Support BikePortland - Journalism that Matters

Regional mayors look to neuter Metro’s Regional Active Transportation Plan

Posted by on August 14th, 2013 at 5:48 pm

Will it be rendered powerless?
(Photo © J. Maus/BikePortland)

Mayors from 22 of the 25 cities represented by Metro are pushing to make the Regional Active Transportation Plan (ATP) relatively powerless. The plan has been in the making for over two years, and Metro has been showing off the 70-page review draft via public open houses since May.

Lake McTighe, the Metro project manager in charge of the ATP, had planned to have a resolution pass by Metro Council by next month that would have moved the plan to its next step toward implementation. However, a power struggle between Metro and regional mayors became evident last month as they feared the plan would give Metro too much power and would force their hand in implementing new bicycle pathways, walking facilities, and other active transportation projects.

Unlike Portland’s Bicycle Master Plan, which lacks the policy or funding authority it needs to actually build the projects listed in its pages, Metro’s Regional ATP was developed with the intent to have it officially integrated into the all-powerful Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Projects in the RTP are essentially in a guaranteed pipeline for federal funding as it becomes available. Putting the ATP projects into the RTP would be nothing less than a major milestone for our region’s commitment to active transportation. According to McTighe, the purpose of the ATP is to “help deliver the desired outcomes and vision adopted in the RTP to increase biking and walking, create a safer and more reliable transportation system.”

In other words, the ATP would be a blueprint for cities around the region to create a transportation system that actually lives up to the RTP’s mode share, environmental, and other goals.

But now, the plan is facing a critical juncture as regional mayors have joined members of Metro’s influential Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) in raising concerns about the plan.

The effort to neuter the ATP started in July, as JPACT members began to weigh in on the draft Policy Recommendations and Actions (PDF). At the August 1st JPACT meeting, JPACT Chair Carlotta Collette circulated a document that included edits to the language. According to a source, the JPACT members who were most uncomfortable with ATP’s policy recommendations were Lake Oswego City Councilor Donna Jordan, Washington County Commissioner Roy Rogers, Clackamas County Commissioner Paul Savas, and Beaverton Mayor Denny Doyle.

Their key concern was that the initial language would force cities to implement active transportation projects they didn’t want. JPACT member and the Cornelius Mayor Jeff Dalin stated at the August 1st JPACT meeting that he “still had a lot of concerns” about the ATP. Dalin said he wanted the recommendations and actions in the draft ATP to be “guidelines” instead of “mandates”.

Here’s just one example of how the language was changed:

Metro’s original version:

Prioritize projects for addressing pedestrian and bicycle safety on a regular basis…

After feedback from JPACT members:

Work with partners to emphasize the need for safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities on routes with heavy motorized vehicle traffic by prioritizing projects that address pedestrian and bicycle safety on a regular basis…

And here’s a screenshot from the actual document:

Dalin and others know that if the projects and policies in the ATP are folded into the RTP, cities would lose their power to delay or stop the projects. “Funding scares some of the people I’ve spoke with,” Dalin said at the August 1st JPACT meeting, “If we implement these as requirements, there would be a substantial share of the funding. Make it a recommendation, not a requirement… I think a lot of these decisions are local decisions.”

When Washington County Commissioner Roy Rogers spoke about the edits at JPACT earlier this month, he said, “The new language makes it very clear that this is a recommendation… It gets us to a yes vote… It has calmed the troops a bunch.”

Apparently not enough.

Now it turns out that simply diluting the power of the Regional ATP by weakening its language wasn’t enough. Yesterday, Tualatin Mayor Lou Ogden sent a letter to Metro President Tom Hughes that was co-signed by 21 other regional mayors. The only mayors that didn’t sign the letter were Portland Mayor Charlie Hales, Beaverton Mayor Denny Doyle, Johnson City Mayor Kay Mordock, and West Linn Mayor John Kovash.

The letter laid out a set of concerns including a direct request to “leave matters of implementation to local decision makers,” and “Neither the ATP nor its policies, goals, or guidelines should be tied to federal funding.”

The letter also took a pre-emptive swipe at “road diets”. Under the heading, “Impact on Freight,” Ogden cited a recent poll of Washington County residents that found 72% of respondents disagreed that the county should add narrow roads to add sidewalks and bike lanes.

Ogden called for the resolution to be amended in the following specific ways:

  • Delete references to incorporation of the ATP or elements thereof into the RTP
  • Limit the “acknowledgement” [resolution] of the ATP only as a “concept plan,” as further outreach with the public is needed before a decision can be made as to whether to incorporate the ATP into the RTP.

Download Ogden’s letter and his proposed resolution here (PDF).

BTA Advocacy Director Gerik Kransky says his organization supports the ATP’s adoption into the RTP. “Our Executive Director, Rob Sadowsky served on the stakeholder committee that helped write the plan and we look forward working on many of its proposals,” he shared today. And via email, Sadowsky seemed to already be looking past the ATP, “While we think regional planning can be an important tool, the reality is that we need to build local support for each specific project. Our work is set out in our Blueprint and we will continue to build support for our priorities. We will work to get the ATP passed but won’t let failure to do so get in the way of advocacy work.”

The outcome of this squabble is very likely to be a major delay in the ATP moving forward. Whether or not it becomes completely powerless — and yet another planning document that sits on a shelf and lacks the political teeth to move the needle away from business as usual and toward a region where bicycle travel is possible for more people — remains to be seen.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for discrimination or harassment including expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

39
Leave a Reply

avatar
22 Comment threads
17 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
30 Comment authors
Oregon MamacitaHillsonsJim Labbewsbobspare_wheel Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Adam
Guest
Adam

Would this be the same group of regional mayors that went on the Policymaker’s Gorge Ride and couldn’t say enough nice things about bike tourism and the positive effects bikes have on their communities?

Noah Brimhall
Guest
Noah Brimhall

What can people who don’t want the ATP to be neutered do to voice their concerns? Write the Metro council? Their mayor?

Psyfalcon
Guest
Psyfalcon

How much can Portland narrow the roads at the city line?

If the other towns don’t want to encourage active transportation can we please discourage them from driving into town?

howard draper
Guest
howard draper

“emphasize the need” seems like a subjective loophole, an action that no one can later quantify.

Chris Anderson
Guest

Would be nice to set the funding levels regionally but allow cities to opt out. So that money Cornelius doesn’t want to spend can get spent on active transportation in the forward looking places.

spare_wheel
Guest
spare_wheel

Colette Carlota is up for re-election in 2014. I am more than willing to donate to any credible candidate who opposes her. Filings are due in September and I will be following these very closely.

Alain
Guest
Alain

Is the Fed monies in these projects free money, or matching? If matching, what is typically the local match?

Tony
Guest
Tony

Et tu Maywood Park!?? For real?

The mayors who have not signed represent 1/2 the population of the metro. Maywood Park… for shame.

Timo Forsberg
Guest

Broaden your understanding of the Regional Active Transportation Plan at the PBOT Bicycle Brown Bag, Thursday, August 15 from noon to one at City Hall.
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/144945

wsbob
Guest
wsbob

“…Their key concern was that the initial language would force cities to implement active transportation projects they didn’t want. …” maus/bikeportland

Maybe I’m the only person having posted a comment to this story so far, that hasn’t yet read, browsed, or knows what the Regional Active Transportation Plan would effectively oblige associated cities to build if the plan’s language was not altered to have project objectives be guidelines rather than mandates.

Included in this story, or posted in the comments, some short, concise summaries of specific projects in the plan, could be helpful towards understanding whether mayors’ concerns are reasonable, or whether they’re simply attempting to evade taking responsible action…the latter which seems to be the opinion of some people commenting here.

Ogden’s letter, which a number of mayors signed onto and sent to Metro President Hughes, seems articulate, well thought out, fair.

If bikeportland’s publisher editor is looking to encourage thoughtful discussion, I think the use, in this bikeportland story’s headline, and in the in the story itself, of the sexually related term, ‘neuter’, was a poor choice, . Words like ‘constrain’, ‘constrain obligations’, or ‘guidelines rather than mandates’ would have done better to describe the mayors’ thoughts expressed in Ogden’s letter.

dwainedibbly
Guest
dwainedibbly

Not surprising, really, and exactly why Mrs Dibbly & I decided from the outset that we were going to live within the Portland city limits when we moved here.

I have to wonder how much of this is a backlash against Metro rather than a backlash against bikes.

pliny
Guest
pliny

My heart truly bleeds for these mayors who fear they might have to spend funds on road improvements to help move people to and through their cities.

As a Portlander, I can’t imagine what it’d be like. It’d almost be like having to rebuild a bridge to accommodate traffic from an outlying suburb with city money, instead of getting the suburbs to chuck in.

Joseph Readdy
Guest
Joseph Readdy

It’s a pity that the understanding that relatively modest investments in active transportation provide large economic return to their communities hasn’t’ been shared with these mayors and their staff.
I worked on Meto’s RTP and served on the Portland Pulse Access and Mobility committee. I appreciate the need to facilitate freight mobility; but to do so at the expense of pedestrian and bicycle mobility means the unintended promotion of the automobile and the prioritization of mobility over place. That diminishes the economic resilience of the local community.
We make tremendous investments in our streets, that investment should always prioritize place over “flow.” In addition to more robust local economic development, you will also be providing better, safer access for those who are too young or too old or are otherwise unable to drive.

Steve Hoyt-McBeth-PBOT
Guest

You can learn more about the propsed Regional Active Transportation Plan at today’s Bicycle Brown Bag at City Hall, noon- 1:00 p.m.
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/458691

Garlynn
Guest
Garlynn

These mayors are definitely short-sighted. The continued economic health and well-being of the Portland suburbs depends on them being able to attract the next generation to live within their borders; and the next generation overwhelmingly supports having active transportation choices and living in complete communities. To the extent that these mayors prevent Metro from funding and implementing the regional active transportation plan within their borders, they will be shutting themselves off from appealing to this demand, and condemning themselves to eventual future economic decline as their current car-addicted baby boomer populations slowly fade into retirement….

Spiffy
Guest

“However, a power struggle between Metro and regional mayors became evident last month as they feared the plan would give Metro too much power and would force their hand in implementing new bicycle pathways, walking facilities, and other active transportation projects.”

yes, we want to force you off your ass… we want to cripple the single occupancy vehicle market with public mass transit…

“Their key concern was that the initial language would force cities to implement active transportation projects they didn’t want.”

it’s not about what you want, it’s about what the future of the city needs…

“The letter also took a pre-emptive swipe at “road diets”. Under the heading, “Impact on Freight,” ”

why is it so hard for people to figure out that less cars on the road means more room for freight trucks… these plans benefit the future freight industry…

I’m tired of politicians always looking out for themselves now instead of making a difference for the future… nobody will remember the guy that kept the status quo, they’ll remember the brave pioneer who brought change…

wsbob
Guest
wsbob

“…The letter also took a pre-emptive swipe at “road diets”. Under the heading, “Impact on Freight,” Ogden cited a recent poll of Washington County residents that found 72% of respondents disagreed that the county should add narrow roads to add sidewalks and bike lanes. …” maus/bikeportland

In reading the letter, the reference to road diets is certainly no “…swipe…”, or necessarily a criticism of that type of road use planning, but more accurately appears to be a legitimate expressed concern in response to a finding in the Washington County survey conducted by DHM Research, that a substantial majority of residents in that county aren’t presently supportive of narrowing roads to provide sidewalks and bike lanes.

As with any survey, reliability of this survey’s results and how well they correlate to actual public sentiment, is open to debate. It would seem though, that the mayors having signed onto the letter, are doing the responsible thing by simply having mentioned the survey’s results in reference to road narrowing for sidewalks and bike lanes.

paikikala
Guest
paikikala

“local control’ issues abound – safety be damned.
http://tinyurl.com/lrlvry8

Rex Bruce Burkholder
Guest

The true intent of those who propose “weasel” words like “should,” “encourage,” “seek to” etc is to avoid providing bike facilities required by state law.

ORS § 366.514¹
“Use of highway fund for footpaths and bicycle trails
(1) Out of the funds received by the Department of Transportation or by any county or city from the State Highway Fund reasonable amounts shall be expended as necessary to provide footpaths and bicycle trails, including curb cuts or ramps as part of the project. Footpaths and bicycle trails, including curb cuts or ramps as part of the project, shall be provided wherever a highway, road or street is being constructed, reconstructed or relocated.”

Note use of the word “shall.” No weasel word here. Since Metro seems to be easily cowed by the minority nowadays, and we have mayors who think its okay to flout the law, its time for a lawsuit.

http://gettingto2100.org/portlands-bicycle-revolution-started-with-a-lawsuit/

gutterbunnybikes
Guest
gutterbunnybikes

I bet a few big companies (especially the likes of Nike, Columbia, and Intel) could put a little pressure on some of these folks. Nike and Columbia of course has a vested interest in supporting anything sports. The new tech blood that Intel wants to attract also seem to appreciate bicycling and walking as well.

And of course these are only a couple big industries that might be interested in one part of town. I’m sure a there are others in other parts of town too. Like the real estate company that owns the Clackamas Town Center etc…)

The voices of the businesses would have more sway with the list signers than a bunch of ticked off Freds and Wonks (myself included, of course).

Hillsons
Guest
Hillsons

These nearsighted mayors are digging their own graves.

Oregon Mamacita
Guest
Oregon Mamacita

The snobby remarks on this blog are one reason why people don’t want to
work with Rex B. et al. Yeah, only one side to the story. I am sure many people near me in outer SE would love to join Gresham or Milwaukie just to get away from the posters on this blog. Y’all cannot put up a candidate that can win in the next election- IMHO. You’re just too ideological and snobby to connect with anyone who doesn’t have bamboo floors and a 2500 cargo bike.