Support BikePortland

Journalist Angie Schmitt, critic of ‘hyper-macho trucks’ and defender of walkers, to speak in Portland

Posted by on August 30th, 2019 at 6:53 am

(Photos courtesy Portland State University)

One of America’s leading voices in the War on Cars is coming to Portland.

Angie Schmitt is the editor of Streetsblog USA, author of a prolific and popular Twitter account, and author of a forthcoming book (due out next year from Island Press) that will cover the ‘pedestrian safety crisis’ nationwide.

Schmitt has been invited to speak at Portland State University on October 15th as part of the Transportation Research and Education Center’s (TREC) Ann Niles Transportation Lecture series which TREC describes as, “a unique opportunity to bring world-class thinkers on pedestrian and bicycle issues to Portland State University (PSU) and the active transportation community in the Portland metro region.”

Advertisement


(A sampling of Schmitt’s recent headlines.)

Tickets ($10-$20 sliding scale) go on sale next month and they’re sure to be a hot item. Schmitt has gained a strong following among activists, planners, and fans of cities in recent years for her clear and powerful reporting and opinions on America’s dysfunctional traffic culture.

Among the topics she regularly covers are the acute threat to road users posed by oversized SUVs and “hyper-macho trucks”, the “environmental justice disaster” of major highway projects, how the transportation system is biased against women, the pitfalls of electric scooters, and the negative impacts of Uber and Lyft. Read more of her work at Streetsblog.org.

If you’re interested in attending the lecture, you can sign up here to be notified when tickets go on sale.

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

Never miss a story. Sign-up for the daily BP Headlines email.

BikePortland needs your support.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

32
Leave a Reply

avatar
12 Comment threads
20 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
DaveChris IdanBike GuyAlex Reedin Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
grannygear
Guest
grannygear

Gonna be a long walk to get here

Cory P
Guest
Cory P

That’s why I’ll skate there.

dan
Guest
dan

“hyper macho”? More like “hyper insecure”. We won’t even get into truck nuts.

Dan A
Subscriber
Dan A

I know a guy with a huge quad cab truck on a lift kit with big offroad tires and dark black windows. Super tuff. The irony is that guy is afraid to go camping. Buying a truck like that seems like a strange way of compensating.

bikeninja
Guest
bikeninja

When I was in engineering school I had a crusty thermodynamics professor who refused to own or ride in cars, because they were too thermodynamically inefficient. He old walked, cycled or rode the bus ( this was in a small town in the middle of no-where, not a city) . He referred to big cars and oversized 4-wheel drive pickups ( they were much smaller back then too) as Entropy Buggies because they were driving the earth from a low to high entropy state for no good reason.

Ken S
Guest
Ken S

I’m going to start using that phrase ALL THE TIME.

Middle of the Road Guy
Guest
Middle of the Road Guy

Did you stay off his lawn?

Brian
Guest
Brian

I’m seeing more and more women driving big-ass trucks these days, too. Mini-van moms are becoming Monster-truck moms.

Dan A
Subscriber
Dan A

It’s a ‘crush others before they crush you’ mentality.

My neighbor next door has two quad cab trucks, and no other vehicles. I’ve never seen anything in the bed of the trucks. He doesn’t even do his own yardwork. And boy does he love to let his trucks idle in the mornings….

Phil
Guest
Phil

Idling trucks are the worst!

SS
Guest
SS

Large trucks are a reliable indicator of how scared someone is.

maxD
Guest
maxD

yesterday’s view outside my office window was a a new Subaru Outback parked on the street in front was I think was a late early 2000’s Jeep Cherokee. The Subaru was bigger in every way, taller, longer and much larger tires. Cars have gotten enormous, and styling is very “bro-dozer”. I would love to see Oregon base registration fees on length, height, weight and miles driven since the last registration.

Chris I
Guest
Chris I
Mick O
Guest
Mick O

Can we buy tickets to the talk as gifts for others? Certain state and city officials, perhaps? I wonder if any sort of coordinated social media pressure on certain officials to attend would be effective? I’m too pessimistic to think so…

Liz
Guest
Liz

***heart eyes***

Brendan
Guest
Brendan

Funny enough, I once did a post on how cars, trucks, SUVs are all weighty enough to be equally deadly to a walker or a biker at speed. Doesn’t matter the make or model, from the Prius to the F-250, vehicles can easily destroy a person.

Matt
Guest
Matt

Sure, just like being shot by a .22 or being shot by a high powered rifle can both be deadly. But one of them is a hell of a lot more likely to inflict a fatal injury.

9watts
Subscriber

I agree with Brendan. Focusing on the egregious oversized version allows the rest of us to feel better about our sedans. In this era the problem is not fuel economy or size but automobility, carbon emissions.

9watts
Subscriber

“the pitfalls of electric scooters…”

Interesting. Can you say more? Link to her arguments?

Mike Quigley
Guest
Mike Quigley

Texas is the latest state to ban red light cameras. One wag’s excuse was, “people should have a right to speed through red lights if they think they can make it.”

Middle of the Road Guy
Guest
Middle of the Road Guy

And Progressives don’t like them because they sometimes capture minorities or less well off folks breaking laws.

9watts
Subscriber

This is the quintessential MotRG jeer.
You (presumably) know that this is not a fair statement, not accurate, not helpful. I try to read the comments here pretty carefully, and my impression is that the kind of cameras some of us occasionally raise concerns about are not red light cameras (discussed above) but speed cameras, as those have in some cases been found to be spatially deployed in ways that suggest bias.
Your glib comment:

“because they sometimes capture minorities or less well off folks breaking laws.”

I think reveals you to be a troll, someone who makes outlandish claims, whose objective is to polarize the conversation. I think we know that rich folks and poor folks generally have similar rates of engaging in proscribed behaviours, but that it is always the poor who disproportionately end up paying fines, doing time, getting mistreated by our ‘justice’ system. I invite you to find and show us a comment here that demonstrates what you are referring to.

Jim Lee
Guest
Jim Lee

Angie’s apodictic statements about “hyper macho trucks” and “bias against women” perhaps could be quantified by the concept of entropy, thoughtfully introduced by “bikeninja” and amplified by others.

This is not simple.

Women “consume” several times the “goods and services” men do, and and overconsumption is the greatest generator of artificial entropy. On the other hand, never have I seen a woman “rolling coal” on the way to Nordstrom.

As a physics-person dedicated to the enhanced concept of entropy anchored in the omnipresent Gibbs free energy, it is my duty to formulate a method of solution to this conundrum. When I have done that I shall unsheathe my log-log duplex decitrig slide rule, the lowest entropy-generating calculating device ever, and calculate.

Stay tuned.

Liz
Guest
Liz

Jim Lee
Angie’s apodictic statements about “hyper macho trucks” and “bias against women” perhaps could be quantified by the concept of entropy, thoughtfully introduced by “bikeninja” and amplified by others.This is not simple.Women “consume” several times the “goods and services” men do, and and overconsumption is the greatest generator of artificial entropy. On the other hand, never have I seen a woman “rolling coal” on the way to Nordstrom.As a physics-person dedicated to the enhanced concept of entropy anchored in the omnipresent Gibbs free energy, it is my duty to formulate a method of solution to this conundrum. When I have done that I shall unsheathe my log-log duplex decitrig slide rule, the lowest entropy-generating calculating device ever, and calculate.Stay tuned.Recommended 1

Are you trying to be absurdly misogynist on purpose or……?

Middle of the Road Guy
Guest
Middle of the Road Guy

It’s not possible one gender consumes more than the other?

Alex Reedin
Guest
Alex Reedin

It’s totally possible, but the way Jim went about it raising that possibility (with a rather extreme claim, no citation, and alignment with stereotypes of women “shopping too much”) gave the appearance of sexism. From the quick Google search that I did, I couldn’t easily separate out “goods and services” from “transport, etc” nor could I find a US-specific paper. But, it looks like once you add everything up, an average Western man causes more carbon emissions than the average Western woman, so I expect that extends to the US.

Various European countries:
http://www.wecf.eu/english/articles/2011/02/gender-climateimpact.php

Canada:
http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/viewFile/20595/16990

The UK:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800912003709

Alex Reedin
Guest
Alex Reedin

Reading more into it, it seems like parsing out emissions by gender is pretty inherently flawed.

From the Canada article:
-Men work in industries that produce more emissions (but everyone uses the products of those industries).
-Women with male partners buy more emissions’ worth of products than their partners (but many of those products are used throughout the household, including by the male partner and the kids).
-Men drive more miles to work and use bigger vehicles (but some need bigger vehicles for their jobs/some other purpose. Note, I am skeptical that any sizeable percentage of bigger vehicles is actually needed but research on this is thin.)

So anyway, I think the best evidence that emissions are gendered is psychological rather than based on a carbon balance sheet. There are numerous studies out there showing that people, and especially men, feel that “green” behaviors are feminine. I’m aware of studies on reusable shopping bags and vehicle type but I’m not gonna dig them up.

Toby Keith
Guest
Toby Keith

I have never been aggressively tailgated, passed, or cut off by a woman in an oversized SUV…ever! ; )

dan
Guest
dan

I experienced some intentional malicious driving from a woman this summer, but I will say that she was not in an SUV.

BikeRound
Guest
BikeRound

I think when we use expressions like the “War on Cars,” then we are feeding right into the car lobby’s insinuation that those who advocate for better conditions for walking and cycling are unreasonable radicals disjointed from the concerns of everyday Americans. While nothing could be further from the truth, why play into their hand?

Dave
Guest
Dave

“War on cars” is catchy; every song needs a hook. Sometimes you have to take the chance of offending some people so that you’ll inspire more new people in your movement.

Bike Guy
Guest
Bike Guy

Brendan
Funny enough, I once did a post on how cars, trucks, SUVs are all weighty enough to be equally deadly to a walker or a biker at speed. Doesn’t matter the make or model, from the Prius to the F-250, vehicles can easily destroy a person.Recommended 3

Um, this isn’t the only relevant consideration, even if true. So nice false equivalency.