ODOT needs your input as 53 bike/walk projects vie for $8.5 million

N Williams Ave Open House-N Williams Ave Final Open House-17

PBOT is still looking for funding to
improve bike access on N. Williams.

What do bike boulevards in Grants Pass, a new trail from Hagg Lake to McMinnville, and the North Williams project have in common? They’re just a few of the 53 projects from all over the state being considered for $8.5 million in grant funding from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT).

This year, ODOT’s Active Transportation Section is combining two funding programs — the federal Transportation Alternatives Program (formerly Transportation Enhancements, TE) and the ODOT-run bicycling and walking program administered by the Oregon Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee — into one application process.

Now the powers-that-be at ODOT want to gauge public feedback before making their final decisions. They’ve set up an online survey which allows people to express support or opposition to the various projects based on specific geographic areas. When I put in my Portland address, seven projects came up (three from Portland and four from cities in Washington County).

The three projects from Portland include the North Williams Traffic Safety Project, a segment of the Willamette Greenway Trail (from Chimney Park (in St. Johns) to Kelley Point Park, and the SW Barbur Blvd safety project. (For more details on these projects, download the applications from ODOT’s website.)

Below are some of the criteria ODOT is using to score these projects:

Legacy – Projects of lasting value, appropriate and cost effective.
System – Important link, addition or start of a network or program.
Community – Enhances livability, contributes to economic stability or development.
Quality – Qualitative difference in the walking or bicycling experience.
Need – Serves a documented high priority, broad benefits or timely opportunity.

To give you an idea of how popular biking and walking projects are in Oregon — throughout the entire state, not just in the larger, traditionally bike-friendly cities — there were initially 155 project applications for these funds. As it stands now, 53 projects requesting about $50 million are competing for the paltry $8.5 million. That tells me our funding streams and government support for these projects are way behind the times.

Stay tuned for news of the funding awards. The Oregon Transportation Commission will announce the winners in February or March 2013 and the cash will go out the door by July.

Take the online survey here.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scott
Scott
11 years ago

Bouncy castle streets so everybody is safe.

Andrew N
Andrew N
11 years ago

That was a nice opportunity to say just how much I do not support the Williams Ave proposal.

Blair
Blair
11 years ago

This was a nice opportunity to cry over funding priorities – 400 million for adding a lane for a mile to an interstate…8 times the amount requested by these 50 proposals, which are also primarily for safety improvements.

Scott S
Scott S
11 years ago

Hopefully the funding goes toward a project which is better thought out than the Williams corridor

Hart Noecker
11 years ago

ODOT should be spending 8.5 million on each of these project.

Mabsf
Mabsf
11 years ago

That is one horrendous user-unfriendly survey: you really have to be involved in the projects to figure out what they are talking about. Or is it just me?

Seth Alford
Seth Alford
11 years ago
Reply to  Mabsf

They assume that you’ve got one window opened on the survey, and another window opened on the list of projects at

http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/AT/Pages/NOI.aspx?&&p_SortBehavior=0&p_FileLeafRef=Lowell.pdf&&PageFirstRow=1&&View={F0B7EB17-573C-46F5-A0C4-613BB0A88555}

and at

http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/AT/Pages/NOI.aspx?Paged=TRUE&p_SortBehavior=0&p_FileLeafRef=Linn_County.PDF&p_ID=102&PageFirstRow=81&&View={F0B7EB17-573C-46F5-A0C4-613BB0A88555}

I think they want you to look at each project on the survey, find the corresponding link in the project list, click on the link in the project list which opens a pdf with the project’s application. The applications that I looked at included a statement from the city as to why the particular project was deserving of funds, as well as a map of the project.

Yes, it would be nice if the survey itself contained the links to the project applications on ODOT’s web page. But, I’m not sure if surveymonkey, the online survey tool ODOT and everyone else seems to use, will allow links in survey questions.

I also voted against the Williams project.

The last question was for general comments. I told them they need to fix BHOS-Beaverton-Hillsdale/Oleson/Scholls, also known as “crash corner.” It’s the most “interesting” part of my bicycle commute.

spare_wheel
11 years ago

Another no vote against the Williams project. I voted strongly support for the two Fanno creek projects.

MAX-drive-bike
MAX-drive-bike
11 years ago

Wasn’t the Williams project already funded? Or did the drawn out public process use all the funds?

Andyc of Linnton
Andyc of Linnton
11 years ago

Yeah, I’m right there with the user-unfriendliness of these surveys.
I’ve forwarded them to others in the past, who aren’t as in the know in the minutiae of each project, and they are usually simply overwhelmed and don’t fill them out.
Perhaps there is a survey I can take to judge this survey host?

IanC
IanC
11 years ago

I voted for the Hagg Lake to MicMinnville route because I’d love to see our nearby small towns linked by separate multi-use paths. What a boon that would be to these small communities if the bike tourism marketing was done right.

I also agree that every project looks important and it’s incredibly sad that there is ony $8.5 million available… for all 53 of them! When we look at “economic stimulus” and “putting people back to work”, why not prioritize these projects above new freeways?

Art Fuldodger
Art Fuldodger
11 years ago
Reply to  IanC

This would be a great project, with or without the bike tourism marketing, because — as they say — build it an they will come.

Alain
Alain
11 years ago

I live on N Williams, and strongly support these improvements, which is what they are… improvements over the present situation, which I believe will help calm auto traffic. People drive 40+ MPH in front of my house (where I also work) every day. The Williams proposal will change this section of N Williams to one lane of traffic… and I support this.

Chris A
Chris A
11 years ago

I filled it out!

Daniel R. Miller
Daniel R. Miller
11 years ago

Brothers and Sisters, won’t you join me in a prayer and a chorus this fine Sunday (er…Monday) morning, for the full funding and implementation of EVERY ONE of these FINE projects. Yes, FULL FUNDING (can I get an AMEN??) for every single one of these BEAUTIFUL and (indeed) HOLY projects, now prioritized as ESSENTIAL and deeply RIGHTEOUS for the health and PROSPERITY of the state of Oregon and the commonwealth of CASCADIA!!

Alan 1.0
Alan 1.0
11 years ago

AMEN!

Alan 1.0
Alan 1.0
11 years ago
Reply to  Alan 1.0

I know not why that link failed. Should point to http://biketemple.org/ …Yay!

mizz
mizz
11 years ago

McMinnville to Hagg Lake would be AWESOME!!!!