E-bike sale at Western Bikeworks

Washington Park shuttle drivers concerned about unsafe behaviors from bicycle riders

Posted by on June 20th, 2017 at 1:43 pm

When you see purple, slow down and chill out.

It’s peak season at Washington Park. That means about 1.2 million people will visit the Oregon Zoo, the Rose Garden, Hoyt Arboretum, the Japanese Garden and many other attractions between now and September.

The good news is that about one-quarter of visitors opt to get around the park via the free shuttle. The bad news is that according to shuttle operators, some people who ride bicycles in the park are not being as safe as they should be.

Washington Park’s free shuttle service is the fastest growing mode of transportation in the park. 120,000 people used it last season, a 40 percent increase from 2015. This year the park is encouraging even more people to take the shuttle due to the reservoir construction project.

Advertise with BikePortland.

Be wary of stop locations and one-way roads.

Explore Washington Park is a nonprofit that oversees transportation in the park. Executive Director Heather McCarey (a veteran bike advocate who used to sit on the City’s Bicycle Advisory Committee) got in touch with us recently to help spread the word about safe riding around the shuttles. McCarey says too many people are riding dangerously and she’s worried about the potential of collisions between bike and shuttle operators. “They are biking the wrong way down a one-way, windy street, they are bombing through a stop sign at a blind intersection, and they are drafting off our shuttle buses,” McCarey shared.

“The shuttle drivers complain to me about it on a daily basis. They are extremely concerned about the safety of the cyclists,” she added.

After hearing from operators, McCarey boarded a few shuttles to judge for herself. “I was shocked to see how close the cyclists get to the shuttles,” she said. “If the shuttle driver tapped the brakes – there would be a serious injury.”

If you ride through or in Washington Park, please be aware that shuttles make many stops on a continuous loop from 9:00 am to 7:00 pm. It’s also imperative to heed the direction of the main one-way road in the park — Rose Garden Way.

“We love having cyclists in the park,” McCarey says. “But we want to keep everyone safe.”

— Jonathan Maus: (503) 706-8804, @jonathan_maus on Twitter and jonathan@bikeportland.org

BikePortland is supported by the community (that means you!). Please become a subscriber or make a donation today.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are productive, considerate, and welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Thank you — Jonathan

180 Comments
  • BB June 20, 2017 at 1:57 pm

    I’m more concerned about the thousands of automobile users operating their vehicles in an unsafe manner all over the city. This is just another example of hand wringing because bikes and should be ignored until people causing actual hazards can be reined in.

    Recommended Thumb up 50

    • Eric Leifsdad June 20, 2017 at 2:47 pm

      “hand wringing because bikes” indeed

      Drivers always notice the times they thought they were about to kill someone on a bike (and blame the cyclist for what may or may not be illegal but only risks the rider’s own neck) and never notice the times they didn’t know they were about to kill someone.

      Recommended Thumb up 28

      • Jason Skelton June 20, 2017 at 3:12 pm

        So true. Rarely does a driver recognize me as I stop/slow to prevent them from killing me.

        Recommended Thumb up 10

        • Matt June 21, 2017 at 10:12 am

          Was the driver a Knicks fan?

          Recommended Thumb up 1

          • Jason Skelton June 21, 2017 at 11:32 am

            If so, I would have rammed them before they saw me.

            Recommended Thumb up 0

    • wsbob June 21, 2017 at 12:14 am

      “I’m more concerned about the thousands of automobile users operating their vehicles in an unsafe manner all over the city. …” bb

      How thoughtful of you. What, if any concern, do you have for people that are said to be biking unsafely around shuttle buses in the park? Sounds like what you’re really more concerned with, is having people biking in the park, somehow be freed of their responsibility and their obligation to ride safely.

      I can’t quite make out what you intended to say in your last sentence. Are you seriously advising readers here, to ignore what the rep from the shuttle service has reported about people biking dangerously close to the buses, and other dangerous road use by people biking in the park? So if somebody riding takes your advice, ignores their obligation to ride safe, and gets in a collision as a result, will you still try to downplay the seriousness of what the shuttle service rep is trying to share with people reading here, about unsafe riding behavior in the park?

      Recommended Thumb up 20

      • Paul Atkinson June 21, 2017 at 3:48 pm

        Can you quantify the danger? How many lives can be saved, based on historical data, if we correct this dangerous situation?

        I recently read a study from the UK, done in response to a public complaint about how pedestrians were constantly having to dodge weaving cyclists in a shared space. The researchers used available CCTV footage to watch for and categorize cyclist-pedestrian interactions. Any time a pedestrian had to change course or speed, that counted; they also counted times a bicyclist passed a pedestrian close enough to startle, and also times cyclists adjusted their course to avoid pedestrians. All this based on someone’s claim that pedestrians were being put in danger.

        The result was that there was no significant danger. Out of hundreds of interactions (I want to say ~450 one day, ~410 the other) they found that cyclists avoided pedestrians often, and a few times (5, I think) they passed close enough to startle, but no pedestrians had to change course for a cyclist at all during two 12-hour viewing windows.

        So when I read this article I take it with a grain of salt. If the behavior is as dangerous as all that, I’d expect some kind of incident to have happened. No incident — not even a single bump, fall, spill, collision, much less an injury or a death — has been reported. I know people can, sometimes, misjudge how much risk a cyclist is really taking. So I don’t see the benefit in encouraging any pearl-clutching over this.

        I do see cyclists hurt by close-passing cars from time to time. I do see them hurt by right hooks, left hooks, dooring, cars in the bike lane, and sometimes by jumping lights or crossing streets illegally. Not often by drafting or rear-ending cars.

        So unless there’s really a danger here I’m not sure action is required.

        Recommended Thumb up 5

        • wsbob June 22, 2017 at 12:32 am

          The concern expressed by people driving the bus shuttles, and the bus shuttle service rep, apparently has to do with what they feel is some people’s dangerous riding specifically near to and around shuttle buses. Do people driving buses and people riding bikes, using the road together, not seem to you to be a situation holding potential for danger, particularly when all such road users aren’t using due care in their use of the road?

          Portland has had some terrible collisions involving people riding bikes, and people driving motor vehicles. I don’t know how many collisions consisting of someone on a bike rear ending an abruptly stopped motor vehicle, you think need to happen before that kind of situation consists of a danger to which action needs to be taken. A few years back here in Portland, on NE Broadway, quite a traumatic collision of this very type happened: Seemingly confusion between the person driving and the person riding, had, the driver stop abruptly with the person on the bike crashing through the back window of this SUV. This weblog likely has its story on that collision in the archives.

          Recommended Thumb up 3

          • Dan A June 22, 2017 at 11:03 am

            I nearly rear-ended a car last week when the driver appeared to be proceeding straight ahead, and then he suddenly slammed on his brakes and turned on his left blinker. That was a one-way communication problem.

            Recommended Thumb up 2

    • Lester Burnham June 21, 2017 at 7:18 am

      Why is it every time someone points out bad behavior by cyclists we have to go on the defensive and pretend like it doesn’t happen? People have valid concerns up there at the park.

      Recommended Thumb up 32

      • Brian June 21, 2017 at 9:37 am

        For me, personally, I am tired of listening to all of the cyclist finger pointing BS and my defensiveness is probably a result of it. “Cyclists should get off the road until they learn to obey the laws.” Or, “Cyclists think they own the road.” These comments, without a single finger pointed at other drivers to do the same, are annoying as hell.

        Recommended Thumb up 12

        • SE Rider June 21, 2017 at 12:26 pm

          But this is a website about bikes, so of course it’s going to come up here sometimes? I get the defensiveness (I mean we all have to be a bit defensive when riding), but that shouldn’t just trump all rationality.

          How about the fact that these complaints/suggests are coming from a pretty well known bike advocate? Does that matter?

          Recommended Thumb up 5

          • Brian June 21, 2017 at 1:38 pm

            My defensiveness comes from the BS I hear from otherwise, seemingly intelligent people at work, at pubs, on social media, etc who point the finger in one direction when it comes to the use of our roads. That defensiveness tends to carry over to other conversations on the topic, such as this. I was just trying to point out one reason why some of the comments might be a little feisty. When the lectures are seemingly one-sided, that can be frustrating. Also, I was being facetious with my comment about passing the shuttles. Mostly. Those things are slow as hell on the descent and the emissions aren’t exactly as fresh as the park air. In fact, I now avoid that area altogether on my ride home because of the shuttles.

            Recommended Thumb up 5

            • SE Rider June 21, 2017 at 4:00 pm

              But again, if these comments are coming from someone with a very strong bike advocacy background, does that make them more valid?

              Recommended Thumb up 2

              • Brian June 21, 2017 at 4:29 pm

                No, it does not.

                Recommended Thumb up 2

        • jeff June 21, 2017 at 4:23 pm

          but no less true in most instances.

          Recommended Thumb up 2

    • Mike June 21, 2017 at 12:19 pm

      I am curious if there is ever a time where it is o.k. to criticize a cyclist’s behavior because if even a hint of needed correction is spoken here the cars-kill-millions card is always pulled. It is as if people here feel free to ride however they want regardless of etiquette because of those darn killing machines. I certainly understand the dangers cars have but for me it doesn’t give me the freedom to ride like a jackass, I still respect my surroundings. So, is it ever ok to call out dangerous riders?

      Recommended Thumb up 13

      • Middle of the Road Guy June 21, 2017 at 12:23 pm

        The Moral Relativism approach is frequently used here by others who do not want to take ownership of their own behaviors.

        Recommended Thumb up 7

      • q June 21, 2017 at 12:32 pm

        Certainly it is. Read the comments here and in other articles. Read the article itself. Read the recent articles about the potential closing of Riverview Cemetery to bikes. The articles and comments (at least many) often criticize poor cycling behavior. Even comments about cars being more dangerous don’t necessarily mean those commenters are defending dangerous cycling so much as putting it in perspective.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

        • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 2:43 pm

          Even comments about cars being more dangerous don’t necessarily mean those commenters are defending dangerous cycling so much as putting it in perspective.

          Exactly.

          I do not condone dangerous cycling behavior. I was nearly hit in the park a couple of weeks ago by a cyclist who was was riding the wrong way on Washington Way (why would anyone go the wrong way on that road? there’s a shorter way to get there that isn’t as dangerous). But the way people drive on Kingston is considerably more threatening to me.

          Recommended Thumb up 4

  • BradWagon June 20, 2017 at 2:06 pm

    Ooh, Ooh, Pick me, Pick me!

    Make Kingston one way the direction the shuttle travels with a nice bike path each direction.

    In my riding in the park this was the only place I contemplated dangerous maneuvers due to cars/shuttles. Granted this is a small portion of the route but I would bet good money it’s the most problematic stretch.

    Recommended Thumb up 9

    • shirtsoff June 21, 2017 at 8:45 am

      @BradWagon

      I like this idea. It’s willing to step aside the traditional boundaries by acknowledging the goals of each group while remaining committed to the safety of everyone involved by formalizing the behavior in a nontraditional way. Anyways, listen to BradWagon and the shuttle operators, cyclists, and other park users will all be happier!

      Recommended Thumb up 3

  • I wear many hats June 20, 2017 at 2:06 pm

    Buses and people driving around looking for parking spots drive so slowly that one must ride the brakes 100% of the time on this loop. I’m constantly riding the brakes and using air resistance to slow down when behind slower traffic. Not once have I ever rear ended a car while on a bike. Its counterproductive to kill myself while riding. The one way loop is a work around that works for car traffic, but the bike traffic is routed onto a sidewalk where one is advised to walk. This is not acceptable.

    Recommended Thumb up 32

  • hotrodder June 20, 2017 at 2:08 pm

    I’m sure that there are many valid points in this story, especially about the dangers of head on collisions, but it’s my experience that if you were “drafting” off the shuttle bus you’d be taking a very leisurely, stinky ride through the park.

    Recommended Thumb up 16

    • I wear many hats June 20, 2017 at 2:14 pm

      Exactly! Drafting a slow moving bus would be asinine. There are routes that avoid this congestion and I’d happily share them.

      Recommended Thumb up 6

    • Brian June 20, 2017 at 2:19 pm

      Is it cool if I just pass them then? It will give all of the tourists a chance to photograph a real, exotic Portland cyclist in it’s natural environment.

      Recommended Thumb up 17

      • Christopher of Portland June 20, 2017 at 4:26 pm

        The driver of some kind of tour bus…trolley…thing, maybe one of those pink ones, mentioned cyclists and bike lanes when I rode by them near the Pearl district. I thought it was kinda funny to become a sort of exhibit for a few seconds just by doing something I normally do.

        Recommended Thumb up 7

  • Teddy June 20, 2017 at 2:19 pm

    “If the shuttle driver tapped the breaks – there would be a serious injury.” That should be brakes.

    “It is also imperative to heed the direction of the man one-way road in the park — Rose Garden Way.” That should be main one way road.

    I am not surprised to read this considering​ the recent articles about abusing graveyard access. Irresponsible bicyclist need to think of the trauma they cause first responders as they scrape your mangled body off the pavement and the stress to motor vehicle operators when bicyclists ignore the laws of the road such as blatant stop sign running.

    Recommended Thumb up 9

    • Matt Meskill June 20, 2017 at 2:45 pm

      Thank God all the motorists drive in such a safe manner.

      Recommended Thumb up 29

      • wsbob June 21, 2017 at 12:27 am

        People that drive, the majority of which are fair to good to excellent drivers, every day manage to avoid colliding with people using the road on foot, riding bikes, skateboards and doing so unsafely.

        Seriously…where motor vehicles and bikes are being used on the road together, it’s people biking that are the vulnerable road users. That should obviously be understood to mean that however watchful and cautious people driving should be with regards to people as vulnerable road users on the road, vulnerable road users should be doubly watchful and cautious wherever there may be motor vehicles in use on the road.

        Recommended Thumb up 5

        • Brian June 21, 2017 at 8:38 am

          The majority of cyclists are great. The best. You wouldn’t even believe how amazing they are. They ride day in and day out without crashing into any cars, busses, scooters, skateboarders, or squirrels. And there are a hell of a lot of squirrels in town these days.

          Recommended Thumb up 9

        • B. Carfree June 21, 2017 at 9:16 am

          I don’t know what nation you are living in, but here in the US motorists are sending over four million people to the hospital each year and killing about 110 per day. That’s not what would happen if they were actually operating their vehicles in safe, responsible ways. Come visit some time and observe how few of them obey any law, particularly speed limits, stop signs, traffic signals, following distance, maintaining lanes and safe passing movements. I can’t remember the last time I observed a motorist go three blocks without a violation.

          Against that background of lethal lawlessness, is anyone actually surprised that many pedestrians and cyclists adopt unorthodox behaviors in order to create some sense of safety? And of course any suggestion that cyclists are the safety problem is going to get hackles up among people who have actual skin in the game.

          Recommended Thumb up 10

          • wsbob June 22, 2017 at 12:47 am

            “I don’t know what nation you are living in, but here in the US motorists are sending over four million people to the hospital each year and killing about 110 per day. That’s not what would happen if they were actually operating their vehicles in safe, responsible ways. …” b carfree

            I live in the U.S., in Beaverton, just west of Portland. How about yourself? Corvallis, isn’t it?

            Of the people driving, I’d say a fair guess is that it’s a relatively small minority that are driving badly and causing collisions. About people biking, I’m not so confident to guess, at least not about people riding in Portland, because I’m not there very much to watch what’s happening on the streets.

            In Beaverton, I see a lot of people riding well, signaling at least some, and generally riding fairly safe. With exceptions. Out here though, I don’t think there are as many people riding as there are in Portland. Less people riding could explain fewer examples of people not riding safely.

            Recommended Thumb up 1

            • Dan A June 22, 2017 at 11:05 am

              We judge driving badly only by the collisions caused?

              Recommended Thumb up 2

        • Chris I June 21, 2017 at 9:42 am

          How many vehicular deaths are acceptable in Oregon each year?

          How many are acceptable in Portland?

          How many are acceptable in your family?

          Are we doing enough to prevent these deaths?

          Recommended Thumb up 4

        • Spiffy June 21, 2017 at 11:04 am

          “the majority of which are fair to good to excellent drivers”

          citation? where are you getting this data? the majority of people I see on the roads are driving dangerously and doing illegal things…

          Recommended Thumb up 4

          • Kyle Banerjee June 21, 2017 at 2:53 pm

            You’d think if they were all so bad there would be a lot more trouble given that the typical bike commuter probably encounters hundreds of drivers every day.

            Recommended Thumb up 2

            • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 5:26 pm

              Most of us that have been doing it sometime have learned ways to avoid most of the stupid mistakes that drivers make. If I didn’t purposely give up my right of way all the time, I would have been right-hooked by non-signaling drivers multiple times by now.

              Recommended Thumb up 3

      • canuck June 21, 2017 at 9:02 am

        Always justifying bad behaviour with others bad behaviour. At that point you give up the moral high ground. You’ve lowered yourself to their level and the argument is lost.

        Recommended Thumb up 8

        • Chris I June 21, 2017 at 9:44 am

          Ah, but the morality is different in this case, since operating a 5000lb chunk of metal at high-speed is a significantly greater risk to the public. I agree that it is a poor excuse to point out that others behave badly, but let’s not equate speeding and rolling stop signs on a bicycle to an activity that kills 40,000+ US citizens every year.

          Recommended Thumb up 6

          • Middle of the Road Guy June 21, 2017 at 12:26 pm

            The morality is not different. You still have the responsibility to operate your bike in a safe manner on the road. the manner in which you do so may vary, but the same end result is expected.

            Recommended Thumb up 4

            • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 2:51 pm

              Yes, stealing a jelly bean is the exact same thing as stealing a million dollars. /s

              Recommended Thumb up 6

      • jeff June 21, 2017 at 4:25 pm

        speaking of moral relativism.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

    • Buzz June 21, 2017 at 8:56 am

      The reason cyclists may be salmoning on Rose Garden Way is because of all the Water
      Bureau road closures in the park, which are going to last for years…

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 9:50 am

        I take the Kingston/Tichner/Marconi detour and have been doing so since the closure. There’s really no excuse for riding the wrong way down Rose Garden Way, or on Washington Way for that matter.

        Recommended Thumb up 6

      • Dan A June 22, 2017 at 7:24 am

        When I’m riding in the correct direction, up Rose Garden Way, I expect drivers traveling alongside me to be courteous and give me space, and there’s plenty of room for them to do so because it’s a one-way road. This does not work well when there are cyclists salmoning in the wrong direction. Also, because this road is one way, I should have the freedom to ride on the left side of the road on the way up, which I typically do from that sharp left-hand turn all the way up to the intersection. This is not your space for riding backwards on. If there’s anyone reading this who thinks it’s acceptable to ride the wrong way down Rose Garden Way, well, it’s not.

        Recommended Thumb up 4

  • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 2:28 pm

    That’s funny. Last week I was tempted to report a shuttle driver who passed me way too closely on the way up. I know that they aren’t legally required to give extra space when only traveling 20mph, but seriously, the guy nearly hit my elbow when he went by, and it was on the long straightaway right after the really steep right turn. There was nobody in the oncoming lane and he had plenty of room to move over. It was the worst pass I’ve seen from any driver in Washington Park in at least a year.

    Recommended Thumb up 37

    • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 2:30 pm

      “I was shocked to see how close the cyclists get to the shuttles”

      More like the other way around.

      Recommended Thumb up 24

    • CaptainKarma June 21, 2017 at 12:14 pm

      Get a bus # or plate # next time. Then publish.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

      • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 12:46 pm

        Apparently we need video proof for some people.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

        • Alex B June 23, 2017 at 2:27 pm

          Did you actually try to report it to anyone? Seems like this article give you a great place to start – Explore Washington Park

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • I wear many hats June 20, 2017 at 2:36 pm

    Don’t forget that Waze is now directing traffic through the arboretum and by the rose garden to avoid Burnside. These roads used to provide mild and safe recreational cycling opportunities. Now the congestion doesn’t allow riding quickly. As I said before, there are options to avoid this downhill mess. I’d advise every rider to ride over to Burnside via the old road @ 25th. Its far nicer riding. BTW, this is different than the cemetery as this is a public road. Its an example of the city’s failure to accommodate cycling and driving in this park. It behooves us all not to be ___holes, whether driving or riding.

    Recommended Thumb up 13

    • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 3:16 pm

      Whatever you do, don’t go up the shoulder of 26 or you will be FB shamed by concerned drivers.

      Recommended Thumb up 8

      • Buzz June 21, 2017 at 8:58 am

        regardless of the fact that riding on 26 west of the Jefferson St. exit is totally legal….

        Recommended Thumb up 2

    • fourknees June 20, 2017 at 4:23 pm

      Can you post a link of the “Burnside via the old road @ 25th” route?

      Recommended Thumb up 0

      • rick June 20, 2017 at 5:15 pm

        I’m glad it is legal to ride on the east-bound shoulder. The path is across from where NW 24th Place meets Burnside. PBOT will build sidewalks to NW Uptown Terrace along with other projects for Burnside. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/69920

        Recommended Thumb up 1

        • fourknees June 21, 2017 at 9:07 am

          Thanks. I frequent NW 24th Place and the switchbacks in the park, just didn’t know it by the other name. I do like that there are now only posts versus the gate as you enter the park.

          I wish they would put lane as they did on NW 24th PL on NW 24th between Glisan and Flanders. Going to the park you have to go up the sidewalk there as it’s a one-way and NW 24th is a bikeway. There are rarely pedestrians on that stretch though.

          Recommended Thumb up 1

          • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 9:56 am

            Yeah, that’s a really awkward area for bikes, and a critical connector for me. You’re cruising along NW 24th southbound, and then you have to ride up the sidewalk on the left-hand side of 24th, where you reach a really weird intersection. From there you have to either shoot out onto Westover, or cross Flanders in the wrong direction to get to a crosswalk that people practically park on top of. And then 24th/Burnside is an excellent place to get right-hooked. Ideally they would make it no-turn on red with an advanced bike/ped crossing light.

            Recommended Thumb up 3

    • AJ June 21, 2017 at 9:28 am

      I wonder if there might be eventual value in setting up gates at the park entrances and charging entry fees for drivers in order to combat the cut-through traffic (walking/biking/buses would still get in free). Could be balanced by reducing the parking fees an equivalent amount.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • jh June 21, 2017 at 12:17 pm

        But what about the people that actually live up there? Since the water department work, the bus route now incorporates non-park streets, and some of these “cut through” people are actually driving on those streets.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

        • q June 21, 2017 at 12:27 pm

          Exactly. Arlington Heights has only three ways into it–up Park Place through the park, up Tichner/Burnside (not very close to Park Place via streets) and over the top from the west (a multi-mile detour).

          Recommended Thumb up 1

  • gtrain June 20, 2017 at 2:43 pm

    But it is so much more fun to ride down the one way! This is going to be a struggle for me to resist every day on my ride home. Those beautiful curvy switchbacks beckon me! I knew I would get called out sooner or later… Safey and fun go back and forth in my priority levels constantly. I try to be somewhat reckless, but safely. More to consider now.

    Recommended Thumb up 4

    • I wear many hats June 20, 2017 at 2:55 pm

      Zoo bomb tunnel bomb past gridlocked traffic on the 26 is a blast every time. There is a big wide shoulder.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

      • Steve June 20, 2017 at 3:02 pm

        Except it is throttled down into the debris field by construction…

        Recommended Thumb up 3

      • rick June 20, 2017 at 5:07 pm

        Do you mean the Jefferson street exit tunnel? It is a lot of exhaust smoke to breathe, but I can coast downhill on the highway 26 shoulder to the exit. Less wear and tear on the bike.

        Recommended Thumb up 0

      • gtrain June 21, 2017 at 7:11 am

        Yeah, it is a blast. But the freeway is ugly especially compared with Washington Park and I don’t want to breath in more exhaust than I already do.

        Recommended Thumb up 1

    • Brian June 20, 2017 at 3:54 pm

      I think the descent just above, through the neighborhood, might be even better. I’ve been hitting that every day. The key is to wait until there are no cars ahead as they are WAY slower on the curves. That and you get to avoid all the cars backing out of their spots by the Japanese Garden/tennis courts.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

  • Middle of the Road Guy June 20, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    Wow, every comment runs away from any concept of accountability or the possibility that the shuttle drivers might be simply stating observations. If shuttle drivers are complaining about it every day, perhaps it really is an issue. It’s not like they are racing shuttles at high speed up and down the road. I’d say there is more incentive for a cyclist to tear down these roads (it’s fun) than for someone tasked with carting others safely from place to place.

    Recommended Thumb up 29

    • SE Rider June 20, 2017 at 4:52 pm

      Did you expect anything else in the comments here?

      Recommended Thumb up 16

      • pruss June 20, 2017 at 6:16 pm

        i silently pegged the over/under at 2.5 comments before we saw “BUT CARS!!!”
        boy…did i get wrecked.

        Recommended Thumb up 11

      • Middle of the Road Guy June 21, 2017 at 12:35 pm

        Nope. And not everything is mutually exclusive – both the shuttle drivers and cyclists can have valid points.

        Recommended Thumb up 1

      • q June 21, 2017 at 12:51 pm

        You and Middle of the Road Guy ARE commenters here.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

        • SE Rider June 21, 2017 at 4:03 pm

          zing!

          Recommended Thumb up 1

    • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 8:29 pm

      Windshield-biased observations.

      Recommended Thumb up 9

    • jeff June 21, 2017 at 4:28 pm

      your average PDX cyclist is quite selfish, always have been. Its proven here every single time one of these stories comes out.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 5:28 pm

        Your average person is selfish.

        Tell us, please, how PDX cyclists are more selfish than the drivers we share the road with.

        Recommended Thumb up 4

  • Steve June 20, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    Seriously, virtually every day I have the shuttle in my lane going around the corners as they come uphill and I am descending.
    Pot. Black.

    Recommended Thumb up 25

    • wsbob June 21, 2017 at 12:40 am

      Borrow a go-pro and film what you’re claiming to see. Send a copy to bikeportland, and the shuttle service management. If you’re truly threatened by what you’re seeing, people should see proof of it. Some of the buses may be going over the center line of the curvy sections of the road…and they shouldn’t be…but if they are, people biking on the road had better be thinking ahead about the chance that this kind of driving behavior may happen.

      Recommended Thumb up 3

      • BradWagon June 21, 2017 at 8:26 am

        I love how cyclists have to go the extra mile to prove wrong doing or just accept that buses will be driven dangerously and take the responsibility for it themselves haha. Yet cyclists riding close to the shuttle (which I’m not aware of any law against) is criticized.

        Recommended Thumb up 5

        • wsbob June 22, 2017 at 12:59 am

          Here’s what Steve wrote:

          “Seriously, virtually every day I have the shuttle in my lane going around the corners as they come uphill and I am descending.
          Pot. Black.” steve

          I don’t want to say I don’t believe him about the situation he describes, but he skimped on the details, inviting readers to assume whatever they were inclined to. That’s why I replied, suggesting that if he really felt the situation he typically experiences with the shuttles was dangerous, he ought to consider documenting it with a go-pro, or at least…describing how far into his lane he estimated the shuttle tends to be.

          A tire over the center line of the road isn’t so good, but it’s also not particularly a dangerous situation for someone riding, unless the person riding happens also to be hugging the center line of the road.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

          • Dan A June 22, 2017 at 7:32 am

            Do you ride Kingston much? There are potholes all up and down it. The safest place to be when descending is in the middle of the lane, or towards the left side of the lane. The entire right half is pretty much off limits, unless you like swerving around large holes in the road.

            I descend early enough that I rarely see cars in the morning heading up, but I have encountered a driver passing someone on that blind left-hand turn. They were halfway out into my lane, and it was terrifying. I wish they would mark that turn as a no-passing zone somehow.

            Recommended Thumb up 1

      • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 9:58 am

        So you say you were assaulted? The bot won’t believe you unless you have video evidence.

        Recommended Thumb up 1

  • ed June 20, 2017 at 3:13 pm

    The gall of Washington Park overseers to blame cyclists for the mess they created. The ongoing “remuddling” of the park and its routes have made it almost impossible to negotiate on a bicycle. And as others have noted, the resulting bumper to bumper parking lot that now comprises that parks roadways and Kingston Av makes it even more impossible. Instead of blaming the hapless cyclists trying to make progress/survive perhaps look to whatever team dreamed up this mess and ask them to be more responsible, or replace them. I avoid that park now and go up Fairview Blvd. from southbound Kingston (via hidden road south from 25th and Burnside) but really miss the park and highly resent the park being made effectively unrideable.

    Recommended Thumb up 23

    • rick June 20, 2017 at 5:05 pm

      Should the gravel parking spots be removed ?

      Recommended Thumb up 2

    • Middle of the Road Guy June 21, 2017 at 12:34 pm

      It’s rideable. You just have to go slower.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

  • rachel b June 20, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    Come on. There are a lot of self-absorbed, careless cyclists here now, for gud knows what reason. Shape up and don’t ride like a jerk! I’m livid that we may, for example, lose the privilege of riding through Riverview Cem because of several ahole fellow cyclists. And yes, yes, yes–I agree drivers are a million times worse. Both things can be true.

    Recommended Thumb up 33

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) June 20, 2017 at 3:46 pm

      thanks for saying this rachel.

      I believe we can debate WHY people ride like jerks. But there’s no debate that many people ride like jerks.

      In my experience, bicycle riders are no different than auto drivers… Both can display self-centered, jerky, and dangerous behaviors at any given time and often for no apparent reason.

      Recommended Thumb up 27

      • John Lascurettes June 20, 2017 at 4:19 pm

        A-holes are a-holes regardless the means of their conveyance.

        Recommended Thumb up 10

        • Paul H June 21, 2017 at 8:15 am

          Yes! Ask any flight attendant. Or bus driver. Or crossing guard.

          Recommended Thumb up 3

      • ed June 20, 2017 at 7:41 pm

        I’m a little ambivalent about your comment Jonathan. Hopefully you don’t intend comparing the two as being equivalent. Rarely do jerky, rude and thoughtless cyclists (or pedestrians) kill and maim; though unpleasant and occasionally dangerous they may be. The same cannot be said for motorists behaving that way. This isn’t to justify bad behavior, but consequences matter. I’ll take an aggravating asshole over a murderous one any day.

        Recommended Thumb up 9

        • canuck June 21, 2017 at 9:12 am

          Yes you only kill yourself in these cases, leaving someone else to live with having run someone over and killing them through no fault of their own. It is still selfish behaviour. The idea that you hurt no one else is false.

          Recommended Thumb up 7

      • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 8:38 pm

        So… where is the scolding of drivers who speed, and pass on the blind corners on Kingston? Did I miss that? Those people have endangered my life multiple times. Someone needs to notify the driving community so that they can police themselves.

        Recommended Thumb up 19

        • SE Rider June 21, 2017 at 12:30 pm

          You should go to driveportland.org.

          Recommended Thumb up 2

          • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 12:51 pm

            Maybe the National Motorists Association. Oh, nevermind, they just complain about speed limits, traffic calming, road blocks, and speed/DUI/red light enforcement.

            Recommended Thumb up 4

      • Hello, Kitty
        Hello, Kitty June 21, 2017 at 9:47 am

        That’s perhaps unsurprising considering that so many cyclists ARE drivers.

        Recommended Thumb up 3

      • Middle of the Road Guy June 21, 2017 at 12:32 pm

        JM,

        the thing is…the people who are the jerks never think they are the jerks. It’s always the other guy/gal.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

      • Bjorn June 21, 2017 at 4:09 pm

        The problem with this false equivalence is that anytime that a cyclist does something that violates the letter of the law, treating a stop sign as a yield for example it is labeled as dangerous, even though decades of evidence from Idaho show us that it has absolutely no impact on collision, injury, or death rates. I see no reason to pretend that a cyclist rolling a stop sign with no cross traffic is somehow equivalent to a driver going 2x the speed limit and passing stopped cars in a left hand turn lane or insert your own deadly example here.

        Recommended Thumb up 2

        • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) June 21, 2017 at 5:26 pm

          hi Bjorn,

          I’m not saying they are the same. Be careful with putting words in my mouth.

          With all due respect, I don’t need to have the difference between the two explained to me.

          I’m saying operators of bikes and of cars can and often do act like selfish, jerkish idiots. It’s a fact. Obviously there’s a lot more to this debate than that. But that basic fact remains.

          Recommended Thumb up 2

          • rachel b June 22, 2017 at 12:37 am

            NOBODY is drawing that equivalence except the people here insisting on looking at this whole article within that false framework. Nobody’s saying motorists aren’t horrifically self-absorbed and dangerous, increasingly. Nobody’s trying to color it 50/50. I don’t understand why so many are seizing upon this like a dog with a bone! It’s distracting from the actual topic at hand. Which is, again: don’t be a jerk.

            Recommended Thumb up 2

          • Hello, Kitty
            Hello, Kitty June 22, 2017 at 10:11 am

            Could we just simplify it to people often act like selfish jerks?

            Recommended Thumb up 1

          • Bjorn June 22, 2017 at 2:07 pm

            Jonathan when you say: “In my experience, bicycle riders are no different than auto drivers…” you are drawing an equivalence between the behaviors in my opinion. You also label the behaviors as both being dangerous later in your comment. I do feel that the underlying message of your comment here is that they are the same, and while perhaps the selfishness is, the danger certainly is not.

            Recommended Thumb up 1

            • rachel b June 22, 2017 at 8:47 pm

              But he’s saying right now that he’s NOT saying that, so doesn’t that take care of that misunderstanding?

              Recommended Thumb up 1

              • rachel b June 22, 2017 at 8:48 pm

                And what I got from it was the more universal “humans can be jerks.” And: don’t be one of those.

                Recommended Thumb up 1

              • q June 23, 2017 at 11:12 am

                Yes. Bicycle riders and auto drivers are no different in their ability to be jerks, and both do dangerous behaviors. It doesn’t seem difficult to understand that that’s not saying the dangerous behaviors are equal.

                The “pot calling the kettle black” comments here are totally justified, but ones that seem to have problems with discussing bad cycling behavior because it’s not as bad as drivers’ behavior remind me of people who read about an animal shelter raising money and say, “Why don’t these people help children with cancer instead?”

                Recommended Thumb up 1

    • wsbob June 21, 2017 at 12:46 am

      Thank you for trying to get people that bike unsafely, to own up to what they’re doing. About some of the people that drive unsafely, doing so, much worse than the people that bike unsafely? I don’t think so. About the same, really. It’s the same kind of dumb mentality that has a person use the road unsafely, regardless of what vehicle they’re using the road with.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • BradWagon June 21, 2017 at 8:32 am

        People biking unsafely mostly expose only themselves to risk. People driving pose a risk to others. This “both are bad” take is wrong.

        Recommended Thumb up 9

        • canuck June 21, 2017 at 9:16 am

          Both are bad. Your taking risks does impact other road users. This I can do no wrong entitled attitude is the problem. Ride the way you expect drivers to drive. Sure you take on the greater risk, but does anyone want to kill someone through no fault of their own just because the other person doesn’t think their actions don’t impact the other guy. Heck it’s only an insurance deductable, mental scars be damned.

          Recommended Thumb up 4

          • BradWagon June 21, 2017 at 11:03 am

            Ride in a way you want drivers to drive? Ok, I ride my bike in a way that only myself will be injured by a mistake I make… can the same be said for vehicle drivers when they make mistakes?

            I was hit by a car last week, up on the hood, bouncing across asphalt, full meal deal. My taking that left turn posed a risk of maybe… sliding out on wet pavement? The car trying to overtake me while I turned left risked splattering me and my bike across their hood. The two situations are not at wsbob said “about the same, really”. Complaining about cyclists having an a entitled mentality sounds similar to criticizing other minority groups that just want fair and equal treatment.

            Recommended Thumb up 9

            • canuck June 21, 2017 at 11:45 am

              So as long an only you get injured, even if it is your fault that you get hit by a car, somehow you don’t think that impacts the driver. Again a selfish attitude. You don’t get it and never will.

              Recommended Thumb up 3

              • BradWagon June 21, 2017 at 1:48 pm

                I said “risk” and “injured”, not impacted. Please enlighten me as to how a driver is injured or at personal risk from getting hit by a cyclist? If it is my fault their insurance will come after me for all costs related to damages to vehicle so no real financial hardship there… maybe having to get a rental car and drop their vehicle off at the shop for a day for a new hood or windshield? Sure that’s an impact in a very material sense…

                I’ve been without a commuter bike for a week and have had no productive response from their insurance. That’s not even counting the day I missed of work and the weekend I spent gingerly getting out of bed and making sure my road rash didn’t stick to my clothes.

                So not only is the level of risk incomparable but even the “impacts” are drastically one sided. You seem to think I am encouraging people to ride recklessly because it doesn’t affect a driver… no, I am saying stop equating the responsibilities of drivers and the responsibilities of cyclists as equal. It is an inherent advantage of being a cyclist that you don’t have the same responsibilities as drivers. Don’t complain because someone is choosing a method of transportation that is advantageous, not everything had to be equal and cars and bikes are clearly not. What cyclists enjoy in less responsibility we more than compensate for in risk, effort, and inconvenience.

                Recommended Thumb up 5

              • BradWagon June 21, 2017 at 1:52 pm

                I said “risk” and “injured”, not impacted.

                Recommended Thumb up 1

              • El Biciclero June 22, 2017 at 7:55 am

                The logical implications of your position here would mean that bicyclists must ride perfectly, since any time a bicyclist makes a mistake that results in a collision, it will be the bicyclist who gets injured, and the poor motorist who must then live with the lifetime of psychological damage. The same cannot be said for motorists, who, when they make a mistake that results in a collision—especially with a bicyclist—are usually left with only repair bills.

                Recommended Thumb up 4

        • wsbob June 22, 2017 at 1:08 am

          “People biking unsafely mostly expose only themselves to risk. People driving pose a risk to others. This “both are bad” take is wrong.” bradwagon

          So do you think it’s no big deal to most people driving, if someone riding does so in a way that particularly places the person driving at risk of colliding with the person riding?

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • jh June 20, 2017 at 3:47 pm

    And yet , the last few times i’ve been on the shuttle, we’ve gone far over the speed limit, whipping though the park and the residential area around the park, driving down the center or left lane. All this while the shuttle driver is almost literally turning around and handing out pamphlets or talking about the “unique houses and the rich people who live up here in the west hills.”

    The only time I’d be worried about them “tapping the brakes” is when they’re flying by the bus stops and remembering that they have to stop, or when they almost truck over ped’s coming off the wildwood at a road crossing and they aren’t paying attention to the road.

    Recommended Thumb up 19

    • Jonathan Maus (Publisher/Editor) June 20, 2017 at 4:29 pm

      woah. Thanks for sharing this jh. I have encouraged the Explore Washington Park staff to monitor these comments so someone might reply to you. I will certainly pass this on. thanks for sharing.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • jh June 20, 2017 at 4:37 pm

        K.

        I certainly don’t want to get anyone in trouble, but it’s just clear it’s become far too congested up there, and everyone’s frustrated and nobody seems to be paying attention. Two trips is anecdote, not evidence, but I can see why a cyclist would seem to be following too close when the bus drivers seem to be overwhelmed with things to do, say, and car traffic to deal with. It was unnerving.

        Recommended Thumb up 7

        • mran1984 June 21, 2017 at 1:19 am

          That is the problem. Far too many people showed up. There was no rsvp. Kind of blows too. I began daily commuting when I realized that I could ride through the park instead of Burnside. That seven day a week approach sure enhanced every aspect of riding.

          Recommended Thumb up 1

      • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 8:39 pm

        Please include my critique from last week, above.

        Recommended Thumb up 3

      • Heather McCarey June 21, 2017 at 11:58 am

        Thanks Jonathan and jh. jh- I’m sorry to hear of your experience. That certainly does not sound acceptable and I’ll happily work to address it. We placed large numbers on the back of each shuttle, as well as inside each shuttle. We’re always working to make improvements to our system, so if you do see something that is unsafe with one of our Explore Washington Park shuttles, please let us know. You can e-mail info@explorewashingtonpark.org with the bus number, date, time and location and we will work to address it. In the past, both the drivers and the shuttle parent company have been very responsive to issues and prioritize safety. Thanks for all of your patience with the reservoir construction project and its road closure impacts. We certainly hope the addition of the Washington Park shuttle will continue to lead to a decrease in the number of people driving to the park. Thanks for all of the feedback on this story.

        Recommended Thumb up 3

  • RH June 20, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    I biked from Beaverton to Portland via Washington Park recently…it was a mess compared to when I last did it about 2 years ago. It used to be the favorite part of my ride….like a treat from grinding up 1000ft to get to the Zoo. Now it’s just crazy up there with cars driving all over looking for a parking spot, etc…Then I looked online and it said construction will be going on for the next 8 years?!!

    https://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/62547

    Recommended Thumb up 3

    • rick June 20, 2017 at 5:02 pm

      ODOT sometimes clears the east-bound shoulder of Highway 26. Rush-hour has 30 mph traffic and it is legal to ride on the shoulder from Sylvan to the Jefferson street exit. Smooth pavement once the gravel and construction are gone.

      Recommended Thumb up 3

      • El Biciclero June 21, 2017 at 1:45 pm

        This shoulder is currently severely constricted and at times fully blocked at two points between the zoo and Jefferson due to “smart sign” installation work. This work is scheduled to conclude in “fall 2017”. Now, I could be pleasantly surprised, but my bet is the shoulder will be restored by January.

        I’ve been taking Hewett to Patton and down Broadway drive in the mornings, which can be a real brake-burner to keep it under 30 (speed limit is 25).

        Recommended Thumb up 1

  • oliver June 20, 2017 at 4:18 pm

    I’ve not been up there this summer, but If a shuttle is on it’s way downhill, maybe they should slow and move to the side to be passed (it only costs a few seconds), the same way that I move aside when I’m the slow moving vehicle on my way uphill.

    And sweet Mary and Joseph stop cutting the blessed corners.

    Recommended Thumb up 10

  • fourknees June 20, 2017 at 4:27 pm

    I love the park route, but switch it up with the south route toward council crest. From downtown @ SW 13th & SW Montgomery. Take Montgomery all the way up until you need to jog on SW Patton to SW Greenway to SW Talbot. Then SW Patton, right on Hewitt, pop out at Sylvan to rejoin your normal route.

    Recommended Thumb up 3

    • rick June 20, 2017 at 5:00 pm

      Have you tried riding to Council Crest from Hillsdale via 18th using the old dairy gravel road / trail ?

      Recommended Thumb up 1

      • fourknees June 21, 2017 at 9:15 am

        I haven’t is that SW 18th Drive coming off of SW 18th Pl? (on google maps with no streetview?)

        If I’m over that way I usually take from Sunset – 27th to Twombly to Cheasapeak to get to Fairmont. It’s a pretty steep route though.

        Recommended Thumb up 1

  • rick June 20, 2017 at 4:59 pm

    Would it help if SW Barnes Road to West Burnside had protection for walk and biking and enforced, lower speed limits? A rebuilt SW Scholls Ferry Road? I prefer riding downhill on Scholls and Burnside outside rush hour or on an early weekend morning.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

  • I Voted for Trump June 20, 2017 at 5:12 pm

    Thank you Heather for doing the right thing and pointing out dangerous behavior that you’ve noticed is happening too often. Hopefully this might prevent another tragedy.

    Recommended Thumb up 3

  • Buzz June 20, 2017 at 5:27 pm

    My take on this is just the opposite – the shuttle bus drivers are the dangerous ones, especially when they attempt to pass cyclists dangerously where the lanes are narrow and/or curvy.

    And do the bus drivers really adhere to the 15 MPH park speed limit? In most instances, I doubt it very much.

    Recommended Thumb up 11

  • curly June 20, 2017 at 7:30 pm

    Thanks Jonathan.
    This is another illustration of why the city, state and regional governments aren’t throwing money into active transportation options. A few cyclists not being courteous transportation users give just cause to the decision makers who distribute transportation dollars. Think BIKE TAX!
    I’m sure Heather, a bike activist, is disappointed also. Washington Park is where we all play, no matter how we get there. BTW, from outer east Portland, MAX is the best for Concerts!

    Recommended Thumb up 3

    • Jason H June 20, 2017 at 8:30 pm

      And yet when thousands of motor vehicle misbehave and get aggressive and pushy in traffic on a daily basis, the government sure thinks throwing money at extra “capacity” is the panacea. Used to feel cyclists needed to self-police, but the situation has gotten worse every year, nd it’s not the cyclists changing the climate. SO, SO over bike shaming anymore. Government and motor vehicle lobby have bled dry any good will to get along.

      Jonathan, did YOU go up there and make any observations? If the complainers are just shuttle drivers and their bike-washed director, I can guarantee it’s their vehicle centric perspective skewing things, not any real uptick in unsafe riding.

      Recommended Thumb up 15

      • I Voted for Trump June 21, 2017 at 12:23 pm

        If YOU can guarantee it’s all the driver’s fault then YOU must have gone up there to see it for yourself, right?

        Recommended Thumb up 0

    • Dan A June 20, 2017 at 8:44 pm

      And this is why they won’t widen the highways.

      Recommended Thumb up 1

    • I wear many hats June 21, 2017 at 8:01 am

      The concerts are auditory torture for the prisoners in the zoo

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • Steve June 21, 2017 at 9:51 am

        Actually, we use music as environmental enrichment for many of the animals, but thanks for your opinion.

        Recommended Thumb up 3

        • Hello, Kitty
          Hello, Kitty June 21, 2017 at 10:01 am

          Perhaps that was a comment on the volume. I find the choice of artists to be audio torture for people, but maybe the animals like the selections.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

          • Steve June 21, 2017 at 10:17 am

            I definitely agree with the choice of artists.

            Recommended Thumb up 0

          • I wear many hats June 21, 2017 at 11:05 am

            Lets ask the animals if they enjoy being in the zoo. Then we can ask if they enjoy concerts. Lets ask Packy 1st. Oh wait, METRO killed him.

            Recommended Thumb up 1

          • Steve June 21, 2017 at 12:07 pm

            Whoops, I meant I agree with you about the artist selection.

            Recommended Thumb up 0

        • q June 21, 2017 at 11:59 am

          And I’m sure the number of concerts and noise levels were carefully arrived at to maximize benefit to the animals.

          Recommended Thumb up 1

      • Middle of the Road Guy June 21, 2017 at 12:29 pm

        The animals told you this?

        Recommended Thumb up 2

    • El Biciclero June 21, 2017 at 2:29 pm

      “A few cyclists not being courteous transportation users give just cause to the decision makers who distribute transportation dollars.”

      “Cause” in their own minds maybe, but certainly not “just” cause. If anything, behavior that drivers consider “undesirable” by bicyclists means that there are not enough bike-friendly routes (i.e. actually optimized for bike travel) between popular destinations, and more should be done to be sure that people have access to routes that offer the same level of safety and convenience when riding a bike as they do when driving a car.

      Also, as already mentioned, why must bicyclists be the only ones that have to “beg for their supper” by being good little boys and girls? We definitely don’t require this of drivers to invest millions in car-only infra. I mean, we could buy a couple of F-16s for the price of a few freeway lane-miles. Although F-16s probably wouldn’t be carbon-neutral, either.

      Recommended Thumb up 6

  • Tom Hardy June 20, 2017 at 8:59 pm

    I have been riding from the Zoo-MAX station since it opened to the Main street exit. It was always great until the construction cut off the route past the east side of the reservoir. I am usually going downhill on the steep descending LH curve where the busses are climbing in the middle of the road. They usually consider it one way unless a cyclist is going the same direction then they will cut the cyclist off if they are going around any curve. I have never seen an oncoming bus in the right lane.
    I am glad that either Portland or the Zoo has fixed the road however. I have broken 3- $200+ wheels hitting the potholes. When a pothole report was turned in the reply was the parks take care of it. The Zoo said that Portland takes care of it. Grimm fixed one of the worst sections. The second section was taken care of this year. We still have the very rough section just down hill from the archery range well before the sharp LH corner. You know the one that is just after the trees shade the patch after the bright sunlight.
    I have been riding the ZOO since 1953 (OLD ZOO) and riding the wrong way from the old 4 way, now 3 way, intersection. Riding through the parking lot to the downhill “S” curve since the reservoir road was closed, I have never encountered a vehicle coming up the hill. Occasional pedestrians yes! I continue through the ped path to the road that goes around the memorial to Main then 23rd. I have never encountered any traffic there either, 3 times I though of using the MUP to 24th Place but each time a city pickup was blocking it either from the top or the bottom trying to follow it up or down and getting stuck with 3 wheels off the pavement trying to go around a hairpin curve.
    It made me think he was trying to find a shortcut for a bus.:)

    Recommended Thumb up 1

  • Andy K June 20, 2017 at 9:03 pm

    I’ve been riding Kingston for 8 years and have found the shuttle drivers to be very cautious…and so much better than the many drivers passing me that are on the road for the first time.

    Recommended Thumb up 0

  • q June 20, 2017 at 9:05 pm

    There’s a whole story not being told here, although some comments have hit on it–Washington Park and the streets just outside it–Fairview and Kingston especially–have become drastically crowded with park vehicle traffic. Much is due to poor decisions by the City.

    I lived in that neighborhood for 20 years. The parking spillover for the Rose Garden and Japanese Garden that would happen then on holidays and nice summer weekends happens constantly now.

    One reason–the City and neighborhoods were working out a paid parking plan there. The City abruptly cut the neighborhoods out of the planning, and proceeded with a plan that requires payment within the park, but free parking yards away on the extremely narrow neighborhood streets.

    Another–the Japanese Garden just completed a huge expansion–not of garden space, but of buildings–about 15,000 sf of meeting rooms, event spaces, a cafe, etc. At the same time, it CUT the number of public parking spaces, and it didn’t do anything meaningful to encourage other travel modes. The expansion also exceeded the land use review’s limit by several thousand square feet, so all the traffic studies used for approvals were voided. The result is many more people driving to the Japanese Garden.

    Another–the City allowed the Japanese Garden to expand its office use into a residential house outside the park on Kingston, next to the park entrance. What used to be a single-family house with a car or two of traffic now houses many staff, plus many volunteers, plus generates more traffic and parking demand right at the crowded park entrance. Not a huge amount, but it happens in the worst possible location.

    Another–as part of the Japanese Garden expansion, Parks attempted to close the trail that links the Rose Garden/Japanese Garden area to the Wildwood Trail, which in turn connects to the Zoo/Children’s Museum/Forestry Center area. Thus, it cut off the pedestrian connection between those areas, forcing people who’d prefer to walk to drive or use the shuttle. Parks pretended the trail never existed, and called it “an unofficial shortcut”, even going so far to remove the official signage for the trail ahead of the hearing so they could claim that. After protests, Parks agreed to build a crappy, compromised trail, but it’s not built yet. So again–less walking between attractions, more driving and shuttle use.

    Another–neighbors have been complaining since the 1980s that this huge park lacked an official, up-to-date master plan. Parks did nothing until recently. And the recent plan is really poor, and won’t have any impact until its in place anyway.

    The institutions in the park have a horrible track record for transportation. I could give MANY examples prior to these recent ones (and worse than them, too). The traffic problems are a direct result of the City putting its head in the sand while those institutions act in their own selfish ways, and the current transportation mess is the result.

    I’m sure there are plenty of poorly mannered cyclists, but they’re a SYMPTOM of the larger problems.

    Recommended Thumb up 28

    • q June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm

      By the way, throughout the Japanese Garden expansion land use review process, Parks argued extensively that the trail through the woods that it decided to close not only was no more than an “unofficial shortcut”, it wasn’t needed because there was a sidewalk outside the park on Fairview that people could walk on instead.

      In other words, Parks saw no difference in experience between walking on a trail in the woods in a park and walking on a neighborhood sidewalk on a fairly busy street.

      So what is the chance that Parks places much value in having the biking experience within the park having any value? By the logic they used in their trail closure decision, people riding on Kingston through the woods in the park could get the same experience riding up Burnside or Fairview.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • Buzz June 21, 2017 at 4:46 pm

        Or maybe just poach one of the park trails and avoid the roads altogether…

        Recommended Thumb up 1

        • I wear many hats June 21, 2017 at 4:53 pm

          The most pleasant ride is one without cars ;). Trails are for people, be polite on them if you find yourself wanting to appreciate nature on your ride home.

          Recommended Thumb up 0

  • Leann June 20, 2017 at 9:55 pm

    Gee. I’m concerned that one of their shuttle drivers forced me into the ditch a couple of weeks ago when they decided to pass me on a blind corner and encountered an on coming car.

    Recommended Thumb up 14

  • Douglas K June 20, 2017 at 11:48 pm

    The city is working on a master plan for Washington Park right now. Their draft concepts from this spring contemplated two large parking structures (one by the MAX station, one north of Burnside) to intercept cars, shuttle service through the park linking the two parking areas, and auto access within the park heavily restricted to make more room for bike traffic and pedestrians.

    We’ll see what they come up with when the final master plan is released this fall.

    Recommended Thumb up 7

    • q June 21, 2017 at 10:51 am

      It is good that the master plan is recognizing traffic and parking issues. At the same time, in the survey it used to solicit public input, it had MANY types of expanded and new development, and I had to write in that I valued nature, because there were hardly any options to check for wanting to keep a focus on natural areas that didn’t involve building more stuff.

      I see the master plan as being dominated by the institutions in the park, and the result will be more development and more traffic.

      You won’t hear the Zoo saying that they have one of the most expensive rail stops in the world serving them, so that’s how their visitors should be arriving. They’ll push for more parking. So will the Japanese Garden, Children’s Museum, etc.

      Recommended Thumb up 4

      • Steve June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm

        The Zoo DOES promote use of the MAX, even offering discounts off admission and the idea that Washington Park is a nature experience is naive. My guess is the likely outcome will be a large parking structure operated by the city/Metro sited where the current lot sits.

        Recommended Thumb up 1

        • q June 21, 2017 at 12:24 pm

          Yes, I know it does now. It wasn’t long ago that it claimed it promoted coming by Light Rail at the same time it had a full-page ad in the phone book with no mention of Light Rail, and “5 minutes from downtown via Highway 26” with free parking.

          It also wasn’t much longer ago that it got permission to turn a grass meadow into a temporary parking lot to replace parking lost during the light rail station construction. Then, when construction was complete, it refused to remove it, despite a court order. Mayor Hales called it something like the worst example of a public body ignoring land use law that he’d ever seen, and was ashamed that the zoo did that to the public.

          During that time, the zoo claimed the parking was needed due to constant overflow from the main lot. It turned out (via a Freedom of Information Act request) that the main lot reached capacity only a few times that year.

          I have no idea why you’d claim it’s naive to think of Washington Park as a nature experience. Of course it is. It’s got acres of forest, with miles of trails, all officially recognized as natural areas if seeing it with your own eyes isn’t enough.

          Recommended Thumb up 3

  • Wanderer June 21, 2017 at 10:18 am

    I’m glad to see that there are some folks on this list who will acknowledge that cyclists can misbehave as well as auto drivers.

    I think the issue with reckless biking is not so much killing/maiming people, though it happens occasionally. The real issue is intimidating pedestrians who are trying to cross a street where cyclists are ignoring stop signs. My wife is semi-disabled and walks very slowly, she encounters this all the time. It also makes her more insistent about demanding parking spaces adjacent to her destination, which can be problematic for other road users.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

    • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 2:52 pm

      Nobody here is arguing for ignoring stop signs.

      And as for making other drivers walk a bit more, well, let them walk. It’s good for them.

      Recommended Thumb up 3

    • Buzz June 21, 2017 at 4:50 pm

      Yeah, but this doesn’t have anything to do with cyclists endangering pedestrians, and everything to do with cyclists endangering busses…when push comes to shove who do you thing will lose that encounter every time?

      Recommended Thumb up 1

  • Spiffy June 21, 2017 at 11:09 am

    concerned about what others might do to themselves? afraid they’re not taking proper precautions? I assure you they are…

    rarely is this type of discussion for the benefit of the people making their own decisions…

    if you’re worried one of your shuttle drivers might hit a cyclist then you don’t have trust in your drivers to obey the law… cyclists are looking out for themselves, I assure you…

    Recommended Thumb up 7

  • michael khamsot June 21, 2017 at 12:20 pm

    I ride up and down Fairview everyday for commute and occasionally intervals. The
    City of portland is particularly to blame because they closed off Sherwood Blvd. 90% of commuter use Kingston and they are left with 2 options, either make a left turn and try to fight the traffics around tennis court or take the one way Kingston down. I ride up Fairview during evening commute and I don’t recall seeking any bad cyclist trying to overtake a bus! I do recall TriMet bus overtake cyclist on a narrow part of Fairview going up!

    Recommended Thumb up 3

    • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 3:02 pm

      I’ve passed shuttles in the park, but only when they are stopped. And now they have a new pickup spot at the Kingston/Rose Garden Way intersection which is just terrible. They used to stop a little further back on Rose Garden Way where it’s one-way only, which left room for cars and cyclists to pass. But now they stop right at the intersection and sit there for a few minutes, which backs up the cars on Rose Garden Way, makes it harder for people to go around, and is really confusing to everyone at the intersection.

      Recommended Thumb up 3

      • Dan A June 23, 2017 at 11:16 am

        Passed a shuttle here yesterday, and they were parked at the original pickup spot below the intersection (instead of AT the intersection). I hope this is a permanent change. It works much better.

        Recommended Thumb up 1

  • bikeninja June 21, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    Yesterday I was going west on Couch just past where it crosses over 405. Two of these Washington Park shuttle buses were in the oncoming one way lane that has the westbound bike lane opposite the eastbound car lane. Both of the shuttle bus drivers were hugging the left hand side as they drove completly taking up the whole bike lane and causing me and many other riders to leap from our bikes up to the median island for safety. I think there might be something wrong with these shuttle bus drivers, maybe prison work release or something.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

    • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 3:10 pm

      You’re talking about this little chunk of road, right?

      https://goo.gl/maps/tonZ2Qn3eMz

      The city should either remove the parking spots there or prohibit vehicles over a certain width from using that. I don’t see how one of those shuttles would fit without taking up the bike lane too. I mean, look at the size of this thing!

      https://goo.gl/maps/fkV6d2ZsLRz

      Recommended Thumb up 2

      • bikeninja June 21, 2017 at 3:15 pm

        Yes, that is the chunk of road. I totaly agree they should get rid of the parking, but I looked at the second bus in the row going through after I had bailed to the median and it had enough room between its mirror and the cars to have stayed out of the bike lane. They were just lazy or didn’t care.

        Recommended Thumb up 3

        • Dan A June 21, 2017 at 5:33 pm

          Well, just like a car driving down a skinny road towards you. They will drive down the center and wait for you to move out of the way. I don’t think this is particularly related to the Washington Park shuttle drivers.

          Recommended Thumb up 1

          • Hello, Kitty
            Hello, Kitty June 22, 2017 at 10:08 am

            That’s exactly what I do when I’m on my bike.

            Recommended Thumb up 0

            • Dan A June 22, 2017 at 11:06 am

              You use your size to bully smaller road users out of the way?

              Recommended Thumb up 0

              • Hello, Kitty
                Hello, Kitty June 22, 2017 at 11:16 am

                When I arch my back, I appear bigger and meaner than I actually am.

                I have also found that if drivers have a place to pull off, they often will, just as they would if I were in a car.

                Recommended Thumb up 0

  • fourknees June 21, 2017 at 3:09 pm

    Since this is being monitored for feedback – I only encounter the shuttles on my commute home going up Kingston toward the Zoo. I’ve passed the buses when they are loading passengers (by the rose garden gift shop intersection). At first I didn’t, but it would take about 3 minutes (I timed this one day) for the passengers to get on/off and the bus to begin moving again. I suggest moving the location of this stop further back where there are two lanes between the tennis courts and parking lot next to rose garden.

    I’ve also pulled off to the side to let the shuttles pass me if I’m approaching one of the up hill curves. However the times when the shuttles have passed me on straight sections they have remained too close for comfort.

    Also, why no bike racks on the front of these buses? Seems like a good idea.

    I’ve felt more uncomfortable in the mornings when on the Tichner/Marconi/Park detour. Many cars race through there and rarely stop at the stop signs. Even when I’m at a stop either in the same direction or at an intersection.

    Recommended Thumb up 2

  • I wear many hats June 21, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    Just this evening the shuttle bus rolled a stop at a 3 way where I was stopped in a track stand. How and why are the bus drivers concerned about bike riders when they can’t even bother to stop?

    Recommended Thumb up 4

  • jered bogli June 22, 2017 at 12:11 pm

    My bike commute takes me over the hill and I jump on highway 26 from the Zoo to Goose Hollow in order to avoid the sketchy, twisty, bumpy, dark, congested, chaos that is Washington Park. I feel safer on the shoulder of 26 than I feel riding through Washington Park.

    Recommended Thumb up 4

    • Dan A June 22, 2017 at 2:32 pm

      I love riding through the park, especially in the morning when the sun’s coming up. It was even better when Sherwood was open and you could get a nice view of the city. My biggest worry in the morning is that a bird might fly through my front wheel.

      Recommended Thumb up 2

  • Kittens June 22, 2017 at 3:31 pm

    I am a professional bus driver for the city and we are trained to be exceptional drivers. Meaning, we are to be above the fray: pedestrians, bikes, cars — we are to expect the unexpected, the illogical and illegal behavior of other users. This is not an excuse, but a realization that no amount of hand-wringing or scolding will suddenly make other road users start being safer.

    Singling out bike riders for unsafe behavior in the park is pointless at best and counter productive. Heather should focus her energies on finding drivers who are patient, professional and able to operate such that no one is put at risk. That is her’s and her drivers’ responsibility.

    If I can steer a 40-foot 20,000lb box down 21st on a summer afternoon safely every day, there is absolutely no reason not to expect the same in a park with a fraction of the traffic, congestion, pedestrians.

    And finally, I don’t recall TriMet ever complaining about bikes while they operated a shuttle on the same route for decades without incident.

    Recommended Thumb up 12

  • Mark smith June 23, 2017 at 9:57 pm

    Everything close seem dangerous when you are in a car/bus. Just go with the flow and don’t worry.

    Recommended Thumb up 0