which increases the Passenger Facilities Charge.

For some reason, Senator John McCain (“rather spitefully” according to the League), inserted a provision into the bill that specifically prohibits using those funds to pay for bicycle parking at airports. The League says they weren’t able to strip it out and adds, “We’re not sure what the motivation could possibly be for this action.” Me neither.

Here’s more from the AASHTO Journal:

Bicycle Funding Ban Amendment Approved

An amendment adopted by the Senate to the FAA bill would prohibit airports from using passenger facility charge revenue to build bike storage facilities.

The amendment was offered by Sen. John McCain, R-AZ, and approved by unanimous consent as part of a manager’s package.

“Most airline passengers would agree with me that they would rather see more improvements to ensure faster travel times and safer departures and arrivals,” McCain said on the Senate floor.

That provision is also likely to be debated during a conference committee with the House as several key representatives, including House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman James Oberstar, D-MN, are major supporters of bicycling.

“This is just providing another mode of transportation option to people who travel to and from the airport,” said Oberstar spokesman Jim Berard. He noted bike parking racks at airports are especially useful given the nation’s emphasis on reducing the use of fossil fuels.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

5 Comments
  • Avatar
    Richard Masoner August 16, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    Admittedly, bike facilities at airports isn’t high on my priorities list, but McCain’s amendment that micromanages at the Federal level how money is spent at the project level is inane.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    Kathleen McDade August 16, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    Too many politicians (and they do tend to be conservative/Republican) are still convinced that bicycles=recreation, not transportation. See also Jim DeMint.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    Steven Vance August 16, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    That’s okay for Midway Airport, as there are 75+ bike parking spaces (sheltered, too) at the Chicago Transit Authority Orange Line station.

    O’Hare actually has a couple of interior spaces at the CTA Blue Line station. And some spaces at the far away parking lot. But you have to train it in – supposedly you’re not allowed to bike on airport roads.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    John Murphy August 17, 2010 at 10:56 am

    The most important reason to have bike parking at Airports is for employees. I guess that’s not a “passenger facility”, but this is bizarre micromanagement as Richard says. Why is this being dealt with at the Senate level.

    McCain is from Arizona – perhaps he thinks those racks will be used by people who work at the Airport who don’t have a lot of money and have a little extra color in their skin.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    Spiffy August 24, 2010 at 10:23 am

    somehow I don’t think the amount to be spent on bike parking will come anywhere close to the expense of pretty much anything else at an airport…

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar