Portland will pilot Nike’s recycled rubber bike share stations

New station on the left. Existing station on the right.
(Photos: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland)

The City of Portland is rolling out 40 new Biketown stations with a new design and a new material: rubber mats made partly from the scraps of Nike shoes.

This is what happens when the title sponsor of your bike share station also happens to be the largest shoe company in the world.

Biketown operator Lyft sees the new station material — which is known as Nike Grind — as a way to deliver their service with a smaller environmental footprint.

Here’s more from a press statement:

Advertisement

(Photo: Lyft)

“The rubber mats of the Lyft stations will be made with 25% Nike Grind rubber from Nike’s footwear manufacturing scraps in the top layer and 100% recycled tires in the bottom layer. The stations embrace the concept of circular economy by repurposing shoe scrap manufacturing waste and recycled tires.”

A spokesperson for Lyft said Portland will be the pilot city and will get 40 recycled rubber stations to start. E-bike share systems in Denver and Chicago will get the stations later this year.

I spotted one of the new stations a few days ago on the north side of NE Ainsworth Street just east of Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd (in front of Walgreens).

As you can see the new design has a smaller footprint than the previous locking station design. This will free up a bit more space and make the sidewalk a bit friendlier in general. This is important because PBOT seems to increasingly use Biketown stations to enhance safety and visibility at busy intersections. The new stations are also easier and quicker to install than previous versions, which should help PBOT add service to more areas beyond the central city core.

Lyft says the stations, “Perform an important placemaking function in cities by giving riders a reliable place to park e-bikes as part of Lyft’s efforts to build cities around people.”

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org
— Get our headlines delivered to your inbox.
— Support this independent community media outlet with a one-time contribution or monthly subscription.

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor)

Founder of BikePortland (in 2005). Father of three. North Portlander. Basketball lover. Car driver. If you have questions or feedback about this site or my work, contact me via email at maus.jonathan@gmail.com, or phone/text at 503-706-8804. Also, if you read and appreciate this site, please become a paying subscriber.

Thanks for reading.

BikePortland has served this community with independent community journalism since 2005. We rely on subscriptions from readers like you to survive. Your financial support is vital in keeping this valuable resource alive and well.

Please subscribe today to strengthen and expand our work.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Walter in Portland
Walter in Portland
3 years ago

I’m a little confused, is the new design different or better because of the materials used? Or is it just a new design (smaller footprint, more user friendly) and also happens to use the new recycled shoe material?

Starbreaker
Starbreaker
3 years ago

Why is a rubber mat necessary to park bikes on?

Racer X
Racer X
3 years ago
Reply to  Starbreaker

It’s marketing, so not “necessary” but very interesting. [The world has to find some use for all the tires – car and bike – we end up with after their initial lifespan is done.]

Though from an operations standpoint it will be interesting if this “marketing solution” becomes an “operations nightmare” after a few years of use…I have used recycled rubber for speed bumps etc…its very heavy (likely heavier than the original steel) and may break up or decompose overtime and get into streams…like other tire debris.

El
El
3 years ago
Reply to  Starbreaker

The mats hold down the mounting infrastructure

Chase
Chase
3 years ago

Aren’t the existing station bases made of metal? Metal of course is highly durable, and is recyclable at end-of-life.

Whereas rubber mats aren’t durable, aren’t particularly recyclable, and release the dreaded “micro-plastics” into the environment as they degrade and break down over time. How is this a smaller environmental footprint?

Or is this just more marketing green-washing?

Chris I
Chris I
3 years ago
Reply to  Chase

The rubber is recycled, which would give it a significantly smaller environmental footprint when compared to the mostly virgin steel of the old design (probably from coal-powered mills in China).

Phil
Phil
3 years ago

Hey Nike! How about paying some taxes instead of giving us some glorified floor mats? And while you’re at it, why don’t you talk about how much of your total scrap goes into the Regrind process?