[via Streetsblog]
Nobel Prize winning economist and NY Times columnist Paul Krugman has given some powerful punditry to the recently launched “Build for America” campaign. In an Op Ed piece published last week, he wrote:
“..right now, increased government spending is just what the doctor ordered, and concerns about the budget deficit should be put on hold.”
And here’s the part where he specifically calls out infrastructure spending:
“And this is also a good time to engage in some serious infrastructure spending, which the country badly needs in any case. The usual argument against public works as economic stimulus is that they take too long: by the time you get around to repairing that bridge and upgrading that rail line, the slump is over and the stimulus isn’t needed. Well, that argument has no force now, since the chances that this slump will be over anytime soon are virtually nil. So let’s get those project rolling.”
It seems like the battle might turn into, not if we should spend money on our transportation infrastructure, but on what type of infrastructure we fund.
Thanks for reading.
BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.
Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.
Yes, I can easily see this as suddenly being justification for the CRC. People will no longer say that it is “too expensive” but “just what our economy needs.”
My only hope is that the CRC will get delayed enough between the EIS and going out to bid and everything else that it will be too late to be “just what our economy needs” and instead we’ll have to use the money to fill potholes and put in sidewalks and “little” things like that…