Video, witness, reveal more about Taser incident

“He was definitely making a racket and making it loud intentionally… he was trying to get people’s attention.”
— John Henry Dale, a witness to the Phil Sano Tasing incident

On Tuesday night, 31 year-old John Henry Dale was waiting for a bus at SE 7th and Morrison when he heard screaming and the buzzing of Tasers.

Looking north, he noticed a bike in the road and two police officers surrounding Phil Sano. Once Dale realized what was going on, he pulled out his cell phone and started recording.

Dale captured the incident just after the Tasing had stopped.

Dale’s video is below. You can’t see much, but the screams of Phil Sano cut sharply through the footage.

The only words I could make out were,

“You’re knee is in my f***ing neck and that’s wrong!… This is ridiculous… You’re jackasses… I dropped to my knees and begged, I begged and then you both f***ing shot me… it’s terrible… this is f***ing ridiculous.”

Dale says it was clear that Sano made his protestations loud on purpose. “He was definitely making a racket and making it loud intentionally… he was trying to get people’s attention,” recalled Dale. He added, “Once he had gotten pulled down, if he wanted to end it as quickly as possible, he would have made less of a fuss.”

But Dale also feels that it was a good thing Sano screamed so loudly, “because it’s pretty messed that the cops were using Tasers.” Dales feels that Tasers should not be used for that kind of interaction. “No matter how much noise he’s making, this is just messed up.”

Here is Dale’s footage:

[If anyone can make out more of what Sano said (a professional linguist perhaps?), please feel free to share in the comments.]

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car owner and driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, feel free to contact me at @jonathan_maus on Twitter, via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a supporter.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

57 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Captain Kirk
Captain Kirk
15 years ago

Sweet Jesus, this just gets more interesting. Dear Lord, please call me up for jury duty on this one!

tonyt
tonyt
15 years ago

If I had just gotten inappropriately tased, I think I\’d want passersby to hear what I had to say, and as happened here, hopefully attract the attention of someone with a recording device.

If nothing else, it might make the cops wary of lying about what I said for fear that witnesses would contradict them.

I imagine that the cops have already filed their reports as to what was said. It would be interesting to see if their written versions and this recording match up.

toddistic
toddistic
15 years ago

he\’s on the other side of the street! if some cop yelled at me from across the street i\’d have no idea he was talking to me.

DJ Hurricane
DJ Hurricane
15 years ago

They recognized him from previous incidents, knew he had made the PPB look bad (rightfully so) in the past, and wanted a little revenge. They got it. And they\’ll get away with it.

On a related note, I\’m adding a new Pedalpalooza ride today: The PPB Body Count Ride. It will visit all the sites where the PPB has killed people over the years. Bring extra water, it\’ll be a long one…

Russ
Russ
15 years ago

I know they made \”Don\’t tase me bro!\” tee shirts, and Andrew Meyer was a pussy unlike Phil. I think therefore Phil deserves a tee shirt too. The proceeds might cover any legal or alcohol expenses he\’ll incur from getting beat down by these guys.

How about: \”I\’m being assaulted by two JACKASSES!\”

toddistic
toddistic
15 years ago

I definately would support Phil through a t-shirt/spoke card fundraiser. Hopefully something can get setup with the proceeds going to his legal fund.

Spencer
Spencer
15 years ago

It is interesting to note how he was still able to yell with a cops knee in his throat. I don\’t think I could have had enough of an air way to yell as loudly.

Also, interesting was how quiet the cops were relative to phil. They don\’t sound supper pissed and irrational.

Hillsons
Hillsons
15 years ago

The video is so long that it\’s very apparent that a lot left out of the original witness reports. This is very interesting to watch play out.

Diogo
Diogo
15 years ago

You know, I find it strange and sad that there is this underlining presumption in people´s head that you should´t make a fuss out of it. \”No matter how much noise he was making\” (as if making noise and trying to get attention was wrong in this case).

This mentality for me is analogous to the old one that used to condemn women who came forward when they were sexually abused ou harassed – like \”oh, you are making too much of a biG deal out of it\”.

I think that the moment a cop (or anyone for that matter) unjustifiably attacks someone – resisting and fighting back is the RIGHT thing to do, even though it is the most dangerous one.

I really don´t understand this country – the Constitution seems to allow people to carry guns as a protection from government abuse, but physically fighting authority or \”making a fuss\” out of it – that´s just not cool, apparently.

WEIRD!!!!

toddistic
toddistic
15 years ago

\”Also, interesting was how quiet the cops were relative to phil. They don\’t sound supper pissed and irrational.\”

That\’s because they weren\’t just yanked off their bike, thrown on the ground, and tazed. Get some perspective.

Diogo
Diogo
15 years ago

Spencer,

Several armed guys can afford being quiet to carry on their abuse.

Its pretty clear for me that your prejudice: that you shouldn´t protest or resist when your being attacked by authorities.

The times change, but big men on uniform continue to have such an appeal on people…

Spencer
Spencer
15 years ago

The point I was making was that if phil was being beaten and his throat crushed, he could not be yelling very easily. The main bias in this thread is \”against the man\”. I\’m just being a contrarian and pointing out the inconsistencies. If this make me biased or un-concerned about women who are assaulted, etc. so be it.

N.I.K.
N.I.K.
15 years ago

The point I was making was that if phil was being beaten and his throat crushed, he could not be yelling very easily.

Where are you getting this throat crushing business? Being pinned to the ground by means of a knee in the back of your *neck* won\’t impair one\’s ability to speak or breathe. Vertebrae get in the way.

n8m
n8m
15 years ago

This is great that someone was there with a camera. Unfortunately we need cameras on the PPB at all times to monitor them. They are unprofessional. It is time for them to update their policies and practices with the times.

BrianM
15 years ago

When I read yesterday that there was video of this incident, I hoped it would show the whole incident. I guess that was optimistic.

Can\’t watch this until I get to my laptop but by description… No, I\’ll wait until I see the video before commenting.

Robert Dobbs
Robert Dobbs
15 years ago

I\’m just being a contrarian

Awww… Spencer just wants some attention guys.

GROUP HUG!

leonard maltin
leonard maltin
15 years ago

I give this movie 3 gears out of 5. I found it very arresting, it got me really charged up.

so much to see: a lot of flashing lights on police cars and a well lit street. though, the camera man should use a dolly next time to get a steadier shot. I know rev phil\’s bike was available, that would have done in a pinch.

\”stood apart from him in a defensive position…\” – I think the police might interpret that to mean that you are ready to fight. and it worked! this fight scene was electrifying, the best of the year.

swearing at the police and yelling really loud (it\’s not tarantino, but pretty good monologue nonetheless given that it was improv)- if you do that don\’t expect the police to give you hand up like you just fell down on the basketball court.

three letters: AFV! maybe the prize money will pay his legal costs.

a suggestion for the trailer: \”wait. stop. hammer time!\”

MichaelK
15 years ago

The cops here don\’t seem to be using Tasers to avoid using deadly force on someone who poses an immediate physical threat; they\’re using Tasers as a lazy means of forcing compliance to their will.

matchu
matchu
15 years ago

Goodness! This video helps add perspective to the situation. It is no wonder that Sano was unsure of who had ordered him to stop or if their order was even directed at him. The road is huge!

People should protest unjust use of force and while it is efficient to do anything possible to please officers, the police had invalidated their right of authority and any due respect they might expect by using such excessive force. This pertains only to the situation at hand of course. I wish Sano the best of luck and that the responsible officers accept that there are consequences for bad decisions on their own part as well as of others.

Whiney McWhinerson
Whiney McWhinerson
15 years ago

> Awww… Spencer just wants some attention guys.

> GROUP HUG!

Awww. Robert Dobbs is being condescending and annoying.

GROUP HUG!

Dag
Dag
15 years ago

I agree with n8m: officers of the law should be monitored with video and audio recordings at all times.

Carrie
Carrie
15 years ago

Rev. Phil sounds like a pro. Some people live for this $h^t.

DJ Hurricane
DJ Hurricane
15 years ago

And the cops sound like amateurs. Some people live for this $h^t.

Jake F
Jake F
15 years ago

The \”cops should be videoed\” thing jogged my memory…I did some LEO-type stuff up in Washington and when the lights were turned on in the cruiser, the digital video recorder also came on. It recorded what was directly in front of the car and audio (it\’s how they get all the footage for those dumb \”extreme video\”) shows. Does anyone know if the PPB cars are set up the same way? It would be awfully interesting if even just audio had been recorded. Of course it would be interesting if the recording had been turned off…

steve
steve
15 years ago

Who is up for a bike riding protest outside these officers homes?

Dan
Dan
15 years ago

you KNOW the cops tasered him because he\’s Phil and they don\’t like Phil. Granted the Rev tends to attract/create a certain amount of drama around himself, but there\’s no way the cops had any reasonable justification to actually taser him (as if he was some kind of threat.) They just don\’t like him.

Mike
Mike
15 years ago

I\’ll be in town until Monday evening. If it\’s before then, I\’m in.

KT
KT
15 years ago

Matchu #19, that road\’s not huge.

It\’s one lane in each direction, with bike lanes.

Huge would be something like Hwy 99W. 2 lanes each direction with a center turn lane, and bike lanes both sides.

Although you are correct, it does add perspective: the police cars on the other side of the road have their lights on and flashing red and blue.

I can\’t tell from the video if the cops are dressed like cops, and I didn\’t listen to the audio (I\’m at work).

Regardless of all that, though, it sounds to me like the police over-reacted to Phil\’s presence and actions.

Dave
Dave
15 years ago

\”you KNOW the cops tasered him because he\’s Phil and they don\’t like Phil.\”

Right. Even though Phil says he couldn\’t see well enough to tell they were cops, the cops immediately recognized him on his bike and thought \”Hey! Lets mercilessly assault a notorious attention hound in front of these witnesses!\” Definitely the most likely explanation.

DJ Hurricane
DJ Hurricane
15 years ago

KT, the road is pretty wide, isn\’t it? It\’s one lane in each direction with bike lanes on each side, but it also has a center turn lane and a parallel parking \”lane\” on either side, right? So that\’s the equivalent of 5 full and two bike lanes wide?

SkidMark
SkidMark
15 years ago

I agree with Dan. Rev. Phil is very visible and recognizable. He has also fought the law and won on several occasions, the last time being an incedent that happened almost exactly a year ago. I get the impression that cop recognized him, and when he didn\’t comply immediately, he decided to fuck him up, and hope he gets away with it.

SkidMark
SkidMark
15 years ago

I hope Dave isn\’t right because if he is, that means that the Police would have treated any of us that way in that situation. So if someone tells you to stop and doesn\’t identify themselves as a cop and they are a cops, expect to get beat down and have a taser used on you, for not having a light on your bicycle.

TJ
TJ
15 years ago

\”The general idea behind Tasers is that while painful (I can attest to that personally) they actually reduce injuries to all parties involved, as they can take the place of protracted physical struggles, which might involve tackling or punching or strikes with a metal baton, or the danger of a suspect grabbing one of an officer’s weapons while fighting in close quarters with an officer.\” -that statement from popo\’s column is so text book.

When talking about police I also turn to the \”serve and protect\” phrase. Who are they serving and who are they protecting?

If an individual is not in immediate danger to anyone and they have not previously used deadly force or the threat of then the police should not be able to use a taser.

It is used to often as punishment. In this case, it seems for not being quiet (not against the law). Cruel and unusual punishment.

All the world's a stage
All the world's a stage
15 years ago

Rev Phil in trouble with the law? I can\’t believe how much you people buy this crap! This guy is an amateur antagonist looking to break into the professional world. And there just happened to be a witness there that doesn\’t know him? I smell a fat lawsuit…

Caroline
15 years ago

I love youTube. Rev Phil, need a nurse again?

Caroline
15 years ago

I thought it might be a good one, next time a cop pulls a taser on you, to say \”Wait! I have a pacemaker!\” They can\’t immediately prove you don\’t (short of a quick physical exam)… and you may escape with just a brutal beating instead!

(Granted, there is varying evidence on the effects of taser shocks on pacing. If a study was ever done.)

PS – anyone heard of \”excited delirium?\” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excited_delirium

hanmade
hanmade
15 years ago

The bottom line is we are paying these cops what, $25 an hour (or more) to fight bad guys, and they choose to taser a guy who won\’t stop fot them because he doesn\’t have a light on his bicycle? Something is seriously wrong here.

Ken Convery
15 years ago

Spencer:
\”…still able to yell with a cops knee in his throat. I don\’t think I could have had enough of an air way to yell as loudly.\”
and
\”…being beaten and his throat crushed, he could not be yelling very easily…\”

I think you are misunderstanding. The maneuver cops use is to put the suspect on their stomach and one officer puts his knee on the back of their neck. Another cuffs him. The suspect usually ends up with his head to one side. Painful and uncomfortable but I\’m sure you could yell.

Also the fact that the cops seemed to be talking calmly is not really important. The problem isn\’t that the cops are hoolagins fireing their six shooters in the air. The problem is that we have come to a point where this kind of action seems like the best, safest course of action to them. In their mind they are professionals taking the appropriate steps for greater good.

I personally think yelling someone down and hoping they stop is more than enough effort. Especially since they were busy on the other side of the street. That is unless there is some news we haven\’t heard yet. I can\’t think of any common bicycle infraction that would justify tackling. All the other charges stem from the fact he was tackled. If Rev Phil was riding through town tossing M80s at people on the sidewalk I would say tackling would be justified.

Marc
15 years ago

what if phil were a hearing impaired person and couldn\’t hear the cop? ppd gets to beat the crap out of handicapped people now?

Caroline
15 years ago

http://www.taser.com

Also, thought I\’d share the music at Taser International. Enjoy!

MichaelK
15 years ago

Well, they may want to re-think their Taser policy, Taser has been handed its first defeat:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/like-them-or-de.html

And it\’s not like people aren\’t catching on that Tasers are abused:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/04/video_stun_gun_.html

revphil
15 years ago

a point of clarification:

\”I dropped to my knees and begged, I begged and then you both f***ing shot me\”

was actually:

\”I dropped to my knees and then, and then, you both f***ing tasered me

i dropped to my knees and obeyed your f**ing words and then you both f***ing shot me\”

It still makes me shudder.

velo
velo
15 years ago

We need to hold the police accountable on this one. This is clearly a disproportionate use of force given the threat posed to public safety. Just because a TASER is less lethal doesn\’t mean the police should be allowed to use it without imminent threat of serious violence or loss of life.

Portland Police: you are here to serve and protect us. Abuse of Portland\’s residents is not acceptable behavior and we will do our level best to hold you to account.

Snacky
Snacky
15 years ago

It doesn\’t feel right for lots of force to be used for a bicycle offense.

BUT:

Several facts here don\’t make Phil look very good. Taking just what we 100% know, and aren\’t allegations.

* He was riding past an obvious traffic stop — at least two police cars w/ lights. Very obvious that there are police around.

* He was riding at night w/out a light and w/ no hands on the handlebars. Dude, are you a prof. biker or not? You give us a bad name.

* Because he\’s riding like that, it\’s a good expectation (he should have had) that one would attract police attention.

* The area is NOT terribly dark as Phil said. The video shows the sidewalk to be esp. very well-lit. It should have been obvious they were police.

My take: Phil should have just been polite, \”Yes sir\”, \”No sir\”, and taken his traffic ticket like a man.

IMO, the previous comments about the police being hooligans are conclusory, and only reduce the credibility of that point of view.

Ken
Ken
15 years ago

I was pissed that something like this could happen to someone just riding down the street, but this video isn\’t going to help Rev. Phil.

The street was lit up like center field of PGE park. So much for the dark shadowy forms that he claims he saw and wasn\’t sure who was talking to him. Add on the parked police cars that are seen at the end of the video that have their blue and red lights blazing and that pretty much sinks the \’I had no idea who I was dealing with\’ boat.

I was really upset when I first read this story and I am still not happy, but I must say I feel a little guilty for automatically assuming the police were completely at fault and this video has cast a different light on the matter. If you see flashing lights across the street and your on a well lit road and the police tell you to stop you are required to stop. If you try to run it isn\’t going to end up well for anyone.

SkidMark
SkidMark
15 years ago

I talked to Phil yesterday, the cop was over his shoulder, and he was zipping up his sweatshirt, so he couldn\’t get to his brake. So he didn\’t have a clear view of the cop because he was essentially behind him, and he did not have access to his brake because he was zipping up his jacket. For that he gets tackled and tased. It\’s FxCKING BULLSH!T.

SkidMark
SkidMark
15 years ago

Also I have seen the size of these two thugs that jacked him. They should not need a taser to subdue Rev. Phil.

wsbob
wsbob
15 years ago

Snacky #44, Ken #45, on editor Maus\’s other thread: man-on-a-bike-is-tackled-then-tasered-by-portland-police

…Sano doesn\’t say it was \”…terribly dark…\”. Below are his words from a quote on that thread:

“It was pretty dark and they were wearing all black without any sort of shiny badge…. Phil Sano

I can\’t seem to locate it, but I think I read an excerpt from the police report where the cops said the area was \”well lit\”. I suppose people might find reason to quibble about the relative darkness of the location, but it\’s probably wise not to rely too much on others choice of words to describe the illumination there. I\’d say, go there personally to check it out.

There\’s all kind of other factors too, such as where Sano was standing relative to the nearest street light, and what the illumination was in that particular spot, if the officer\’s body was blocking the light as he approached Sano, and so forth. Also, judging illumination based on video is not necessarily accurate, because video technology has the ability to enhance low light levels making light conditions seem brighter on the monitor than they are in reality at the actual scene, to the human eye.

About some of the other things you mention…we\’ll just have to wait and see how things shake out if this goes to court.

Justa
Justa
15 years ago

there might be people reading this who are of the opinion that phil\’s just doing this for notoriety or kicks, but i think it\’s worth mentioning that i personally haven\’t heard a peep out of him regarding this incident, in spite of having conversed more than a few times since then.

Russ
Russ
15 years ago

I still like my \”I\’m being assaulted by two JACKASSES!\” tee shirt idea, but I think I can go one better for bicycle related consumer products:

How about a police brutality avoidance kit? It would include a helmet (if only for the Vancouver version), front and back light, easy to install brakes for your fixie, heavy neoprene body suit to help block taser prongs/electrical currents, and directions for specifically educating bicyclists on what prone position to immediately get down on the ground in when addressed by an officer of the law.

Many posters on these threads have said that what the real problem is, is that citizens need to be educated about how to interact with police officers in order to avoid being maimed or killed by them. I think this product package could be a great step in the right direction.