Urban Tribe - Ride with your kids in front.

Nine bereaved family members pen open letter to City Council demanding action on Division Street

Posted by on December 9th, 2016 at 1:43 pm


After the two deaths on Southeast Division Street Tuesday night, family members who have lost loved ones due to traffic violence want Portland City Council to take action.

As we reported earlier this week, Kim Stone and Krisy Finney-Dunney — two of the founding members of the local chapter of Families for Safe Streets — are feeling Wednesday’s deaths with a particularly heavy heart. That’s because the two fatalities happened in the same intersections on Division that claimed the lives of their sons.

Led by Stone and Finney-Dunn, seven other women who have lost a family member have stepped forward with a demand that the City of Portland, “expedite major changes in order to slow speeds and increase safety for all on outer SE Division St.”

Here’s the full text of the letter (emphases theirs):

Action Needed on SE Division St. Now

December 9, 2016

Dear Portland City Council,

As families who know intimately the pain and suffering of losing family members to traffic violence, we call on the City of Portland to expedite major changes in order to slow speeds and increase safety for all on outer SE Division St.

Oregon and SW Washington Families for Safe Streets is comprised of families who have lost loved ones to fatal traffic crashes that were preventable. Yes, we call on all road users to own their responsibility for safety on our streets. We call on all drivers to choose to travel as they would have others drive around their loved ones–to drive at safe speeds, to not drive impaired, and to look for the other precious humans sharing the road. But when crashes happen again and again on the same corridor, we know the road design itself is part of the problem, and we also call on government to act swiftly to make the necessary changes to protect future families from the senseless loss of cherished loved ones.

OR Families for Safe Streets came out in numbers to support the passage of the City of Portland’s Vision Zero Action Plan. We applauded PBOT staff for developing the plan with a robust community stakeholder engagement process, and we celebrated City Council members for voting unanimously to pass the plan. However, we are left feeling like the City’s commitment “to eliminate deaths and serious injuries for all who share Portland streets” is false when we stand by and watch repeated fatalities take place on the same corridor without executing the kind of road re-engineering that our Portland Bureau of Transportation knows can save lives.

Two of our founding members lost their sons, young men filled with promise, joy, and love for family and friends, to crashes on outer SE Division. On the 2015 World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims, we placed 13 memorials along SE Division St. where people had been killed. Since then, five people have died on SE Division in 2016 alone. This week two people were killed on the same day at the exact same locations where we lost our own children, Joe and Dustin. As families that know the pain that two more families are now experiencing, we cannot stand by and wait any longer for changes. We demand action now.

We call on the City of Portland to re-engineer SE Division St. immediately and to demand the ability to lower posted speeds from the State Speed Board or Oregon legislature.

The City of Portland’s Vision Zero Action Plan states:

    “We are committed to ending traffic violence in our communities. Portland traffic deaths outnumber homicides year after year. All too often, we as a community have accepted this as an unfortunate but inevitable cost of moving around the city. Vision Zero rejects that assumption. With this action plan, Portland makes a clear statement that the cost is too high—and directs attention, commitment and resources to ending traffic violence in the city.”

As those most impacted by traffic violence, we call on the City of Portland to direct their attention and the necessary resources to our high crash corridors and especially outer SE Division now. Don’t let the commitment to Vision Zero sit on the shelf as a broken promise to all who share Portland’s streets.


Kim Stone
Kristi Finney-Dunn
Tammi Rocher Beers
Betsy Reese
Jeannette Robart
Jenna McLeod
Shannon Moulton
Heather Johnson
Susan Kubota

Oregon and SW Washington Families for Safe Streets formed just over a year ago and is modeled directly after a group with the same in New York City.

These family members are not the only ones calling on the City of Portland to take immediate action on Division. The non-profit Oregon Walks has taken to Twitter several times in the last few days urging people to contact City Council members. “This is devastating. Outer Division is one of most dangerous roads and 4 people have died at this intersection,” read one of their Tweets. “Drastic change needed NOW.”

Bike Loud PDX has put together a “citizen-led emergency traffic calming” event on SE Division that will take place tomorrow (Saturday 12/10) at 2:00 pm. They plan to “takeover” the wide, nine-lane thoroughfare by occupying the outermost lanes while holding signs and interacting with passersby.

Just last month Families for Safe Streets held a “Remembrance Day” for victims of traffic where they released their first-ever policy platform. Focusing on road user education, the group wants more frequent driver testing, changes to the Oregon driving and cycling manuals, mandatory driver education classes, and more.

With city offices closed due to weather today, it’s unlikely we’ll hear any response from Mayor Charlie Hales and the other commissioners until next week.

— Jonathan Maus, (503) 706-8804 – jonathan@bikeportland.org

BikePortland is supported by the community (that means you!). Please become a subscriber or make a donation today.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Thank you.

  • Kristi Finney Dunn December 9, 2016 at 1:50 pm

    Thanks, Jonathan! Something is wrong with the first paragraph of our letter. It’s missing “to expedite major changes in order to slow speeds and increase safety for all on outer SE Division St.”

    Recommended Thumb up 6

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) December 9, 2016 at 1:53 pm

      fixed it Kristi.

      Recommended Thumb up 4

    • rick December 9, 2016 at 2:34 pm

      Thanks for your hard work !

      Recommended Thumb up 7

    • J.E. December 9, 2016 at 2:37 pm

      Beautiful letter. I hope you sent it to our incoming Mayor and new Commissioner as well?

      Recommended Thumb up 12

  • Gerald Fittipaldi December 9, 2016 at 2:09 pm

    Thank you everyone from OR Families for Safe Streets for your relentless dedication to making our streets safer. I can’t imagine how badly these recent traffic fatalities must sting, which makes it all the more remarkable that you are able to pen such a poignant letter to the City.

    Recommended Thumb up 19

  • buildwithjoe December 9, 2016 at 2:13 pm

    City Council talks. They don’t act . Seattle acted to drop default speeds everywhere to 25.

    Dear families of the dead, Portland’s head of transportation responded to your letter

    “I don’t know there is anything anybody could have done to have prevented that fatality except for the driver,” said Leah Treat, director of Portland Oregon Dept of Transportation

    Recommended Thumb up 16

    • rick December 9, 2016 at 2:33 pm

      Kyle Chisek from PBOT told earlier this year of the denial of the request for a lowered speed limit to 30 mph for outer SW Vermont Street. Just wow.

      Recommended Thumb up 5

    • wsbob December 11, 2016 at 2:37 pm

      “…Dear families of the dead, Portland’s head of transportation responded to your letter

      “I don’t know there is anything anybody could have done to have prevented that fatality except for the driver,” said Leah Treat, director of Portland Oregon Dept of Transportation” buildwithjoe

      joe…could you cite the source from which you got that quote from PBOT’s director?

      If the source you drew the comment from, shows she made that statement in regards to the fatalities of last Tuesday on Division, I think that’s clarification all of us reading here would benefit from knowing.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

  • Tim December 9, 2016 at 2:40 pm

    35 sounds high for an urbane street, but 45 is common and won’t get you a ticket. 25 MPH would save lives, but would require enforcement. Is anyone willing to enforce speed laws on city streets where there may be a disproportionate number of minorities?

    Recommended Thumb up 3

    • Dick Button December 9, 2016 at 2:46 pm

      I think adding focus on the skin color of the drivers does no good. How about we pull over the SPEEDING ones?

      Recommended Thumb up 13

      • Adam H.
        Adam H. December 9, 2016 at 3:10 pm

        Focusing on the skin color of the drivers matters when black and brown people are being targeted at a higher rate than whites.

        Recommended Thumb up 4

        • Dick Button December 9, 2016 at 3:21 pm

          Then focusing more on their behavior than skin color can’t help but benefit the situation.

          Recommended Thumb up 11

          • David Hampsten December 10, 2016 at 11:32 pm

            The issue is not so much that non-whites are being pulled over proportionally more often than whites, but rather what happens when they show up at court. In general, white offenders are more likely able to show up, be represented in court, and thus much more likely to get their cases dismissed or a lighter sentence proportionally than non-whites, for the same offense. Hence the term “driving while black.”

            Recommended Thumb up 0

            • Adam H.
              Adam H. December 11, 2016 at 9:17 am

              White people are also far less likely to be shot by police during a traffic stop.

              Recommended Thumb up 1

              • Dick Button December 12, 2016 at 8:44 am

                Unless they should happen to be poor. In which case they would make up the majority of people who happen to be shot by the police each year.

                Of course, one could adjust for population size on a national level, aggregating peaceful working and middle class neighborhoods into the mix and back up something like what you said.

                But hey, statistics can be manipulated, we learn that in statistics 101, right?
                So, it’s maybe not the strongest foundation to stake sweeping claims upon.

                Recommended Thumb up 0

        • Hello, Kitty
          Hello, Kitty December 9, 2016 at 5:35 pm

          Right problem, wrong solution.

          Recommended Thumb up 6

    • Adam December 11, 2016 at 12:04 am

      I would argue solid street engineering would go a long way to firmly encouraging slower speeds.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

  • Spiffy December 9, 2016 at 2:47 pm

    we don’t need the State Speed Board or the Oregon legislature to lower the speeds on Division, we just need obstacles so that people aren’t able to drive fast…

    we have tons of construction barriers sitting is city yards that could be strewn on alternating lanes of Division forcing people to slow as they navigate lane to lane around equipment…

    that’s what Bike Loud PDX is doing, but with activists…

    Recommended Thumb up 8

    • David Hampsten December 10, 2016 at 11:33 pm

      My favorite is spilled orange paint. Accidentally, of course…

      Recommended Thumb up 1

  • Middle of the Road guy December 9, 2016 at 2:49 pm

    Very little change happens until something happens to the people who can facilitate a change.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

    • El Biciclero December 11, 2016 at 3:53 pm

      I really don’t want to be disrespectful, but I remember how quickly the I-5 center barrier south of Portland was completed after Steve Fritz and his passenger were hit on their way to Salem by a pickup driver that crossed over the freeway median after being splashed with rain water by an oil truck.

      Recommended Thumb up 3

      • Hello, Kitty
        Hello, Kitty December 11, 2016 at 11:00 pm

        Is it because Fritz has a lot of pull down at ODOT?

        Recommended Thumb up 1

        • El Biciclero December 12, 2016 at 4:15 pm

          I’m nearly certain more pull than my wife would have.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Andy December 9, 2016 at 8:57 pm

    The problem with having a multi-year plan like Vision Zero is that it can distract everyone away from immediately addressing known problems, even if temporary solutions must be adopted that aren’t optimal. Why isn’t PBOT asking itself what it can do in the next 90 days to reduce traffic deaths?

    I am genuinely curious about Leah Treat’s reaction to the last two fatalities on Division. Does she think there was nothing she could do? Does she think that it mostly comes down to pedestrians and motorists being more “responsible,” with government having minor responsibility?

    In my view, this whole issue of enforcement disproportionately affecting people of color is a smokescreen or possibly even racist. Is the view that minorities disproportionately violate the traffic code? What data do they have? That’s not what I observe. Competent managers can monitor and manage an enforcement program so that it does not disproportionately affect people of color. There certainly can be alternative penalties so that traffic fines don’t hit the poor too hard. These are all issues that can be dealt with and managed.

    What’s the real reason that the City won’t step up traffic enforcement? I don’t know. Budget? Because it’s politically unpopular? Officer shortage? Something else? I don’t know, but I think they should be challenged to justify the claim that stepped up enforcement must unavoidably affect people of color disproportionately. I don’t think they would get away with this in any other area of law enforcement.

    Recommended Thumb up 8

  • Marianne Fitzgerald December 10, 2016 at 10:07 am

    PBOT is behind on installing the automated speed cameras that were supposed to be installed on Division by now. The one on SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway has been effective in slowing people down: http://www.wweek.com/news/2016/11/23/portland-officials-begged-state-lawmakers-for-authority-to-erect-new-speed-cameras-they-installed-them-very-slowly/ and http://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/index.ssf/2016/11/portland_speed_cameras_issuing.html.

    While these high-crash corridors need more than just cameras to make them safer, the automated speed cameras should be installed sooner rather than later throughout the city. My deepest condolences to all of the families that have lost loved ones on our streets. Let’s use all the tools we have to make our streets safer.

    Recommended Thumb up 3

  • SE December 10, 2016 at 10:32 am

    Speed cameras actually work on SE Stark in the Mall 205 vicinity.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

    • David Hampsten December 10, 2016 at 11:36 pm

      Technically, those are red light cameras at intersections, not speed cameras along straight-aways.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

  • peejay December 11, 2016 at 10:59 am

    When people say PBOT did nothing in response to this letter and to the action yesterday on Division St, that’s not exactly true. I mean, they came and removed the hay bales. So they were actively involved in restoring the deadly nature of the street, because it’s what their narrow job description tells them to do. What concerns any city employee is not what’s safe or not safe; it’s what they might be liable for. A deadly street built in accordance with the various engineering and planning manuals is preferable over a safer street that has no legal protection in an approved design manual.

    I wonder how our resident PBOT employee commenter will respond to this.

    Recommended Thumb up 4