Final thoughts on the 2013 National Bike Summit

Posted by on March 8th, 2013 at 11:35 pm

National Bike Summit Congressional Reception-6

League President Andy Clarke addresses attendees of the National Bike Summit after a day of lobbying on Capitol Hill Wednesday.
(Photos © J. Maus/BikePortland)

Coverage from Washington D.C.
made possible by:

When I first starting thinking about this year’s National Bike Summit, it seemed like it’d be a real dud. With no transportation bill to fight for and a list of “asks” that were frankly, not very exciting, I didn’t have very high expectations. But now, after three and-a-half days of listening and talking as much as my brain would allow, I realize that there’s a lot important stuff going on and I’m glad I was there to be a part of it.

Below are a few themes, tidbits, and personal hunches I took away from the event:

Veronica Davis

Veronica Davis of Black Women Bike DC is leading a wave of new energy into the bike movement.

I know I’ve covered this already; but it can’t be said enough how profound of an impact this influx of female energy is for the bike movement. Like I shared exactly one year ago today, the renaissance of women in the bike world started locally and organically. Now, having been wholly accepted by the League of American Bicyclists, the women’s movement has unstoppable momentum.

The vibe in the rooms of the National Women’s Cycling Forum (a League-sponsored event held before the Summit) was electric. Everywhere I turned there were passionate conversations going on, women introducing themselves to each other, and connections being made. I sensed a willingness among women to ask for advice and support from one another that doesn’t exist to the same degree with men. This peer-to-peer strength is just one thing that will make this new vein of the bike movement powerful and transformational.

What does this influx of female energy and ideas mean to the bike movement? It means that bicycling — both as an issue and a cultural phenomenon — will be more accessible, joyful, stylish, and family-oriented. With more women on our side, it makes the case for bicycling much stronger.

Bike advocacy in transition
DC bike people-3

This is what bicycling looks like in more and more American cities.

In just the past few years there’s been a profound shift in how bicycling is perceived in America. Bicycling has shed much of the cultural baggage that has followed it around for decades. The sport and spandex-focused Lance Armstrong Era is over and it’s been replaced with images of well-dressed men and women using bikes as transportation in cities from Nashville to New York City.

Put another way; bicycling has come of age.

When you have Republicans like Congressman Eric Cantor and Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard as bicycle cheerleaders, you know things have changed.

As shown by the work of Douglas Meyer, bicycling now garners much more respect politically and from the general public. And with that respect comes a responsibility for professional advocates and grassroots activists. They must embrace these changes and be willing to change along with them or they risk becoming either 1) ineffective or 2) irrelevant.

The challenge we face is how to balance our seat at the table with the understanding that there’s still a lot of fighting to do. Take it from me, this very complicated; but it’s a good problem to have: I’d rather pound my fist on the table than pound my fist on the door outside hoping someone lets me in.

LaHood’s swan song
National Bike Summit 2013-10

US DOT Secretary Ray LaHood has had a very good run. His speech at this year’s Summit, his fifth, was also his last (as DOT Secretary at least). (It’s hard to imagine that LaHood’s predecessor didn’t even consider bicycles a transportation mode.) The big news from LaHood was his announcement of two bike safety summits he and US DOT staff plan to convene this spring and summer. The details are still very preliminary; but any time LaHood makes waves about bicycles, it elevates the issue in the eyes of the public and politicians. If he keeps his promise and holds the bike safety summits, it would not only cement his bike-friendly reputation, it would elevate bicycling as a legitimate transportation mode in the eyes of the federal government and the public at large.

It’s also time to look beyond Sec. LaHood. At the Congressional Reception party Wednesday night, I was struck by the ringing endorsement Congressman Earl Blumenauer gave to United States Deputy Secretary of Transportation John Pocari. “If John would consider being Secretary of Transportation,” Blumenauer said, “we couldn’t do better.”

Regardless of who replaces LaHood, I very much doubt we’ll go backwards. LaHood has been a bright spot for Obama and the respect the Secretary has given to bicycles is well-known in the White House. Much like American transportation culture has become less car-centric and more accepting of bicycling in the past few years, so too has the culture at the US DOT. It’s not a question of if the next DOT Secretary will respect bicycling, it’s a question of how hard will they fight for it.

Bike share is a game-changer
Washington DC-12

Bike share is arguably the most important thing going for the bike movement right now. Mentions of it as a “game-changer” seeped into many breakout sessions and speeches at the Summit. Thanks in large part to the unbridled success of Capital Bikeshare in DC, bike share has become the manifestation of the case for bicycling. It has shown cities that bicycles offer the best return-on-investment of any transit mode and that bicycles are a popular transportation option with regular people (not just “cyclists”). Bike share also creates the much-needed urgency for local DOTs to design streets with better bike access.

Portland no longer the only example (and that’s a good thing!)

It was an ongoing joke at the Summit that the only time Portland gets mentioned these days is in the context of how, “It’s not just Portland anymore.” Thanks to visionary city leaders, a growing realization of bicycling’s economic impact, and programs like the Green Lane Project, there’s been a proliferation of protected bikeways and other innovative bike facilities in cities all over the country. This was the first Summit I’ve attended where it didn’t feel like Portland was put on a pedestal in every breakout session and speech… And that’s a great thing!

Changes at the League of American Bicyclists
League's new logo

The League’s new logo.

The League unveiled a new logo and re-branding effort at the Summit. It looks great. The graphics are tight and simple and it’s exciting to see the League get a facelift. (My only quibble is that they didn’t purge every mention of “bicyclists” from their identity.) But beyond aesthetics, the League is changing in an even deeper way. “This is not your father’s or your grandfather’s League,” exclaimed League President Andy Clarke on Monday night.

The League’s Equity Advisory Council is forcing them to become more racially diverse and their support of women is helping them tear down the gender barrier. I’ve seen the members of the Equity Council and they are not pushovers. They will expect change at the League and they will force it to happen.

Beyond simply “changing the face of bicycling,” these changes will have another great impact on the League and bicycling in general. The League has struggled for years with an internal debate over vehicular cycling — which advocates education and “taking the lane” versus advocating for physically separated facilities that appeal to riders of all skill levels. The League’s official stance is for protected bikeways; but some board members and other long-time members are staunchly in the vehicular cycling camp.

The League’s embrace of women, people of color, and folks new to bicycling, will result in more members and board members who support protected bikeways. So in some ways, this new influx of members will bolster the ranks of protected bikeway believers and could help the League finally shed its last vestiges of vehicular cycling once and for all.

Looking forward

By the time discussions begin on the next transportation bill (fall of 2014), bicycling will be poised for unprecedented growth. The arguments in favor of more investment and policy attention to bicycling get stronger by the day and its advocates more mature and professional. Combine that with the bipartisan wave of momentum behind bicycling from mayors in cities in every corner of the nation and you have the makings of a bona fide sea change.

If I were an investor in ideas or social movements, I would put a lot of money into bicycling right now.

I hope you enjoyed following our 2013 National Bike Summit coverage. Please give a special thanks to Planet Bike for the financial support that made this trip possible and to Pro Photo Supply for donating rental of some excellent camera equipment. I stayed a few extra days in DC to do some other reporting and some street photography, so stay tuned!

NOTE: Thanks for sharing and reading our comments. To ensure this is a welcoming and productive space, all comments are manually approved by staff. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for meanness, discrimination or harassment. Comments with expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia will be deleted and authors will be banned.

Leave a Reply

7 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Terry NobbeareDeniseMarklonggone Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Karen Kefauver

Deeply appreciative of your fantastic National Bike Summit coverage – thank you! Especially heartened and inspired by your coverage of women’s cycling – thank you!

Love your words: “It can’t be said enough how profound of an impact this influx of female energy is for the bike movement. Like I shared exactly one year ago today, the renaissance of women in the bike world started locally and organically. Now, having been wholly accepted by the League of American Bicyclists, the women’s movement has unstoppable momentum.

The vibe in the rooms of the National Women’s Cycling Forum (a League-sponsored event held before the Summit) was electric.”

Mister Man
Mister Man

“They must embrace these changes and be willing to change along with them or they risk becoming either 1) ineffective or 2) irrelevant.”
I’ll choose irrelevant, thank you very much.
I do not wish to be associated with so-called bicycling advocates.

Now New Urbanism and Public Health and Bicycle Merchandising may include a few tid-bits I would support, but otherwise, I’d rather just use what I’ve got already in a safe and efective manner and not ask for handouts that are not what I would want for my mother, children, or best friends.

Mister Man
Mister Man

“(My only quibble is that they didn’t purge every mention of “bicyclists” from their identity.)”
The constituency is far broader than bicyclists, so it’s a misrepresentation. Now bicycles have advocates with a need to promote and enlarge the market, their manufacturers and retailers.

Mister Man
Mister Man

Mr. Maus, I *do* appreciate your coverage and I’m delighted that the bike culture is becoming less insular. However, if it mirrors mainstream American culture, then I’m definitely avoiding participating in it.


Luckily for you, bicycling can be done all by your little ‘ole self.


Jonathan, your coverage was absolutely fantastic and insightful, as always. Thanks for letting us share your Summit experience.


Fantastic coverage, thanks bikeportland! While I support the “protected bikeways” movement, primarily becuase it’s much more pleasant than riding in the lane along with cars (at least until we’re all driving Smart Cars) the bike lane is less costly yet likely safer than the vehicular approach. Why are the bike-share riders in the photos in this post riding on the sidewalk? I would guess because they don’t feel safe riding like a vehicle in the lane.

Terry Nobbe

Denise: Can you please tell me what’s “smart” about a carbon monoxide belching vehicle named Smart Car? I wouldn’t mind sharing a traffic lane with a Nisson Leaf for the sake of my health. I doubt very seriously that we’ll experience a strong abundance of electric vehicles on our streets and roads any time soon.
Feeling “safe” while traveling with other vehicles is a matter of behaving as they do except in speed while giving and getting respect from other road users. That is the basis of shared lane use by civilized folks the world over.


there is a difference between saying “bike paths and trails are not transportation infrastructure” and saying “bikes are not transportation.”

just whistling into the wind here, don’t mind me.