Support BikePortland - Journalism that Matters

Local headlines go after Portland Bike Share

Posted by on September 6th, 2012 at 4:11 pm

It’s a “Bike-Share Snare” in the Willamette Week

The City of Portland hasn’t even chosen a vendor for their Bike Share system yet; but the local media is already showing its skepticism about the project. Two recent stories — one in The Oregonian, the other in the Willamette Week — have given the Bureau of Transportation a clear indication that the PR stakes are high with this project.

Last month, the Willamette Week looked into what they see as a “Bike-Share Snare” due to the fact that PBOT has yet to choose a vendor:

But with seven months left until the projected start date, the city hasn’t decided how many bicycles it will rent out, for what lengths of time it will rent them out, or how much it will charge. That’s because it doesn’t have an operator for the program.

PBOT says they’re still on track to launch the system in sping of next year and they’re still interviewing the two final candidates on their short list: Alta Bicycle Share and B-Cycle. It’s hard to know how much time either vendor would need between accepting the job and deploying the system, but seven months seems like a pretty short window. That being said, PBOT staff have likely already put in a lot of work planning station locations and thinking through other issues, so the chosen vendor won’t start from scratch.

The Willamette Week article did point out one inconvenient truth for Alta: “In recent months,” wrote reporter Sam Stites, “Alta’s struggles have caused those cities to push back start dates for their bike-share programs from this past July to next March. That’s also when Portland’s bike-share program would start.” However, despite delays in other cities, Alta says, if chosen, they don’t foresee any delays to the Portland timeline.

As you can read by my comments in that article, I will not be surprised if PBOT announces a delay. They’ve waited this long, and they have every reason to take their time and get it right.

Today, The Oregonian published a story with the headline, Portland bike-share plan worries bicycle rental shops (which interestingly reports the launch day as “by April” so maybe PBOT is already pushing it back). The story features an old photo of an upset-looking Todd Roll, owner of what might be Portland’s largest and most successful bike rental and tour business, Pedal Bike Tours. Below is an excerpt:

“Some of the city’s bike rental shops have been fretting for months about how they’ll weather the deluge of bike share rentals about to wash over the city… “We’re definitely going to lose some money, and I’m not happy about that,” said Todd Roll, owner of Pedal Bike Tours.”

Another owner of a major bike rental business, Waterfront Bicycles, told the paper, “In the short run, I think it really will hurt our business.”

The Oregonian also introduced the fear that bike share might “siphon” people away from transit, and thus put TriMet in an even more precarious budget situation than they already are. Thankfully, a TriMet spokesperson dispelled that notion, telling the paper they’re, “in favor of anything that increases bike access” and that, “People who walk or bike more end up riding transit more.”

While not blatant, in my opinion both of these articles make a slight attempt to stir up controversy and/or raise doubts about the success of bike share in Portland. This is to be expected. Bike share is seen by some as nothing more than a crazy pet project of Mayor Sam Adams; and to the local media, it’s a tempting — and somewhat easy — target. Stay tuned. We’re due for more bike share news. And with that of course, will come more headlines.

NOTE: We love your comments and work hard to ensure they are welcoming of all perspectives. Disagreements are encouraged, but only if done with tact and respect. BikePortland is an inclusive company with no tolerance for discrimination or harassment including expressions of racism, sexism, homophobia, or xenophobia. If you see a mean or inappropriate comment, please contact us and we'll take a look at it right away. Also, if you comment frequently, please consider holding your thoughts so that others can step forward. Thank you — Jonathan

35
Leave a Reply

avatar
19 Comment threads
16 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
25 Comment authors
JacobjeffTodd RollJamieGDorn Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Wayne Myer
Guest

“…I think it really will hurt our business?” That sounds to me like a failure to adapt. The rising tide raises all boats, except the ones with hulls that leak faster than they can be bailed.

Alexis
Guest
Alexis

Nice that TriMet is already on-message about this. For once I appreciate their PR people!

Joe Adamski
Guest
Joe Adamski

One needs to remember there is an election a few months away, the support for bike sharing might be a casualty of a new council I do not know where everybody lines up on this, but the golden rule for council is ‘count to three’. A coalition of three supporters or three opponents may seal its fate, depending on how much a ‘hot topic’ bike sharing becomes.

Randall S.
Guest
Randall S.

What’s wrong with bicycle-riding taking people away from transit? Mass transit is definitely more efficient that SOVs, but it’s still a petrol-powered vehicle that doesn’t involve any physical activity.

RonMH
Guest
RonMH

I’m really torn about this whole bike share stuff. One the one hand, it could be great for a few who don’t already have bikes or visitors to Portland. But, on the other hand, the problems with bike share programs elsewhere (theft and vandalization of the bikes themselves, and even sketchy economics of bike share programs) could easily turn into a PR nightmare for both the mayor and bike advocates in general. We are already in the sights of conservative budget hawks over public spending on bike infrastructure. A very public and costly failure (or even the perception of failure) could be a big setback for the cycling community. At the end of the day we have to really ask why we NEED a bike share program. Are there really thousands of bike-starved citizens out there who can’t buy their own set of wheels? Maybe I just don’t get the whole point of this exercise.

Indy
Guest
Indy

“People who walk or bike more end up riding transit more.”

As I bike and walk more my use of transit has dwindled more and more. Anecdotal, and all, but I find this attitude somewhat insane. It is exactly because of less service + more $$$ to ride tri-met that I’ve gotten into biking as a primary mode of commuting.

Rol
Guest
Rol

For how innocuous and straightforward (to the point of being kind-of-like, uninteresting) the bike share concept is, it sure does draw a lot of attention. (Thinking mainly of NYC, but this goes in the same file.) But I suppose that’s true of bicycling in general.

I just realized, probably people who view it as a “playing field” get nervous when they see the previously small & outnumbered “other team” offering new recruits such easy access to “athletic shoes.”

dwainedibbly
Guest
dwainedibbly

Let’s face it: it’s going to be late, probably by 6 months (my uneducated guess), and once you get that far into 2013, why not wait for Spring 2014?

The bike rental businesses are going to have to examine the rates and membership requirements of whatever bikeshare system we get. There should be opportunities for them, especially with the tourist market. Add value! The problem for these businesses is that the rates & requirements are unknown until a vendor is selected, etc, etc.

I want Alta to get the contract because they’re local, and I’m grateful for all Mia Burke has done for Portland, but Alta haven’t been doing much to counteract the impression that the fix is in and the bidding doesn’t really matter.

Ross Williams
Guest
Ross Williams

The reason cycling raises transit use is that it allows the range of transit to be extended well beyond the usual quarter mile beyond stops. That’s why you see bike racks on buses and trains.

In terms of bike sharing, there is the same effect. The ability to get around without a motor vehicle allows people to use transit when they would otherwise drive.

I agree bike sharing will only impact short term rentals. But it may be that some of the bike rental places make money from those. Its clear bike sharing will better meet the needs of that market.

Bjorn
Guest
Bjorn

The oregonian doesn’t have a great track record on this stuff, they were also vehemently opposed to the Eastbank Esplanade.

Todd
Guest

For the record, I also said I’m hopeful that bike share will also create more interest in biking and bring more people to our tours, long term rentals, and higher end bikes than it takes away. That just didn’t make it into the story.

liquid silk
Guest
liquid silk

“People who walk or bike more end up riding transit more” definitely isn’t true for me. I used to be a monthly bus pass user for several years until 2008. At that time I was fed up with increased fares and decreased service and so I picked up a better bike and started riding everywhere. Since 2008, I can count the number of times I’ve used a Trimet bus on one hand, and the number of times I’ve used backs on two hands.

liquid silk
Guest
liquid silk

that I’ve used MAX* on two hands.

JJJ
Guest
JJJ

At this point, Id expect, at best, a June launch from B-cycle.

If Alta is chosen, you can pencil in 2014.

Spiffy
Guest

I’m skeptical of TriMet’s endorsement seeing that they haven’t increased bus bicycle capacity and have taken away MAX bicycle capacity…

also, the reduction in service to some lines means it’s now faster for some of those people to bypass the bus completely in favor of a bike (or car)…

Spiffy
Guest

I think the local shops will be fine… they have a wider selection and family friendly options… those are major attractions for tourists… also, Kerr Bikes has those pedal cars and no bike-share rents those types…

Kiel Johnson (Go By Bike)
Guest
Kiel Johnson

I have a bike rental service at Go By Bike. Even if I lose 20-30 percent of my business I won’t really mind. I’m in this business because I want more people to ride bikes and bike share will do that. Portland is planning on increasing the number of people that ride bikes to 25% in 28 years. That will surely positively effect my business. Stop complaining, adapt, and stop letting the Oregonian take such sour pictures of yourself.

Jacob
Guest
Jacob

Bike share and bike rentals are two completely different markets. If you want to go on a recreational bike ride, or want to bike outside the urban core, you rent a bike from a bike shop. If you’re looking for a cheap means of transportation within the urban core, you go with bike share. With prices starting at $25 per day, bike rental shops aren’t really targeting the cheap urban transportation market at present, so I doubt they’ll lose much money. The experience in DC shows that local bike shops saw a boom in business after bike share, as many people began biking with bike share, and then decided to buy their own bike.
http://wamu.org/programs/metro_connection/12/06/29/from_a_to_b_bike_shop_owners_see_big_returns_from_capital_bikeshare

Also, bike share works extremely well with transit, extending its reach. This is especially true for people commuting into the city core from beyond comfortable bike commuting distances. Bringing a bike on MAX or a bus is cumbersome, and leaving an extra bike in the city’s core requires a lot of planning and is subject to theft. If MAX doesn’t quite get you there, many people from outer areas will simply drive, whereas with bikeshare, it’s much easier to realize that a destination is within, say, 1 mile of a MAX station. It makes chaining transit with biking so much easier.

jeff
Guest
jeff

I am ambivalent about bike share systems and wonder if they are worth the very large initial investment. I see three main problems with bike share, all of which I experienced during a recent trip to Denver, where I did use their system.
1. Not familiar with the area and easy to get lost. Most people don’t have a photographic memory for maps.
2. Not sure where to ride to avoid high-traffic streets (see number 1) and felt unsecure in traffic without a rear view mirror (which I have on both of my regular bikes).
3. No helmets.