Politico: Blumenauer, Oberstar on short-list for Transportation Secretary

Blumenauer would be a shame in some ways. He would give up a lot of hard earned seniority and committee seats, and would be replaced with a Junior representative.

But I have met Blumenauer a couple times, and he has presented a few times at some transportation events I have attended – I think he would make a fine Transportation secretary.

Following the Politico article… I would also say Kitzhaber could possibly get Secretary of Health and Human Services, since Daschle will likely be White House Chief of Staff and they probably won’t pull Howard Dean off the DNC chair, since his 50 state strategy appears to be working. Go Team Oregon.

Right that, eileen. And turn in your freaking ballots!

Blumenauer in then Novick as his replacement.
Win-Win

I dont think we have seen the last of mr novick. thankfully. a new administration will provide the opportunity for a lot of marginalized and out of power guys.

Its not just bikes. Getting our country off the oil tit, and rebuilding the infastructure to insure that transit is a right, not a dream.

building the 20 minute communities. its not gonna be cheap,but it will provide a huge economic incentive, and will do more for the long term economic survival of our country.

Barf. The law states that when a president lies and breaks the law he should be impeached. It does not state Earl should not impeach because it is not yet strategic. Earl cut a deal with the blood of civilians in the middle East. This is not a good strategy we should ever wish to repeat. Open your minds folks, this is sick politics!

I would be happy with Blumenauer or Oberstar in that position. Along with the Kitzhaber at Health & Human Services, I also noticed the nod towards Schwarzenegger as Energy secretary. the more I think about it, the more I like it. Meaningful national fuel efficiency standards modeled on what California tried to do before Bush sicked the big dogs on them – take that, GM!

Better to send Earl to Iraq where he can rebuild the roads and bridges he has helped to destroy. Sitting in one of the best districts to support impeachment efforts, Earl has bought the Pelosi koolaid, probably to improve his chances at a cabinet position. He didn’t get my vote for District #3, and he won’t get my vote for a D.C. post.

Blumenauer’s deceit is part of a more general DP attempt to support Republican hegemoney while maintaining “anti-war” credibility.

Earl and most of Pelosico are security risks for America because of their their open-ended support for U.S.-Israel crimes, which inflames the Arab/Muslim world, and which therefore makes future attacks on us far more likely. Their enthusiasm for neoliberal economics, including trade deals that are opposed by most liberal activists, further endanger our country as well as the rest of the world.

Blumenauer has failed to support Kucinich in his attempt to convince Pelosi to prevent “emergency” spending bills from coming out of committee. He has further failed to call for his buddy Wyden and the rest of the DP senators to filibuster those spending bills. And, possibly most egregious of all, he has actively blocked the third way to effectively end the occupations: impeachment of the war criminals who rule our country. Insread, he is an apologist for those who commit crimes against humanity.

There’s more.

Earl supported the Israeli destruction in Lebanon not only in his votes of support for Israeli crimes, but in his failure to support a cease-fire after a vicious attack that Seymour Hersh and others reported had been in the planning for more than a year prior (I’ve got references for this). PIPA has found that “No country favors taking Israel’s side, including the United States, where 71 percent favor taking neither side.”

Earl has never apologized for his vote in favor of H.J. Res. 64, “Authorization for Use of Military Force”, which gave Bush authority to single-handedly conduct war against unspecified nations, organizations, or persons for an unspecified duration in ’01. He claims that he voted only for an attack on Afghanistan – bad enough, since the Afghan people were not responsible for any attack on us – but Barbara Lee spoke for me when she clearly announced that H.J. Res. 64 was a prescription for cencentrated dictatorial power. So Earl’s “opposition” to the authorization in ’03 was too late to prevent Bush from doing what he already was authorized to do by Earl.

Earl refused to support the McGovern Amendment, part of the Declaration of Peace, which would have cut off Iraq funding. (He issued the equivalent of a Bush “signing statement”, claiming to be for peace, but only if no effective way of enforcing it were enacted.)

He weaseled out of supporting progressive legislation on the occupation last year (H.R. 508, which required the withdrawal from Iraq of “all U.S. Armed Forces and contractor security forces within six months”), instead presenting his own H.R. 663 (“New Direction for Iraq Act”), a masterfully constructed bit of fluff.

In a debate I had online with a Blumenauer operative, “Bobby” claimed, “‘The only times [Blumenauer] supported any funding was for fully funded withdrawls, that is, when there were hard and fast end dates attached.'” I answered, “There were no “hard and fast end dates attached.” Go back and read the wording of the non-binding resolutions and weasel-worded supplementals that Earl supported, e.g.:

Earl voted YES on 3/23/07 on Vote 186: H R 1591:Prohibited the use of funds to deploy any troops to Iraq unless the military had “certified” to congressional appropriators in advance that the military unit is fully mission-capable. The measure authorized the president to waive the prohibition and deployment limits on a unit-by-unit basis for reasons of national security.

Earl voted YES on 4/25/07 on Vote 265: H R 1591: $124.2 billion. Bush had to “certify” that the Iraqi government was meeting certain diplomatic and security benchmarks. If that certification were made, deployment would begin no later than Oct. 1, 2007, with a goal of completing the redeployment by within 180 days. Some U.S. forces could remain in Iraq for special counterterrorism efforts along with protection, training and equipping Iraqi troops. In other words, all “benchmarks” approved by Earl gave Bush the choice to say whether or not they’ve been met, and then to say that “special” troops could remain.

Earl voted YES on 11/14/07 on Vote 1108: H R 4156: Set a goal for Bush to begin “redeploying” (another weasel word) U.S. troops.” When did Earl ever vote for significant cuts in our obscenely bloated Pentagon budget? (Or any cuts at all?) Earl is not a member of the Progressive Caucus, so even he doesn’t believe that he is a progressive.

Vote for Meo.

You guys are way too harsh on blumenauer. I don’t think it is affair to assume his motivations in voting for the funding while opposing the war. Soldiers were being sent over there, but not being provided adequate supplies. It’s a tough spot. In my view, Earl is one of the few politicians who seems to make his own decisions and I honestly think he tries to do what’s right. In fact, if anything, his idealism might make him less effective. I don’t know him personally so it could be my own wishful thinking and that I have an affinity for bowties.

Eileen, you stated he makes his own decisions. Not true. Earl is a lap dog of Nancy and lobbyists and will only reflect on decisions that are easy or popular. When it comes to tough issues he is vague or silent and will not justify his inaction nor dialog with protesters. Examples: Failure to support a cease fire and peace in Lebanon 2006, Impeachment protesters, Free trade in Peru. He is hired to be a security guard of checks and balances. He refused to use the one tool that would work to stop the illegal war and war profiteering. Impeachment may have saved 1/2 million lives in the Middle East, and even if impeachment failed, it is his duty to try and use the tool. It is sick that he’s promoted for being so inactive. He talks so tough about Bush but took no worthwhile action.

I quote:
“has refused to comment publicly on how he will vote”
http://pcasc.net/Blumenauer-SitIn/

Looks like neither Earl nor Oberstar is getting the appointment. Word is that Obama has offered the position to Illinois Republican Ray LaHood:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aFgLnWGOe1nc&refer=home

Not sure what his stand on biking is.