Bike Tires Direct Warehouse Sale

Metro funding task force votes for Tier 1 project list, sends recommendation to council

Posted by on December 26th, 2019 at 11:46 am

Metro Transportation Funding Measure Task Force members during a meeting in October.
(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)


“What I think is remarkable is the amount of community consensus around 90% or so of the projects.”
— Andy Shaw, Metro

After nearly a year of public meetings the Metro 2020 Transportation Funding Task Force, a group of 35 community leaders and stakeholders appointed by Metro Council President Lynn Peterson, held several votes Wednesday night on what to include in the spending measure that could inject billions into the region’s transportation system.

At the end of a three-hour public meeting in a Clackamas County Community College community room last week, the most significant vote had resulted in a recommendation for Metro Council to include the Tier 1 corridor projects as part of the package. The package will go to the ballot in November 2020.

The Tier 1 corridors represent the most ideal locations for targeted transportation investments in the region, and they include significant high-volume and well-worn roadways like Burnside Street, 82nd Avenue, the Tualatin Valley Highway, SE Powell, and SE McLoughlin.

To help Metro meet equity, safety, climate action, and other goals for these corridors, the recommendations would result in improvements to active transportation facilities. These improvements could take the form of 40-45 miles of new sidewalks, 130-140 miles of improved bike lanes, and 280 marked crossings for cyclists and pedestrians. According to the meeting’s presentation, 56% of the proposed investments are transit related, 38% are safety related, and 79% are in “Equity Focus Areas” that are concentrated in east Portland and the Beaverton/Hillsboro area.

This vote, which passed unanimously, had been in the works since February and several of those present on Wednesday were feeling a little worn out before the 3-hour session started.

According to Richa Poudyal, Advocacy Director at the active transportation advocate group The Street Trust, “people were feeling tired, not just because of that night, but (also) because of all the work that has gone into the analysis of these projects.” That being said, Poudyal left feeling like there had been “really strong” wins for transit and for avoiding “disastrous investment” in Clackamas County.

Advertisement

Nolan Lienhart, Principal and Director of Planning and Urban Design at ZGF and a member of the task force, noted that the year-long build-up to this vote had left some feeling “frustrated that the process was long, at times complicated or a little unclear,” but he commended the staff at Metro “for trying to organize (the process) in the clearest way possible, provide as much information about the different projects and their impacts and benefits as they could.”

List of Tier 1 Corridors.
(Source: Metro)

Despite the long process, several people who were present at the vote felt it came to a positive conclusion. Metro’s Director Government Affairs Andy Shaw said Metro was “very pleased with the results” produced by the task force, adding “what I think is remarkable is the amount of community consensus around 90% or so of the projects, and also the really civil, positive discussions that the task force was able to have.”

On whether this process should serve as a model for future, similar Metro task forces, Andy felt the votes demonstrated that “we can bring together really diverse points of view and people from different places… and we can have a process of dialogue, understanding, prioritization, and decision-making.”

While the Tier 1 corridor vote represented the biggest collection of projects, the task force also voted on and discussed several other projects and amendments.

One of the larger discussions was whether include roadway improvements to the NE Airport Way/NE 82nd intersection in the recommendations. While the task force initially decided not to recommend the improvements, which included constructing an overpass for traffic leaving the airport, a compromise was made with the Port of Portland, which operates PDX. The task force voted to recommend funding Airport Way corridor improvements under the condition that the Port of Portland would commit resources to the planning and design of a multi-use path along Alderwood/Killingsworth.

Notes on Sunrise project from October Task Force meeting.

A third vote was on the Highway 212 corridor, which has struggled with congestion and network connectivity problems. Opponents of the proposal, including The Street Trust, pointed out that funding the whole project would not be a bold enough stance for climate action, as the proposal included improvements that would benefit single-occupancy vehicles. Many Task Force members recognize that failing to take a bold stance on this issue could result in a failure at the ballot box.

As a result, the task force voted against recommending funding for all of the proposed projects along Highway 212, but it did vote to include the Safety and Local Connections Project, which emphasizes multi-modal improvements. The task force approved $130 million for these projects with an additional $50 million for planning, which Poudyal described as a win for The Street Trust.

Metro Council will decide what to do with these recommendations after hosting an open house on January 13th. According to Lienhart, one result of Wednesday’s vote “was the recognition (among those present) that it is important that we begin to start looking to enact (the projects)… rather than debating the last ten percent of projects that not everyone is going to get behind.”

As Andy puts it, “the next big step is to continue looking at revenue sources and the options for how to actually pay for (these projects).”

The council will eventually develop a package that it will present to the public for a bond measure vote in 2020.

— Henry Miller, henryltmiller@gmail.com

— Get our headlines delivered to your inbox.
— Support this independent community media outlet with a one-time contribution or monthly subscription.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

4 Comments
  • Avatar
    rick December 26, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    Voting for “yes” for yet another freeway project?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar
    chris December 26, 2019 at 3:12 pm

    Not only do I really want the Sunrise extenstion to be built, but I want it to be built all the way past Sandy before connecting to 26.

    212 is a joke of a dangerous rural road that receives far more more traffic than it’s built to handle.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

  • Avatar
    Johnny Bye Carter December 27, 2019 at 6:59 am

    Glad to see big motor vehicle projects voted down and east Portland getting some love.

    Hard to believe that people are still thinking of doing things like expanding Hwy 212. That road is already too wide and encouraging massive motor vehicle usage. No sound science would ever let that road get any bigger. Too bad the people in charge don’t make decisions on sound logic.

    Want to make your suburban freeway less congested? Stop driving on it alone at peak hours. It’s not the government’s job to cater to your bad transportation choices. Sure, we’ll use the money to make it safer, at the cost of a slower driving time.

    Recommended Thumb up 4

  • Avatar
    pdx2wheeler January 16, 2020 at 6:01 pm

    “Clackamas to Columbia”, but only on the East side of the river. Does little for those on the West side of the Willamette. West Linn, Lake Oswego, Tigard, Tualatin, and SW Portland. For those communities you ride a in a debris filled shoulder, if one even exists, and/or take the lane with 45mph+ motor vehicular traffic… For now I’m rolling the dice and mixing motor vehicles at near highway speeds. Wonder why I never see anyone else on my bike commute to work?

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Avatar